Ian L. wrote:
I'm trying to update my xfree86-base package, but Fink doesn't seem to
recognize that there's a new version available, let alone a new version of
Fink. What follows is the output of four fink commands. Any ideas?
From the output it is clear that you are (or at least fink thinks
It would seem that I have (somehow) managed to brake my cvs access.
The first thing I noticed was that 'fink selfupdate' followed by 'fink
update-all' reports No packages to install. even though a lot of the
packages I have installed are out of date (going by fink's packages
list) I have fink
Brooks: I can confirm this. However, I have no idea to fix it. Does it
happen with other lesstif apps? I'll try nedit with openmotif3 and see if
that works.
-Jeff
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, M. Brooks Clark wrote:
A couple of weeks ago, I posted a question about a problem I'm having with
Nedit.
I deleted the 'fr' directory from '/sw/share/man/', thinking I wouldn't
need it as I don't speak french. while trying to update tornado the
compile failed as it couldn't find this directory to put files in. I
recreated it and compiled it with no problems, so everything is fine
now.
Is this
I'd say that it is not uncommon.
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 10:13, Andrew Hartung wrote:
I deleted the 'fr' directory from '/sw/share/man/', thinking I wouldn't
need it as I don't speak french. while trying to update tornado the
compile failed as it couldn't find this directory to put files in. I
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Koen van der Drift wrote:
I just realized that the word 'fink' can be an acronym just
like GNU (GNU's not Unix). So for instance: Fink Is No Kidding
Fink Is Not KDE?
Fink Is No Kernel?
--
Chris Devers[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computer games don't affect kids. I mean,
At 23:19 Uhr -0500 18.11.2002, Jason J. Park wrote:
I have noticed that dillo-0.6.6-1.info in the 10.2 stable branch is
still writing a dillorc file in /etc. Shouldn't this package be
taken out of the stable branch before 0.5.0 is prepared?
Argh, guys, why don't you use our bug tracker to
Hello
I'm wondering if it would be possible to see the release of a *xchat*
version that doesn't require gnome (as suggested by Fink's information
for xchat)? If would be great to see a version that doesn't require 50
or so gnomish packages when I actually have no intention of ever
running
I did a selfupdate-cvs last night, and on the subsequent update-all, I
got the following unceremonious reply:
creating libkbattleshipdialogs_la.all_cpp.cpp ...
/bin/sh ../../../libtool --silent --mode=compile --tag=CXX g++
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../.. -I/sw/include -I/usr/X11R6/include
Are there any special fink packages that need to be installed in order
to have an xterm display UTF-8 encoded characters? I have the standard
xfree86-base, xfree86-rootless and xfonts installed (and up to
date).Thanks,
Paul
---
This sf.net
I'm seeing the same problem (OS 10.2.2, latest fink as of this morning,
October Dev Tools, kdegames3-3.0.7-3)
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 12:55, adam hixson wrote:
I did a selfupdate-cvs last night, and on the subsequent update-all, I
got the following unceremonious reply:
creating
Peter: I've confirmed that this happens if nedit is compiled with
openmotif3 as well. Ditto for the cvs version of nedit. A workaround is
to first open a new window with File -- New, the open a file to edit in
that new window.
-Jeff
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Peter Lichtner wrote:
I have the same
A couple of things to check, operationally, is whether /sw/fink/10.2 is
present on your system, and whether /sw/fink/dists is a symbolic link to
/sw/fink/10.2 . If not, then you might be able to solve the problem by
going into the directory where you decompressed the fink source tarball
to
make that kdegames3-3.0.7-4
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 13:49, Alexander Hansen wrote:
I'm seeing the same problem (OS 10.2.2, latest fink as of this morning,
October Dev Tools, kdegames3-3.0.7-3)
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn
Alexander,
Thanks for the tip...but...that's not the problem, I'll try running
postinstall.pl anyway and cross my fingers...
