I have changed the order of two staves in a multi-stave work by dragging the
stave and then using sort and respace while in scroll view. The staves are
as I want them in scroll view, but when I go to page view, the staves are in
the original order. When I try dragging and respacing the staves
Michael,
reoptimizing should help.
Best wishes for 2006
to all on this marvellous list
Raimund Lintzen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
I have changed the order of two staves in a multi-stave work by dragging the
stave and then using sort and respace while in scroll view. The staves are
as I
Hi all,
A couple of days ago, a few of us were complaining that Finale 2006b
wanted us to download an update, even though it looks like we already
have the latest version.
I submitted a support request about this, and the response was:
There was an updated 2006b updater posted, which is
Does this affect Mac users as well?
Martin
On Jan 3, 2006, at 11:31 AM, Aaron Sherber wrote:
Hi all,
A couple of days ago, a few of us were complaining that Finale 2006b
wanted us to download an update, even though it looks like we already
have the latest version.
I submitted a support
At 11:53 AM 1/3/2006, Martin Banner wrote:
Does this affect Mac users as well?
As I quoted in my earlier post:
Note: The Windows version of Finale 2006b was updated on December 21
to include an updated AIOLIB file.
Apparently the Mac version is not affected.
Aaron.
Apologies if this has already been covered.
I finally took the plunge and updated to winFin 2006 and have spent an hour
or so playing with the Garritan feature.
However, in applying it to existing orchestral files, only the first 8
channels are playing, the others are silent.
Am I doing
Hi Lawrence,Are you loading the instruments in the correct slots 1 - 8, 17 - 24, etc.?Have you tweaked the mod wheel on the Native Instruments editor as you load each instrument?Please check Darcy's excellent tutorial. Taking a few minutes to go through it thoroughly will save time in the long
Hi, Lawrence --
Your problem/queryis precisely the
substance of a posting I sent the list about a week ago; unfortunately I
received no replies. However, over the weekend I did find
Darcy's absolutely great GPO playback tutorial; it's the first link found at
this page:
Hi, Aaron --
Yeah, this is not really great behavior on the
part of MM. I got the autoreminder upon opening yesterday and was
about to ignore it when I decided to check MM and saw the really fine print
regarding this being the UPDATED 2006b UPDATE - a NEW version of 2006b
as of December
In the Taking care of #1 mode, is the Mac version involved in the
update update issue?
On Jan 3, 2006, at 8:31 AM, Aaron Sherber wrote:
Hi all,
A couple of days ago, a few of us were complaining that Finale
2006b wanted us to download an update, even though it looks like we
already
it's Finale 2006c, anyway, I'm just updating...
Kurt
At 21:10 03.01.2006, you wrote:
In the Taking care of #1 mode, is the Mac version involved in the
update update issue?
On Jan 3, 2006, at 8:31 AM, Aaron Sherber wrote:
Hi all,
A couple of days ago, a few of us were complaining that
Thank you, the tutorial is terrific and no doubt I'll be using it a lot -
thanks for the pointer.
Just one question though, am I being picky in thinking that maybe it should
have been in the box with my CD?
Thanks again,
Lawrence
"þaes
ofereode - þisses swa
I finally got a reply from MakeMusic tech support, and the case is that
the original 2006b updater contained an incorrect file, so there was a
NEW 2006b updater posted, and that is why my computer didn't think that
even though I have 2006b it isn't the most recent 2006b.
If that isn't total
I finally got a reply from MakeMusic tech support, and the case is
that the original 2006b updater contained an incorrect file, so
there was a NEW 2006b updater posted, and that is why my computer
didn't think that even though I have 2006b it isn't the most recent
2006b.
If that isn't total
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you, the tutorial is terrific and no doubt I'll be using it a lot
- thanks for the pointer.
Just one question though, am I being picky in thinking that maybe it
should have been in the box with my CD?
What, you expect a software manufacturer to actually
Now it IS listed as Finale2006C! Go figure!
David H. Bailey
Martin Banner wrote:
Does this affect Mac users as well?
