Am 11.09.2009 um 00:56 schrieb Jack Howarth:
Hi Jack, all
Jack, good luck for you, and I hope for both you and the MacPorts
folks that you'll get along better with them.
Cheers,
Max
Max,
Nice back biting slap on the way out. You just can't help
yourself can you?
Jack
ps Other
2009/9/10 Jack Howarth howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu:
Daniel and Benjamin,
I've been pondering switching my efforts over to
MacPorts for awhile now since it is obvious that the
X11 Xquartz situation is going to be very problematic
for fink in the absence of manpower to maintain a proper
set
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 08:55:04AM +0200, Max Horn wrote:
Am 11.09.2009 um 00:56 schrieb Jack Howarth:
Hi Jack, all
Jack, good luck for you, and I hope for both you and the MacPorts
folks that you'll get along better with them.
Cheers,
Max
Max,
Nice back biting slap on the way out.
Jack Howarth wrote:
Daniel and Benjamin,
I've been pondering switching my efforts over to
MacPorts for awhile now since it is obvious that the
X11 Xquartz situation is going to be very problematic
for fink in the absence of manpower to maintain a proper
set of X11 packages in fink.
I
Benjamin,
Again, my complaint is the berating was always coached in
the royal 'we' when there were (as far as can demonstrated
publicly) few complaints outside of a troika of developers.
If my behavior was so outside of the bounds, why did Dave
Morrison never once mention it? For you
A couple more comments before I go. One recent episode
that stuck in my craw was the breakage of the unzip 3.0 package
on 10.4. I would mention that...
1) I posted the proposed packaging on fink tracking.
2) At least one core maintainer had no objections to the
concept of upgrading those.
3) I
On Sep 11, 2009, at 7:52 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
2) At least one core maintainer had no objections to the
concept of upgrading those.
Jack,
Perhaps you misread the message in question, but in fact there WAS an
objection to the upgrade you proposed, but you went ahead and did it
anyway.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Costabel wrote:
Jack Howarth wrote:
Daniel and Benjamin,
I've been pondering switching my efforts over to
MacPorts for awhile now since it is obvious that the
X11 Xquartz situation is going to be very problematic
for fink in the
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 08:16:55AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote:
On Sep 11, 2009, at 7:52 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
2) At least one core maintainer had no objections to the
concept of upgrading those.
Jack,
Perhaps you misread the message in question, but in fact there WAS an
The time wasn't wasted. You did many good things here, and you will
be missed.
-- Dave
On Sep 11, 2009, at 8:52 AM, Jack Howarth howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 08:16:55AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote:
On Sep 11, 2009, at 7:52 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
2)
On Sep 11, 2009, at 8:49 AM, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Costabel wrote:
Jack Howarth wrote:
Daniel and Benjamin,
I've been pondering switching my efforts over to
MacPorts for awhile now since it is
David,
Not according the obscene email that I just got
from one of your Japanese developers. Should have
forwarded that one to the list ;) You've got one
very disfunctional crew under you.
Jack
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 09:13:43AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote:
The time
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David R. Morrison wrote:
So we should concentrate on a future with Apple's SL X11. Let
Macports
spend their energy on bleeding edge X11 packages.
Agreed.
We'll have some users that carp about this, of course, but they're
free
to tweak
Am 11.09.2009 um 18:24 schrieb Jack Howarth:
David,
Not according the obscene email that I just got
from one of your Japanese developers. Should have
forwarded that one to the list ;)
If people do something like that, it's of course sad. But I am glad
you did the right thing and did not
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 06:53:58PM +0200, Max Horn wrote:
Am 11.09.2009 um 18:24 schrieb Jack Howarth:
David,
Not according the obscene email that I just got
from one of your Japanese developers. Should have
forwarded that one to the list ;)
If people do something like that, it's of
Dear Fink community:
Since my computer skills and diplomatic skills are both quite
rudimentary (an assessment based on reality, not modesty),
I've been reluctant to say much (apart from accepting the blame for
suggesting the latest scipy-core be updated, which
I based on some mistaken
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/11/09 2:13 PM, William G. Scott wrote:
I think this is a Good Thing, assuming all fink packages work with the
SL X11. We should just assume it is there, and not
concern ourselves at all with what gets installed in /opt, or support
it.
Benjamin Reed wrote:
Once we have automated builds of any kind, we can start promoting
packages from unstable - stable automatically or semi-automatically,
because we'll really know how info files and the state of binaries map,
and we can solicit and receive feedback on packages from end-users
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 09:13:43AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote:
The time wasn't wasted. You did many good things here, and you will be
missed.
-- Dave
Dave,
Sorry for the separate replies but I recalled one last thing that will
impact everyone here. Ben Elliston (who maintains
19 matches
Mail list logo
