On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 14:12, James Sparenberg wrote:
For speed. The pro100 edged out the 3c905 (especially when using
multiple NICS to a single network as in for example a web server.) by
about 2 or 3 percent. For reliability. I've yet to have either one
fail (over the last 4 years.) so I
On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 03:07, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 09:45, Richard Bown wrote:
Hi all
I did send this in when the server was down so it looks like it got
lost.
My cable connection is not as good as it could be, so called out the
cable guys and to my horror, his
On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 01:40, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 03:07, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 09:45, Richard Bown wrote:
Hi all
I did send this in when the server was down so it looks like it got
lost.
My cable connection is not as good as it could
On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 11:12, James Sparenberg wrote:
...
it's pretty even. (anyone need a collection of bad netgear and linksys
nics?)
James
Just hang 'em on the christmas tree in about five months :-)
--
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture...
Want to buy your Pack or
On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 15:21, Jack Coates wrote:
On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 11:12, James Sparenberg wrote:
...
it's pretty even. (anyone need a collection of bad netgear and linksys
nics?)
James
Just hang 'em on the christmas tree in about five months :-)
Nah I'm going to give em as
Perhaps they will make a good mobile if you combine them with outdated
memory chips and AOL CD's.
;-)
For speed. The pro100 edged out the 3c905 (especially when using
...
it's pretty even. (anyone need a collection of bad netgear and linksys
nics?)
Want to buy your Pack or Services
Hi all
I did send this in when the server was down so it looks like it got
lost.
My cable connection is not as good as it could be, so called out the
cable guys and to my horror, his win98 laptop downloaded faster than
this machine,
My current NIC is a realtek 8139, and I always thought a linux
Richard Bown wrote:
I did send this in when the server was down so it looks like it got
lost.
My cable connection is not as good as it could be, so called out the
cable guys and to my horror, his win98 laptop downloaded faster than
this machine,
My current NIC is a realtek 8139, and I
Got the same chip on my NIC. At what speed does it not work as expected?
Mine works but freqwently locks the network service so it has to be
restarted.
tis 2003-07-15 klockan 18.45 skrev Richard Bown:
Hi all
I did send this in when the server was down so it looks like it got
lost.
My cable
Hi,
well the comparison method was to compare the traceroute time to the ISP
server, he was getting around 8 msecs compared to my 18 msecs, the
fastest download speed I've ever seen has been about 90 kb/s.
Which I think for a broadband cable link is not as fast as it could be..
I wish I could
: [expert] NIC's
Got the same chip on my NIC. At what speed does it not work as expected?
Mine works but freqwently locks the network service so it has to be
restarted.
tis 2003-07-15 klockan 18.45 skrev Richard Bown:
Hi all
I did send this in when the server was down so it looks like it got
lost
yeah, must say i have had a good run with the intels as well.
rgds
Franki
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of logic7
Sent: Wednesday, 16 July 2003 2:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [expert] NIC's
I use Intel Pro100 and 3com nics
you must have a lot of people on your node. I get about 250KB/sec on good
sites no matter which PC I'm using.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Richard Bown
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 2:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] NIC's
Richard Bown wrote:
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 18:23, Felix Miata wrote:
My machines all have Realtek 8139's, but not ultracheap generics.
They're made by AOpen, ALN-825, which was superceded by AON-825. I just
bought 5 AON-825's for less than $9US apiece. My 9.0 box downloads
Mandrake
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Richard Bown wrote:
My cable connection is not as good as it could be, so called out the
cable guys and to my horror, his win98 laptop downloaded faster than
this machine, My current NIC is a realtek 8139, and I always thought a
linux machine would floor a poxy winyuk
Everyones comments all noted.
Bill I can discount the HD FD bit as I've force the link between the
cable modem to FD, surfboard SB3100 and the NIC to FD but I cant get any
faster than 10MB none of the 100MB settings work.
motherboard is a K7 triton, with a 1.2 GHz duron, 500MB of ram.
I know the
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 09:45, Richard Bown wrote:
Hi all
I did send this in when the server was down so it looks like it got
lost.
My cable connection is not as good as it could be, so called out the
cable guys and to my horror, his win98 laptop downloaded faster than
this machine,
My
On September 1993 plus 3604 days Richard Bown wrote:
Hi all
I did send this in when the server was down so it looks like it got
lost.
My cable connection is not as good as it could be, so called out the
cable guys and to my horror, his win98 laptop downloaded faster than
this machine,
My
Well - it depends on the Implementation.
The 3c9x can be in a bad implementation as on the Asus A7N8X Delux Boards.
The Onboard via-rhine Lan-port is 2 times faster than the onboard 3c9x
Implementation. But I have to admit - that in long run - Intel/Tulip and 3c9x
Boards have proven to be the
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Richard Bown wrote:
Bill I can discount the HD FD bit as I've force the link between the
cable modem to FD, surfboard SB3100 and the NIC to FD but I cant get any
faster than 10MB none of the 100MB settings work.
Probably because the hardware at the cable modem end cannot
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 14:02, Vox wrote:
The only NIC worth using, IMNSHO, is Intel Etherexpress Pro
100+...if you have the inclination, a Pro+/S is a very good model
too, but the encryption on it isn't really worth unless you are
doing VPNing between boxes that all have the same NIC.
On September 1993 plus 3604 days [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 14:02, Vox wrote:
The only NIC worth using, IMNSHO, is Intel Etherexpress Pro
100+...if you have the inclination, a Pro+/S is a very good model
too, but the encryption on it isn't really worth unless you
22 matches
Mail list logo
