Sorry yes I meant once these are all done I am going to put them all in
their own SG since its all down anyway.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 8:19 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: eseutil /p
Not until everything in an SG
Not until everything in an SG can mount clean.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Lists - Level5 [mailto:li...@levelfive.us]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 8:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: eseutil /p
Ok, but would now
Issues
Subject: RE: eseutil /p
You cant ignore the fact that you are operating in
multiple-databases-per-SG mode.
In that case, the fact that an individual DB is clean shutdown is pretty
much irrelevant. You need to have all DBs in that SG in clean shutdown.
Once you are in one-DB-per
ust 31, 2010 7:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: eseutil /p
Yes, I have been arguing with them that their DB's need to be smaller and to
implement archiving. I hate to be the I told you so and use these as 'lessons'
but hopefully the urgency will be understood now.
just hoping its fairly contained to the actual problem
which was maybe 50-100 emails when the db went offline.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 7:25 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: eseutil /p
At this point I think you need to
At this point - I think you need to wait it out.
You see now why it is best to have one DB per SG.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Lists - Level5 [mailto:li...@levelfive.us]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 7:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Cool. Priv has 1.2 GB of free space. Pub
has 56 MB. I never looked closely at those defrag Ids. Thanks again
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 12:03
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: ESEUTIL
New
Title: Message
Thanks all. I am glad I didn't run
it then
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:52
AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL
Yes, seriously!
Leave it up for another 4
New around here, huh?
Never.
- Original Message -
From:
Matthew
Carpenter
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 12:41
PM
Subject: ESEUTIL
What is the recommended calendar
for using this defrag tool?
Once a month?
Twice a
again) do *not* balance the out
downtime required to run the tool, and the potential to seriously corrupt your
Store.
-Original Message-From: Matthew
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29,
2002 12:52 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
ESEUTIL
mass amounts of mailboxes off of the
server?
-Original Message-From: Matthew
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29,
2002 12:52 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
ESEUTIL
Seriously?
This server has been
up for 4 years, and I am p
Title: RE: ESEUTIL
I had a feeling this had come up before. I appreciate the note.
I was misinformed, then, that the ONLINE defrag was not enough. That the online defrag was OK, but an offline ESEUTIL was necessary routinely.
-Original Message-
From: Ruan Kotze - CPX NAM [mailto
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
ESEUTIL
Seriously?
This server has been
up for 4 years, and I am pretty sure it has never been run. Does it fragment
like a normal hard drive on a workstation or server would, which needs regular
maintenance?
Exch 5.5
SP4
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:38
AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL
Only when
necessary?
Only during DR
procedures?
Only under direction of
PSS?
Only if you're
encountering the 16GB DB limit in the Standard version?
-Ori
Deja Vu :)
Regards
Ruan Kotze
MCSE, Master ASE
For: Comparex Namibia
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 4:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Regular offline defrags: definitive answer
I guess Ed is not busy enough
Title: Message
I like
to run it every Monday morning just to piss off my users for the
day.
--Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and
WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-From: Matthew
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:
Title: Message
Only
when necessary?
Only
during DR procedures?
Only
under direction of PSS?
Only
if you're encountering the 16GB DB limit in the Standard
version?
-Original Message-From: Matthew
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29,
2002 12:41 PM
What service packs ?
-Original Message-
From: Nick Symiakakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 09:29
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL Question
> I am running Exchange 5.5 on NT server.
What OS ?
> What version of Ex
*looks up at the sky filling with fire and brimstone*
Heheheh... ok who wants to take this one
-Original Message-
From: Woodrick, Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 9:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL Question
My first question is why
My first question is why do you think that an offline defrag is
necessary?
-Original Message-
From: Nick Symiakakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, March 18, 2002 8:54 AM
Posted To: Exchange Sunbelt
Conversation: ESEUTIL Question
Subject: ESEUTIL Question
Hi Everyone,
> I am running Exchange 5.5 on NT server.
What OS ?
> What version of Exchange ?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Nick Symiakakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 08:54
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: ESEUTIL Question
>
>
> Hi Everyone,
> Well
What OS ?
What version of Exchange ?
-Original Message-
From: Nick Symiakakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 08:54
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: ESEUTIL Question
Hi Everyone,
Well I am currently in the process of running an Off-Line Defrag,
and Thi
Title: RE: ESEUTIL Question
Youre copying almost 3 GB over a LAN.. It may take a while, depending on your LAN speeds.
The server then has to put it in place, and remove the old priv.edb and patch the temp db.
