On 4 Jun 2006 at 17:25, Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
> David Fenton suggested
> that I use the Maestro symbol 174/39 for the dagger symbol, which
> really looks great.
>
> The only issue I'm having is when I need symbol this UNDER notes, such
> as middle "C," the symbol doesn't get placed *under* the
David Fenton suggested
that I use the Maestro symbol 174/39 for the dagger symbol, which really looks great.
The only issue I'm having is when I need symbol this UNDER notes, such as middle "C,"
the symbol doesn't get placed *under* the note. I looked at the edit dialogue box, and despite several
On 4 Jun 2006 at 14:32, Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
> Would anyone have a suggestion for the "dagger" symbol (typically a
> long line drawn over a note in 18th century manuscripts)? I've been
> using symbol #50 (the beveled triangle symbols), but I think it's too
> small when printed and it looks very
what i did was change the names from lower to upper case and that does it.
thank you very much, now i can go back to breathing again - my face was
already turning from a deep blue to an ugly violet... :-[
gr
dhbailey wrote:
Godofredo Romero wrote:
i am trying to make audio files from a seri
Godofredo Romero wrote:
i am trying to make audio files from a series of parts and score and get
the following message " could not create the audio file (the file may be
in use by another application).¿?
what am i doing wrong, aside from trying to walk and breathe at the same
time?
The target
Would anyone have a suggestion for the "dagger" symbol (typically a long line drawn over a note in 18th century manuscripts)?
I've been using symbol #50 (the beveled triangle symbols),
but I think it's too small when printed and it looks very similiar to a staccato symbol.
And it's just too small.
i am trying to make audio files from a series of parts and score and get
the following message " could not create the audio file (the file may be
in use by another application).¿?
what am i doing wrong, aside from trying to walk and breathe at the same
time?
gr
___
Don Hart wrote:
It hasn't, and apparently won't any time soon, according to mac support. I
suggested MM provide a comprehensive list of such things to them a while
back and was told there were too many things to possibly list them all.
*Someone* has to have that information, don't they? Don't
It hasn't, and apparently won't any time soon, according to mac support. I
suggested MM provide a comprehensive list of such things to them a while
back and was told there were too many things to possibly list them all.
*Someone* has to have that information, don't they? Don't most programs
incl
Christopher Smith wrote:
On Jun 4, 2006, at 6:59 AM, dhbailey wrote:
You need to go to the OPTIONS menu and select Show Active Layer Only.
The windows shortcut for doing this is ctrl-shift-s -- this is a
toggle to switch between showing active layer only and showing all
layers.
D'OH!
Wa
On Jun 4, 2006, at 6:59 AM, dhbailey wrote:
You need to go to the OPTIONS menu and select Show Active Layer Only.
The windows shortcut for doing this is ctrl-shift-s -- this is a
toggle to switch between showing active layer only and showing all
layers.
D'OH!
Way to rub it in!
Christoph
Jonathan Smith wrote:
While I'm on a rant, which clever Trevor decided to pop in the "Items
to copy" dialogue EVERY time I want to mass mover copy something.
(Someone, please tell me there is way out of this annoyance, maybe
hidden deep in a program options menu that has a double sub dialogue
Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
Thanks to David Fenton for posting that link.
I had read that New York Time's essay earlier this week, great reading.
And judging from a comment Mr. Heyman makes, it looks like China is
going to be the major consumer of classical music, in the near future.
Which is am
Steve Currington wrote:
Hi.
I am a relatively new Finale User and to be honest have not read the manual
cover to cover. I also find that locating some info can be hard in the manual.
Anyway my question
Is there any way that one can copy a part - say Violin 1 in layer 1
And paste in as the se
Actually, cmd-opt-` (the Fin2005 shortcut) *is* reserved by OS X.Cmd-E is a lot easier to reach than cmd-opt-` anyway. I'm glad they made the change, even if I sometimes go for the wrong combo when I forget which version of Finale I'm in. But anyway, if you use QuicKeys or iKey, you can make it wha
Close, but used to be cmd ~. Maybe on non-US keyboard maps it was cmd <. Christopher Are you sure? It was cmd-opt~ on my kbds (French and U.K. layout) with 2005. It was even something else way back many versions before, but my patience has worn too thin to bother finding it. This key stroke was n
On 04 Jun 2006, at 3:11 AM, Jonathan Smith wrote:While I'm on a rant, which clever Trevor decided to pop in the "Items to copy" dialogue EVERY time I want to mass mover copy something. (Someone, please tell me there is way out of this annoyance, maybe hidden deep in a program options menu that has
Why, oh why is page/scroll view now allocated in 2006 to control E?!! Surely a logical choice would have been 'E'nharmonic spelling. Toggling from scroll to page view has been wired to Ctrl-E as long as I've been using Finale. Perhaps this is a change to on the Mac side to bring it into harmon
While I'm on a rant, which clever Trevor decided to pop in the "Items to copy" dialogue EVERY time I want to mass mover copy something. (Someone, please tell me there is way out of this annoyance, maybe hidden deep in a program options menu that has a double sub dialogue that they have altered 4 t
19 matches
Mail list logo
