On 8-Nov-05, at 22:20 , Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On 11/8/05, Alexander K. Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/8/05, Kevin Horton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8-Nov-05, at 18:21 , Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
Speaking for myself, I can now try to expedite some packages out of
the tracker.
On 9-Nov-05, at 07:09 , Kevin Horton wrote:
On 8-Nov-05, at 22:20 , Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On 11/8/05, Alexander K. Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/8/05, Kevin Horton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8-Nov-05, at 18:21 , Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
Speaking for myself, I can now try
Koen van der Drift wrote:
Hi,
What's a proper location to install example files that come with a perl
module? The package bioperl-pm that I maintain stores a bunch of those
files in /sw/bin. Which prompts the validator to give the following
message:
...
A possibility could be
I've downloaded an update of the pyx-py from the trackers (#1306090).
The package installs a conf file in /sw/etc / that is listed in the
ConfFiles: field of the info file. However, when trying to two
variant (-py23 and -py24), dpkg complains about overwriting the file:
/sw/bin/dpkg: error
Hi Sébastian,
I've added the ConfFiles field to the pyx info file exactly with the
idea that it would have been shared between different variants.
Anyway re-reading the packaging manual I've noticed that (citing from
the manual):
When a package is removed, the configuration files will
I have created a few fink packages, but I always find it a struggle
to determine what to list as Depends, and BuildDepends. Sometimes I
can glean a few hints from studying the output of the build process,
and sometimes a failed build is a good clue. But I am never sure to
have captured
On Nov 9, 2005, at 6:01 PM, Kevin Horton wrote:
I have created a few fink packages, but I always find it a struggle
to determine what to list as Depends, and BuildDepends. Sometimes
I can glean a few hints from studying the output of the build
process, and sometimes a failed build is a
On Nov 9, 2005, at 3:12 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote:
I'm not an 'old pro', but what I usually do for a new package is to
remove all non-essential packages (eg with FinkCommander). And then
start from scratch to compile the package. Then one by one I start
to add packages based on the
On 11/8/05, Brendan Cully [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday, 08 November 2005 at 18:21, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
Speaking for myself, I can now try to expedite some packages out of
the tracker. Anybody reading this thread who's got a package sitting
around, please email me (better yet,
Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
On Nov 8, 2005, at 9:33 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
Do we have an implicit epoch for distributions, so that a package
built under 10.3 will be implicitly a lower version than the same
package version and revision number under 10.4-t?
[]
Long ago I repeatedly proposed
Andrea Riciputi wrote:
[]
AFAICU this is the reason why dpkg fails when you try to replace -py24
variant with the -py23 one.
[]
On Nov 9, 2005, at 17:35 , Sébastien Maret wrote:
I've downloaded an update of the pyx-py from the trackers (#1306090).
The package installs a conf file in /sw/etc
11 matches
Mail list logo
