[filmscanners] A moribund list

2003-09-20 Thread Frank Paris
insulting posts like this one and Bryce's. At least they're good for a hardy laugh. Whenever one of the three of you actually tries to address technical issues, I just reach for the delete key as quickly as possible, because it's almost always so stubbornly repetitious as to be worthless. Frank Paris

[filmscanners] RE: 8 bit versus 16

2003-09-17 Thread Frank Paris
you always have simple good snapshots to start with... -- Regards, Henk de Jong Austin Franklin can be dismissed as a troll. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED

[filmscanners] RE: 24bit vs more

2003-09-17 Thread Frank Paris
to tell you two apart, since you both troll so much. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate

[filmscanners] RE: Canon's new digital SLR

2003-09-17 Thread Frank Paris
. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body

[filmscanners] RE: 24bit vs more

2003-09-17 Thread Frank Paris
of fact. Fiddlesticks. You are apparently totally insensitive to the tone of your posts. At least I KNOW when I'm being insulting and childish. You don't have a clue. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe

[filmscanners] RE: 8 bit versus 16

2003-09-17 Thread Frank Paris
not believe you, I know what you're saying is wrong. Again, if someone here really wanted to shut me up about this, then provide an image What a troll. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL

[filmscanners] RE: 24bit vs more

2003-09-17 Thread Frank Paris
dozen or so people who didn't capitalize the S and made posts here, are you going to call them on it as well? But they don't need being picked on. You do. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe by mail

[filmscanners] RE: 8 bit versus 16

2003-09-16 Thread Frank Paris
Count me also to the 16 bit/channel club :-) Yup, it does not cost me anything more than working with 8bits but a bit of storage for those images that I archive for future editing. So why risk loosing information. Arguing for 8bits is just plain silly. Silly is one word, sophistry is

[filmscanners] RE: 24bit vs more

2003-09-16 Thread Frank Paris
VueScan produces much better scans than Polacolor Insight. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest

[filmscanners] RE: 24bit vs more

2003-09-16 Thread Frank Paris
. I hardly ever use anything else but brightness. So maybe the SS4000 is exempt from your dismissal of scanners that aren't all that good. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL

[filmscanners] RE: Vuescan vs Insight: what is better about Vuescan? (was 24 bit vs more)

2003-09-16 Thread Frank Paris
the differences are in our workflow or our scanner model, or both? Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest

[filmscanners] RE: 8 bit versus 16

2003-09-13 Thread Frank Paris
Bert, I'm with you. These guys must be smoking dope besides having poor color discrimination. This exchange is hilarious. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Logan Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 2

[filmscanners] RE: 8 bit versus 16

2003-09-13 Thread Frank Paris
! Mr. Pontification! Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body

[filmscanners] RE: Kodak High Definition Film

2003-09-03 Thread Frank Paris
As for the 400 UC question, I have shot about 8 rolls of landscapes and the SS4000-scanned skies are very clean (free of noise). Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nagaraj, Ramesh Sent: Wednesday, September

[filmscanners] RE: New Fuji Films

2003-08-14 Thread Frank Paris
sure Miss Elizabeth Bennett would say once again, I'm all astonishment. Frank Paris wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 11:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [filmscanners] Re: New

[filmscanners] RE: New Fuji Films

2003-08-14 Thread Frank Paris
reds are a bit too green, and greens are a bit too red, don't you? I find that I have to add red and subtract blue. Is that the same thing? I'm too senile to figure it out. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED

[filmscanners] RE: keeping the 16bit scans

2003-04-01 Thread Frank Paris
addressed. They were so off the mark they didn't even merit a reply, especially the one that depended on your distaste for audiophiles. Totally ad hominem. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe by mail

[filmscanners] RE: HD failure [was RE: keeping the 16bitscans}

2003-04-01 Thread Frank Paris
(read: this is how we keep costs down, by limiting our liability to warranty replacements). #3 is your answer, as I pointed out a week ago. It's just an effort to cut costs. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED

[filmscanners] RE: HD failure [was RE: keeping the 16bit scans}

2003-04-01 Thread Frank Paris
distribution. Who would want one that lasted even 10 years, let alone 100? Ten years ago, drives were 200 Mbytes. Who would be using such hard disks today, even if they were immortal? Some software installations are bigger than that. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED

