Hi.
I tried to build numeric-atlas 22.0-1 but the build failed (see
transcript below). I'm using 0S X 10.2.1 with, i believe, the latest
Dev Tools. Any suggestions as to how to get numeric-atlas installed?
I have the following related packages installed:
atlas 3.3.15-1
python 2.2.1-6
Thank
Neal A. Crocker wrote:
> []
> gcc -L/sw/lib -bundle -bundle_loader /sw/bin/python
> build/temp.darwin-6.1-PowerMacintosh-2.2/lapack_litemodule.o -L/
> ld: can't locate file for: -lg2c
What version of g77 do you have installed? Do you have /sw/lib/libg2c.a?
Unfortunately, you truncated the gcc c
>Neal A. Crocker wrote:
>
>>[]
>>gcc -L/sw/lib -bundle -bundle_loader /sw/bin/python
>>build/temp.darwin-6.1-PowerMacintosh-2.2/lapack_litemodule.o -L/
>>ld: can't locate file for: -lg2c
>
>What version of g77 do you have installed? Do you have /sw/lib/libg2c.a?
I have g77 2.95.2-2. I'm guessing
On mercredi, oct 16, 2002, at 18:58 Europe/Paris, Neal A. Crocker wrote:
>> Neal A. Crocker wrote:
>>
>>> []
>>> gcc -L/sw/lib -bundle -bundle_loader /sw/bin/python
>>> build/temp.darwin-6.1-PowerMacintosh-2.2/lapack_litemodule.o -L/
>>> ld: can't locate file for: -lg2c
>>
>> What version of g77
>On mercredi, oct 16, 2002, at 18:58 Europe/Paris, Neal A. Crocker wrote:
>
>>>Neal A. Crocker wrote:
>>>
[]
gcc -L/sw/lib -bundle -bundle_loader /sw/bin/python
build/temp.darwin-6.1-PowerMacintosh-2.2/lapack_litemodule.o -L/
ld: can't locate file for: -lg2c
>>>
>>>What version of
Sorry for the long lag since you last offered advice on what might be
going wrong with the numeric-atlas installation for me. I updated to
the latest Dev tools from the Apple Developer site. It doesn't
install. Here are answer to some of the questions you asked a couple
weeks ago:
Neal A. C
On 10/27/02 10:08 PM, "Neal A. Crocker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fink doesn't seem to offer a later version of g77 than g77-2.95.2. I
> just did a cvs-update to check.
Yes, it does when updating from cvs unstable source:
% fink list
...
i g77 3.1-2002042 GNU FORTRAN77 compi
On 10/27/02 10:08 PM, "Neal A. Crocker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fink doesn't seem to offer a later version of g77 than g77-2.95.2. I
just did a cvs-update to check.
Yes, it does when updating from cvs unstable source:
% fink list
...
i g77 3.1-2002042 GNU FORTRAN77 compi
On Sunday, October 27, 2002, at 11:43 PM, Neal A. Crocker wrote:
On 10/27/02 10:08 PM, "Neal A. Crocker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fink doesn't seem to offer a later version of g77 than g77-2.95.2.
I
just did a cvs-update to check.
Yes, it does when updating from cvs unstable source:
%
On Sunday, October 27, 2002, at 11:43 PM, Neal A. Crocker wrote:
On 10/27/02 10:08 PM, "Neal A. Crocker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fink doesn't seem to offer a later version of g77 than g77-2.95.2. I
just did a cvs-update to check.
Yes, it does when updating from cvs unstable source:
% f
On lundi, oct 28, 2002, at 08:43 Europe/Paris, Neal A. Crocker wrote:
g77 3.1. is not showing up for me. I just did a selfupdate from
CVS from the command line:
[~]% fink selfupdate
sudo /sw/bin/fink selfupdate
Your Fink installation is set up to update package descriptions
directly from
On lundi, oct 28, 2002, at 08:43 Europe/Paris, Neal A. Crocker wrote:
g77 3.1. is not showing up for me. I just did a selfupdate
from CVS from the command line:
[~]% fink selfupdate
sudo /sw/bin/fink selfupdate
Your Fink installation is set up to update package descriptions directly from
On mercredi, oct 30, 2002, at 19:58 Europe/Paris, Neal A. Crocker wrote:
[]
I did the fink update as described at
http://fink.sourceforge.net/news/jaguar.php, expect for the part
about checking package integrity, since I didn't do an archive
install of Jaguar. However, "more /sw/fink/dists/C
Hi,
I just reran this update-fink.sh script from fink-0.11-cvs in order to see if
something had changed. I ran it while I had an old pre-jaguar
distribution in /sw, so no /sw/10.2 yet. After a while, I got the
following output:
Unpacking replacement fink ...
Setting up fink (0.11.0.cvs-20021101.
Neal,
Somebody had a problem that looks vaguely similar to yours, and he
solved it by running the postinstall script manually.
On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 15:18, Neal A. Crocker wrote:
> >Hi,
> >I just reran this update-fink.sh script from fink-0.11-cvs in order to see if
> >something had changed. I ra
I just noticed something about the .info files for fink 0.11.0 which
I wondered at the significance of. There are two .info files for
fink 0.11.0-1. One includes a postinstall script, while the other
one doesn't (see below). As far as I understand, the postinstall
script is actually responsi
Neal A. Crocker wrote:
I just noticed something about the .info files for fink 0.11.0 which I
wondered at the significance of. There are two .info files for fink
0.11.0-1. One includes a postinstall script, while the other one
doesn't (see below).
Yes, one is installed during bootstrap and t
Neal A. Crocker wrote:
I just noticed something about the .info files for fink 0.11.0 which I
wondered at the significance of. There are two .info files for fink
0.11.0-1. One includes a postinstall script, while the other one
doesn't (see below).
Yes, one is installed during bootstrap and th
Neal A. Crocker wrote:
Doing this seems to have created /sw/fink/10.2. I'm still somewhat
concerned that somehow postinstall.pl failed or was not run the first
time I attempted the fink 10.2 update.
It is now clear that this is a bug. It fails to run when you already
have fink-0.11 before d
19 matches
Mail list logo
