Not to raise this thread from the dead but your right, I hadn't thought of
that.
James
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Egan"
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues"
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 10:28 PM
Subject: Re: List Etiquette
how exactly do you feel that
Admin Issues
Subject: RE: List Etiquette
Or, for those that can, simply set their own Out of Office not to go to
external senders.
I'm in the "don't give a cr$p" camp - OOO replies are just emails that take a
few seconds to delete, or filter. Never been a problem.
Fr
t's my definition of annoying thing
(that can be easily fixed). In some lists you are off the list if you refuse to
change your OOO settings.
Miguel
--- El mar, 1/6/10, Sobey, Richard A escribió:
De: Sobey, Richard A
Asunto: RE: List Etiquette
Para: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues"
If you've ever sent an email to the Patch Management list, you'd think 12
was a blessing. It may be better now, but it used to be terrible.
On 31 May 2010 10:34, James Bensley wrote:
> Can people on this list please think about amending their email
> accounts; I am on a few mailing lists but th
sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8945627-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Cliff
Partlow
Sent: 01 June 2010 03:57
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: List Etiquette
When I go out of office I just go to the Sunbelt site and set my account to not
get email from the list during that tim
spinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 7:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: List Etiquette
Same. And these are *easy* to filter. For us that belong to distribution
lists, this is a must. People use OOFs. Get over it.
--
ME2
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:32 PM,
al Message -
From: James Bensley
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: Mon May 31 08:35:28 2010
Subject: Re: List Etiquette
On 31 May 2010 13:03, Andrew Levicki wrote:
It's ironic, is it not, that it's only the Exchange list that
suffers from
the out of office problem?
As I was typin
gt; - Original Message -
>> From: James Bensley
>> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>> Sent: Mon May 31 08:35:28 2010
>> Subject: Re: List Etiquette
>>
>> On 31 May 2010 13:03, Andrew Levicki wrote:
>>
>>
>>> It's ironic, is it no
n OOF at all for this very reason.
>> John W. Cook
>> Systems Administrator
>> Partnership for Strong Families
>>
>> - Original Message -----
>> From: James Bensley
>> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>> Sent: Mon May 31 08:35:28 2010
>> Sub
James,
I personally use it verify my post made it on-line.
I just set a rule to send all Out of Office Auto-Replies to the trash,
problem solved.
Cheers
~Dr. Doug
-Original Message-
From: James Bensley [mailto:jwbens...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 2:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin I
ilies
- Original Message -
From: James Bensley
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: Mon May 31 08:35:28 2010
Subject: Re: List Etiquette
On 31 May 2010 13:03, Andrew Levicki wrote:
It's ironic, is it not, that it's only the Exchange list that suffers from
the out of office proble
change Resources: http://exbpa.com/
From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com]
Sent: 31 May 2010 21:42
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: List Etiquette
The point was more to the affect of, maybe a few from the others, but ZILLIONS
from this one:)
It is "funny"
ars ago of ASB's autoresponder to OOO reply's,
it was a treat!
Andrew, if you do, treat us with that one:)
From: Carl Houseman [mailto:c.house...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 10:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: List Etiquette
That's not true, I get OOO&
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 02:34, James Bensley wrote:
> Can people on this list please think about amending their email
> accounts; I am on a few mailing lists but this is the only list on
> which people are inconsiderate enough to use email accounts on which
> they have set up an "out-of-office" re
Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families
- Original Message -
From: James Bensley
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: Mon May 31 08:35:28 2010
Subject: Re: List Etiquette
On 31 May 2010 13:03, Andrew Levicki wrote:
> It's ironic, is it not, that it's only the
and...@levicki.me.uk]
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 8:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: List Etiquette
It's ironic, is it not, that it's only the Exchange list that suffers from
the out of office problem?
On 31 May 2010 19:38, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>I agree. Well sai
: List Etiquette
Sunbelt has tried, with unfavorable results, to filter the OOO messages to
their lists. The list membership pretty much unanimously agreed that we would
rather suffer through the OOO's than NOT get emails from the list. It's pretty
easy with gmail & other mail
Sunbelt has tried, with unfavorable results, to filter the OOO messages to
their lists. The list membership pretty much unanimously agreed that we
would rather suffer through the OOO's than NOT get emails from the list.
It's pretty easy with gmail & other mail readers etc to write a rule to just
d
On 31 May 2010 13:03, Andrew Levicki wrote:
> It's ironic, is it not, that it's only the Exchange list that suffers from
> the out of office problem?
>
As I was typing my original post I did sense some irony there, apart
from the obvious but also because of all the lists I am on, this one
would b
It's ironic, is it not, that it's only the Exchange list that suffers from
the out of office problem?
On 31 May 2010 19:38, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >I agree. Well said.
>
> Grin...
> You two must not have been here long: This horse has been beating to death
> and back. I remember ASB used to h
>I agree. Well said.
Grin...
You two must not have been here long: This horse has been beating to death
and back. I remember ASB used to have a great autoresponder for that.
Good luck, it is a PITA.
jlc
I agree. Well said.
On 2010/05/31, at 18:34, James Bensley wrote:
Can people on this list please think about amending their email
accounts; I am on a few mailing lists but this is the only list on
which people are inconsiderate enough to use email accounts on which
they have set up an "out-of-
22 matches
Mail list logo
