Re: [Fink-users] feature request (was: upgrade from 0.3.1 to0.3.2a)

On 20/3/02 4:18 PM, "Rich Ramos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Sorry if this wasn't particularly clear. If you haven't already, it may be >> an idea to read the Documentation and FAQ, and if you have already, maybe >> this sort of information should be included in it! :) > > Trust me, I have

Re: [Fink-users] feature request (was: upgrade from 0.3.1 to0.3.2a)

On 20/3/02 3:01 PM, "Rich Ramos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> >>> bitchx is only in unstable, correct? I do not have unstable in my fink.conf >>> file, correct? Yet it still shows up in fink list. >>> >>> -Rich >> >> No, bitchx is in fact in the stable distribution. I am not sure whethe

Re: [Fink-users] feature request (was: upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a)

>> According to the web page it is only in unstable: >> http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package.php/bitchx > > % find /sw/fink/dists | grep bitchx > /sw/fink/dists/stable/main/finkinfo/net/bitchx-1.0c18-3.info > /sw/fink/dists/stable/main/finkinfo/net/bitchx-1.0c18-3.patch > /sw/f

Re: [Fink-users] feature request (was: upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a)

On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Rich Ramos wrote: > >> bitchx is only in unstable, correct? I do not have unstable in > >> my fink.conf file, correct? Yet it still shows up in fink list. > >> > >> -Rich > > > > No, bitchx is in fact in the stable distribution. > > According to the web page it is only in

Re: [Fink-users] Xdarwin question

> Another good option for a window manager is OroborOSX. It basically works > like a standard double-clickable Mac application, runs rootless so that you > have easy access to other applications, and also has controls in the Mac > menu bar. Check out http://wrench.et.ic.ac.uk:80/adrian/software

Re: [Fink-users] feature request (was: upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a)

>> >> bitchx is only in unstable, correct? I do not have unstable in my fink.conf >> file, correct? Yet it still shows up in fink list. >> >> -Rich > > No, bitchx is in fact in the stable distribution. I am not sure whether it > was included in the stable (binary) distrubution when the latest v

Re: [Fink-users] feature request (was: upgrade from 0.3.1 to0.3.2a)

On 20/3/02 2:33 PM, "Rich Ramos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If it's in unstable trust me you need to compile from scratch. >>> >>> I'm completely aware of that fact. However here's the current problem, what >>> about this: >>> bitchx 1.0c18-3IRC client >>> tells me that i

Re: [Fink-users] feature request (was: upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a)

>>> If it's in unstable trust me you need to compile from scratch. >> >> I'm completely aware of that fact. However here's the current problem, what >> about this: >> bitchx 1.0c18-3IRC client >> tells me that it's currently only available as unstable? > > I don't get the point of

Re: [Fink-users] feature request (was: upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a)

I'm sure about the policy really. And it might not have been xfree86-system, I'm compiling qt 3.0.2 right now and don't want to use extra cpu time :P But altimetly max will have final say on weather this is useful or not. Though i do believe there is a high enough demand for it :P. it does do

Re: [Fink-users] feature request (was: upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a)

Max helped me make it. Well the finishings, though I would never commit to fink it's self that is why it's on the tracker. I like to know cause at times I wonder if I'm running my version from local or not. And if you have your fink.conf setup so the tree vies is local, stable, unstable it will

Re: [Fink-users] feature request (was: upgrade from 0.3.1 to0.3.2a)

On 20/3/02 1:25 PM, "Justin Hallett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > this isn't fully true some are stable only. I know this cause I just > added the patch and if i do a fink list | grep "s " there are some like > xfree86-system I believe. > "as it is almost definite". :) Well... According to

Re: [Fink-users] feature request (was: upgrade from 0.3.1 to0.3.2a)

On 20/3/02 1:24 PM, "Justin Hallett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a patch online in the patches it works with info and list, but > doesn't not do binary only stable/unstable/local and if we ever add > testing it will work as well. I'd have a talk to Max about this before committing it (if

