On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 04:58:56PM +0100, Wols Lists wrote:
> On 28/03/16 15:59, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> >> But still clone of Firebird repository is 10 times bigger than its
> >> > sources.
> > That's one way to look at it. Another way is to say it's about 0.18 EUR
> > of disk space in case of a S
On 28/03/16 15:59, Michal Kubecek wrote:
>> But still clone of Firebird repository is 10 times bigger than its
>> > sources.
> That's one way to look at it. Another way is to say it's about 0.18 EUR
> of disk space in case of a SSD and 0.02 EUR in case of classical
> magnetic disk.
Another way to
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:07:43 +0300, marius adrian popa wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Michal Kubecek
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 04:25:15PM +0200, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>> > 28.03.2016 16:16, Jim Starkey wrote:
>> > > nothing else was more suitable.
>> >
>> > But still cl
One can do something like:
git gc --prune=now --aggressive
git repack
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
--
Transform Data into Opportunity.
Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
Intel Data Anal
28.03.2016 16:59, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> BtW., the directory with my checked out trunk from Subversion has 636 MB
> for some reason.
You either have some temporary files there which you can find with "svn
status
--no-ignore |grep "^\?" or it is a known SVN problem with internal DB that can
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 10:49:53AM -0400, Jim Starkey wrote:
> On 3/28/2016 10:25 AM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> > But still clone of Firebird repository is 10 times bigger than its
> > sources.
>
> That's an interesting question. I don't know the answer, but somebody
> should research it -- ma
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 04:25:15PM +0200, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> > 28.03.2016 16:16, Jim Starkey wrote:
> > > nothing else was more suitable.
> >
> > But still clone of Firebird repository is 10 times bigger than its
> > sources.
>
> T
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 04:25:15PM +0200, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 28.03.2016 16:16, Jim Starkey wrote:
> > nothing else was more suitable.
>
> But still clone of Firebird repository is 10 times bigger than its
> sources.
That's one way to look at it. Another way is to say it's about 0.18 EUR
On 3/28/2016 10:25 AM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 28.03.2016 16:16, Jim Starkey wrote:
>> nothing else was more suitable.
> But still clone of Firebird repository is 10 times bigger than its
> sources.
>
That's an interesting question. I don't know the answer, but somebody
should research
> 28 марта 2016 г., в 17:25, Dimitry Sibiryakov написал(а):
>
> 28.03.2016 16:16, Jim Starkey wrote:
>> nothing else was more suitable.
>
> But still clone of Firebird repository is 10 times bigger than its sources.
>
If you do not need full history, you can do shallow clone.
--
Artyom Smi
28.03.2016 16:16, Jim Starkey wrote:
> nothing else was more suitable.
But still clone of Firebird repository is 10 times bigger than its sources.
--
WBR, SD.
--
Transform Data into Opportunity.
Accelerate data an
On 3/28/2016 10:06 AM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 28.03.2016 15:29, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>> Somewhy that zip link is awfully slow - download took 2m 12s (compare
>> with Firebird-3.0.0.32366-ReleaseCandidate2.tar.bz2 at SF mirror, 24s)
> Git is not suitable for large projects with long history
On 28/03/2016 11:06, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 28.03.2016 15:29, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>> Somewhy that zip link is awfully slow - download took 2m 12s (compare
>> with Firebird-3.0.0.32366-ReleaseCandidate2.tar.bz2 at SF mirror, 24s)
>Git is not suitable for large projects with long history su
28.03.2016 15:29, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> Somewhy that zip link is awfully slow - download took 2m 12s (compare
> with Firebird-3.0.0.32366-ReleaseCandidate2.tar.bz2 at SF mirror, 24s)
Git is not suitable for large projects with long history such as Firebird:
long time it
has to spend on extra
On 03/28/2016 02:09 PM, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
> On 28/03/2016 06:24, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>> I think that we do not need that additional problems and therefore
>> should not change existing dumb method to generate tarball as long as we
>> do not have same quality with new one.
>>
>>
>
On 28/03/2016 06:24, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>
> I think that we do not need that additional problems and therefore
> should not change existing dumb method to generate tarball as long as we
> do not have same quality with new one.
>
>
But for *who* you generate tarballs with this script?
To put a
On 03/27/2016 09:59 PM, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
> Em 27/03/2016 15:38, Michal Kubecek escreveu:
>> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 10:36:34AM -0300, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>>> So, if we want these files for people build sources more easily, we
>>> should include them in git.
>> Put
Em 27/03/2016 15:38, Michal Kubecek escreveu:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 10:36:34AM -0300, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>>
>> So, if we want these files for people build sources more easily, we
>> should include them in git.
>
> Putting generated files into git would mean developers would ha
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 10:36:34AM -0300, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>
> So, if we want these files for people build sources more easily, we
> should include them in git.
Putting generated files into git would mean developers would have to
take care not to include them in their commits -
Em 27/03/2016 09:00, Александр Пешков escreveu:
>
>
>
> Воскресенье, 27 марта 2016, 5:59 +03:00 от Adriano dos Santos
> Fernandes :
>
> Hi!
>
> Can't we replace this script by git archive command?
>
>
> 2 files, missing in git tree (configure and something like config.guess,
We (RedSoft) usually zip also generated files (cpp for epp) in the
same source archive to debug purposes. These are archive with sources
for the release. Maybe just to build it's not necessary.
2016-03-27 15:00 GMT+03:00 Александр Пешков :
>
>
>
> Воскресенье, 27 марта 2016, 5:59 +03:00 от Adriano
>Воскресенье, 27 марта 2016, 5:59 +03:00 от Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
>:
>
>Hi!
>
>Can't we replace this script by git archive command?
2 files, missing in git tree (configure and something like config.guess, not
absolutely sure which file exactly), should be included in tarball. Can it be
Hi!
Can't we replace this script by git archive command?
Adriano
--
Transform Data into Opportunity.
Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
Click to learn more.
htt
23 matches
Mail list logo
