RE: [Finale] JW Space systems

2004-03-13 Thread Brad Beyenhof
er go in to 98, but PostScript stuff works better from there. -- Brad Beyenhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David H. Bailey > Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2004 3:13 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > S

Re: [Finale] JW Space systems

2004-03-13 Thread David H. Bailey
Upgrade to WinXP if anything, but if this is the only problem you are having with Win98, hold on until you get a new machine built around the specs of WinXP. David H. Bailey Brad Beyenhof wrote: On Friday, March 12, 2004, at 03:16 PM, Barbara Touburg wrote: Should I consider updrading to W

Re: [Finale] JW Space systems

2004-03-12 Thread Brad Beyenhof
On Friday, March 12, 2004, at 03:16 PM, Barbara Touburg wrote: Should I consider updrading to Win2000? Or to WinME? WHATEVER you do, DON'T "upgrade" to WinME. -- Brad Beyenhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu

Re: [Finale] JW Space systems

2004-03-12 Thread Barbara Touburg
Thanks to everyone who tried to help me. It looks like it's a Win98SE problem and I'll have to do the vertical spacing by hand. Next questions would be: are there any other Win98SE users who experience the same chrash with JW Space Systems? Should I consider updrading to Win2000? Or to WinME? Or

Re: [Finale] JW Space systems

2004-03-12 Thread Michael Good
While linking didn't change for Windows plug-ins with Finale 2004, many data structures changed from Finale 2003 to 2004. So it's quite possible for a plug-in that worked on 2003 to not work on 2004 if it hasn't been updated. It really depends on what the plug-in is doing and how it's doing it. I d

RE: [Finale] JW Space systems

2004-03-12 Thread Lee Actor
> > To return to Barbara's original posting, though, I just ran > through several > of Jari's plugins on Win2000 and Fin2004b with no problem, > including Forza > (once I set my clock back to 2003). So whatever problems Barbara's having > might be related to something specific to Win98. > > Aaron.

Re: [Finale] JW Space systems

2004-03-12 Thread Barbara Touburg
Would you be willing to try out the JW's on a couple of my files on your Win2000 system to see if that makes any difference? Aaron Sherber wrote: To return to Barbara's original posting, though, I just ran through several of Jari's plugins on Win2000 and Fin2004b with no problem, including For

Re: [Finale] JW Space systems

2004-03-12 Thread Robert Patterson
Unlike MacFin, the linkage for WinFin plugins did not change. Anyone who has visited my download site will have noticed that there are two downloads for MacFin whereas there is only one for WinFin. Aaron Sherber wrote: To return to Barbara's original posting, though, I just ran through several

Re: [Finale] JW Space systems

2004-03-12 Thread Aaron Sherber
To return to Barbara's original posting, though, I just ran through several of Jari's plugins on Win2000 and Fin2004b with no problem, including Forza (once I set my clock back to 2003). So whatever problems Barbara's having might be related to something specific to Win98. Aaron. _

Re: [Finale] JW Space systems

2004-03-12 Thread Robert Patterson
The linkage for plugins changed for FinMac2004. Plugins for MacFin2003 and earlier will not work with MacFin2004 even in OS9. This is not an OS issue. It was a change in how MacFin talks to plugins. -- Robert Patterson http://RobertGPatterson.com ___

Re: [Finale] JW Space systems

2004-03-12 Thread Barbara Touburg
Brad Beyenhof wrote: However, if all you need is JW Space Systems, you can use Page Layout > Space Systems Evenly... to do most of the same things. Yes, I know, I've already been doing that, sort of. But I have about 60 songs, kind of hymns I guess, and at least that much to come... Sigh... T

Re: [Finale] JW Space systems

2004-03-12 Thread Barbara Touburg
d. collins wrote: I use JW Space Systems every days with Finale 2004 (a then b), never had a problem. Did you try it on different files? Yes, I just tried to run it on a new file based on the 2004b default document and it crashed, and so did the Tempo one (if I remember correctly). I really

