On 10.10.2007 Darcy James Argue wrote:
I assume you would hide the left "barline" for the new system in this case
(it's a work for piano), but what about clef, key signature and time signature -- do I
show or do I hide?
When I have done this, I have not hidden a left barline (unless it was a
Ray Horton wrote:
Since I got my computer running again, I'm not getting much mail on the
three lists with which I keep up. Has mail here been particularly light?
Yeah -- sometimes no news is good news, but in Finale2008's case, no
news (as in "no interim big-fix release") is bad news.
A
Darcy James Argue / 07.10.10 / 1:34 AM wrote:
>Pardon my ignorance, but I've never had to do this before -- when it
>is necessary to split a single measure across two systems (because
>the composer added too damn many notes to fit into a single system),
>what elements do you show on the the
I've just reviewed most of the posts dealing with Finale '08, and --
following what appears to be a consensus around here -- have decided to
stick with '07 until notice of further improvements in known bugs.
I also took a look at some press statements on the MakeMusic site
announcing quarterly
Hey Darcy,
You can have an invisible or dotted right barline on the preceding
system, then just the usual clefs and key signatures on the
continuing system. No need to hide the left barline on the that next
system. I double checked a few of my Henle piano scores to confirm this.
Hope it h
On 10.10.2007 Daniel Wolf wrote:
Would it be possible now, from the list membership, to get a more accurate
sense of the number of us who are (a) a long-term, professional users of
Finale, (b) have serious concerns about bug fixes, and (c) iare either skipping
an '08 upgrade or switching to a
On Oct 10, 2007, at 2:37 PM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
I have had serious concerns about bug fixes for a long time.
And, although I haven't decided to not buy Finale 2k8 (I may have
to for compatibility reasons), I will not buy it yet.
I do have serious concerns about the future of Finale in
Since I got my computer running again, I'm not getting much mail on
the three lists with which I keep up. Has mail here been
particularly light?
Everybody’s migrated to
Sibelius___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mail
Hey Greg,
Thanks! All good to know.
CHeers,
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On 10 Oct 2007, at 1:19 PM, Hamilton Greg wrote:
Hey Darcy,
You can have an invisible or dotted right barline on the preceding
system, then just the usual clefs and key signatures on the
continuin
> I've just reviewed most of the posts dealing with Finale '08, and --
> following what appears to be a consensus around here -- have decided to
> stick with '07 until notice of further improvements in known bugs.
>
> I also took a look at some press statements on the MakeMusic site
> announcing qu
I'm required to use Fin2k6 for this project.
Cheers,
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On 10 Oct 2007, at 3:22 PM, Fiskum, Steve wrote:
FYI: The Split Measure plug-in works well for these situations.
Steve
10/10/07 1:38 PM, "Darcy James Argue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey
Daniel Wolf:
> From my own informal count on this list, at least twenty established,
> long-term, professional users have indicated that they are not switching
> to '08; most of them indicate that bug fixing is their main concern,
> several of indicated a move to a competing product.
I'm not sure
It was introduced in 2006 in the plug-ins' submenu "New Plug-ins for Finale
2006."
Steve
10/10/07 2:33 PM, "Darcy James Argue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm required to use Fin2k6 for this project.
>
> Cheers,
>
> - Darcy
> -
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Brooklyn, NY
>
>
>
> On 10 Oct 2007
--- Daniel Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would it be possible now, from the list membership,
> to get a more
> accurate sense of the number of us who are (a) a
> long-term, professional
> users of Finale,
Long-term, non-professional - current grad student in
musicology, former choir librari
FYI: The Split Measure plug-in works well for these situations.
Steve
10/10/07 1:38 PM, "Darcy James Argue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Greg,
>
> Thanks! All good to know.
>
> CHeers,
>
> - Darcy
> -
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Brooklyn, NY
>
>
>
> On 10 Oct 2007, at 1:19 PM, Hamilton
I'm a long time user, but not for publishing. I use finale to compose and
arrange for singing groups, including instrument accompaniments which I put on
a sequencer. I upgrade when it looks like an improvement will help me, usually
about every two years. I also monitor the list for others' exper
I've been a long time (since 2000) user and have remained on version 2006
because of all the problems noted on this list... I will not upgrade until I
see, based on comments on this list, that the new version is stable and
relatively bug free... I use Finale to write dance band arrangements fo
No no no. You can't do that. Make them participate on a list? Then they
would have to respond to feedback. They might be confronted with things
that they need to fix. We won't get the new, fluffy Pokemon notation
that will be included in Finale 2009. It will be a hit with the newly
targeted pre
As I mentioned in a previous post, I have bought the Competitive Upgrade
from Sibelius, since we can do that this month for half price. The softward
arrived yesterday, so I am just getting used to the differences. Because I
used Simple Entry in Fin the differences aren't all that great. What
At 19:40 +0200 10/10/07, Daniel Wolf wrote:
Would it be possible now, from the list membership, to get a more
accurate sense of the number of us who are (a) a long-term,
professional users of Finale, (b) have serious concerns about bug
fixes, and (c) iare either skipping an '08 upgrade or swit
On Oct 10, 2007, at 12:15 PM, Daniel Wolfr wrote:
Would it be possible now, from the list membership, to get a more
accurate sense of the number of us who are (a) a long-term,
professional
users of Finale, (b) have serious concerns about bug fixes, and (c)
iare
either skipping an '08 upgrad
Since I got my computer running again, I'm not
getting much mail on the three lists with which
I keep up. Has mail here been particularly
light?
