Re: [expert] new reiser question

2000-07-24 Thread Sarang Lakare
> > Well, that is not always the case, as often stuff like developmental USB > drivers and such got their way into the kernel, but marked possibly > dangerous. I just think that if others can get their way into the kernel > with bugs still in them, why shouldn't Reiser? I mean I know tons of > ha

Re: [expert] new reiser question

2000-07-24 Thread Ellick Chan
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Sarang Lakare wrote: > Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 11:57:37 -0400 > From: Sarang Lakare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [expert] new reiser question > > > there is a sort of flame war going

Re: [expert] new reiser question

2000-07-24 Thread John Aldrich
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, you wrote: > > That is why ReiserFS is not an available option during install unless > you choose an expert install. It is expected that people who select > expert are exactly that: expert. > > If you don't know enough to make an informed decision (read: you have > read all

Re: [expert] new reiser question

2000-07-24 Thread Vincent Danen
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 01:23:15PM -0400, Hoyt wrote: > The MaxOS (www.maxos.com ) distro appears to use reiserfs as a default. I > have a copy on the way for a magazine review. There may be a few things in > it that Mandrake would want to take a look at. It also offers DVD support > and free ISP

Re: [expert] new reiser question

2000-07-24 Thread John Aldrich
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, you wrote: > I think I will wait until reiser is as good as ext2--- > I can't afford to experiment with the very core > of the system, but I hope it turns out to be > a good filesystem > Spamcop.net runs on ReiserFS, IIRC.

Re: [expert] new reiser question

2000-07-24 Thread Anton Graham
Submitted 24-Jul-00 by Sarang Lakare: > somethign is better than nothing dosn't work in this world.. if you have > ReiserFS, it better work... else I don't see any point in including it in > the kernel.. some distributions like LM itself gives the user the option to > install ReiserFS in beta.. so

Re: [expert] new reiser question

2000-07-24 Thread Hoyt
- Original Message - From: "Civileme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 3:49 AM Subject: Re: [expert] new reiser question > On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, you wrote: > > on 7/23/00 11:00 PM, Vincent Danen wrote: > > >

Re: [expert] new reiser question

2000-07-24 Thread Vic
01 -0700 > > From: Gavin Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [expert] new reiser question > > > > on 7/23/00 11:00 PM, Vincent Danen wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Jul 23, 2000 at

Re: [expert] new reiser question

2000-07-24 Thread Sarang Lakare
> there is a sort of flame war going on. Let's just say that Reiser and Cox > don't want to get along too well. I personally believe we need Reiserfs to > get a real edge against others, and it is annoying to apply the kernel > patch each time hoping it works... I would much rather have built-in >

Re: [expert] new reiser question

2000-07-24 Thread Ellick Chan
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, Gavin Clark wrote: > Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 23:22:01 -0700 > From: Gavin Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [expert] new reiser question > > on 7/23/00 11:00 PM, Vincent Danen wrote: >

Re: [expert] new reiser question

2000-07-24 Thread Civileme
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, you wrote: > on 7/23/00 11:00 PM, Vincent Danen wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 23, 2000 at 09:43:26PM -0500, Vic wrote: > > > >> Just wondering, > >> how does everyone who is trying out the reiser fs like it? > >> > >> Any pros cons? > > > does anyone see it replacing EXT2 as

Re: [expert] new reiser question

2000-07-23 Thread Gavin Clark
on 7/23/00 11:00 PM, Vincent Danen wrote: > On Sun, Jul 23, 2000 at 09:43:26PM -0500, Vic wrote: > >> Just wondering, >> how does everyone who is trying out the reiser fs like it? >> >> Any pros cons? does anyone see it replacing EXT2 as the default anytime soon?