Martin
On Jan 3, 2006, at 11:31 AM, Aaron Sherber wrote:
Hi all,
A couple of days ago, a few of us were complaining that Finale 2006b
wanted us to download an
Randolph Peters wrote:
I finally got a reply from MakeMusic tech support, and the case is
that the original 2006b updater contained an incorrect file, so there
was a NEW 2006b updater posted, and that is why my computer didn't
think that even though I have 2006b it isn't the most recent
Hi David --
To answer your question, absolutely this update
should have had some discrete name. But then, it should
havenotcontained an incorrect file to begin
with.
How much y'all wanna bet there
willnow be some sort of tardy announcement from MM to Win users to
alert us all to this
I'm sorry to trouble you again with another question which I know was
raised earlier this week but which I cannot find in my archives.
In the instruction manual it shows the option to save special as either wav
or mp3
I am only offered wav.
Am I doing something wrong again? I have already
2006c for mac up on versiontracker.com
-A
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
-Randolph Peters said "It's all moot anyway. Finale 2006c was just
posted."Unbelievable. I
just 'checked for updates' and found that 2006C is indeed a brand-new update -
and not merely a rename of the 'improved' second version of 2006B which I
downloaded and installed only last night. This
Ok ... so, is 2006c different from 2006b, and if so, how and, if
so, is 2000c for both PC and Mac?
Dean
On Jan 3, 2006, at 4:41 PM, Adriel wrote:
2006c for mac up on versiontracker.com
-A
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
At 07:59 PM 1/3/2006, Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
Ok ... so, is 2006c different from 2006b, and if so, how and, if
so, is 2000c for both PC and Mac?
Dean, with all due respect, the web page with information on updates
is easily accessible, and the URL has been posted in this thread at
least
You could duplicate the score, delete the choral parts, and reduce
from there. Then, copy into the other file.
I've found, though, that it takes too much editing from the plug-in to
make a good, playable piano reduction, so I do them by hand.
I would move the SATB on top of all instruments in
On 3 Jan 2006 at 15:30, Mariposa Symphony Orchestra wrote:
David Fenton wrote:
Secondly, since the fix was Windows-only, if it had been named 2006c,
then the latest updates for Mac and Windows would end up with
different numbers, which would be a nightmare for end users as well as
for
I have been plugging away at a project over the holidays to arrange a
piece for 4 string parts as an organ piece. It's worked out quite
well.
In the process of trying to prepare a MIDI file to produce an MP3
demo, because it's for organ, one of the things I really needed to do
was double
In the transpose dialogue box check preserve original notes. Then
transpose by an octave and you'll get the old and the new pitches.
-Carolyn
On 1/3/06, David W. Fenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been plugging away at a project over the holidays to arrange a
piece for 4 string parts as
On 1/3/06, David W. Fenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there some simple way to do this with some of the tools Finale
provides? I ended up putting the octaves by hand, which was pretty
tedious.
Yes... just use the Transpose function from Mass Edit, and check
Preserve Original Notes. This will
Couldn't you use the (octave) transpose function in mass edit, and check the "preserve original notes" checkbox?Le 06-01-03 à 21:13, David W. Fenton a écrit : Yes, I could copy to another staff, transpose, then copy back to the original staff in a different layer, but what I really wanted was to
Ultimately all that really matters is did they fix the data deletion issue
(among other bugs but, that's a biggie).
-A
From: dhbailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: finale@shsu.edu
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 19:11:11 -0500
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] Automatic check for updates
On 3 Jan 2006 at 18:22, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
On 1/3/06, David W. Fenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there some simple way to do this with some of the tools Finale
provides? I ended up putting the octaves by hand, which was pretty
tedious.
Yes... just use the Transpose function from
On 3 Jan 2006 at 18:20, Carolyn Bremer wrote:
In the transpose dialogue box check preserve original notes. Then
transpose by an octave and you'll get the old and the new pitches.
How counterintuitive is that? It never would have occurred to me to
notice that.
--
David W. Fenton
RTFM
In the transpose dialogue box check preserve original notes. Then
transpose by an octave and you'll get the old and the new pitches.
How counterintuitive is that? It never would have occurred to me to
notice that.
___
Finale mailing list
33 matches
Mail list logo