-Original Message-
From: Nick Symiakakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Title: RE: ESEUTIL Question
It all depends on yuor network speed
-Original Message-
From: Nick Symiakakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL Question
My Store was 3.4 GB, I looked at the size of the
My Store was 3.4 GB, I looked at the size of the Temp File, and it said
2.75 GB. I had to place the temp file an a network drive, because I didn't
have the space on my Exchange Server. i was going to move the IS over to
the other Server and run the defrag there, and then move it back, but
someone
Title: RE: ESEUTIL Question
Nick,
You will return to a normal command prompt. How big is your store? If at all possible don't defrag to a net drive.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Nick Symiakakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 8:54 AM
To: MS-Exc
Thank you Mike, I appreciate the info.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Title: RE: ESEUTIL Question
Yikes@ Defragging to a network drive..
When it is done, the cursor should return to a normal status, showing x seconds it took to do the defrag.
Then you can start the IS
-Original Message-
From: Nick Symiakakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
gigs of data IO wise, and process things.
Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..
-Original Message-
From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 7:51 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eseutil Questions
Just an update here for those who may
-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 7:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eseutil Questions
When I said "quoted", that's what I meant! I read those figures somewhere
(they were from Microsoft) but I do admit in reality they'
Great links, thanks !
-Original Message-
From: Rickenbacher Beat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 20:26
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: AW: RE : Eseutil Questions
eseutil /?
or http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q182903
or http
Issues
Betreff: RE : Eseutil Questions
I have also to clean my databases and run eseutil can you point me on a
whitepaper how exactly to do it
thanks
-Message d'origine-
De : Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : vendredi 22 février 2002 16:55
À : MS-Exchange Admin I
I have also to clean my databases and run eseutil can you point me on a
whitepaper how exactly to do it
thanks
-Message d'origine-
De : Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : vendredi 22 février 2002 16:55
À : MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Objet : RE: Eseutil Questions
Thank
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 07:19
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eseutil Questions
Now that's fast what was you running that on for hardware? I would be
not raid.
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
Did I just say that out loud?
-Original Me
Thanks for the info. I haven't done one of these either in about 3 years
and wouldn't be doing it if PSS had not requested it.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 10:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: R
Very smart man...
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
Did I just say that out loud?
-Original Message-
From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 7:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eseutil Questions
Thanks for the info. I
22, 2002 7:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eseutil Questions
When I said "quoted", that's what I meant! I read those figures
somewhere (they were from Microsoft) but I do admit in reality they'd
probably be a bit lower. To be honest, I've not done an offli
nge List
Conversation: Eseutil Questions
Subject: RE: Eseutil Questions
Now that's fast what was you running that on for hardware? I would be
not raid.
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
Did I just say that out loud?
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
ssues
Subject: RE: Eseutil Questions
I've seen quoted speeds of 4-6Gb per hour, but it really depends on how
much data within the database is used, not necessarily the actual
physical size of the edb file, as well as the spec of the machine
running it.
Neil Hobson
Silver
I've seen quoted speeds of 4-6Gb per hour, but it really depends on how
much data within the database is used, not necessarily the actual
physical size of the edb file, as well as the spec of the machine
running it.
Neil Hobson
Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Pa
25-45 minutes per gig has been my experience. On that hardware with
50/50 IO cache on the RAID, best guess would be 32 minutes. The biggest
factor being disk IO.
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
Did I just say that out loud?
-Original Message-
From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL
Let alone break all of the single instance store!
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely - Verizon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, January 25, 2002 8:05 AM
Posted To: Exchange Sunbelt
Conversation: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs
That
That's a rather ignorant solution...
D
-Original Message-
From: Ben Ong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 3:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs
What I did before was, I'll transfer their mail to their "
es
> Subject:RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs
>
> Here is a snippet from Q272234 that tells you about offline
defragmentation.
>
> "Generally, however, avoid offline defragmentation because it is
an
> expensive procedure. When offline defragmentation runs, it cre
What I did before was, I'll transfer their mail to their "personal folder",
than use eseutil.exe to defrag.
-Original Message-
From: James Chris L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 January 2002 03:31
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs
How long management will allow the server to be unavailable before they
freak out.
-Original Message-
From: Kopec, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs
Please explain, "
How long is your time window?
Dependent on the I/O capabilities of your system, it could take a few
days to compress a 60GB store. You can roughly judge the speed by
looking at the size of the temp DB during the process. It will slowly
grow to about 47GB before it completes.
60GB isn't something
Please explain, "time window"?
-Original Message-
From: James Chris L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs
We have an on going problem in our company, our Exchange database exceed
60gb on s
anuary 24, 2002 2:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs
We have another drive we have added for the defrag and we need to defrag the
database because there is only 300mb of free space on the database drive and
to expand the disk, we need to move the database
Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs
Here is a snippet from Q272234 that tells you about offline defragmentation.