[filmscanners] RE: Scanning for laser printing

2003-03-28 Thread Frank Paris
of my knowledge only dye sub printers are. To the best of my knowledge, digital photoprinters are also continuous tone. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED

[filmscanners] RE: Unsubscribe

2003-02-03 Thread Frank Paris
Try sending mail directly to Tony Sleep: [EMAIL PROTECTED] You're only supposed to do this as a last resort. If he doesn't answer, he must be incognito at the present time. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf

[filmscanners] RE: Accessories for Sprintscan SS4000

2003-01-25 Thread Frank Paris
I got three slide holders for the SS4000 directly from Polaroid. Only took them three months to deliver! After I ordered them, I experimented with using superglue to glue a broken spring back on and it worked beyond my expectations. It seemed stronger than when it was brand new! -Original

[filmscanners] RE: [filmscanners_Digest] filmscannersDigestforFri17 Jan, 2003

2003-01-20 Thread Frank Paris
Hmmm, thanks for the tip. I suppose I'll find out for myself soon enough, but does this filter soften the image much? For people pictures a little softening might be okay, but I'm a stickler that my landscapes stay sharp, and that's what I do most. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original

[filmscanners] RE: [filmscanners_Digest] filmscanners DigestforFri 17 Jan, 2003

2003-01-19 Thread Frank Paris
automatic spot removal. I try to avoid working with negatives altogether. Sometimes slides are the same way, but less often. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED

[filmscanners] Life is so hard.

2003-01-19 Thread Frank Paris
To vic [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steven Kefford [EMAIL PROTECTED], Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED], Arthur Entlich [EMAIL PROTECTED], Austin Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] and others: Will you e-mail program not allow you to change the subject when you reply to an e-mail? Do you think that retaining

[filmscanners] RE: Re:Re: digital artifacting

2003-01-15 Thread Frank Paris
at 4000 dpi, and I've had it up to here with the workflow, and have been eagerly watching the progress of digital SLRs. I can't WAIT until I can get away from this scanning business! But it looks like with my budget, it's at least two to three years away, and I ain't getting any younger. Frank Paris

RE: filmscanners: (anti)compression?

2001-08-06 Thread Frank Paris
Zip is not lossy. Otherwise you couldn't pack up software packages. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jim Snyder Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 7:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: filmscanners

filmscanners: Photoprinters is not off topic

2001-03-31 Thread Frank Paris
No, that obviously has nothing to do with it, because this list produces hundreds of posts about other Epson printers which is actually not surprising at all since hearing about good photo printers is of interest to just about anyone doing filmscanning. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

RE: filmscanners: Printdpi

2001-03-30 Thread Frank Paris
on this list? Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gordon Tassi Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 9:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: filmscanners: Printdpi

RE: filmscanners: File format

2001-03-29 Thread Frank Paris
inspection couldn't detect any degradation. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Laurie Solomon Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 8:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: filmscanners: Adobe Elements

2001-03-28 Thread Frank Paris
They add up how many jelly beans they get from each platform, and guess who wins hands down? Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Raymond Carles Sent

RE: filmscanners: OT-ish Epson 1270, was Repro house..

2001-03-27 Thread Frank Paris
With 50 messages still in my queue from filmscanners, I'm sure someone has already answered this, but just in case not: A3: 297x420 mm (11.7"x16.5") A4: 210x297 mm Super A3/Super B: 329x483 mm (13"x19") Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com

RE: filmscanners: scanning/photoshop workstation (long)

2001-03-26 Thread Frank Paris
lots of processes, perhaps at the expense of display response. This is heresay from my system administrator, however. Haven't actually read anything authoritative about it and so can't vouch for it. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message

RE: filmscanners: VueScan, Insight, Epson (David H.) take note)

2001-03-24 Thread Frank Paris
and keep clean. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Sleep Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 6:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: filmscanners: VueScan

RE: filmscanners: 72 dpi

2001-03-24 Thread Frank Paris
As I pointed out before, I am running my Cornerstone p1700 at 116 dpi. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bob Shomler Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 10:14 AM

RE: filmscanners: OT: Screen resolution of filmscanner list members

2001-03-24 Thread Frank Paris
I just added one data point at 1856x1392, if all it takes is to access the page. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Henry Richardson Sent: Saturday, March 24

RE: filmscanners: Sorting OT mail

2001-03-23 Thread Frank Paris
I don't believe that's true. Like Tony says, the man has to take a break every now and then. All this talking behind his back and speaking for him is in extremely bad taste. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: filmscanners: VueScan, Insight, Epson (David H.) take note)

