Since PDFs are basically postscript, and Finale's display, I guess, is also
a kind of postscript, this should be solved easily. Finale's superior fine
tuning possibilities (like the possibility to adjust the thickness of staff
lines) has its ups, on the other hand drawing the lines as hairlines wou
> Since PDFs are basically postscript, and Finale's display, I guess, is
> also
> a kind of postscript, this should be solved easily.
This does not address the fact that Finale's "Compile Postscript Listing"
function produces a perfect display. Finale prints to Postscript and
compiles Postscript q
PS to previous: The reason this is very important for me is that "Compile
Postscript Listing" does *not* include embedded graphics. For many scores, I
need them, and have had to fall back on printing to Postscript and its
poor results.
Dennis
___
F
On 23.09.2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The example you posted looks like the quality display produced by "Compile
Postscript Listing" rather than print-to-Postscript. What was your
printing sequence from Finale? And what printer driver were you printing
to?
No, he just used very thin lines. If
Johannes wrote:
> No, he just used very thin lines. If you print this example it will look
> pretty awful, at least to my eyes. If you look at the example at high
> magnification you will still see that the lines don't anti-alias, and
> display slightly different thicknesses.
The lines are very th
September 2007 21:47
> An: finale@shsu.edu
> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [Finale] Converting from Sibelius to Finale
>
> > Since PDFs are basically postscript, and Finale's display, I guess,
> is
> > also
> > a kind of postscript, this should be solved easily.
&g
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im
> Auftrag von [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 23. September 2007 22:05
> An: finale@shsu.edu
> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [Finale] Converting from Sibelius to Finale
>
>
> PS to previo
3. September 2007 22:22
> An: finale@shsu.edu
> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [Finale] Converting from Sibelius to Finale
>
> Johannes wrote:
> > No, he just used very thin lines. If you print this example it will
> look
> > pretty awful, at least to my eyes. If you look at the exa
On 23 Sep 2007 at 21:37, Kurt Gnos wrote:
> Since PDFs are basically postscript, and Finale's display, I guess, is
> also a kind of postscript,
Huh? How does Finale on Windows utilize PS onscreen? The fact is, it
doesn't.
For that matter, on Mac, display PS *is* used for rendering, but at
the
On 23 Sep 2007 at 15:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Since PDFs are basically postscript, and Finale's display, I guess, is
> > also
> > a kind of postscript, this should be solved easily.
>
> This does not address the fact that Finale's "Compile Postscript Listing"
> function produces a perfect
On 23 Sep 2007 at 22:09, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
> On 23.09.2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > The example you posted looks like the quality display produced by
> > "Compile Postscript Listing" rather than print-to-Postscript. What was
> > your printing sequence from Finale? And what printer driver
dc wrote:
David W. Fenton écrit:
But, again, the problem as I see it is *not* with Finale, but with
Acrobat's incorrect line smoothing. I don't know why Finale sends
multiple thin lines instead of a single line with a particular
thickness to the print driver, but perhaps there's a reason for tha
dc wrote, on 9/24/2007 2:02 AM:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] écrit:
This does not address the fact that Finale's "Compile Postscript Listing"
function produces a perfect display. Finale prints to Postscript and
compiles Postscript quite differently.
Does this work with any kind of font? TT or PS or OT?
dc wrote, on 9/24/2007 8:12 AM:
I can't get Compile PS to work. Finale
crashes if I include the fonts. And it gives nice staff lines if I
don't, but without the fonts (except Maestro, for some reason)... The
resulting PDF has only two fonts listed: Maestro and Courier.
Courier is the normal s
On 24 Sep 2007 at 8:02, dc wrote:
> David W. Fenton écrit:
> >But, again, the problem as I see it is *not* with Finale, but with
> >Acrobat's incorrect line smoothing. I don't know why Finale sends
> >multiple thin lines instead of a single line with a particular
> >thickness to the print driver,
rk ok for me. I have even used PDFs to create EPS, with
success...
Kurt
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im
> Auftrag von dhbailey
> Gesendet: Montag, 24. September 2007 12:37
> An: finale@shsu.edu
> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [Finale
On 24.09.2007 Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
As I say, the only thing Finale's "Compile Postscript Listing" doesn't do is
compile the TIFF graphics with it.
Have you tried using EPS graphics instead?
Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de
> you can send me a Finale File using embedded Graphics, and I will print it
> using Acrobat 7 Pro in XP and upload the output.
Kurt,
Most of my files are 20-100MB with their embedded graphics -- a tad too
large to send. But I am trying another set of new drivers, and other than
the staff lines,
Dennis,
Try
yousendit.com
for large files. They allow files to be sent up to 100mb when you
register. I find it very useful.
Christopher
On Sep 23, 2007, at 5:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you can send me a Finale File using embedded Graphics, and I will
print it
using Acrobat 7 Pro
19 matches
Mail list logo