Everybody¹s migrated to Sibelius...
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
yeh.
there was once a sign on the saskatchewan-alberta
border, not sure exactly where, ma
No no no. You can't do that. Make them participate on a list? Then
they would have to respond to feedback. They might be confronted
with things that they need to fix. We won't get the new, fluffy
Pokemon notation that will be included in Finale 2009. It will be a
hit with the newly targeted p
A few months ago Bob Morabito (I think it was him -- if not, I apologize
to whomever it was) posted the e-mail addresses of the COO, CTO, CEO and
several others at MakeMusic and posted a copy of the letter he sent
(with CC: to all of them) listing his concerns and complaints and he
urged any/al
On 10.10.2007 Christopher Smith wrote:
What did they say to you when they informed you that you would not be beta
testing any more?
They did not inform me at all. Nada. I eventually asked why I hadn't
heard. It took them two weeks to reply.
Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http:/
If by "tweaking" things, you mean adjusting the placement of individual
items in the music, simply click on it and either drag it or use the
cursor keys to move it.
If you mean "edit" then you can do a lot of that under House Style menu,
Edit Text Styles -- to Sibelius expressions are just a s
Bruce Clausen wrote:
On Fin's side, I don't yet see in Sib the ability to tweak things,
e.g. hairpins, expression placement, slurs, etc., but this may be that
I haven't yet found the means of doing so. So far, I believe that Sib
is more the way I like to work . . . but it is way too soon for a
posted the e-mail addresses of the COO, CTO, CEO and several others
at MakeMusic and posted a copy of the letter he sent (with CC: to
all of them) listing his concerns and complaints and he urged
any/all of us to do the same. I did, writing my own letter and
sending it to the same recipients
Ah, it has finally happened. The Finale List is now morphing into a
Sibelius list. Not that there's anything wrong with that, just an
interesting example of Darwin's thesis.
Dean
On Oct 10, 2007, at 2:23 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
Bruce Clausen wrote:
On Fin's side, I don't yet see in Sib th
I think it was jef chippewa
dhbailey wrote:
A few months ago Bob Morabito (I think it was him -- if not, I
apologize to whomever it was) posted the e-mail addresses of the COO,
CTO, CEO and several others at MakeMusic and posted a copy of the
letter he sent (with CC: to all of them) listin
Or tee-shirts. I need my tee-shirts!
shirling & neueweise wrote:
No no no. You can't do that. Make them participate on a list? Then
they would have to respond to feedback. They might be confronted with
things that they need to fix. We won't get the new, fluffy Pokemon
notation that will be i
I don't know about morphing . . . When I posted to the list that I was going
to get the Sib Competitive Upgrade, one reply asked me to keep the list
informed as to my progress/lack thereof. So that is what I did. I was just
fortunate that someone knew the solution to my problem.
Bruce
-
On Oct 10, 2007, at 4:43 PM, shirling & neueweise wrote:
additional weight could be given to such a compilation as you have
suggested if responders gave an indication of how many potential
finale users they have suggested use sibelius instead, and if
certain people could let MM know that
On Oct 10, 2007, at 5:10 PM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 10.10.2007 Christopher Smith wrote:
What did they say to you when they informed you that you would not
be beta testing any more?
They did not inform me at all. Nada. I eventually asked why I
hadn't heard. It took them two weeks to r
I have one! A very large blue one! (guess where it came from - thanks,
Carla!)
Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Or tee-shirts. I need my tee-shirts!
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Thanks, David and Richard. Am tweaking happily away!
BC
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 2:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Finale] Re: Finale '08
Bruce Clausen wrote:
On Fin's side, I don't yet see in Sib the ability to tweak
That description might apply to John Howell and me. 15 workstations
(all of them) at my school upgraded this year to Sibelius 5, but not
Finale.
yeh i figgerd i could shake you out! 8-)
--
shirling & neueweise ... new music publishers
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :.../ http://newmusicnotation.c
- I am a long term amateur user (with six books published).
- I will not upgrade to Fin2008 (the first I skipped in ten years).
- I ill be reluctant to upgrade to 2009 unless bug fixes are made.
- I check out each new Sibelius version to see if it can do what I need.
Richard Yates
>-Original
Side note, I received yet another upgrade today flyer from MakeMusic. I
think this is the third one from them (since I have two copies of Finale
2007)
Marvin Rosenthal wrote:
I've been a long time (since 2000) user and have remained on version 2006
because of all the problems noted on
Daniel Wolf wrote:
Would it be possible now, from the list membership, to get a more
accurate sense of the number of us who are (a) a long-term,
professional users of Finale
User since version 1.0
Among other things, I've written 3 operas in Finale and use pretty
much every feature except gu
40 matches
Mail list logo
