Re: [expert] problem running sound as non-root user?

2001-04-02 Thread b5dave
he "audio" group, and the perms something like crw-rw. Does anybody else find it a bit odd the way Mandrake set this up for the lone sundance user? b5dave - 02-Apr-2001 23:16:37 -

RE: [expert] localhost address and cups conflict

2001-03-22 Thread b5dave
erything you try, and if you succeed, please tell us exactly what you did to get it working. Thanks. b5dave. - 22-Mar-2001 22:56:09 -

RE: [expert] Lyx doesn't work with CUPS

2001-01-25 Thread b5dave
ur problem is documented and there's a fix. Peace, b5dave

Re: [expert] RPM updates

2001-01-18 Thread b5dave
-Uvh will update rpms that already exist on your system, but if the rpm doesn't already exist on your system, it will do the same as an -ivh (i.e., install the new rpm). In this sense, -ivh is redundant. -Fvh will *only* update rpms that already exist on your system. Dave. . On 18-Jan-2001 Mark

Re: [expert] Security Lists

2001-01-18 Thread b5dave
Okay, well the Security Announce is working for me gain; just got the glibc advisory. Thanks for the work Vincent, and sorry if I was overly critical. Dave. Vincent wrote: At this point the going is slow to find a fix because that individual is gone for the week, but rest assured we are

[expert] To mail list experts re this list

2001-01-18 Thread b5dave
Looks like I'm complaining again (sigh) about a free, perhaps volunteer service from which I have no real right to expect anything. Still... I'd really like to know if it's just me, or are we all in some significant time warp here. I've had posts on this list delayed more than 24 hours, and a

Re: [expert] Cups is winning the battle

2001-01-18 Thread b5dave
Sternesky wrote: On Thursday 18 January 2001 20:39, Jerry Sternesky wrote: OK Bad form replying to your own email. [and Jerry's previous post] On Tuesday 16 January 2001 10:41, b5dave wrote: OK cups is alive and staying alive. I also get the ghostscript rpms t-shirt, I forgot I had the install cd

RE: [expert] ram issue(continued)

2001-01-18 Thread b5dave
eason why you should be denied a satisfying PC experience. Microsoft and Apple design computers for most of the people in the world, people just like you. Peace b5dave. On 19-Jan-2001 chronos . wrote: To Chris- No I have absolutly no experience editing files. So go flame away. I am a newbie and I

RE: [expert] Linux worm...?

2001-01-18 Thread b5dave
t, that's just about all Linux distros. b5dave On 18-Jan-2001 Mark Weaver wrote [snip] Seriously though...it's about darn time that something SERIOUS be done about and WITH these people that are a great big pain in the arse to the rest of the world that HAVE a real life and a descent direction for that life. [snip]

Re: [expert] Linux worm...?

2001-01-18 Thread b5dave
The list went down, although there seem to be conflicting reports just as to when (see the thread "Security Lists"). I received the "slocate" advisory on Dec 18, and then nothing untill today (the glibc advisory). Yet there were very many Mandrake advisories during that period that I would see

RE: [expert] Problems with 2.4.0 and the reiserfs and supermount

2001-01-18 Thread b5dave
For what it's worth, ReiserFS was only merged into the 2.4.1-pre8 kernel yesterday. (see: http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2001-01-18-004-04-NW-KN) It never was in the 2.4.0 source. This may not help your supermount patching though. Just passing on some info; my kernel patching

RE: [expert] Win4Lin 2.0 - J'ai 2 répertoires /usr/src/linux/

2001-01-17 Thread b5dave
Tout est beau; c'est normal. Le rpertoire linux est un lien symbolique linux-2.2.17. Le systme va toujours chercher pour le rpertoire linux. Ce dernier pourait, par exemple, etre li une diffrente version du "kernel" pour raisons d'exprimentation. Si tu fais un "ls -la" dans le rpertoire

[expert] Failed message delivery

2001-01-17 Thread b5dave
Hi folks, Since a few days, whenever I post to the list I get an e-mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] that starts like: The msg to [EMAIL PROTECTED], had delivery problems due to unknown recipient or host: [etc etc etc] This is too weird. My posts work, but who the hell is [EMAIL PROTECTED] and why

RE: [expert] Removing SCSI devices?

