This might sound tongue-in-cheek, but have you considered setting up a
script in Photoshop (or GraphicConverter if you use a Mac) to rotate your
photos? I don't know of any setting in the scanner or in the scanner
software. I think that you can see that, yes, I have experienced it.
A
W Shumaker
You take a plastic card--eg, a xerox machine card or a hotel entry key
card--and you cut it to the right length and tape it in place. When in
Mexico, I used a wooden coffee stirrer. Very low tech, and you can have
different cards for slides of different thicknesses.
I would post an image, but
I am having very good luck scanning old Kodachrome (not sure if 64 or 25)
35mm slides with a Nikon 4000. I have to work to recover the color, but
Vuescan does 50% of the work for me. Some of the slides have a funny
surface--probably lacquer that has aged--and the IR does a good job of
removing it.
I've scanned 3,000 slides on my LS4000ED. I don't know if that is a lot
or a few. Almost all with the auto slide feeder. No problems (knock on wood).
A
[EMAIL PROTECTED] at Thu, 5 Feb 2004 00:13:25 + said:
As to the question about Nikon scanner reliablity. My LS4000 failed at 13
months, one
[From a lurker on this list]
Well, I think so. Two simple examples--one from film per se, one from
scanning.
Last year I tested some film on a 4x5, comparing Velvia to Astia. Photos
were on the coast, mid afternoon, clear skies but high humidity, hence
the light was a little blue. The difference
Re: dust covers
Go to a fabric store and get a plastic sewing machine cover for $5. I
bought one that fits my SS4000 pretty tightly and have never had a dust
problem.
- Original Message -
From: david.gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:34
I had exactly the same experience. I found that using the target
transparency that came with my copy of 5.5 (included with my SS4000) to
generate an ICC profile gave 8-bit scans that were very close to the
original. When I tried high-bit scans I was entirely unable to wrench them
to quality as
Tony
I hate to fill up lists about important things (like film scanning) with
off-topic issues (like spam), but I also hate to see spamcop unfairly
tarnished.
I use spamcop to filter my email, and I get very few false positives. (I
have a few friends who use aol, which comes and goes from the
every time.
Alan
- Original Message -
From: Austin Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 10:30 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: 8 bit versus 16
Hi Art,
...and that's even concluding that the scanner is really
capturing the full 16 bit
And I think Vuescan is the cat's meow.
Can we have a three-week, 80-e-mail, discussion of whether you are right
or I am? Can I write long diatribes on the difference between the cat's
whiskers and the cat's meow? Please?
Sorry, cat got my tongue. I'll just lick my fur.
A
--
Alan Harper
[EMAIL
disks that don't
wake properly. Apple System Profiler will tell you what kind of hard disk
you have.
A
--
Alan Harper
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 6:03 PM 7/13/02, Julian Vrieslander said:
I have seen three instances of VS freezing in OS X. The spinning disk
cursor is displayed, and the application
There is another gotcha for OS X that I have found for some USB
scanners, and may exist for Firewire scanners. If you are running OS 9
(Classic), the drivers there can interfere with VueScan communicating
with the scanner. Depending on I don't know what, sometimes you have to
reboot if you let OS
far as I can see.
My own solution is to have kept the Help file from Vuescan
7.2.2, on my 'Start Menu' next to 'Vuescan 7.5.5'. This
contains almost everything I need to refer to, and a bit of
intelligence enables me to guess the answer for current
versions.
Regards
Alan T
- Original
Is this a recent issue with Vuescan? In the past I scanned my film as RAW files, then
went to disk mode, pointed vuescan to the first batch file. Scan0001.raw then told it
to scan frames 1 to 36. In about 30 minutes I had 36 finished files.
Alan
But: I discovered that there is no mean
Paint Shop Pro 7 has a facility called print multiple
images that does most of what you require, but you'd have
to create the captions as separate images using PSP7's text
tool.
- Original Message -
From: Ian Boag [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001
as everything else.
Regards,
Alan Tyson
- Original Message -
From: Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:05 AM
I've heard that too, although I don't understand what
difference it makes
when the dyes are added!
(but I can see that it does
I'm a Freeserve user, yet I've had these messages. I spotted
the offending virus-containing message as dodgy and deleted
it immediately on arrival.
Regards,
Alan T
- Original Message -
From: Steve Greenbank [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 1:13
or to do
large numbers of images.
Regards good luck,
Alan Tyson
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 12:12 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Quick / Quality Scans - Help
Have Polaroid .
