On Tuesday 04 March 2003 12:34 am, David E. Fox wrote:
> Well, first start your app. Note the process id (PID) by top or ps or
> other method.
>
> Start up gdb in a terminal window, and then do 'attach PID' where PID
> is the process id you wrote down in step #1.
>
> Now if the process crashes you
> Whoops (and laughing) that went over my head. Can you tell me how=
> to=20
> do whatever it is you mentioned?
Well, first start your app. Note the process id (PID) by top or ps or
other method.
Start up gdb in a terminal window, and then do 'attach PID' where PID
is the process id you wrote
David E. Fox wrote:
Having several xmms-insances running at the same time (stress the
soundcard a bit), and perform a kernel-compile:
make -j 100 bzImage
That's pretty extreme... you might void the warranty :).
I just tried that, but reduced it to a -j 20 and closed mozilla out
because I have
On Sunday 02 March 2003 07:15 pm, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
> What is your video cards temp? an over heating video card will segfault
> / crash / lockup. I had this exact problem, getting a fan for the video
> card fixed the problem.
It has a built in fan - how do I find out the cards temp?
> It co
On Sunday 02 March 2003 04:06 pm, Joerg Mertin wrote:
> Hi Ronald,
>
> I had a similar experience once with a Computer, Via-Chipset.
> Averred that the Mainboard had a problem. The issue actually was a
> combination of Network/Sound/Memory & High PCI Usage. Means - that I
> always had a segfault wh
On Sunday 02 March 2003 12:09 pm, J. Grant wrote:
> Have you tried running it in gdb ? then doing what ever you do to make
> it SIGSEGV
> I've found div-by-zero and other bugs this way.
>
> Cheers
>
> JG
Whoops (and laughing) that went over my head. Can you tell me how to
do whatever it is you m
> Having several xmms-insances running at the same time (stress the
> soundcard a bit), and perform a kernel-compile:
> make -j 100 bzImage
That's pretty extreme... you might void the warranty :).
I just tried that, but reduced it to a -j 20 and closed mozilla out
because I have 256 megs of RAM
Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Sunday 02 March 2003 08:46 am, Greg Meyer wrote:
If you are the one with the different drivers, try and isolate that by
dropping back to theirs. If it is not the drivers, it sounds like it could
also be a heat issue ie, program segfaults when things get a little warm.
W
Hi Ronald,
I had a similar experience once with a Computer, Via-Chipset.
Averred that the Mainboard had a problem. The issue actually was a
combination of Network/Sound/Memory & High PCI Usage. Means - that I
always had a segfault when these 4 things where producing together a
high-load. In the
Have you tried running it in gdb ? then doing what ever you do to make
it SIGSEGV
I've found div-by-zero and other bugs this way.
Cheers
JG
on the 02/03/03 15:23, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Sunday 02 March 2003 08:46 am, Greg Meyer wrote:
If you are the one with the different drivers, try and is
On Sunday 02 March 2003 08:46 am, Greg Meyer wrote:
> If you are the one with the different drivers, try and isolate that by
> dropping back to theirs. If it is not the drivers, it sounds like it could
> also be a heat issue ie, program segfaults when things get a little warm.
> What's the cooli
On Sunday 02 March 2003 01:58 am, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
> I don't know what's causing the segfault, but I can assure you that it is
> not the XiG-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD message. That message pops up if you're not
> using a Xi Graphics (XiG) X server. In other words, it happens to all
> XFree86 use
On Sunday 02 March 2003 01:17 am, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> Anyone else having problems with this game under v9.0? I can play it just
> -so- long then, always...it segfaults out. Whats puzzling is that this
> game, running under 9.0 on my 2 sons computers runs for hours flawlessly.
> We all use Nvidi
On Sun, 2 Mar 2003 01:17:46 -0500, "Ronald J. Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone else having problems with this game under v9.0? I can play it just -so-
>
> long then, always...it segfaults out. Whats puzzling is that this game,
> running under 9.0 on my 2 sons computers runs for hours fla
Anyone else having problems with this game under v9.0? I can play it just -so-
long then, always...it segfaults out. Whats puzzling is that this game,
running under 9.0 on my 2 sons computers runs for hours flawlessly. We all
use Nvidia Geforce cards. One is running the 4191 drivers, 2 are using
On Thursday 13 February 2003 12:53 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 February 2003 09:58 pm, Lorne wrote:
> > Ahhh crap, that complicates things. I thought I had read where they were
> > all the same. I guess just some components are the same. I'm fairly
> > certain it is hardware based,
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 09:58 pm, Lorne wrote:
> Ahhh crap, that complicates things. I thought I had read where they were
> all the same. I guess just some components are the same. I'm fairly certain
> it is hardware based, but perhaps with some tweaking of cmos or ?? you can
> get it more s
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 10:48 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 February 2003 10:04 pm, Lorne wrote:
> > I'd start by swapping out the ram from one of the others and seeing of
> > the problem follows. If not, try video card and then... well you get the
> > idea.
> >
> > :)
>
> Ram is di
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 03:42 pm, Todd Lyons wrote:
> Wild shot in the dark here.
> cd /lib
> mv i686 i686.nouse
> ldconfig
>
> Then see if it still does it (probably requires a runlevel change, maybe
> even a reboot). This will make it use the i586 optimized glibc instead
> of the i686 optim
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 10:04 pm, Lorne wrote:
> I'd start by swapping out the ram from one of the others and seeing of the
> problem follows. If not, try video card and then... well you get the idea.
> :)
Ram is different on all 3 machines
comp1 - 512 megs DDR ram (2100)
comp2 - 384 megs D
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 12:47 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 February 2003 01:31 pm, Jack Coates wrote:
> > haven't played it, but...
> >
> > three machines with same OS, same video card, same video driver, one of
> > them keeps crashing? Sounds to me like the one machine is a) the o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ronald J. Hall wrote on Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 02:57:47PM -0500 :
>
> Also, one said that it was a glibc problem, and a symbolic link was needed
> between /lib/i686/libpthread-0.9.so and /lib/libpthread.so.X? There is a file
> by the name of libpthrea
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 01:36 pm, s wrote:
> > [darklord@darkforce darklord]$ ut2003
> > Xlib: extension "XiG-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD" missing on display
> > ":0.0".
> I get that too, I don't think it's fatal.
Right. According to the readme in one of the patches, its expecting Xi
Graphics stuff
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 01:31 pm, Jack Coates wrote:
> haven't played it, but...
>
> three machines with same OS, same video card, same video driver, one of
> them keeps crashing? Sounds to me like the one machine is a) the one
> with the different video driver, or b) overheating.
Hi Jack. Tha
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 10:29 am, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> -Posted this to newbie first-
>
> Anyone else having problems with this game under v9.0? I can play
> it just -so- long then, always...it segfaults out. Whats puzzling
> is that this game, running under 9.0 on my 2 sons computers runs
>
haven't played it, but...
three machines with same OS, same video card, same video driver, one of
them keeps crashing? Sounds to me like the one machine is a) the one
with the different video driver, or b) overheating.
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 08:29, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> -Posted this to newbie fi
-Posted this to newbie first-
Anyone else having problems with this game under v9.0? I can play it just -so-
long then, always...it segfaults out. Whats puzzling is that this game,
running under 9.0 on my 2 sons computers runs for hours flawlessly. We all
use Nvidia Geforce cards. One is runnin
27 matches
Mail list logo
