been removed from the
virtual server so non admins couldn't use OWA.
Cheers
Chris
From: Bao, Gang [b...@exchange.tc.columbia.edu]
Sent: 25 July 2011 20:31
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Disable OWA on Exchange 2003
Hello,
I'd like to disable OWA
What if you tinker with the protocolSettings attribute instead?
~d
From: Chris Boller [mailto:ch...@mahoola.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 10:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Disable OWA on Exchange 2003
Hi Bao,
If you disable http on all your exchange servers
Hello,
I'd like to disable OWA on Exchange 2003. I was suggested to simply
disable the HTTP virtual server of front end server. The question is:
will this action affect other exchange services?
Thanks in advance,
Bao
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com
The supported way to do this is to do disable the OWA Exchange Feature on all
users.
If you disable the HTTP Virtual Server, you'll break all IIS-based
functionality.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Bao, Gang [mailto:b
I have a weird OWA issue on my 2010 installation. I have multiple sites and CAS
and CAS arrays. ISA 2006 appears to be setup correctly with a digicert SAN
cert. The cert is installed on the ISA and the CAS servers. All external users
come in to owa.company.com, the local users work but the
virtual
directories.
Ex, to clear the ExternalURL setting on a virtual directory:
set-owavirtualdirectory CASServer\OWA* -ExternalURL $null
From: phil levine [mailto:plevin...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 9:07 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Weird OWA Issue Exchange 2010
I
...@intergraph.com
Subject: RE: Weird OWA Issue Exchange 2010
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Date: Tuesday, April 19, 2011, 12:28 PM
It sounds like you’re trying to do CAS to CAS proxying and may have configured
an ExternalURL on your virtual directory in the other
...@safeway.com]
Sent: 29 November 2010 09:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA/ActiveSync Exchange 2003
Yup - and by their reasoning, it probably should.
-Original Message-
From: itli...@imcu.com [mailto:itli...@imcu.com]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 11:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Exchange 2003
Ok. So my auditors want us to use a VPN to access our OWA I can kind of
understand this. Don't direct traffic from the firewall to the Exchange
server.
But if I do that will it kill my Smartphones that are using
ActiveSync???
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
Admin Issues
Subject: OWA/ActiveSync Exchange 2003
Exchange 2003
Ok. So my auditors want us to use a VPN to access our OWA I can kind of
understand this. Don't direct traffic from the firewall to the Exchange server.
But if I do that will it kill my Smartphones that are using ActiveSync
Yup - and by their reasoning, it probably should.
-Original Message-
From: itli...@imcu.com [mailto:itli...@imcu.com]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 11:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA/ActiveSync Exchange 2003
Exchange 2003
Ok. So my auditors want us to use a VPN
Conversation: OWA/ActiveSync Exchange 2003
Subject: RE: OWA/ActiveSync Exchange 2003
In what way do they think that a VPN is any better than a SSL
certificate?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: itli...@imcu.com
Something is all screwy. I haven't used it in the past but a couple of
times. Now when I want to start having users use it I can not get it to
work.
http://server/exchange tells me to use https://server/exchange which
give me a 403.4 error in the iis logs??
I need help on where and what to
Check IIS settings for both the Default Website and the OWA virtual directory.
May need to change the Require Secure Channel setting under Secure
Communications.
We had to set our Default Website to OFF and then OWA to ON to get the
redirection to work.
Its called SafeHTML.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/899394
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Fergal O Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 12:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA
Hi,
We seem to have an issue with the way Exchange is processing certain types of
attachments via OWA -
Example :
I have allowed certain file types to be allowed - like .txt and uim and .xml
However,
If I send any of the attachment and try and view them in OWA - it will not open
correctly -
potentially harm a
desktop.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Fergal O Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 12:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA and Exchange Sp1 2007
I will assume this applies
I will assume this applies for Exchange 2007 Enterprise?
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 January 2008 17:29
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA and Exchange Sp1 2007
It's called SafeHTML.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/899394
Regards,
Michael B
Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 12:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA on Exchange 2000
I've had OWA (on Exchange 5.5) running successfully on my network for
quite some time. It connected to my only Exchange 5.5 server. Both my
OWA box and Exchange box
You will need Exchange Enterprise version if you want a separate OWA boxen.
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 12:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA on Exchange 2000
I've had OWA (on Exchange 5.5) running
keep running my OWA 5.5 box (which I currently am).