2001-01-16 Thread b5dave
Okay, I'll be the bad guy. Yo, Kim TK, sending html mail to a list is considered by many to be rude, offensive, a bad idea, in bad taste, and may also be a loss of face on your part. You will have a better chance of getting help by not offending the people you are seeking help from. I'd suggest

RE: [expert] Cups is winning the battle

2001-01-16 Thread b5dave
On 16-Jan-2001 Jerry Sternesky wrote: It seems I am having lots of problems with cups. When I installed Mandrake 7.2, it found my epson 777 printer and set it up as a 740. There were no drivers for 777. I got a great test page and since then I haven't been able to do a thing with it. My

RE: [expert] Security Lists

2001-01-16 Thread b5dave
Matthew, Has anyone else been seeing traffic on the Security lists? I joined both the Mandrake security announce and security discuss lists just before the new year, and there was some brief traffic. Since then, however, nothing. Last week linuxtoday (http://www.linuxtoday.com/) was full of

Re: [expert] Security Lists

2001-01-16 Thread b5dave
if it's any help, the last advisory I got was the "slocate" one of Dec 18/2000. dave. We're looking into it. I have my suspicions that something has changed with sympa and it is rejecting the mails silently so this didn't actually come to my attention until about two days ago. We hope to

RE: [expert] Removing SCSI devices?

2001-01-16 Thread b5dave
Nice! It's all good. Thanks. The reason html mail is problematic has to do with one of the basic *nix philosophies, i.e., one tool for one job. Every *nix/linux mail program expects (more or less) to get some sort of text format. Html, on the other hand, is generally handled by a web browser.

Re: [expert] Security Lists

2001-01-16 Thread b5dave
Vincent, No, that is not the case at all. It's not useless and it's not dangerous. We're just having some difficulty with it. Sorry, but I must disagree. One expects to be the first notified of Mandrake security issues when one is subscribed to Mandrake's security-announce. There's an

Re: [expert] PLEASE FIX REPLY-TO in this list!!!

2001-01-15 Thread b5dave
Bob is talking specifically about the *digest* version of the list. My "reply-to's" work fine, but I *don't* get the digest version. Is there anyone here with the digest version with the same problem as Bob? I may be wrong, but I'm assuming that Viktor didn't catch the *digest* aspect of Bob's

[expert] Cups removal precedure?

2001-01-11 Thread b5dave
Okay, look, I don't want to get into the plusses or minusses of CUPS. I've paid my CUPS dues, and would like to go back to lpr for now. Sure I think lpr is brain dead, and I think CUPS is the future of printing in *nix. But for *now*, I would really like to wipe CUPS from my system and

Re: [expert] Adding TrueType fonts to LM 7.2

2001-01-10 Thread b5dave
Hate to be a party pooper here, but adding fonts to LM 7.2 and adding fonts to Wordperfect (7-8) for Linux are two entirely different things. In Wordperfect, font rasterization (both display and printing) is handled by Wordperfect exclusively, and it does not support True Type. But you can find

Re: [expert] problems with network

2001-01-02 Thread b5dave
As root try: # services --status-all Any Chain input will be listed. And if you see a line that says "USAGE: pmfirewall [command]" then your uninstall didn't work. If you need to manualy uninstall, you'll find it under /usr/local/pmfirewall, as well as references in your rc scripts: #grep -i -r

RE: [expert] KMail: import files (OT?)

2000-12-31 Thread b5dave
What you've got with your xfmail setup, as you've described it, are "mh" type mailboxes. I have the same thing. You want to convert your "mh" mailboxes to "mbox" type mailboxes. The docs for Kmail talk about a conversion utility (mh2kmail) "that's included with the source", which seems to mean

Re: [expert] Recursive symlinks in /usr/bin?

2000-12-29 Thread b5dave
Weird. I *do* have /usr/bin/mh which seems to duplicate the contents of /usr/bin, and both directories have mh - ./ . A security thing maybe?? Dave. On 29-Dec-2000 Larry Marshall wrote: Tom Eastman wrote: [tom@celleste bin]$ ls -ld /usr/bin/mh lrwxrwxrwx1 root root1 Dec

Re: [expert] Desktop device icons, folders, etc, don't work

2000-12-24 Thread b5dave
Wow! Is that the result of installing every language available? On 24-Dec-2000 Pierre Fortin wrote: Praedor Tempus wrote: Could someone please use an editor and view the device kdelnk in their Desktop directory (preferably from KDE 2.0, 2.0.1 or 2.1) and post the contents? Without a CD

RE: [expert] fstab entry for supermount

2000-12-23 Thread b5dave
On 24-Dec-2000 Praedor Tempus wrote: In trying to fix my problem with desktop devices not working, I altered my fstab for cdrom, zip, and floppy to eliminate the supermount and made them the old-fashioned manual mount devices. I would like to go back to supermount but cannot recall the

RE: [expert] Unmount supermount without reboot

2000-12-22 Thread b5dave
See one of the most explicit and simple man pages ever written: $ man supermount On 22-Dec-2000 Viktor Lakics wrote: Does anyone know how to unmount (suspend supermounting) a supermounted removable disk without editing out the corresponding entry in fstab and reboot? Eg. to use ext2fsck on a

Re: [expert] cups not working properly

2000-12-21 Thread b5dave
The latest CUPS info by Till, along with discussions is here: http://www.mandrakeforum.com/mysearch.php3?author=till Check out FAQ(7) where there's info about the many KDE printing issues. The A4 thing seems to be a known bug. Note also that there's been a lot of fixes to all the associated CUPS

[expert] 'Use hard drive optimizations' does what?