2001-03-23 Thread Frank Paris
I on the other hand find that VueScan produces much better results than Insight 5.0 with virtually no twiddling at all. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bud

RE: filmscanners: I Apologize

2001-03-22 Thread Frank Paris
Yes, please don't apologize because some creep spews forth obscenities and makes idle threats to the whole group. Sheesh! Why bow down to the likes of that THING! Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: filmscanners: OT more copyright questions

2001-03-22 Thread Frank Paris
Oh, well. At least this is good for a laugh. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dicky Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 1:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject

RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution

2001-03-20 Thread Frank Paris
The title of the control is "Contrast (gamma)" Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 7:46 AM

RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution

2001-03-19 Thread Frank Paris
the monitor's gamma? Yes, but not numerically. It is a WYSISYG control. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684

RE: filmscanners: cleaning neg's, sharpening

2001-03-18 Thread Frank Paris
is a logarithmic ratio. Acid rain for example has a pH of less than 4 (10 to 100 times more acidic than what you're talking about). Is 5.5 really dangerous to film? Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684

RE: filmscanners: Gold star for polaroid!

2001-03-16 Thread Frank Paris
I'm just curious. Could you give us a rough estimate of how many scans you put through your 4000 before this problem started to develop? I'm guessing I've put 400 or 500 slides through mine, so far working flawlessly. Of course I realize that's not very many. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

filmscanners: dust in the SS4000

2001-03-16 Thread Frank Paris
two metal cutouts? What is it's purpose? What I'm looking has so much dust on it that it couldn't possibly have anything to do with forming images, because my images are brilliant and sharp. I guess I better order that brush. I don't use any dust cover. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

RE: filmscanners: Re: GeForce2 MX Graphics Card

2001-03-14 Thread Frank Paris
; That also is false. There is indeed an interface for setting a separate display resolution. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684

RE: filmscanners: Independent Resolution on Dual Monitor Win2K

2001-03-14 Thread Frank Paris
that the problem was with W2K. The problem was with the drivers. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684

RE: filmscanners: Re: GeForce2 MX Graphics Card

2001-03-14 Thread Frank Paris
fact because I have those drivers on my system. But why should you think I know what I'm talking about anymore than my friend and co-worker? You're whistlin' Dixie. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684

RE: filmscanners: Trying to Calibrate Monitors to Match

2001-03-13 Thread Frank Paris
with a monitor/printer combination that remains to this day (about three months later) a very good match. My printer is the Epson 2000p, monitor Cornerstone p1700. Both seem to be extremely stable, as they continue to track each other. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u

RE: filmscanners: RE: Photo quality printers: Hewlett-Packard vs. Epson

2001-03-12 Thread Frank Paris
head. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Software City Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 9:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: filmscanners: RE: Photo

RE: filmscanners: Vuescan: Incrementing TIFF file names

2001-03-12 Thread Frank Paris
It increments the number each time you do a new scan, whether it's the same image or not. You can chance the starting filename to anything you want, e.g. xy023. The first file will be xy023, the second xy024, etc. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684

RE: filmscanners: Vuescan: Incrementing TIFF file names

2001-03-12 Thread Frank Paris
Never noticed that. It must be there by default. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 8:48 PM To: [EMAIL

RE: filmscanners: OT: anyone else sick of this? [was Re: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like W98SE?]

2001-03-11 Thread Frank Paris
I'm not flaming. Linux may be ten times better than Windows 2000 in a thousand different ways. But it doesn't have critical mass and will never take over the mainstream. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: filmscanners: OT: anyone else sick of this? [was Re: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like W98SE?]

2001-03-11 Thread Frank Paris
It's only temporary, I'm sure. Hang in there. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ray Amos Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 7:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like W98SE?

2001-03-11 Thread Frank Paris
for all I care. This has been my own personal experience developing on it with all kinds of system software that would crash the system if it possibly could but it doesn't. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684

RE: OT, in fact *way* off-topic Re: filmscanners: Puzzled about..

2001-03-10 Thread Frank Paris
t help you there. That's something I don't know anything about, even though I seem to spend half my free time doing it. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684

RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution

2001-03-10 Thread Frank Paris
. I know what your government has done to some of the canyons in B.C.: logged out all the timber, then scraped the bottom down to bare granite for all the minerals. Those valleys won't recover for thousands of years. Of course we do the same thing. Maybe we even taught you how. Frank Paris [EMAIL

RE: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like W98SE?