..shoot kids ice hockey each
I ran your 577kb SCAN into 7.1.16 and came up with a gorgeous photo without tweaking
anything out of the normal.
Generic Color Negative
Gamma 1.3
White point .05
black point .1
Auto Levels
If you want to email a couple of other scans you are having trouble with, be happy to
work them over.
Here's a dumb question: Polacolar Insight has a
button to pick which frame in the filmstrip or slide holder you want to scan,
but I can't figure out how to do the same thing in Silverfast, so I can only
scan negs or slides in the first frame. Can anyone help?
Thanks.
Alan
are.
Alan T
- Original Message -
From:
peter.phipp
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 8:43
PM
Subject: filmscanners: FW: DIGITAL CAMERA
SCANS
Has anybody any results from using a high quality digital
camera in a slide copier to make an instant
that will impress less critical
friends and relations when hung over the fireplace and
viewed from several metres away, you can go much bigger than
A3 (at least A2) with 2700 ppi and still have satisfied
customers.
Regards, good luck, and have lots of fun,
Alan T
- Original Message -
From: Alex
.
alan
What type of adjustment in gamma and the white point % do you suggest
for
mimicing the effect of Brightness from Vuescan 7.1.16?
Adjust gamma downwards to decrease brightness, and upwards
to increase brightness.
Regards,
Ed Hamrick
Epson Inkjet Printer FAQ
experiment with it at the same time to observe the effects
of the controls.
Alan T
- Original Message -
From: Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Film Scanner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 12:25 AM
Subject: filmscanners: VueScan tutorial?
Sorry if this is a repeat question
if you don't like the result. This
was easier in the olden days when many of the controls were
on a single screen alongside the preview. However, I've now
got used to the big preview the tabs, and do much more
twiddling in Vuescan before going elsewhere.
Regards,
Alan T
- Original Message
Julian,
as is with most things that vuescan does, there is a setting for the BUFFER on one of
the tabs, crop on the right hand side of the controls. Vuescan defaults to 2.0, I
move mine up to 5%.
alan
I think Ed would make it much more user friendly if the exposure algorithm
? Does it function? Does it show under
imaging devices in the device manager?
alan
When i turn on the scanner, go to /my computer/propeties/device manager
and refresh the device list computer freeze-up and only reacts on on
reset button. First, i fought that problems with logic structure
film during drying.
Regards,
Alan T
- Original Message -
From: Roger Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 9:33 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Emulsion flaws (was dust in SS4000)
under my microscope and cranked up the magnification to
400x
What part of the instructions do you find confusing?
I find the instructions very confusing.
What type of scene are you trying to scan? Different scenes with dominate colors can
require different settings within vuescan. I've almost always had trouble with grass
scenes myself.
My
.
BTW, after suffering a processor's lost film mixup, I also
photograph another frame from the computer screen showing my
name address (and a bit of Ed Hamrick's Vueprint test
chart).
Regards,
Alan T
- Original Message -
From: Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
David Lewiston [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote on Sun, 16 Sep 2001
13:57:58 -1000
...buy an enema bulb. I've used one for years (only for my
negs and
tranies you understand) and don't have a dust problem.
Alan T says
Last time David L suggested this, I tried hard to buy one
from many
cold, so we shouldn't overdo any single squirt. This is easy
for me because I'm too mean to buy another can very often.
Alan T
- Original Message -
From: Bill Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 2:46 AM
Subject: Re
has the yellow stain issue been figured out yet on some Scanwits?
alan
Epson Inkjet Printer FAQ: http://welcome.to/epson-inkjet
I took a look at the engine, if you don't use descriptive names you won't be indexed
in a usable manner. No on at google is doing to look at image0001.jpg files and
decide that was a cake and note it in the index.
alan
Harvey writes:
The possibility of losses is scary,
What sort
someone else, without understanding it very well.
Regards,
Alan T
- Original Message -
From: Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 11:46 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: RE:
filmscanners: VueScan Problem
Ed wrote:
VueScan
I have a SS4000 and am getting exquisitely sharp and detailed scans that
print well to 13x19 on my Epson 1270. How can I say this simply? To avoid
dust, just take care of your transparencies! I use a dust removal brush
before scanning and then the rubber stamp tool to take care of the few
. You and he are the folk who're really at the
sharp end of practical modern photography.
Alan T
- Original Message -
From: Ian Boag [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 1:08 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: film vs. digital cameras -
wedding/commercial
of Win98,
but I don't think that's anything to do with it.