Re: [Fink-users] feature request (was: upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a)

this isn't fully true some are stable only. I know this cause I just added the patch and if i do a fink list | grep "s " there are some like xfree86-system I believe. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >I don't get the point of indicating whether a package is in unstable or >stable. If you have the unst

Re: [Fink-users] feature request (was: upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a)

I have a patch online in the patches it works with info and list, but doesn't not do binary only stable/unstable/local and if we ever add testing it will work as well. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> I'm not necessarily asking for a tree view (all though that would be >nice >> maybe >> as a verbose

Re: [Fink-users] feature request (was: upgrade from 0.3.1 to0.3.2a)

On 20/3/02 3:54 AM, "Rich Ramos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> the tree info would be nice but then the list command would get bulky and >> we are already running out of room for short descs and pkg names. > > I'm not necessarily asking for a tree view (all though

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp launch problem

1. Do you have XDarwin running? 2. Try 'setenv DISPLAY 0:0'. On Tuesday, March 19, 2002, at 07:32 AM, Wizard Consulting wrote: > Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: -- Alexander Strange [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Gandalf, has your fondness for the hobbits' weed affected your mind?" - The Lord Of The

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: Internal error: node for zlib alreadyexists

Try fink reinstall zlib and/or fink rebuild zlib HTH, Max -- --- Max Horn Software Developer email: phone: (+49) 6151-494890 ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] h

Re: [Fink-users] upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a?

On Tuesday, March 19, 2002, at 03:59 PM, Finlay Dobbie wrote: > > I was asking a question because I was unsure. I think I changed the > wording to reflect this in the FAQ, but I wanted to double-check. I > guess I'll just run off and commit what I have lying around in my CVS'd > web dir and h

Re: [Fink-users] upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a?

On Tuesday, March 19, 2002, at 08:59 PM, Erik Price wrote: >>> (soon enough the next version of Fink will be out and it'll be moot >>> anyway) >> >> Is this even correct? Since it afflicts and old version of the >> software (it's a problem in 0.3.1), how is a new upstream revision >> going to

Re: [Fink-users] upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a?

On Tuesday, March 19, 2002, at 03:14 PM, Finlay Dobbie wrote: > I do apologise for working at school, doing a bit of professional work, > and working on a wide array of opensource projects (Darwin, Fink, > GTK-Quartz from time to time), attempting to learn Java and WebObjects > at the same t

Re: [Fink-users] upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a?

On Tuesday, March 19, 2002, at 02:55 AM, Erik Price wrote: > (soon enough the next version of Fink will be out and it'll be moot > anyway) Is this even correct? Since it afflicts and old version of the software (it's a problem in 0.3.1), how is a new upstream revision going to fix people's o

Re: [Fink-users] upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a?

On Tuesday, March 19, 2002, at 02:55 AM, Erik Price wrote: >> Somebody worked on a FAQ entry for this one, dunno what happend to >> this (I am now offline, so I can't check) > > Umm... that was me. I sort of winged the format of the submission > because at the time that I wrote it, I didn't k

[Fink-users] gimp-1.2.3-4 fails near end

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I updated everything via CVS/unstable, and this is the error message I get: ln -s gimprc-1.2.5 gimprc.5 rm -f /sw/src/root-gimp-1.2.3-4/sw/lib/gimp/1.2/modules/libcolorsel_*.a mv /sw/src/root-gimp-1.2.3-4/sw/bin/gimp /sw/src/root- gimp-1.2.3-4/

Re: [Fink-users] Xdarwin question

This is a problem with the default window manger (twm) that comes with Xdarwin. You'll need to install a different window manager and set your system up to run it. Check out http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/x11/index.php for more information. 'fink list | grep anager' will give you a list of w

Re: [Fink-users] feature request (was: upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a)

I'm just working on s and u, b someone else will have to do. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Here's another suggestion along the lines of cli switchs. This combines >my two >requests into one: > >fink list -b: for latest binary >fink list -s: for latest stable >fink list -u: for latest unstable > >T

Re: [Fink-users] feature request (was: upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a)

Here's another suggestion along the lines of cli switchs. This combines my two requests into one: fink list -b: for latest binary fink list -s: for latest stable fink list -u: for latest unstable The first would imply running dselect or apt-get where as the latter two would imply having to d

Re: [Fink-users] Gnome, sawfish, searchable list archives?

