I like the concept of the mice.xml file, but am not really comfortable about
having the implied modal state hidden in there. Can we break it out, so that
mouse, joystick and keyboard events can be conditional on state variables ?
/input/mice/mouse[0]/mode>/property>
0
Some good news and bad news with trying to get MSVC to compile the current
version of JSBSim. First the good news: I just went through the exercise
of changing the names of the methods the confused MSVC (adding _V to the
vectors) and got all of JSBSim to compile. Make things easy for the
co
way lee wrote:
>
> I meet a problem when I compile flightgear0.7.9. The VC
> compiler told me that there was no mk4vc60s.lib.
>
> I can't find it in CD-image.
>
> Can you tell me where is it?
>
mk4vc60s.lib is the Metakit library. The source is included as a
separate tar.gz file in the SimG
> > > > > Will there be a way to get the base package with rsync some day? The
> > > > > snapshots keep my 14kbps modem busy for a long time.
> > > >
> > > > I've got an experimental server that offers scenery via rsync, but it
> > > > is hardly used. I assert that few people in the FGFS com
I meet a problem when I compile flightgear0.7.9. The VC compiler told me that there was no mk4vc60s.lib.
I can't find it in CD-image.
Can you tell me where is it?Do You Yahoo!?
Æû³µ -- ÓÀ²»Ñá¾ëµÄ»°Ìâ
> You can do it with your keypad as well (unless you have a notebook,
> like I do).
On mine, I can use shifted-arrow-keys for 90 degree steps, or
shifted-pageup and shifted-pagedown for the diagonal right views
with shifted-home and shifted-end for the diagonal left views.
It's better than sillyb
Andy Ross writes:
> Wolfram Kuss wrote:
> > I indeed think it is very important while landing to be able to look
> > ahead or look at the landing spot with the press of a key. In RL, my
> > head swivels between those two views, especially while in base. Don't
> > know whether some AI or
On Tuesday 26 March 2002 02:17 pm, you wrote:
> > > > Will there be a way to get the base package with rsync some day? The
> > > > snapshots keep my 14kbps modem busy for a long time.
> > >
> > > I've got an experimental server that offers scenery via rsync, but it
> > > is hardly used. I as
Jim, the transparent panel now has the correct viewport but is oversized
so the edges disappear beyond the end of the forward view. In contrast,
the standard panel is slightly undersized because the compass is not centered.
Other than that, it's great and I'll switch my default as soon as the mou
On Tuesday 26 March 2002 10:23 am, you wrote:
> Matthias Heukäufer writes:
> > I've asked this before on FGFS-Users, but obviously nobody has read my
> > mail so far:
> > Will there be a way to get the base package with rsync some day? The
> > snapshots keep my 14kbps modem busy for a long time.
>
> Something I've thought would be useful (but don't know how
> feasible it is to implement) would be for a user to be
> able to configure where [s]he looks while "in the
> pattern". It would be nice to enable some kind of
> "auto-look" kind of feature that scans various views while
> making t
> I indeed think it is very important while landing to be able to look
> ahead or look at the landing spot with the press of a key. In RL, my
> head swivels between those two views, especially while in base. Don't
> know whether some AI or much user defined stuff is needed for *this*
> feature tho
Wolfram Kuss wrote:
> I indeed think it is very important while landing to be able to look
> ahead or look at the landing spot with the press of a key. In RL, my
> head swivels between those two views, especially while in base. Don't
> know whether some AI or much user defined stuff is needed
Wolfram Kuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I indeed think it is very important while landing to be able to look
> ahead or look at the landing spot with the press of a key. In RL, my
> head swivels between those two views, especially while in base. Don't
> know whether some AI or much user defined
Jon S Berndt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Something I've thought would be useful (but don't know how
> feasible it is to implement) would be for a user to be
> able to configure where [s]he looks while "in the
> pattern". It would be nice to enable some kind of
> "auto-look" kind of feature th
> A tower view could therefore be either "lookat" or "lookfrom" depending on
> what it is that you want to see. Tower as defined in the proposal would be
> "lookat" and would therefore follow an object down the runway.
I should point out that I think of the "lookat" view from a fixed point as
th
> > > Will there be a way to get the base package with rsync some day? The
> > > snapshots keep my 14kbps modem busy for a long time.
> > I've got an experimental server that offers scenery via rsync, but it
> > is hardly used. I assert that few people in the FGFS community know
> > how to u
Alex Perry writes:
> I've got an experimental server that offers scenery via rsync, but
> it is hardly used. I assert that few people in the FGFS community
> know how to use rsync.
