...@alaska.net; FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] First look at the FLEX-3000 production units
Bruce,
USB was initially tested and failed for use with the FLEX-x000 radios at
high sampling rates. USB is not designed or well suited for high throughput
isochronous multi-channel audio required
-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Steve Kallal
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 8:02 AM
To: 'Tim Ellison'; kl7...@alaska.net; FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] First look at the FLEX-3000 production units
Tim
Tell me then... Where are the 4 channel 192kHz audio USB devices??
Eric Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Lux, James P james.p@jpl.nasa.govwrote:
The PowerSDR software and the Windows drivers available do not know how to
deal with the asynchronous nature of
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Eric Wachsmann e...@flex-radio.com wrote:
Tell me then... Where are the 4 channel 192kHz audio USB devices??
Eric Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems
Here's a defence of USB 2.0 based on experience:
We routinely have 4, 32 bit, 250 kHz data streams running via USB
Tell me then... Where are the 4 channel 192kHz audio USB devices??
Hmm... someone asked me the same exact question three years ago. This
was my reply:
http://www.roland.com/products/en/UA-101/index.html
- 10-In/10-Out 24 bit/96 kHz
- Up to 6-In/6-Out 24 bit/192 kHz
And I'm sure there are
From: Eric Wachsmann [mailto:e...@flex-radio.com]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 10:15 AM
To: Lux, James P
Cc: Steve Kallal; Tim Ellison; kl7...@alaska.net; FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] First look at the FLEX-3000 production units
Tell me
Based on all the problems that seem to be associated with Flex Radios and
FireWire, whether the problem is Windows, drivers, or whatever, it seems to
me that Ethernet is a much better choice. Ethernet chips are cheap, driver
support is standard on all computers/operating systems and it is
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of W7CE
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 11:52 AM
To: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] First look at the FLEX-3000 production units
Based on all
Of Bruce Mills - KL7JDR
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 11:18 PM
To: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] First look at the FLEX-3000 production units
Surprised that Blue was chosen for the Flex-3000 [GY] We did an online
customer poll and blue won.
Black or Silver might go better
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] First look at the FLEX-3000 production units
I note that FRS is introducing new radios that have an IEEE 1394
interface between the computer and the transceiver. Will Linux drivers
be developed? The current IEEE1394 driver situation seems to me to be
very difficult, if even
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Chuck Mayfield
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 9:02 AM
Cc: FlexRadio Reflector
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] First look at the FLEX-3000 production units
Tim, Jim, Terry
Surprised that Blue was chosen for the Flex-3000
Black or Silver might go better with most laptops lcd monitors.
Maybe we could have a color option ?
Also surprised that the key jack is on the front. More wires in front.
Glad to see the 1/4 jack, maybe thats the reason.
Thinking about the
: Re: [Flexradio] First look at the FLEX-3000 production units
Surprised that Blue was chosen for the Flex-3000
Black or Silver might go better with most laptops lcd monitors.
Maybe we could have a color option ?
Also surprised that the key jack is on the front. More wires in front.
Glad to see
For those who are interested, there are two new updated images of the
production version FLEX-3000 on the web site.
http://www.flex-radio.com/Products.aspx?topic=F3k_features
You will notice a few changes from the original prototype pictures that were
used previously other than an improvement
--- On Wed, 2/18/09, Tim Ellison t...@flex-radio.com wrote:
From: Tim Ellison t...@flex-radio.com
Subject: [Flexradio] First look at the FLEX-3000 production units
To: FlexRadio Reflector flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Date: Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 6:18 PM
For those who are interested
I note that FRS is introducing new radios that have an IEEE 1394
interface between the computer and the transceiver. Will Linux drivers
be developed? The current IEEE1394 driver situation seems to me to be
very difficult, if even possible, to configure. In fact, I have not
been able to get
] On Behalf Of Burt
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 8:57 PM
To: Tim Ellison
Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] First look at the FLEX-3000 production units
How is it different from the 5000 other than the obvious connections and
outside?
A dedication to WWII Veterans, we should never
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Chuck Mayfield
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 5:55 PM
Cc: FlexRadio Reflector
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] First look at the FLEX-3000 production units
I note
Tim Ellison wrote:
For those who are interested, there are two new updated images of the
production version FLEX-3000 on the web site.
http://www.flex-radio.com/Products.aspx?topic=F3k_features
You will notice a few changes from the original prototype pictures
that were used previously other
: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz]on Behalf Of Chuck Mayfield
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 8:55 PM
Cc: FlexRadio Reflector
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] First look at the FLEX-3000 production units
I note that FRS is introducing new radios that have
20 matches
Mail list logo
