mjackson74:
> I didn't say he made 'em up, I believe he found some
> that he liked and created some mumbo jumbo about them
> like - Oh don't say it aloud, they don't have no
> meaning etc
>
So, how many 'mantras' did you get from MMY? LoL!
> > > From my experience one mantra charged by a real
: Saturday, March 16, 2013 11:02 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Dialogue - A proposal . . .
> > From my experience one mantra charged by a real Master
> > is all you need...
> >
mjackson74:
> Too bad the TM mantras came from the dime a dozen mantra
> bin in India an
> > From my experience one mantra charged by a real Master
> > is all you need...
> >
mjackson74:
> Too bad the TM mantras came from the dime a dozen mantra
> bin in India and were not given by a "real" Master - unless
> by "real" you mean that he was a human being in a physical
> body...You
rsonally I've never
encountered an unfulfilled soul who patiently stayed with his TM-mantra."
You are either the biggest liar since Marshy or you don't get out much.
From: nablusoss1008
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 11,
Beautiful.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> My tradition is Kali Sadhaka Garana. As a Sidh Tantric I can teach
> meditation and do some healings. It's more about the questions that the
> student first asks me.
>
> On 03/12/2013 08:02 AM, sound of stillness wrote:
> >
My tradition is Kali Sadhaka Garana. As a Sidh Tantric I can teach
meditation and do some healings. It's more about the questions that the
student first asks me.
On 03/12/2013 08:02 AM, sound of stillness wrote:
> Thank you Bhairitu for sharing.
>
> In a dialogue we are open to all points of vie
Thank you Bhairitu for sharing.
In a dialogue we are open to all points of view. Including being open to
having, and not identifying with any particular point of view. Although we may
favour some over others.
A dialogue is a way to cultivate the distinction between a point of view or
views an
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> On 03/11/2013 02:08 PM, nablusoss1008 wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >> Maybe because I'm interested in mantra shastra? Maybe because I wanted
> >> to learn more than what the rather limited TMO h
On 03/11/2013 02:08 PM, nablusoss1008 wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>> Maybe because I'm interested in mantra shastra? Maybe because I wanted
>> to learn more than what the rather limited TMO had to offer? Maybe
>> because I know about other paths and have frie
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> Maybe because I'm interested in mantra shastra? Maybe because I wanted
> to learn more than what the rather limited TMO had to offer? Maybe
> because I know about other paths and have friends in those paths who did
> learn more?
>
>
Maybe because I'm interested in mantra shastra? Maybe because I wanted
to learn more than what the rather limited TMO had to offer? Maybe
because I know about other paths and have friends in those paths who did
learn more?
Believe what you want to believe. It's all just an illusion anyway. :-
Why do you have to learn mantra shastra? Lots of people have gotten enlightened
and become masters without any mantra at all. That is I assume this. Because
enlightenment as an experience is only experienced by the person having it, we
can only inductively extrapolate that experience to other in
I agree 100% that TM is definitely not a full meal in terms of spirituality.
It's more of a bait-and-hook way of getting us interested in spirituality.
I'll have to say, if it weren't for TM, I would've never gone any deeper. I'd
probably be a die-hard atheist. But thanks to TM, I diverted f
As I indicate in my post TM is a dead end if you want to become a real
master. It's just a teaching for the masses. You'll never learn about
mantra shastra which is important for that. I got what I wanted and
more with one on one instruction from a real master. Serious students
should not w
You say you came to a "dead end" doing TM. What was the dead end that you came
to?
p.s. My writing experience is in multi-media. The screenplay I'm writing may
come to an iPad near you.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> On 03/10/2013 01:10 PM, sound of stillness wr
When we speak a thought, then think the same thought, wouldn't that be the
process of transcending thought?
And if so, wouldn't transcending thought be a common process, not necessarily
what we think of as meditation?
If we have a room with a table and chair in it, could "in" refer to the sp
Yep, what they [the TM researchers] don't see with their tools is the
illumination of the subtle system of the heart field whereby the jivan shakti
is resident of human being. Fred said as much in a class when he was asked the
question by a physicist about the energetics of the whole system. T
You can generate alpha waves by simple deep breathing. When I
participated in a University of Washington Study back in the 1970s, when
finished I asked if I had generated alpha and the researcher said "no,
you generated theta." Theta is preferable for deep meditative states
and even more so d
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
>
> There's something fishy about what the TM'ers are measuring.
> TM says (declares) it's alpha global coherence across the
> brain that is transcending. Yet I've watched them hook
> people up who were saying they don't experience transcending
There's something fishy about what the TM'ers are measuring. TM says
(declares) it's alpha global coherence across the brain that is transcending.
Yet I've watched them hook people up who were saying they don't experience
transcending but the researchers gloat "there, you see the alpha coheren
20 matches
Mail list logo
