David Fenton:
say you have five quintuplet
8th-notes and three triplet quarter-notes in a 4/4 bar. Why not have
two of the quintuplet 8th-notes, then one of the triplet
quarter-notes, then another quintuplet 8th-note, and so on? ...
Is this doable in Finale?
Set up a 15:16 16th-n
At 8:19 PM +0100 3/24/04, Daniel Wolf wrote:
However, if we want the "delayed tuplet notation", or a metre in
which denominator is anything other than a power-of-two, then we are
probably limited to Score or Music Press, programs that are
essentially for graphics, or using Finale as a graphics p
At 3:04 PM -0500 3/25/04, Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 25 Mar 2004, at 02:55 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote: (replying to a
message that he himself wrote!
Ever get the feeling that you're just talking to yourself? 8-)
Christopher
___
Finale mailing list
[E
On 25 Mar 2004, at 03:22 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 25 Mar 2004 at 14:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for being monstrously thick, but I don't understand the problem
here and I have obviously not understood the initial description of
what the writer is trying to do.
My understanding of the
On 25 Mar 2004 at 14:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sorry for being monstrously thick, but I don't understand the problem
> here and I have obviously not understood the initial description of
> what the writer is trying to do.
>
> My understanding of the problem can be solved by using layers and
On 25 Mar 2004, at 02:55 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
Also, I think you might not have to use the 12/8, that nested triplets
might have worked just as well. But like I said, I found it easier to
work out in 12/8.
Actually, once I thought about it a little further, the nested triplet
solution w
Sorry for being monstrously thick, but I don't understand the problem here and I have obviously not understood the initial description of what the writer is trying to do.
My understanding of the problem can be solved by using layers and simply moving the notes to the left or right using the cursor
On 25 Mar 2004, at 02:32 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
One way might be to change the time signature to 12/8 (but "display as
4/4"), which would (I think) allow you to enter the three notes of the
"big tuplet" at the appropriate rhythmic points without having to use
tuplets at all.
Wait, no, I
Finale's user interface does not allow de-grouping tuplets. However, a plugin possibly
could set up isolated tuplet notes. The problem is that the U.I. does not accept
fractional values for the "in the time of" field. For example, to set up an isolated
triplet 8th, you would have to assign a tup
On 24 Mar 2004 at 20:19, Daniel Wolf wrote:
> The other rhythmic convention that would be useful to overcome in a
> notation program with playback is the strong bar line aspect of
> Finale. I would like to have, on the one hand, vertically aligned
> measures but independent metres and playback (a
On 25 Mar 2004, at 01:41 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
What about this example he gives:
For the record, here’s what I used to be able to do in Encore
that I
can’t in Sibelius: Henry Cowell, in his masterful 1930 book New
Musical Resources, suggested that “tuplets,” as they’re now ca
This is an old complaint of Morton Feldman's about notation programs --
that they won't do "delayed duplets", where the tuplet is divided in two
or more parts, and the parts are separated from one another by some
rhythmic unit. For example: 2/3 of a triplet in 8ths + a quarter note
+ the rem
What about this example he gives:
For the record, heres what I used to be able to do in Encore that I
cant in Sibelius: Henry Cowell, in his masterful 1930 book New
Musical Resources, suggested that tuplets, as theyre now called
in computerese (and we needed a word for tha
13 matches
Mail list logo
