-24x7-online-defragmentation-
and-online-database-scanning/
-Original Message-
From: Bill Humphries [mailto:nt...@hedgedigger.com]
Sent: 18 January 2011 19:31
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: database size vs mailbox size
Thanks, Michael.
I do not see any 1221 events
, January 19, 2011 12:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: database size vs mailbox size
I am wanting to test an online backup solution, so I want to minimize space.
This is the same server that also has the runaway transaction logs creating up
to 80 gigs a week in transaction logs
Check out 1221 for ESE in the Application log to see how much white space you
have.
Also:
Get-mailbox -resultsize unlimited | get-mailboxstatistics | select
DisplayName, TotalDeletedItemSize, TotalItemSize
will provide you with more details...
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant
Thanks, Michael.
I do not see any 1221 events in the application log, but I ran this:
Get-MailboxDatabase -Status | FL AvailableNewMailboxSpace
and it replied 10.34 GB.
I also have one user that shows 20 GB in totsldeleteditemd and one user
with 7 GB. If I set their retention policy to 0
are trying to solve?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Bill Humphries [mailto:nt...@hedgedigger.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 2:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: database size vs mailbox size
and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Bill Humphries [mailto:nt...@hedgedigger.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 2:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: database size vs mailbox size
Thanks, Michael.
I do not see any 1221 events
-
From: Nick Bradford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database size
Point taken re only if you have the 16Gb limit, however the points to
writing that post were not specific to the defrag issue and I believe
are still
, October 18, 2001 11:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database size
Sean
I implemented Exch2k SP2 6 months ago for only 12 users.
By default, would it do any real harm performing a defrag? Or would you
recommend leaving it for the time being
Simon Weaver
NT Domain Administrator
Ext
PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 October 2001 08:32:AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database size
Simon,
I just type more experienced than I actually am. Judging by what I've
learned from the many great individuals on this list
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database size
60+ users, running Exchange 5.5 std edition for about 4 years. Never
once
ran an offline defrag. I've got about 16mb white space in my priv.edb
and
about 4mb in my pub.edb.
Online maintenance seems to be doing a pretty good job in our
environment
-
From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 19 October 2001 08:34
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Database size
Subject: RE: Database size
Thanks Sean.
Actually I am happy to leave them alone, as the files are not extremely
big, I can still perform online backups
Issues
Subject: RE: Database size
HEADS UP EVERYONE:
My original post yesterday stated that the person who asked the first
question in this thread should perform an offline defrag. This was a
quick response to his question that was too simplistic on my part.
In no way do I either perform
Subject: RE: Database size
Too late Neil - Database is damaged - I went by your recommendations :)
Simon Weaver
NT Domain Administrator
Ext. 5544
Tel: 02392-705544 (Direct Dial)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 October 2001 08:38:AM
Subject: RE: Database size
HEADS UP EVERYONE:
My original post yesterday stated that the person who asked the first
question in this thread should perform an offline defrag. This was a
quick response to his question that was too simplistic on my part.
In no way do I either perform or recommend
Im at the cliff !!! ;-)
Simon Weaver
NT Domain Administrator
Ext. 5544
Tel: 02392-705544 (Direct Dial)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 October 2001 08:51:AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database size
LOL - guess
-
From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 October 2001 08:27:AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database size
60+ users, running Exchange 5.5 std edition for about 4 years. Never
60+ once
ran an offline defrag. I've got about 16mb white space in my priv.edb and
about 4mb
-Original Message-
From: Nick Bradford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 6:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database size
Er, are we exchange admins or users...?
Offline defrag is necessary regular maintenance task, and if your DB
fills the disk
You're a great admin and don't you forget it!!! ;o)
D
-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database size
When did this happen? Did I miss something? When did this become
.
William
-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database size
When did this happen? Did I miss something? When did this become regular
maintance? What problem does it prevent/solve?
I
What are your backup suggestions? I notice you refer to Backup Exec, online
backups etc.
Thanks Julie
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database size
400 users or a 1000 users
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BestDBManage.as
p
William
-Original Message-
From: Julie Lienemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database size
What are your backup suggestions? I
: Crouthamel, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database size
You mention ArcserveIT. What has your experience been with the product. Mine
has been nothing short of consistent pain and frustration. I believe I have
Issues
Subject: RE: Database size
The last time I remember any kind of success with ArcServe was when Computer
Associates didn't own it and it was running on Novell. Ever since Computer
Associates got involved, it has become unreliable garbage.
So as far as my experience has been IT SUCKS
Yes? Some of us are still stuck in those days.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database size
ah yes, the happy days of Cheyenne and Novell.
-Michèle
Immigration
: Friday, October 19, 2001 1:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database size
Don't forget goodies like cc:Mail (where the PO's could live equally well on
a NetWare, NT, or Unix boxes and talk to each other quite nicely)
And servers that didn't require a reboot every time you loaded
Subject: RE: Database size
Entropy?
Novell's greatest downside... It can't run Exchange.
Hey... like my new mug?
http://www.cafepress.com/cp/store/productdetail.aspx?prodno=998356zoom=yes
**CONTENT ADVISORY FOR HTE LANGUAGE SENSITIVE**
-Original Message-
From: Charles Whitby [mailto:[EMAIL
Normal behaviour. You need to do an offline defrag, i.e. eseutil.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Gene Nykolyshyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 18 October 2001 14:49
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Database size
Subject: Database size
After deleting hundreds of
The only way to physically reduce the size of the priv and pub is to run
offline maintenance. Exchange does online maintenance to free up white
space but it will not shrink the database sizes as reported on disk until
offline maintenance is run. Look for 1221's in the Event log which reports
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 6:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database size
Normal behaviour. You need to do an offline defrag, i.e. eseutil.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Gene Nykolyshyn [mailto:[EMAIL
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database size
Do we really want to be suggesting that without directing them to PSS?
I might run it and you might run it, but what if this guy isn't as savvy as
we are and he breaks his
supposed intelligence level.
my $0.02
-Original Message-
From: John O'Connor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database size
Very Good Advice. I spent the entire weekend rebuilding my exchange
from
back up
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database size
Er, are we exchange admins or users...?
Offline defrag is necessary regular maintenance task, and if your DB
fills the disk at any time youll be jumping through very similar
Bradford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database size
Er, are we exchange admins or users...?
Offline defrag is necessary regular maintenance task, and if your DB fills
the disk at any time youll be jumping through very
: RE: Database size
Er, are we exchange admins or users...?
Offline defrag is necessary regular maintenance task, and if your DB fills
the disk at any time youll be jumping through very similar hoops to recover
your exchange box.
Like always - never make a change or perform any task
Since William is having troubles sending to the list, I have forwarded his
reply at his request.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 4:41 PM
To: 'MS-Exchange Admin Issues'
Subject: RE: Database size
Offline defrag is necessary regular
: Database size
Since William is having troubles sending to the list, I have forwarded
his
reply at his request.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 4:41 PM
To: 'MS-Exchange Admin Issues'
Subject: RE: Database size
Offline defrag is necessary
36 matches
Mail list logo