"Generally, however, avoid offline defragment
Here is a snippet from Q272234 that tells you about offline defragmentation.
"Generally, however, avoid offline defragmentation because it is an
expensive procedure. When offline defragmentation runs, it creates a new
database file and then copies all the data in the old file to the new f
Judging by your 60GB DB, you need at least twice that in disk space to run
ESEUTIL. That means, to run ESEUTIL at all, you need at least 120GB and I
would say a little more to be safe for it to run.
D
-Original Message-
From: James Chris L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, Jan
No.
William
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL
Same publisher? :-)
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted
Hey!
William
-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 1:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL
Same errors? ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 December
Same errors? ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 December 2001 08:59
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL
Same publisher? :-)
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 20
Same publisher? :-)
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 20 December 2001 18:49
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: ESEUTIL
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL
>>There's enough info in these (and other) archives to fill a book
com> cc:
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL
12/20/2001 10:00
irborne.net
---
Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 8:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL
Same logic applies to eseutil on Exchange 5.5: don't bother
You mispelled 'persecution'.
William
-Original Message-
From: Boswell Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 9:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL
I've been here about 3 months, and when I sort by topic, ESEUTIL has 100
en
Title: RE: ESEUTIL
You
could run it nightly if you wanted to and you'd probably be
fine.
But
when you shrink the database like that, you lose performance as Exchange has to
hesitate and reacquire disk space each time it needs to grow. Personally,
I can't afford the performance
I've been here about 3 months, and when I sort by topic, ESEUTIL has 100
entries (101 with this. A few classic quotes:
- eseutil is a tool that if you are not familiar with, you shouldn't be
using. Now tell us why you want to do it.
- Have a look at eseutil /? (which in my opinion is the only s
Same logic applies to eseutil on Exchange 5.5: don't bother unless you
have a problem (and are under the guidance of PSS or other suitable
consultancy) or you've moved a ton of mailboxes off of the server and
really need the space.
There's enough info in these (and other) archives to fill a book
ssage-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 8:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL
Oh lord... I can see the hellfire and brimstone in the dark clouds forming
above already... hehehehe
I'll save my finger muscles and let some of
Don't.
Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
"Who's watching your network?"
www.clarksupport.com
301-610-9584 voice
240-465-0323 Efax
The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and pr
NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER run Eseutil unless PSS tells you to.
If it ain't broke don't try to fix it.
-Jim
Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Engineer
Advertising.com
We bring innovation to interactive communication.
Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance.
Is this a setup?
Why are you considering running eseutil? What benefit doth thou seek this
blessed holiday season? Overtime pay?
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
---
Why just ride, when you can fly?
http://www.airborne.net
--
Title: RE: ESEUTIL
He he he, this is one of those topics that should come with a warning label in this list. Bring it up at your own risk.
Jez, expect to be resoundly flamed for even thinking of running eseutil by most on this list. Personally, I run it on a monthly basis during a
Dont do it... You really dont want to spend the holidays recovering
from a corrupted database [1], or for that matter bothering to recover
white space that will just be used again [2]. The server is running well
and will continue to do so with out you touching it.
Go home and spend the time wi
Oh lord... I can see the hellfire and brimstone in the dark clouds forming above
already... hehehehe
I'll save my finger muscles and let some of the other people warn you against this.
-Original Message-
From: Jeramy Eling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 11:
Sorry David.
My bladder is right full. Figured I could beat anyone today.
Don't be so shy, dude. David's a great name.
William
-Original Message-
From: dp
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: 11/4/01 6:28 PM
Subject: RE: Eseutil
David precht hailing from just west o
That was my Guess : >
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE
-Original Message-
From: dp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 6:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eseutil
David precht hailing from just west of beantown
-Original Message-
F
David precht hailing from just west of beantown
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 21:22
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eseutil
He is getting at who are you? DP can mean many things. We like to have
names.
We
Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eseutil
8000 users domain migration
What ya trying to get at?
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 21:07
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eseutil
If your words are not worthy of your own
8000 users domain migration
What ya trying to get at?
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 21:07
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eseutil
If your words are not worthy of your own name, how can you expect them
If your words are not worthy of your own name, how can you expect them to be
worthy of anyone's time?
8k? That's a pretty small user...
William
-Original Message-
From: dp
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: 11/4/01 6:08 PM
Subject: RE: Eseutil
Nicknames are Sparky,
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eseutil
What is wrong with a 1.9GB mailbox? Why are you rehashing old threads?
Do you have a name, or shall we assign you one?
William
-Original Message-
From: dp
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: 11/3/01 9:21 PM
Subject: RE: Eseutil
Hot
What is wrong with a 1.9GB mailbox? Why are you rehashing old threads?
