Dave Lers wrote:
>
> On Sat, 26 Aug 2000, Stephen F. Bosch wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > bought a K62-500 instead.
> > > Considering the fact that I managed to totally mis-match the board and
> > > chip, it has been a remarkably wonderful processor. Winflop is unstable;
> > > Linux wo
On Sat, 26 Aug 2000, Stephen F. Bosch wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > bought a K62-500 instead.
> > Considering the fact that I managed to totally mis-match the board and
> > chip, it has been a remarkably wonderful processor. Winflop is unstable;
> > Linux won't install - but the chip never
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I was going to buy the K63-450 in February. The tech told me AMD didn't
> support the K3 because the tri-level cache was flaky and undependable IF I
> was doing equations and other mathematical computations. Based on that and
> the fact I don't know anything about a c
I was going to buy the K63-450 in February. The tech told me AMD didn't
support the K3 because the tri-level cache was flaky and undependable IF I
was doing equations and other mathematical computations. Based on that and
the fact I don't know anything about a cache, I bought a K62-500 instead.
C
On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 10:59:32PM -0400, Richard Potter wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Jean-Louis Debert wrote:
>
> > The L1 cache _always_ runs at processor speed on any processor
> > that I know of ... To do otherwise would defeat its purpose IMHO.
> > But the K6-3 also has 256K of _L2_ cache
On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Jean-Louis Debert wrote:
> The L1 cache _always_ runs at processor speed on any processor
> that I know of ... To do otherwise would defeat its purpose IMHO.
> But the K6-3 also has 256K of _L2_ cache (yep, level 2, the cache
> on the MB, if any, is level 3) running at full p
Jean-Louis Debert wrote:
>
> "Ron Johnson, Jr." wrote:
> > The K6-3 is a kissing cousin of the K6-2. The only diff is that
> > on the K6-3, the L1 cache runs at processor speed, whereas on
> > K6-2, the L1 is slower.
>
> The L1 cache _always_ runs at processor speed on any processor
> that I kn
"Ron Johnson, Jr." wrote:
> The K6-3 is a kissing cousin of the K6-2. The only diff is that
> on the K6-3, the L1 cache runs at processor speed, whereas on
> K6-2, the L1 is slower.
The L1 cache _always_ runs at processor speed on any processor
that I know of ... To do otherwise would defeat its
Vic wrote:
>
> Sorry, what is a scaled dog?
> Does it mean fast?
>
I've heard of catfish, but not dogfish...
Ron
--
+--+
| Ron Johnson, Jr.Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Jefferson, LA USA WWW : [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|
Poodles? I God nolap shark! hoppin hanky hacker!! no thanks. been
there done that never wanna do it again.
--
Mark
** =/\= No Penguins were harmed | ICQ#27816299
** <_||_> in the making of this |
** =\/
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Zaleski, Matthew (M.E.) wrote:
> Maybe he means it runs like a raped ape.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Vic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 4:22 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subj
I think it's akin to a raped ape, or shakin like a dog crappin
razor-blades. that sorta thing. get the picture? :)_
--
Mark
** =/\= No Penguins were harmed | ICQ#27816299
** <_||_> in the making of this |
*
This ain't no flame, its just a poodle.
Poodles are ok by me so you could say there
is one dog I like, hehe.
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, you wrote:
> Vic wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, what is a scaled dog?
> > Does it mean fast?
> >
> Sorry, hadn't had my 3 pots of coffee yet. That would be a
> scalded dog
Maybe he means it runs like a raped ape.
> -Original Message-
> From: Vic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 4:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [expert] AMD K7 Athelon vs. Intel PIII and Linux?
>
>
> Sorry, what is a sc
Vic wrote:
>
> Sorry, what is a scaled dog?
> Does it mean fast?
>
Sorry, hadn't had my 3 pots of coffee yet. That would be a
scalded dog and yep that thar would be fast...
Joe
BTW, I love dogs - NO FLAMEs
Sorry, what is a scaled dog?
Does it mean fast?
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, you wrote:
> Vic wrote:
> >
> > Just curious
> >
> > I use an AMD K6-3 400.
> >
> > I know this is an older slower chip, but
> > it appears to run decently with 7.0-2.
> > Is K6-3 a cousin to the Pentium or Pentium3?
> >
>
"Ron Johnson, Jr." wrote:
>
> "Joseph S. Gardner" wrote:
> >
> > Vic wrote:
> > >
> > > Just curious
> > >
> > > I use an AMD K6-3 400.
> > >
> > > I know this is an older slower chip, but
> > > it appears to run decently with 7.0-2.