Regards,
Alan T
- Original Message -
From: Alan Womack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Majordomo leben.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:45 AM
Subject: re: filmscanners: re: filmscanners: Vuescan
Windows 98SE updated
.
alan
Preferably switch the scanner on before you switch on the PC, or you'll
have to do a refresh in Device Manager before any software can see it.
Rob
Epson Inkjet Printer FAQ: http://welcome.to/epson-inkjet
drivers.
alan
Alan wrote:
Vuescan no longer requires me to have the device show in
the device manager before vuescan finds it, I think it
might even cause windows to put it in the device manager.
On my machine, yes indeed it does cause windows to put the
scanner
Windows 98SE updated to the nines
an adaptec 2902E which uses the actual 2902E drivers, not the 7800 family windows
wants to use.
All I have to due is turn on my scanners and start vuescan, they all show up!
alan
Alan..
I just tried starting my Microtek 4000T w/o re-booting or re
Normally I set my buffer to 5% because I always use maximum crop and later crop in PS.
I'll bet it is sitting at 2% since I loaded 7.1.7
alan
Have you set the Crop and Buffer such that you are sure VueScan is
looking at actual picture content (and not frame edges or sprocket
holes
Is there an archive of the messages on this list, or a FAQ somewhere?
TIA
Alan Rew
Make sure you have your scanner on BEFORE you start vuescan, it does a scsi bus scan
on startup.
alan
I just downloaded a trial version of vuescan and cant get it to work -
presumably it should work without uninstalling nikonscan ?
Thanks
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Alan Eckert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 1:20 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Slightly OT -- Apple Studio Monitor
Brightness
Yes, so you'd think. But the manual is entirely innocent of any
instructions on adjusting
fragile, or if the
CanoScan APS adaptor is problematical in this respect?
I really don't know where to go from here - I suppose could get a
replacement adaptor from Canon, but I'd still be reluctant to scan these
films if there was a generic problem.
Any help would be welcome.
TIA
Alan Rew
Folks on this list and elsewhere have stressed the
importance of an accurate monitor profile, so on the advice of several reliable
sources, including Ian Lyons, I've ordered ColorVision's Photocal Spyder.
Problem is (and this crops up in Adobe Gamma, too), the instructions tell you to
but not charge quite as much? BTW, I'm using PS 6.0 on a G4
Mac.
Alan
I cannot say I do use PS Auto Levels often. Will go off and try it quickly to see.
On the last couple of photos that I adjusted the white point up .05 for the blue
component, auto levels in Photoshop doesn't work out too well. Makes the colors even
more off, took the blue out though!
Alan
Sometime back Ed mentioned there was a SCSI command that causes an extra 20% exposure
on the scanwit and he enables it always.
Alan
I don't think VS controls exposure time on Scanwits directly - they have
an
autoexposure system with no manual control. However, I agree it appears
It's curious most of you are doing less modifying in PS from recent scans, I had been
doing little PS modifying, but have had to make the substantial curves adjustment
lately in PS to bring blue down 20-30 points and red up 5-10 points.
I roll I was working on of beach pictures I changed the
I am always typing faster than I am thinking.
I am scanning almost all negs, the latest roll is Kodak Royal 400. I did play with
various film base settings, some have distinctly different casts than others, but non
I played with were better than generic. Ed has explained this tries to
point from specific image locations. If this is there
somewhere in PSP, please could someone tell me where to find
it?
3. The superior PS5LE dithering of full screen images, which
gives a much more pleasing look, better representative of
what a print will look like.
Regards,
Alan T
When I've tried multiscanning on my 2720S, I've found it
hard to detect any degradation. Misalignment is of the order
of one 2700 ppi pixel on mine, or less, so it wouldn't
bother most
people. I can see it might mess up star locations.
Regards,
Alan T
- Original Message -
From: Herm
this make sense?
Alan T
- Original Message -
From: Frank Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 1:24 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Silverfast and LS1000
Actually scanning the same image twice is not exactly the
same as multipass
scanning in Vuescan - I
always been
difficult to print. The mistake occurred at the moment the
button was pressed, not when the scanner was bought.
Regards,
Alan T
- Original Message -
From: Frank Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Filmscanners@Halftone. Co. Uk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jerry Oostrom [EMAIL PROTECTED
My 7.1.3 has a seperate control for Image Brightness and Gamma. Image brightness will
affect the blacks of the image, Gamma not so much.
I often leave Black to .01 or so which results in the black edge of negs or slide
masks going close to 0, I almost always go with Maximum and do any
digital archiving rearchiving as
we can be bothered with.
Regards to all,
Alan T.