I use it with ssh to maintain a Web site, and it's great. With a fast
network connection, though, CVS is fine
Hi Eveybody,
The text document linked below outlines a format for view configuration
using the new viewer. The interface and backend that could support this is
pretty much done. The only thing left is to finish the viewmanager, hence
this document.
Overview:
The "config" branches should be set
Alex Perry wrote:
> > Will there be a way to get the base package with rsync some day? The
> > snapshots keep my 14kbps modem busy for a long time.
>
> I've got an experimental server that offers scenery via rsync, but it
> is hardly used. I assert that few people in the FGFS community know
> Will there be a way to get the base package with rsync some day? The
> snapshots keep my 14kbps modem busy for a long time.
I've got an experimental server that offers scenery via rsync, but
it is hardly used. I assert that few people in the FGFS community
know how to use rsync.
Thanks, for the tips. I ended up using ImageTool on my
Sun. I didn't have anything on my PC that recognized it.
I converted it to a jpeg so now I can insert it into Word,
PowerPoint, etc.
Thanks!
Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: Curtis L. Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tues
Boslough, Mark B writes:
> I am attempting to grab a frame from FlightGear, which saves images as ppm
> files. Can someone tell me how to display a ppm file? None of the image
> software I have seems to recognize them.
Have you tried gimp or xv? I think 'convert' from the imagemagick
package w
Howdy,
I am attempting to grab a frame from FlightGear, which saves images as ppm
files. Can someone tell me how to display a ppm file? None of the image
software I have seems to recognize them.
Thanks,
Mark Boslough
___
Flightgear-devel mailing
Melchior FRANZ writes:
> * Curtis L. Olson -- Tuesday 26 March 2002 18:01:
> > The current runways.mk4 and code is self consistant (and appears to be
> > correct) and works properly both on my home machines and work
> > machines.
>
> But it causes a more severe error message in the valgrind run,
* Curtis L. Olson -- Tuesday 26 March 2002 18:01:
> The current runways.mk4 and code is self consistant (and appears to be
> correct) and works properly both on my home machines and work
> machines.
But it causes a more severe error message in the valgrind run,
than it did before these changes. I
Melchior FRANZ writes:
> Oops ... that was the wrong fix. The new runways.mk4 was there for a reason:
> Two string entries were written to and read from the runways.mk4 database
> as floats. This was, of course, wrong and potentially harmful, but it was
> at least consistent and worked without (no
* Curtis L. Olson -- Tuesday 26 March 2002 03:16:
> Also, I was crashing with the latest runways.mk4 committed today, but
> I regenerated it myself and could run fine. Maybe something got hosed
> in the earlier commit ??? so I committed my re-re-generated version
> and hopefully that will work fo
I've just added docs-mini/README.xmlsyntax, a very short introduction
to the basics of XML syntax. There's not much there that most of you
haven't already figured out on your own, but I thought that it would
be useful for other FlightGear documentation to reference (to avoid
repeating XML syntax
Matthias Heukäufer writes:
> I've asked this before on FGFS-Users, but obviously nobody has read my mail
> so far:
> Will there be a way to get the base package with rsync some day? The
> snapshots keep my 14kbps modem busy for a long time.
You can get the base package via cvs. Then, subsequen
Hi!
I've asked this before on FGFS-Users, but obviously nobody has read my mail
so far:
Will there be a way to get the base package with rsync some day? The
snapshots keep my 14kbps modem busy for a long time.
Thanks,
Matthias
___
Flightgear-devel m
Alex Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> PS.
> 5. On the non-3D panel, the transparent instrument panel is still doing
> the viewport incorrectly. Oddly, the non-instrument panel viewport is fine.
>
A few mini-panels were screwed up after a bug fix a couple weeks ago. The
default transparent m
The configurable mouse support is now about 75% complete, and it
already provides most of the functionality of the old GUI/mouse.cxx
module. I'd be grateful if people could start taking a look by
building FlightGear --with-new-mouse and looking over
$FG_ROOT/mice.xml. I've designed everything to
Geoff McLane wrote:
>
> Also, such function additions gives the compiler/linker a
> chance to really make this 'inline', since the double value
> could be 'addressed' in simple lines, when loaded, like
> moveax, [0x12345678]; get that double
> movedx,[0x12345678+4]
> or in 64-
> > However, I do think we could clean it up a bit with a pre-processor
> > #define AEROINTFUNC double (FGAerodynamics::*)(int) const
>>> or typedef ...
>> ... renaming ... to remove the ambiguity any better?
As someone - i think - mentioned, IMHO it would be
better to have single getter functio
35 matches
Mail list logo