2001-03-10 Thread Frank Paris
the idea that consumers would be willing to pay $300 for their operating system. That's not in their plans. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684

RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution

2001-03-10 Thread Frank Paris
as the resolution of monitors continues to increase. I suspect that the base class for their tool windows will become even more complex as they try to adjust for different classes of users, judging from their screen resolution and selected font size. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com

RE: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like W98SE?

2001-03-10 Thread Frank Paris
that is robust right down to the core. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684

RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution

2001-03-10 Thread Frank Paris
automatically. You have to go out of your way to stop it. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684

RE: filmscanners: OT (was: Anyone using Win2K? )

2001-03-10 Thread Frank Paris
developers, Art's "Genius Companies." They are gnats on the horizon. If they show the slightest sign of being a threat, they are bought out and either thrown into a black hole or encorporated into the existing product lines. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/A

RE: filmscanners: RE: Photo quality printers: Hewlett-Packard vs. Epson

2001-03-10 Thread Frank Paris
HP printer is from a previous generation. The HP has also worked flawlessly and is a great general purpose printer. The Epson is a dedicated photo printer. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mai

RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution

2001-03-09 Thread Frank Paris
of its way to fail when the font size changes. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684

RE: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like W98SE?

2001-03-09 Thread Frank Paris
performance and responsiveness, which is where using Windows 2000 will pay off using Photoshop. WinMe runs fine for me and doesn't crash at all. I'm basically trying to let someone convince me why 2000 is better than WinMe, but I may not be "professional" enough to understand.

RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution

2001-03-09 Thread Frank Paris
how much to reduce an incoming image when it displays it for the first time. It makes it as large as it can without requiring scroll bars (while still using an integral divisor when it decimates). Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684

RE: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like W98SE?

2001-03-09 Thread Frank Paris
Ever since FAT32 came out, I've given up on NTFS for all but drives that need the extra security. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of shAf Sent: Friday, March

filmscanners: new Matrox 450 drivers for dual monitors at different res work

2001-03-09 Thread Frank Paris
. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684

RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution

2001-03-08 Thread Frank Paris
technical or technological change. It's actually a term of derision, although I wasn't actually deriding Art, just trying to prod him a little. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684

RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution

2001-03-08 Thread Frank Paris
are not widely appreciated, but should be easily understood by members of the filmscanner list since we're all up on resolution, etc. But remember my caveat: don't push your monitor to the point where lines start looking fuzzy, because then you're exceeding the capability of your hardware. Fra

RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution

2001-03-08 Thread Frank Paris
lieve me, it's worth digging around to solve all these problems to run at the resolution your monitor is optimized for, which apparently (from all the email being generated by this subject) is considerably higher than what most people are using. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoi

RE: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like W98SE?

2001-03-08 Thread Frank Paris
It's way more than an upgrade to NT. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Laurie Solomon Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 12:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution

2001-03-08 Thread Frank Paris
They don't increase in size when you set the font larger? Normal dialogs do. These are tool dialogs and if they don't resize with the font increase, I'd complain to Bill Gates. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From

RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution

2001-03-08 Thread Frank Paris
Perfect! I should do that. I even have a 17" Hitachi monitor that is going to waste in the garage. Too lazy to clean off the desk and make room for it! Actually, I'd probably have to buy another house to find the room to put the stuff on my desk to make room for the second monitor! Frank

RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution

2001-03-08 Thread Frank Paris
Funny guy... Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Austin Franklin Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 4:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: filmscanners

RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution

2001-03-08 Thread Frank Paris
and 1856x1392. I don't understand why this isn't a no-brainer. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684

RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution

2001-03-08 Thread Frank Paris
by the color purity of the phosphors as well as by the achievable contrast that's for sure, and they seem to have been improving over the years. I can only say that from experience, not from anything I've heard about being measured. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u

RE: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Idea

2001-03-07 Thread Frank Paris
The tabs will still fit. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Henk de Jong Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 12:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re

RE: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Idea/min res for VS

2001-03-07 Thread Frank Paris
at 640x480? In any case, this whole discussion of min res is moot, since I don't think any of the changes being proposed would overflow an 800x600 screen. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto

RE: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Idea

2001-03-07 Thread Frank Paris
Nope. I was dead serious, and obviously totally deluded. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shough, Dean Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 8:12 AM

RE: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2k? Does is manage color like W98SE?