Is there any major concerns about running Exchange and OWA on the same box
w/ Exchange 2000? I had them seperated before because OWA wasn't as
stable as I wanted it to be and I didn't fancy rebooting my Exchange box
for OWA problems. Security
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 12:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA on Exchange 2000
Ah.. well, see how you find these things out after-the-fact if you don't
research it ahead of time? haha.. Doh! Ok.. well, I'm
Title: RE: OWA on Exchange 2000
OWA installs by default with Exchange 2000 when installed 'fresh'. OWA relies on IIS to function.
As a side note, the latest version of OWA is very good - the interface is much more intuitive. However it isn't compatible with all versions of IE. I had to do
: January 14, 2002 5:32
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DMZ, OWA and
Exchange 5.5 questions
it
is an option.. however be aware this version is very IIS patch aware. If
you're not running the latest, most current patches, you might run into more
trouble that you wish you hadn't
.
Eric
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : 14 janvier, 2002 14:49
À : MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Objet : DMZ, OWA and Exchange 5.5 questions
greetings
Has anyone set up OWA in a DMZ, where the server that OWA resides on is
not
part of the domain
: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: DMZ, OWA and Exchange 5.5 questions
greetings
Has anyone set up OWA in a DMZ, where the server that OWA resides on is not
part of the domain on the internal network? Is this possible? We're using
NT 4 with Exchange 5.5
Title: RE: DMZ, OWA and Exchange 5.5 questions
100% agree with Mr. William..
I also recommend a product for IIS called SECUREIIS by eEye.com. It works very well with IIS 4.0/5.0 and protects against virtually any DOS/Hack attacks. Costs about $800 per server, and very reasonable for what
Title: RE: DMZ, OWA and Exchange 5.5 questions
o
you could just use URLScan and IISLockdown from Microsoft for nothing..
:)
-Original Message-From: Rick Ward - HQ
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2002
07:01To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DMZ
Title: RE: DMZ, OWA and Exchange 5.5 questions
On
your OWA server?
-Original Message-From: Dan Yarrow
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:46
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DMZ, OWA and
Exchange 5.5 questions
o
you could just use URLScan
Title: RE: DMZ, OWA and Exchange 5.5 questions
Just be
aware:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q309508
-Original
Message-From: Lefkovics, William
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002
1:45 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DMZ
Title: RE: DMZ, OWA and Exchange 5.5 questions
yup it
works fine. The original version of IISLockdown was completely unsafe to
use, and in some cases rendered your system unusable. But the new version
has options for OWA systems in the install. Check it out
sometime.
-Original
Title: RE: DMZ, OWA and Exchange 5.5 questions
Of
course. :o)
Months
ago.
William
-Original Message-From: Dan Yarrow
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:52
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DMZ, OWA and
Exchange 5.5 questions
yup it
works fine
Title: RE: DMZ, OWA and Exchange 5.5 questions
That
areticle seems to be posted after the original versions. In the install of
ver 2 its simply an option you select for "Microsoft Exchange OWA
system"
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
Title: RE: DMZ, OWA and Exchange 5.5 questions
Neat!
Also
for E2K:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q309677
-Original Message-From: Dan Yarrow
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:56
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DMZ, OWA
PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002
1:57 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DMZ, OWA
and Exchange 5.5 questions
Neat!
Also
for E2K:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q309677
-Original Message-From: Dan Yarrow
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January
Hello All,
I'd like to get your opinion on this:
Exch 5.5 sp4 on Nt4 sp6
We are in the middle of consolidating as many machines in our infrastructure
as possible...can any of you tell me the cons of having my owa sitting on
the Exchange server itself? Thanks all for all the help and
server can be annoying.
William
-Original Message-
From: Fred Valdez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA on Exchange
Hello All,
I'd like to get your opinion on this:
Exch 5.5 sp4 on Nt4 sp6
We
the patches are
applied.
Thanks,
fred
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:58 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA on Exchange
Hi Fred:
Pros: Single admin entity
Simple for small deployments
, January 10, 2002 11:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA on Exchange
Thanks William,
You always have great info to share...as usual...we are a small enterprise
(under 50 people)...so I don't think performance will be an issue (also
upgrading the exchange server hardware)...your
.
Thanks again,
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA on Exchange
It makes no sense to me to maintain it on a separate server for less than 50
people
Title: RE: OWA on Exchange
5.5 OWA works great under WIN2K IIS 5.0
5.5 also works very well under WIN2K SP2(W/FRS HOTFIX).. Frankly I think it's the most stable platform available for Exchange email.