> > > Is K6-3 a cousin to the Pentium or Pentium3?
> > >
> > >
"Joseph S. Gardner" wrote:
>
> Vic wrote:
> >
> > Just curious
> >
> > I use an AMD K6-3 400.
> >
> > I know this is an older slower chip, but
> > it appears to run decently with 7.0-2.
> > Is K6-3 a cousin to the Pentium or Pentium3?
> >
> > Is the Athlon a totally new architecture or
> > more r
Vic wrote:
>
> Just curious
>
> I use an AMD K6-3 400.
>
> I know this is an older slower chip, but
> it appears to run decently with 7.0-2.
> Is K6-3 a cousin to the Pentium or Pentium3?
>
> Is the Athlon a totally new architecture or
> more related to the K6-3?
>
The Athlon is a totally ne
Just curious
I use an AMD K6-3 400.
I know this is an older slower chip, but
it appears to run decently with 7.0-2.
Is K6-3 a cousin to the Pentium or Pentium3?
Is the Athlon a totally new architecture or
more related to the K6-3?
Sorry for the 1000 questions.
On Sun, 20 Aug 2000, y
I will be out of the office from August 22 through August. 27. I will have limited
opportunity to respond to email until then.
Thank you.
27;s! literally!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2000 8:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [expert] AMD K7 Athelon vs. Intel PIII and Linux?
Eric Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 08/21/2000 08:29:11 AM
Ple
James Long wrote:
> PIV -> 1.5 GHz + on a 400Mhz bus if the rumours are to be believed
That definitely sounds like vapourware to me. Intel hasn't had anything
significant to show for 18 months, so they are resorting to the same tactics
they once accused their competitors of employing.
It's
t 21, 2000 3:29 PM
Subject: RE: [expert] AMD K7 Athelon vs. Intel PIII and Linux?
> And AMD will always have the edge. Considering everything out of Intel now
> days is vaporware. They can not even get their 1Ghz to run stable w/ a
> custom chipset and mainboard.
>
> -Origi
(bcc: Lonny Selinger/SaskPower)
Subject: RE: [expert] AMD K7 Athelon vs. Intel PIII and
Linux?
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] AMD K7 Athelon vs. Intel PIII and Linux?
until the pentium IV comes out, athlon processors have the edge.
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Fox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2000 06:12
Subject: [
until the pentium IV comes out, athlon processors have the edge.
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Fox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2000 06:12
Subject: [expert] AMD K7 Athelon vs. Intel PIII and Linux?
> I'm in the market for a new machine . .
Robert Fox wrote:
>
> I'm in the market for a new machine . . . . and I am seriously considering
> the AMD chip . . . .
>
> Could anyone point me to references which show pros and cons of each with
> Linux, Windows, etc?
>
> Thanks in advance. . . .
>
> Robert Fox
My vote goes to the Athlon.
El dom, 20 ago 2000, escribiste:
> I'm in the market for a new machine . . . . and I am seriously considering
> the AMD chip . . . .
>
> Could anyone point me to references which show pros and cons of each with
> Linux, Windows, etc?
We have a cluster with Athlon @500 MHz and they are fas
I just got a AMD Duron 700 and installed Mandrake 7.1 with no major
problems. it runs fine and seems to be very stable. I upgraded the
kernel immediately to 2.2.16-9mdk, Only slight problem I had was with
the onboard sound on the motherboard (epox socketA), but the alsa
drivers took care of
Greg Stewart wrote:
>
> Don't know of any links to check, but I do know that Gateway's implemetation
> of the Athlon chip can be flaky--even under Windows98.
>
> --Greg
>
> >>> Forwarded Message <<<
> I'm in the market for a new machine . . . . and I am seriously considering
> the AMD chip . .
Hello Robert. An AMD K6-2 will have no problems. An AMD K7 Athlon Slot A(from 500mHz
to 700, I think) there will be no problems. However, if you use an AMD K7 Athlon
Thunderbird(newer athlons, 600mHz and up, I think, made for Socket A, but adaptable to
Slot A) Will have some(easily correctabl
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2000 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] AMD K7 Athelon vs. Intel PIII and Linux?
> Don't know of any links to check, but I do know that Gateway&#
Don't know of any links to check, but I do know that Gateway's implemetation
of the Athlon chip can be flaky--even under Windows98.
--Greg
>>> Forwarded Message <<<
I'm in the market for a new machine . . . . and I am seriously considering
the AMD chip . . . .
Could anyone point me to reference
34 matches
Mail list logo