- Original Message -
From: Laurie Solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 8:31 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Film base deterioration (was
Digital Shortcomings)
Well, honestly I almost returned the scanner for defective because when I got mine I
didn't squeeze hard enough either! Tech support was clueless..
alan
What a great suggestion! The center snaps on the negative carrier don't
snap cleanly/crisply like the end snap and sometimes
have to understand its
limitations.
Regards,
Alan T
- Original Message -
From: Frank Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 6:25 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: ACER Scanwit 2720S problem
What a great suggestion! The center snaps on the
negative
bleached
out during processing.
It is thus inherently easier in the latter processes to use
permanent dyes; the colour chemists have fewer constraints
because they don't have to meet the requirements of
developer chemistry as well as everything else.
Regards,
Alan Tyson
- Original Message
I've never had this happen, only two thoughts come to mind. The clips on the film
carrier are not CLIPPED tightly, double squeeze them to make sure.
Defective. Check the film strip holders and if those are tight, exchange it!
alan
Hi,
I just got an ACER Scanwit 2720s last week and I
Yes, unless you are using a custom profile the native Epson driver does indeed expect
you to be in sRGB.
Alan
AFAIK this is normal. The gamuts of the colour spaces are
different. But it leads me to wonder - if some of the
problems I've had with colour matching between the screen
Has anyone gotten an answer from Acer on this yet? My one year warranty expired
before I realized I had a problem with the scanner and not the negative itself. :)
Alan
Epson Inkjet Printer FAQ: http://welcome.to/epson-inkjet
that the computer can't keep up. It doesn't affect the results.
So, I'm therefore worried that Win98SE's more rigorous checking of things
has slowed things down, altered memory management, etc, so that my old stable
setup is lost forever.
Any ideas, anyone?
Alan T
- Original Message -
From
on the side of the negative continues. I will have to try a kodak
neg next as this was with Fuji 100.
Alan
I just checked a frame with the problem in Miraphoto 2.0 and it exhibits
the
same yellow/brown cast down the right hand side on this sky negative. A
difference
.
I just checked a frame with the problem in Miraphoto 2.0 and it exhibits the same
yellow/brown cast down the right hand side on this sky negative. A difference of up
to 12 points blue.
Alan
could be some kind of reflection from my slide- and filmholder so they
promised me
this negative on a CS-!V with it's
better shadow ability. I can send a CD to have the scan written to in RAW format from
VueScan.
Thanks
Alan
ps I'm in the States
at:
http://www.targets.coloraid.de
Alan
numbered. VueScan also was an excellent autolevels. I use it
almost exclusively on my Scanwit 2720.
There will also be the time for the scanner to focus, although 675 dpi may make this a
moot point.
alan
The best price I've seen so far for the Acer Scanwit 2740S in the US is
$485
http
*contained* within that directory. I for
one would deplore any moves on Ed's part to complicate this
excellent and simple way of working. (He's a clever chap, in
case you hadn't noticed.)
Regards,
Alan T
- Original Message -
From: cjcronin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Rob:
have you tired increase the buffer %? Maybe double it do Vuescan ignores #% of the
image from the border to make sure it doesn't pick up the black film edge.
Alan
Vuescan appears to move the whole crop box sometimes when dragging one
side.
This makes getting the outline right
.
I'll see if I can extract a patch on disk from the UK
distributors, because a 10MB download 'patch' is
ridiculous - obviously it's a whole new program. I've
successfully upgraded PSP several times in the past using
very quick easy patches.
Regards,
Alan T
- Original Message -
From
the print!
Alan T
- Original Message -
From: Arthur Entlich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 9:45 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Cleaning slides
profiling the IT-8 and then taking a RAW scan from VueScan
through this profile and then back into VueScan might produce a more consistant image?
Although Ed does use his own conversion from a Q60 scan..
Wild ass scheme?
alan
as Mira Photo is weak.
Grain aliasing is a problem with all the 2700 dpi scanners, the 2900 _might_ be a
little better. 4000 dpi don't seem to suffer much. This is the single biggest issue
with the Scanwit, the optics are very sharp.
Alan
am new to the filmscanner world, so please bear
My take on the choice would be how much of your image is out of the gamut of
the output device? A gamut warning inside Adobe RGB would be meaningless
right?
So do you convert each to the printer space by two different methods and see
which is better via printing or ??
When reprofiling,
at slightly different values and
observe the difference.
alan
I can! I'm experimenting with many different ways to help with
grain-aliasing on neg's on my Acer 2720, and de-focussing can
help.. Because the Acer does not have manual focus, I have to trick it by
using a dummy frame
to experiment
with the scanning exposure to get tone in the most desired
details.