At 11:19 AM -0500 3/19/02, Duncan Galloway wrote: >Hi there, > I have just joined the mailing list and have a few questions. >First, is there a way to search the mailing list archives? I looked >on the page and couldn't find one. Otherwise, I might have found >answers to the following problem

Re: [Fink-users] feature request (was: upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a)

well since I'm adding a function to determin a pkgs tree it wouldn't be hard but let me work this out first and see what Max thinks of it first. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >How hard would it be to add a fink list --unstable, which would only >list the packages installed from unstable (and have a

Re: [Fink-users] feature request (was: upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a)

I'm working on this right now. Not sure about the out come but i thought of U and S right after sending the email. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >I'm not necessarily asking for a tree view (all though that would be nice >maybe >as a verbose option?), but I agree that could get bulky. Maybe just ad

Re: [Fink-users] feature request (was: upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 How hard would it be to add a fink list --unstable, which would only list the packages installed from unstable (and have a --stable for the stable packages)? I have not looked at the code, so I do not know how feasable this is, but it would really

Re: [Fink-users] feature request (was: upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a)

>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > the tree info would be nice but then the list command would get bulky and > we are already running out of room for short descs and pkg names. I'm not necessarily asking for a tree view (all though that would be nice maybe as a verbose option?), but I agree that coul

Re: [Fink-users] feature request (was: upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a)

the tree info would be nice but then the list command would get bulky and we are already running out of room for short descs and pkg names. If it's in unstable trust me you need to compile from scratch. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >When going to the website I see that the package is only in the cu

[Fink-users] feature request (was: upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a)

> Ok, from what I understand, when you update with CVS, you get all the package > info for all the current packages, stable and unstable. I would like to have a way, when doing a 'fink list', to distinguish between packages that are 'point release stable' vs 'current stable' vs 'current unsta

[Fink-users] Package grass (unstable) fails to d/l dependancy

Hello, [I already tried to contact the package maintainer on this, but haven't heard anything yet, so I'm posting here.] When I try to install the GRASS GIS package via fink (it's in unstable presently), one package it depends on cannot be found: wget --verbose --passive-ftp http://www.ab.wakwa

[Fink-users] Gnome, sawfish, searchable list archives?

Hi there, I have just joined the mailing list and have a few questions. First, is there a way to search the mailing list archives? I looked on the page and couldn't find one. Otherwise, I might have found answers to the following problems: I'm trying to install Gnome (sawfish window manag

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp launch problem

On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Wizard Consulting wrote: > On 03/19/2002 04:45, "Chris Devers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Grasping at straws, but does restarting X-Windows help anything? > > I never directly launched it (I didn't know I had to). How do I do this? Ahh, there's the problem then: Gimp (as wel

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp launch problem

On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Wizard Consulting wrote: > Just loaded gimp, plus associated goodies (dependencies). Upon launch, > received the following messages: > > Gdk-WARNING **: locale not supported by C library > > Gdk-WARNING **: locale not supported by Xlib, locale set to C > > Gdk-WARNING **:

[Fink-users] Gimp launch problem

Hi - Just loaded gimp, plus associated goodies (dependencies). Upon launch, received the following messages: Gdk-WARNING **: locale not supported by C library Gdk-WARNING **: locale not supported by Xlib, locale set to C Gdk-WARNING **: can not set locale modifiers Gtk-WARNING **: cannot ope

Re: [Fink-users] Scilab no demos or help

I have just installed it and everything i have tried works as it should. Among other things the demos and menues. I just run "fink install scilab" after getting the .info file from cvs to my local unstable directory. Fink list gives: " scientificpytho 2.2-5 Python modules useful fo

[Fink-users] Scilab no demos or help

Is everyone else running Scilab OK? I can get it to compile and run but the buttons which give me the demos and the help do not drop any menus and only give error messages. Don -- Prof. Don McKenzie Paul tel. 024 76 523603 Department of Physics fax. 024 76 6920