Hello,
I have exchanged a few emails with Mac Support about speed problems in
FinMac 2004.
My complaints have to do with the miserable hesitation when editing
SmartShapes or when editing using Special Tools.
Their suggestion was that I turn off auto smart word extensions in lyrics,
turn off
Since our listserve is a LINUX beastie the new link is an attempt to
disable whitemail.
It's an experiment whose operation monitoring I ask members of the
list to provide. Offlist reports to yours truly will be read with
interest and shared with the IT person who formulates the list;-)
--
To David Froom and all,
Yes, I'm finding Fin 2004 to be dreadfully slow in OS X 10.3. Enough
that if I had I deadline, I would probably work in
OS 9 and 2003 for the time being. I've decided to switch to simple
entry from speedy entry which I used in previous versions.
I really like the
Edit menu.
By the way, I found 'auto smart word extensions' and turned that off.
Where should I look for auto spacing and auto update?
Best regards,
John Hinchey
Nashville, TN
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If it's any help, I find iKey to be much faster than Quickeys. There
are some things it can't do though, for example iKeys can't hit the
stop button on the playback controls while finale is playing, Quickeys
can.
iKeys costs $20.
steve
On Mar 9, 2004, at 12:57 PM, John Hinchey wrote:
To
I find the latest 2004 Windows update to be considerably slower in one
area - Human Playback. It takes quite a long time to compile the entire
file every time, even after a very minor change to the file.
Raymond Horton
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL
On 09.03.2004 20:28 Uhr, Raymond Horton wrote
I find the latest 2004 Windows update to be considerably slower in one
area - Human Playback. It takes quite a long time to compile the entire
file every time, even after a very minor change to the file.
How can it be slower than before, there
I just upgraded my Mac G4 to OSX, and am having trouble using internal
playback when running FinMac 2003 in Classic mode (external playback
through my MIDI interface/synthesizer works perfectly). For internal
speakers, when I hit play, I get a faint sound AND, more distressingly,
no rhythmic
Steve,
Great tip about iKey! You're right, it's *much* faster than QuicKeys,
and only a fraction of the price. I would encourage anyone who's using
OS X and hasn't yet reprogrammed all of their shortcuts in QuicKeys
(which you will have to do -- QuicKeys X won't import your OS 9
shortcuts)
Yes, I can verify this, and it looks like a bug to me, too.
Liudas
- Original Message -
From: Lee Actor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Finale News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 10:05 PM
Subject: [Finale] Accidental positioning
Has anyone else noticed this change in
Hi gang,
I just thought I'd follow up the paper thread and let you know what I
found.
Mohawk makes an acid-free, natural white, smooth finish paper that
comes pre-cut in 12.375 x 18.125 sheets. It's called Mohawk
Superfine Softwhite Smooth and it comes in a variety of weights -- I
got the
On 09.03.2004 20:54 Uhr, Johannes Gebauer wrote
On 09.03.2004 20:28 Uhr, Raymond Horton wrote
I find the latest 2004 Windows update to be considerably slower in one
area - Human Playback. It takes quite a long time to compile the entire
file every time, even after a very minor change to
It works differently in the update that came out a few days ago.
RH
- Original Message -
From: Johannes Gebauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Finale 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Finale] WinFin 2004 speed issues
On 09.03.2004 20:28 Uhr, Raymond Horton
There was human playback in the original release of WinFin2004, as well
as in 2004a. I got the impression by latest Windows update he meant 2004b.
David H. Bailey
Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 09.03.2004 20:28 Uhr, Raymond Horton wrote
I find the latest 2004 Windows update to be considerably
Hi Darcy-
do you mind telling us what the paper shipping costs were?
you're gonna be busy with that trimmer, man! go to your local
newspaper and ask them to cut it down- smile real big and they'll do it for
free a few bucks under the table to the boss and they'll shrink-wrap
it, too
On 09 Mar 2004, at 06:12 PM, Cecil Rigby wrote:
Hi Darcy-
do you mind telling us what the paper shipping costs were?
I can't remember the exact amount, and it hasn't showed up on my credit
card statement yet. The paper was something like $80 for 2000 sheets,
which I think is probably on the
Well, that beats Hammermill's Accent Opaque 70# for sure. But I lose a good
bit of weight (39 pounds!) because here it's only available in 23x35 and I
have it cut to 11x17.
Too bad you don't live in a little town like mine where people wanna do
favors. sheesh! I've *never* paid for cutting,
On Tuesday, March 9, 2004, at 04:08 PM, Cecil Rigby wrote:
I've been looking for a replacement printer for masters and will check
out
this Ricoh based on what you've said
thanks!
Refer to a recent thread for AP2610/AP2610N issues. It's not in
production anymore, but you can find some
Hi Cecil,
Weyerhaueser makes a nice acid-free natural white70# paper in 11x17 --
Cougar Opaque digital. I'm sure that would be less expensive than
having 23x35 paper cut down.
The Ricoh AP2610 has been discontinued, but you might be able to still
find one on eBay (which is where I got
Cecil Rigby wrote about his favorite paper stock:
here it's only available in 23x35 and I have it cut to 11x17.
shouldn't lose too much, though; you should be able to get 2000 sheets
of 11 x 17 from one ream of 23 x 35
I've *never* paid for cutting, and only ten bucks for wrapping!
some
On Mar 9, 2004, at 8:48 AM, David Froom wrote:
Who knew being smart also means being slow?
Anyone with experience on old, speed-challenged computers. Any feature
that is constantly updating on the fly is going to slow down the
program.
mdl
___
Hey guys,
I wanna thank Steve G. again for mentioning iKey -- it's *fantastic*.
Words cannot describe. I've been using it for just a couple of hours
already and I've already found a whole ton of stuff that it does better
than QuicKeys. In addition to being much faster and much cheaper, it's
Hi, I'm relatively new to Finale and this list. I've found both helpful.
I have an issue regarding getting chords to display intelligently. I'm in
the key of F, here's what is happening.
Gmaj7 F/G Gbmaj7 Bmaj7 is what Finale will do. I want to force Cbmaj7.
Later in the same tune;
Cmaj7 B7 Em
Hi Neal,
Turn off Simplify Spelling in the Chord menu.
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn NY
On 10 Mar 2004, at 12:42 AM, Neal Schermerhorn wrote:
Hi, I'm relatively new to Finale and this list. I've found both
helpful.
I have an issue regarding getting chords to display
24 matches
Mail list logo