2000-12-21 Thread b5dave
I initially thought that install option would engage hdparm since the warning is the same, but hdparm was definitely not running.. That leaves the kernel. Does anyone know what config options get set? Thanks Dave. - 21-Dec-2000 18:32:28 -

RE: [expert] cups not working properly

2000-12-21 Thread b5dave
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~tkamppeter/packages/ Read the text file. These are LM7.2 rpms are are supposed to work 'out of the box". On 21-Dec-2000 Vic wrote: Cool,. where can I find the url of this site? On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, b5dave wrote: Also Till setup a site with upgraded dr

RE: [expert]

2000-12-21 Thread b5dave
The background is called by xsetroot in /etc/X11/xdm/Xsetup_0 (the comments in there suggest there are "issues" with kdmdesktop/kdedesktop.) The rest of the screen is defined in /etc/X11/xdm/Xresources Dave. On 21-Dec-2000 a r wrote: Hi! Does anyone know which file contains the details of

Re: [expert] 'Use hard drive optimizations' does what?

2000-12-21 Thread b5dave
elsewhere??? Cheers, Dave. On 22-Dec-2000 Amit Bapat wrote: hdparam is not a daemon that runs, it just sets some parameters to be used for your HD Original Message Follows From: b5dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [exp

RE: [expert] X 4.0.2 and the RPM database

2000-12-21 Thread b5dave
# rpm --rebuilddb Don't worry, it takes a while. Dave. On 22-Dec-2000 MichaelM wrote: I'm sure I'm not the only one to be bitten by this, but for those out of the loop, the binaries for XFree86 4.0.2 over-write the RPM database, making RPM related stuff nigh on impossible. The question

Re: [expert] X 4.0.2 and the RPM database

2000-12-21 Thread b5dave
ay, if I've completely misunderstood you, I apologize: it wouldn't be the first time I've missed the mark. Yet surely it could be useful given the peculiarities of Drakupdate or whatever that dangerous contraption is called. Dave. On 22-Dec-2000 MichaelM wrote: b5dave wrote: # rpm --rebuilddb

Re: [expert] 'Use hard drive optimizations' does what?

2000-12-21 Thread b5dave
On 22-Dec-2000 Andrew George wrote: On Fri, 22 Dec 2000 13:57, A V Flinsch wrote: On Thursday 21 December 2000 21:17, b5dave wrote: So the burning question is: Does anybody have the hdparm command in their rc scripts or elsewhere??? I have the following at the end of rc.local # hdparm

RE: [expert] cups not working properly

2000-12-20 Thread b5dave
I'm running the stock konqueror from Enlightenment with the kde libs installed all from LM 7.2. (KDE 2.0.x). I have the same upgraded CUPS as you. I can print from Konqueror just fine. If you're printing off the page, your CUPS print driver is probably misconfigured. From the kups utility you

[expert] CUPS exasperation

2000-12-18 Thread b5dave
Hi I really need to be able to print from Wordperfect 8/Linux real soon now or I'm sunk. (essay deadlines etc) With LM 7.2 Cups 1.1.4-7.1 local HP Deskjet520 on /dev/lp0 stand-alone dial-up system, with loopback working. I just can't get cups working properly. The kups program says can't

[expert] CUPS exasperation update

2000-12-18 Thread b5dave
In reply to myself, Been doing some debugging; The kupsdconf utility was not writing to /etc/cups/cupsd.conf. Almost everything was remmed out including ServerName etc. After some manual editing I have partial success. Problem: If I try to print from Wordperfect, it issues a command like: lpr

Re: [expert] CUPS exasperation

2000-12-18 Thread b5dave
Yes, thanks go to John. I posted to linuxprinting.org and got a even better solution from Till. The WP driver for the Tektronix Phasor 140 is fully compatible with all the CUPS drivers. Apparently the postscript passthrough is not colour friendly. Refer to:

RE: [expert] Replicated messages have multiple causes... PLEASE

2000-12-18 Thread b5dave
So Pierre, why the hell are you posting twice? OOF. Bad joke, sorry! I'm sure everyone here greatly appreciates and *needs* your troubleshooting: we're suffering from some serious schizophrenia. A concensus might be that anyone posting from M$ Lookout! should be banned for life (at least). I was

[expert] CUPS + LM 7.2 install/config comments

2000-12-18 Thread b5dave
Hi all (hope your there too, Till) After an LM 7.2 install/print struggle, I'd like to pass on a few printer related 'gotcha's' that I believe are problematic. I'll try and be as terse as I can (I have trouble being terse). Comments are most welcome. #1: /dev/lp0 vs /dev/lp1 When I upgraded