Do you have a name, or shall we assign you one?
William
-Original Message-
From: dp
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: 11/3/01 9:21 PM
Subject: RE: Eseutil
Hot fixes, make sure no one is running a 1.9 gig
Title: Message
and
where does the xx TB PST fit ;) ?
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday,
October 31, 2001 13:16To: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: Eseutil
16GB
for standard.
16TB
(theoretical) for
Title: Message
nope...85meg
-Original Message-From: Martin
Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday,
October 31, 2001 17:13To: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: Eseutil
So
the HD was what? 8GB?
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics
Hot fixes, make sure no one is running a 1.9 gig Mailbox
-Original Message-
From: Scott Schnoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:05
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Eseutil
MessageIMHO, this statement is wrong:
"The best maintance [sic
Title: Message
She
shoots! She scores!!!
-Original Message-From: Diane Beckham
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01,
2001 4:54 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Eseutil
Oh
yes...this seems so much easier then - click on Optimize, go get a cup of tea
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01,
2001 12:47 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Eseutil
There is no performance optimizer in Exchange2000. (perhaps it will
arrive in a future sp sp2 is very close)
Instead you:
Stop. Dismount. Move. Remount
h his mind; the fool is
obstinate, and doubteth not; he knoweth all things but his own ignorance. --
Akhenaton
-Original Message-From: Bibel, Laura Y.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01,
2001 3:59 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Eseutil
Does an onli
Title: Message
Actually, yes. I believe NTBackup does.
-Original Message-From: Bibel, Laura Y.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001
1:59 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Eseutil
Does an online IS backup copy white space to
tape
iginal Message-From: Lefkovics, William
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001
1:26 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Eseutil
Sure. Some people reboot their servers weekly,
too.
For
the average deployment, offline defragging using eseutil as a regular
maint
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01,
2001 9:13 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Eseutil
In
Exchange 5.5 there is a performance optimizer that will let you change the drive
where your exchange folders are. You can move your IS to a different drive
(it shouldn't be on
31, 2001 9:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Eseutil
Yup...
and the same one who runs:
Microsoft Cluster Server Center - www.nwnetworks.com/cluster.html
Internet Explorer Security Center - www.nwnetworks.com/iesc.html
But...enough about me...We now return to our
: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Eseutil
Recently I have archived about 50 mailboxes ,
and hence I want to defrag , because the space freed is not
showing
up
on the exchange database , it still remains the same .
-Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone
m sure there is something in E2K that will do the same
job.
Diane
-Original Message-From: Irfan GM
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001
8:34 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Eseutil
Recently I have archived about 50 mailboxes ,
and hence I
Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 2:14 PM
Subject: RE: Eseutil
And the same Scott Schnoll from Event Log Monitor - www.tntsoftware.com
<http://www.tntsoftware.com/> ?
Steve Clark
Cl
Title: Message
Nightly. By default.
Reading the event logs each morning (yes, I do) will reveal any
issues.
-Original Message-From: Randal, Phil
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01,
2001 6:41 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Eseutil
There'
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:26
AM
Subject: RE: Eseutil
Sure. Some people reboot their servers weekly,
too.
For the average deployment, offline defragging using eseutil as a
regular maintenance tool remains a complete waste of time and
resources.(R
ober 31, 2001 5:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eseutil
See http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q185/4/57.ASP
Pat
> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
> this format, some or all of this me
Title: Message
And
that is?
-Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01,
2001 7:18 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Eseutil
Just
drop out of the Triple-A list!
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Title: Message
Just
drop out of the Triple-A list!
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 01 November 2001
12:53To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Eseutil
You
can "lose" MVP status? How can that happen?
---
Title: Message
Wow.
What's with all the superstars on the list? This is great.
Welcome back!
-Original Message-From: Woodrick, Ed
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 2:49
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Eseutil
Sherry,
You
aren&#x
Title: Message
You
can "lose" MVP status? How can that happen?
-Original Message-From: Scott Schnoll
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:11
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re:
Eseutil
Thanks, William.
Actually, for the past four years
, October 31,
2001 7:04 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Eseutil
Why
do you need to defrag the IS? Has MS told you to do this?
eseutil is a tool that if you are not familiar with, you shouldn't be
using. Now tell us why you want to do it.
-Original Me
lwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eseutil
I explained it to a junior admin this way once (dont know if he understood,
or just was confused more)
eseutil reclaims whitespace, but since you are usually going to re-use i
001 3:11 PMPosted To: Exchange SunbeltConversation:
EseutilSubject: RE: Eseutil
I
suppose I should have been a little more informative. I do delete a
large amount of data on a weekly basis using the Mail Box Manager. On
average, it deletes about half a GB of space per week, so in my sit
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