Re: [Finale] JW Space systems

2004-03-12 Thread Barbara Touburg
Ah, now I've been found out :-) d. collins wrote: Darcy James Argue écrit: Mac version, Dennis. Finale 2004 only exists (so far) for OS X, and the old plugins don't work in OS X. ?? Barbara, who posted the original message in the thread, seems to be using Windows (User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (

Re: [Finale] JW Space systems

2004-03-12 Thread Darcy James Argue
On 12 Mar 2004, at 04:09 AM, d. collins wrote: Darcy James Argue écrit: Mac version, Dennis. Finale 2004 only exists (so far) for OS X, and the old plugins don't work in OS X. ?? Barbara, who posted the original message in the thread, seems to be using Windows (User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows;

Re: [Finale] JW Space systems

2004-03-12 Thread Darcy James Argue
On 12 Mar 2004, at 03:48 AM, d. collins wrote: Barbara Touburg écrit: Hurray! Today Finale 2004 finally arrived. Great program, lots of new things to try out. But: after I've finished my current project though. So I opened one of the files I'm currently working on, tried to run JW Space Systems,

Re: [Finale] JW Space systems

2004-03-11 Thread Darcy James Argue
On 12 Mar 2004, at 02:32 AM, Johannes Gebauer wrote: I doubt it. For two reasons: I don't think carbonized apps even open in classic, at least some don't We've been over this already. I expect that when Finale 2004 for OS 9 is released, it will be as a separate application from Finale 2004 for

Re: [Finale] JW Space systems

2004-03-11 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 12.03.2004 1:11 Uhr, Darcy James Argue wrote > I would assume Jari's been really busy. I did email him, encouraging > him to update his plugins for FinMac2004 and mentioning that I think > lots of us would gladly pay for them if he decides he needs to start > charging for the plugin set. Perh

Re: [Finale] JW Space systems

2004-03-11 Thread Darcy James Argue
But the JW plugins *aren't* Carbonized. There is no problem running any of the JW plugins in Classic mode for Finale 2002 or 2003. Presumably, when Finale 2004 for OS 9 is released, we will be able to run it in Classic and the non-Carbonized plugins will run just fine. Or did you mean you hav

Re: [Finale] JW Space systems

2004-03-11 Thread Brad Beyenhof
On Thursday, March 11, 2004, at 04:11 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote: In the meanwhile, when Fin2004 for OS 9 is finally released, we ought to be able to open Fin2004 files in Classic and run the existing JW plugins -- right? I doubt it. I have tried to run Carbonized programs from Classic, but i

Re: [Finale] JW Space systems

2004-03-11 Thread Darcy James Argue
I would assume Jari's been really busy. I did email him, encouraging him to update his plugins for FinMac2004 and mentioning that I think lots of us would gladly pay for them if he decides he needs to start charging for the plugin set. Perhaps if he's abandoned them, he would be willing to se

Re: [Finale] JW Space systems

2004-03-11 Thread Aaron Sherber
At 06:34 PM 3/11/2004, Barbara Touburg wrote: >So I opened one of the files I'm currently working on, tried to run JW >Space Systems, which I depend heavily on for this project, and Finale >went into a loop.  Oh, that's really bad news. I'd already been bracing myself for working without Forza, s

Re: [Finale] JW Space systems

2004-03-11 Thread Brad Beyenhof
On Thursday, March 11, 2004, at 03:34 PM, Barbara Touburg wrote: Hurray! Today Finale 2004 finally arrived. Great program, lots of new things to try out. But: after I've finished my current project though. So I opened one of the files I'm currently working on, tried to run JW Space Systems, whic

[Finale] JW Space systems

2004-03-11 Thread Barbara Touburg
Hurray! Today Finale 2004 finally arrived. Great program, lots of new things to try out. But: after I've finished my current project though. So I opened one of the files I'm currently working on, tried to run JW Space Systems, which I depend heavily on for this project, and Finale went into a lo