[anduril:/sw/fink] daniello% ls -l
total 56
drwxr-xr-x7 daniello admin 238 Nov 9 20:52 10.2
drwxr-xr-x5 daniello admin 170 Nov 9 20:54 CVS
-rw-r--r--1
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 12:55, adam hixson wrote:
I did a selfupdate-cvs last night, and on the subsequent update-all, I
got the following unceremonious reply:
After some discussion on #fink, I think we've figured out what's
happening. Justin's doing a test build for me to confirm (he saw the
Max Horn wrote:
At 11:35 Uhr -0500 19.11.2002, Chris Devers wrote:
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Koen van der Drift wrote:
I just realized that the word 'fink' can be an acronym just
like GNU (GNU's not Unix). So for instance: Fink Is No Kidding
Fink Is Not KDE?
Fink Is No Kernel?
Fink
Niclas Davidsson wrote:
[]
Next question, *nmap* exists in two versions, one with a X-front-end
enabled, according to the Fink info. Where is the front-endand how
If you look at the nmap package file list (dpkg -L nmap), you see a
binary /sw/bin/xnmap. There is also a man page. man xnmap
Hello Niclas,
Apparently, the nmap package contains files that isn't in the nmap-nox
package? I suspect so, but I don't know since I've got nmap-nox
installed myself with no intentions of installing the X11 version.
(One would think that nmap would contain only the tty version, while
the
Martin von Weissenberg wrote:
[]
In my opinion, *-nox is a bad way to name packages: a better way would
be to have three packages nmap-common, nmap and nmap-gnome, the latter
two being front-ends that both depend on nmap-common but conflict with
each other. Then you can install one or the
On Tuesday, Nov 19, 2002, at 23:12 Europe/Stockholm, Martin Costabel
wrote:
Niclas Davidsson wrote:
Hrmm, ok, that sounded very straightforward until I tried at it
myselftake a look at this:
% dpkg -L nmap
/.
/sw
/sw/bin
/sw/bin/nmap
I have in addition
/sw/bin/nmapfe
I know what was wrong, take a look at this extract:
% cat nmap-3.00-3.info
Package: nmap
Version: 3.00
Revision: 3
Maintainer: Jeremy Higgs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BuildDepends: glib, libpcap, dlcompat-dev
Depends: libpcap-shlibs, gtk+-shlibs
Conflicts: nmap-nox ( = %v-%r )
Replaces: nmap-nox ( = %v-%r
Niclas Davidsson wrote:
I know what was wrong, take a look at this extract:
% cat nmap-3.00-3.info
Package: nmap
Version: 3.00
Revision: 3
Maintainer: Jeremy Higgs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BuildDepends: glib, libpcap, dlcompat-dev
Depends: libpcap-shlibs, gtk+-shlibs
Conflicts: nmap-nox ( = %v-%r )
On Wednesday, Nov 20, 2002, at 00:47 Europe/Stockholm, Martin Costabel
wrote:
Niclas Davidsson wrote:
I know what was wrong, take a look at this extract:
% cat nmap-3.00-3.info
Package: nmap
Version: 3.00
Revision: 3
Maintainer: Jeremy Higgs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BuildDepends: glib, libpcap,
If you read further though, you see that nmap itself does NOT depends on
gtk+, but only the front end, and if no gtk+, nmap is still built, and, I
assume, works in the command line.
D
--On Wednesday, November 20, 2002 0:47 +0100 Martin Costabel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Niclas Davidsson
Thanks for the feedback, everyone.
I tracked down a note in the Nedit archives that suggests the problem is
with Lesstif-0.93.36 and suggests using Lesstif-0.93.0. I gave this a try
but ran into a number of errors when trying to recompile Nedit.
I've also tried compiling with OpenMotif3. With
Hi all,
I know it's off topic but I thought some of Fink's users and developers
might be interested in this story.
Some of the world's most iconic birds are facing a new and grave threat
to their existence. Many of the so-called Darwin finch species on the
Galapagos Islands are being attacked
Is anyone else have an issue with ispell not exiting cleanly when invoked
from within emacs (with auc-tex loaded as well)?
System 10.2.2
ispell 3.2.06-3
emacs 21.2-11
auctex 10.0g-3
It appears to cleanly exit, but if you try and invoke ispell again, it
hangs, and takes emacs with it. I always
28 matches
Mail list logo