But I know William would disagree... ;)
-Original Message-
From: Fred Valdez
-- Superior Technology. Superior Performance.
-Original Message-
From: Fred Valdez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA on Exchange
William,
I will be moving my old exchange server(ex55sp4,NT4sp6,BDC) to the new
server
of Clark Systems Support, LLC.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA on Exchange
The Ed Crowley move method is perfect for what you are attempting.
Make sure to overplay
Title: RE: OWA on Exchange
LOL!
Why
won't it install on my VALinux box?
Exchange2000 on Windows2000 in a Windows.Net forest
runs awesome!
-Original Message-From: Rick Ward - HQ
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:51
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
Oh yes, no need to address questions to individuals. The cumulative talent
pool here is very good.
-Original Message-
From: Fred Valdez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA on Exchange
William,
I
Title: Message
LOL!!
And
when is the OPEN BSD version going to BETA??
.NET
(NOW ENOUGH TRICKS)
hehehe
-Original Message-From:
Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:
Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:53 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: OWA on Exchange
LOL
Hey...that's not a bad idea...is it real Technical?...can I have a copy?
-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA on Exchange
Let me know if you need a multipage timeline w
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA on Exchange
Fred,
I realize your question was directed to William, but I'm going to offer my
02 anyway.
I recently completed a move from an NT4.0(SP6a) Exchange 5.5 server (SP4) to
a Win2K(SP2
Title: RE: OWA on Exchange
No lack of opinions on this alias (pointing finger at self)
-Original Message-
From: Fred Valdez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA on Exchange
Perfect, perfect, perfect
Under 50
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OWA on Exchange
How many users ?
- Original Message -
From: Fred Valdez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin
. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 06 December 2001 02:08
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: OWA 5.5 -- Exchange 2K
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 -- Exchange 2K
It would be Paul Robichaux but I can't confirm he's from the Alabama
clan. To quote the article: In addition, you can't use
: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 7:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA 5.5 -- Exchange 2K
Hello.
the OWA of Exchange 5.5 can be used to accede to mailboxes of a Exchange
Server 2000
thx
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter
No?
Should I stop doing it, then? ;)
William
-Original Message-
From: Bibel, Laura Y. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 5:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 -- Exchange 2K
) 853-3600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 8:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 -- Exchange 2K
No?
Should I stop doing it, then? ;)
William
: Bibel, Laura Y. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 6:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 -- Exchange 2K
Why, yes, you should stop!!!
Seriously??? I just got done reading my December issue of Exchange Outlook
administrator and Paul says you can't
He wanted to use 5.5 to see 2k
--
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 6:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 -- Exchange 2K
You can't use OWA2000 to access
It would be Paul Robichaux but I can't confirm he's from the Alabama clan.
To quote the article:
In addition, you can't use the Exchange 5.5 version of OWA to access
Exchange 2000 Server mailboxes, though you can use OWA 2000 to get to public
folder replicas that are on Exchange 5.5 servers
Never mind.. Lxydexia is getting to me...
--
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 6:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 -- Exchange 2K
He wanted to use 5.5 to see
this.
-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 6:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA for Exchange 5.5 on a IIS5 server (not exchange) -who
thinks about this stuff
Where are good whitepapers, thinking, or online resources that talk about
Where are good whitepapers, thinking, or online resources that talk about
loading OWA from Exchange 5.5 on windows.
We are talking Exchange 5.5 in a Windows 2000 box
OWA on a different windows 2000 box running IIS5
All in a windows 2000 domain.
expect to upgrade to E2K in six months
http://support.microsoft.com/support/exchange/content/whitepapers/owa_ts
hoot.asp
-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 18:49
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA for Exchange 5.5 on a IIS5 server (not exchange) -who
thinks
.
Is there a way to reinstall OWA without reinstalling Exchange?
In case I might be closer to making it work than I think: My current
status is that once logged in, all folders, contacts and calendars
appear to be working, but are empty. This occurs regardless of whether
it is a user or administrator, from
All:
I need some of the new OWA features offered by exchange 2000. We are
currently running exchange 5.5 on an NT box. If I install exchange 2000
OWA on another server running win2000, can I access the exchange 5.5
server? Has any one done this? Did you have any problems or suggestions
for me? I
63 matches
Mail list logo