Regards,
Alan T
- Original Message -
From: Shough, Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 1:56 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: AcerScanwit but also generic
calibration
the maths of jpeg compression
care to comment and suggest reasons for the discrepancy,
please?
Or maybe Henk's and my results need repeating, like cold
fusion and life on Mars?
Alan T
- Original Message -
From: Hugo Gvert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 12:44
there
is no problem,
Alan T says:
This may be the same problem we discussed in February. Here
is an extract from that discussion.
Alan T:
PSP7 will not read the compressed 48-bit tif files from
Vuescan, saying "a predictor of 2 is only supported on
LZW
compression for 8 and 24 bit i
save
routine, because each has its own scale and criteria for
'jpeg quality'.
Regards,
Alan T
- Original Message -
From: Lynn Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: File format
, because then
the jpegging couldn't repeat itself exactly. I haven't tried
that experiment yet because I can't think of a standardised
small
bit of editing to do each time. Any suggestions?
Regards,
Alan T
- Original Message -
From: Laurie Solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
'generic'
setting (Kodak Gold 400 Gen 5) .
Regards,
Alan T
- Original Message -
From: Laurie Solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 10:50 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Neg film for scanning
In all probability it could just as well be Konica film -
also from Germany.
hey're due to post-handling of the negs
(enprinting bagging).
Since our last discussion, has anyone here been using Kodak
Supra 400, and scanning it? Does the extra hardening work as
scratch protection?
Regards,
Alan T
, so I can sit in my bathchair in future looking at my
holiday snaps analogue home videotapes.
I'm not optimistic about my children being able in future to
derive the same pleasure from my efforts that I get from my
parents' BW snapshots from my own childhood.
Regards,
Alan T
- Original
at's worth
considerably less than nothing as it stands.
Thanks for the suggestions, anyway. An internet 'wanted' ad
is perhaps one route I'll explore.
Alan T
- Original Message -
From: Richard N. Moyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 3:42 PM
Subject: Re: fi
on the list, especially those
that make a living at this sort of thing.
alan
Khalid said:
2-What file Format should I use to save?
Arthur said:
TIFF or any other you think you will be able to read years
from now,
which is lossless. That precludes JPEG
Alan T says:
Arthur,
Khalid didn't give us any clues on just how perfect an
archive of his negs he wants
/s C:\files.txt". This puts a nice
directory listing of the CD into "C:\files.txt", amazingly
(under Win98) including long filenames, and it'll load
beautifully into Excel or Word so that you can search it, or
even add columns to tell you what the image files were.
Regards,
Alan T
- Origi
able to convert to that profile and archive it(?).
Not _convert to that profile_, I think, because the data starts out
that way, doesn't it? Rather, just embed that profile, right?
--Alan
?
Either way a subtle box outline would help seperate these controls perceptually.
The Zoom is a great thing.
alan
OK, now I've gone all the way to 1600x1200, but I find my
Photoshop palettes, and the font used in them, have gotten
rather tiny. I don't see an obvious way to fix this.
Can you help?
Thanks,
Alan
selection tool', with judicious
tweaking of the histograms for the selected bits of image.
Any helpful suggestions for better methods (other than 'buy
a more expensive scanner') would be very welcome here as
well.
Regards,
Alan T
Original Message -
From: Lynn Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Rob Geraghty wrote:
Alan wrote:
I agree that the dialog box would be a good thing, but I do
have to point out that directory creation already happens,
and automatically, if you enter a pathname into the raw,
TIFF, or JPEG file name fields!
Which is nice, but less foolproof than
At this rate you should have support for the LS-16000 in a week or so!
Oh, yeah: :-)
the raw data, once you've got it.
So if you're into subtleties like accurate calibration, you
may need to spend more money than you would on the Scanwit,
to get more control over the scanner.
Good luck,
Alan T
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL
on one screen at the same time. This
meant driving the scanner and twiddling its output was
analogous to a simplified NASA control centre with knobs
dials, rather than a TV remote control.
Regards,
Alan T
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday
or control tabs on the left and display
tabs on the
right??
Yes, but I'd get a headache, and have to visit my
optician/optometrist more often.
Regards,
Alan T
difference..:)
alan
I have a Scanwit 2720s, with which I am well pleased. It's
much the best budget scanner, by all accounts.
However, even with Ed Hamrick's Vuescan (a nearly essential
$40 accessory for most scanners) you can exert only limited
control over its initial output. You'll
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