2001-03-07 Thread Frank Paris
That was just a figure of speech. Obviously there are many things about the two systems that are absolutely identical. In areas of performance in large hardware configurations and in reliability, aspects of particular interest to filmscanners, 2000 has it all over 98. Frank Paris [EMAIL

RE: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Idea

2001-03-07 Thread Frank Paris
Then it's a good thing that no one, including myself, is proposing an interface that would require anything higher than 640X480. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution

2001-03-07 Thread Frank Paris
I think Austin Franklin's beef is in using the word resolution to name the pixel dimensions of the display. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of shAf Sent

RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution

2001-03-07 Thread Frank Paris
Try Matrox's latest, the 450, for $150. It has two video outputs build in. One you can run one at 1600x1200, the other up to 2048x1536. Takes only one slot. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution

2001-03-07 Thread Frank Paris
All of that can be handled, since you can specify large icons, etc. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 Lastly, even if my video card and monitor can produce 1600 x 1200 pixel screen, I'd be unlikely to use it that way, due to the way it would

RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution

2001-03-07 Thread Frank Paris
l analysis that doesn't amount to a hill of beans without actually checking it out. There was no indication in the review that they even tried it. Personally, I can vouch for it. The 450 AND the 400. For 2D stuff. Who cares about 3D? Not filmscanners qua filmscanners. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTE

RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution

2001-03-07 Thread Frank Paris
alog boxes, everything, scales automatically. Everything will take on a sheen that you won't believe. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684

RE: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Idea

2001-03-06 Thread Frank Paris
There's no particular reason to have two groups of tabs. This is completely nonstandard. All tabs should be on the same property sheet. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: filmscanners: RE: Win2k and application RAM

2001-03-06 Thread Frank Paris
Well, that's not how it does its memory management. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Geraghty Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 2:40 PM To: [EMAIL

RE: filmscanners: RE: Win2k and application RAM

2001-03-06 Thread Frank Paris
Used to be that NT gave 2G to the OS and 2G to the application. Don't know what Win 2K does. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Finley Sent: Tuesday

RE: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Idea

2001-03-06 Thread Frank Paris
e who over the last 15 years have derived the standard. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of shAf Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 7:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] S

RE: filmscanners: Kodak Color Input Targets

2001-03-06 Thread Frank Paris
I worked very hard at getting my monitor and printer calibrated so that I could judge fairly accurately what the print is going to look like from what it looks like on the monitor. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From

RE: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Idea

2001-03-06 Thread Frank Paris
tab controls, but this is a very thorny problem for programmers, not easily kicked out in a weekend. The Microsoft SDK doesn't support it directly, and I've seldom seen it implemented (I've done it, and know how difficult it is). Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList

RE: filmscanners: pc monitors

2001-03-03 Thread Frank Paris
them and tell them that your monitor is on a blink. Then at your leisure, you can pack up and ship the bum unit to them. And this is a five year warranty. 'Nuff said. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [m

RE: filmscanners: OT but interesting - Interview with Jay Maisel

2001-03-03 Thread Frank Paris
Excellent! His website is better than he lets on. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Larry Berman Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 8:37 AM To: [EMAIL

RE: filmscanners: Vuescan vs Silverfast control

2001-03-03 Thread Frank Paris
. On most images, I require very little adjustement in PS to get outstanding results, and so my throughput is excellent. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joel

RE: filmscanners: VueScan 6.7.5 Available

2001-03-03 Thread Frank Paris
It probably said 837kb. If so, then, as I explained in a previous post, those are exactly the same numbers. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Atherton

RE: filmscanners: pc monitors

2001-03-03 Thread Frank Paris
, but it was noticeable booting back and forth on my dual boot system. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Laurie Solomon Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 12:56 PM

RE: filmscanners: VueScan 6.7.5 Available

2001-03-02 Thread Frank Paris
1kb = 1024. 857,211 / 1kb = 837.12 kb. End of story. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of IronWorks Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 5:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: filmscanners: dither vs haltoning nitpicking

2001-03-01 Thread Frank Paris
"screen area" is entirely off the wall and foreign to what the words mean in common speech. Microsoft doesn't even follow its own interface standards as specified in "The User Experience". Don't get me started. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684

  1   2   3   >