just tried building latest cvs and got the following error:
make[3]: Entering directory `/cygdrive/c/Documents and
Settings/jbarrett/Desktop/FlightSim/Devel/cvsroot/source/src/Cockpit'
if
++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src/Include -I../.. -I../../src -I/usr/X
11R6/include -g -O2 -MT radiosta
I have done some extensive testing with read() using tcp and it seems to
be working great.
Thanks,
Seamus
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Bernie Bright wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 07:23:30 -0600
> "Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Curtis L. Olson writes:
> > > Bernie Bright writes:
> >
On Friday 28 November 2003 02:31, Brandon Craig Rhodes wrote:
> My Microsoft SideWinder 3D Pro joystick was not recognized by
> FlightGear, so I wrote the following joystick configuration file -
> which I hereby contribute, and request that it be added to CVS.
>
> There were two issues that arose
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 10:11:26 +
Matthew Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10:47 Thu 27 Nov , Erik Hofman wrote:
Yeah, but then you'd get a fight over which flag is put in first and
which flag is shows just for 0.1 usec (e.g. the last flag) ...
Erik
Maybe randomise the order ?
All the bes
My Microsoft SideWinder 3D Pro joystick was not recognized by
FlightGear, so I wrote the following joystick configuration file -
which I hereby contribute, and request that it be added to CVS.
There were two issues that arose while writing it, which I think may
have the same resolution:
(1) Joys
Brandon Craig Rhodes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In response to a private request from another developer, I went
> ahead and generated a new star catalogue. I built it from exactly
> the same source as it seems to have been built from before - the
> YBS.edb file in the xephem distribution ...
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Jonathan Richards wrote:
> I noticed this at Cardiff a little while ago:
> http://www.jnorichards.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/images/EGFF.jpg
>
> I downloaded the scenery tile again, and it went away, so I assumed I had got
> a mismatch between the airport data and the scenery someho
Jonathan Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ... if the sim were ever extended to spacecraft, we'd want to get
> the geometry exactly right.
If with intelligent enough management of levels-of-detail we can model
the atmosphere and earth adequately with contemporary hardware, then I
suggest we
Good news: I've just added a dialog box for selecting a new airport from a
scrolling list.
Bad news: the JSBSim 172 flips upside-down whenever I switch airports.
All the best,
David
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flig
I'll justify my diagram just a bit more, maybe for a clarification.
True, the sun has a diameter much larger than earth.
My reasoning for the sizes shown was that even if the sun is much
larger, the earth appears to be much bigger by virtue of being much
closer. My diagram makes some bad assumpti
Matthew Law wrote:
I've looked at these and the grass textures look like green-tinted gaussian noise. The dirt runway looks quite like a filter I've seen somewhere before... ;-) It seems quite reasonable to me but it isn't quite symetrical and the X and Y join lines are visible up close.
What so
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 07:23:30 -0600
"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Curtis L. Olson writes:
> > Bernie Bright writes:
> > > SGSocket::readline() and SGSocket::read() do act differently. For a
> > > server, readline() correctly handles the accept and reads from the new
> > > socket.
On Thursday 27 November 2003 22:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ok, i found it now. :)
>
> It is called "Planet engine" and can be downloaded here:
> http://drtypo.free.fr/download.html
>
> But there are also some bad news, i was wrong, it is only freeware not open
> source. :(
> It also doesn't ru
On Thursday 27 November 2003 20:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thursday 27 November 2003 19:44, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Thursday 27 November 2003 19:29:
> > [simulator for planets]
> >
> > > Does anyone know the name of that simulator?
> >
> > ssystem? Unfortunately, the
On Thursday 27 November 2003 19:44, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Thursday 27 November 2003 19:29:
> [simulator for planets]
>
> > Does anyone know the name of that simulator?
>
> ssystem? Unfortunately, the HP is down. Should be part of
> typical Linux distributions.
>
> m.
No, t
On Thursday 27 Nov 2003 9:47 am, Erik Hofman wrote:
> Yeah, but then you'd get a fight over which flag is put in first and
> which flag is shows just for 0.1 usec (e.g. the last flag) ...
Outside NATO HQ in Brussels, the flags are in alphabetical order of national
name. English name, though, so
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Thursday 27 November 2003 19:29:
[simulator for planets]
> Does anyone know the name of that simulator?
ssystem? Unfortunately, the HP is down. Should be part of
typical Linux distributions.
m.
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Jonathan Richards wrote:
> On Thursday 27 Nov 2003 5:23 am, JD Fenech wrote:
> > Not too shabby, but it probably has holes. I do know that the last time
> > I checked, FG will display the sun at midnight, especially if you fly up
> > high enough, even if the earth is actually in the way, as in dir
On Wednesday 26 Nov 2003 7:51 pm, Major A wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> We've just had a really lucky day in Bristol today, as far as weather
> goes. There were some dark clouds in the West, I think we wouldn't
> have seen much of Concorde's last flight if it had been half an hour
> earlier or later!
>
> A
On Thursday 27 Nov 2003 5:23 am, JD Fenech wrote:
>
> Not too shabby, but it probably has holes. I do know that the last time
> I checked, FG will display the sun at midnight, especially if you fly up
> high enough, even if the earth is actually in the way, as in directly in
> the way.
The diagra
On Wednesday 26 Nov 2003 10:38 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Lee Elliott worte:
> > You said "If anyone has any requests I'd be happy to add them or move
> > them up the list." :)
> >
> > Not an RAF field but I've noticed that London Stanstead (EGSS) appears to
> > have been sunk about 50ft int
On 18:49 Tue 25 Nov , Erik Hofman wrote:
> >So 75x75 textures of these types of surfaces are required, then? I might
> >have a go at these during my attempts at modelling EGNF. Are there any
> >restrictions to the making of textures that I need to be aware of oether
> >than size and color d
Brandon,
Thanks for spotting and fixing this problem, the star file has now
been updated.
Curt.
Brandon Craig Rhodes writes:
> Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Brandon Craig Rhodes wrote:
>
> >> Many FlightGear constellations have the wrong shapes ... whoever
> >> built your star
Brandon Craig Rhodes writes:
>
> I am positive; the coordinates in the stars file were simply wrong,
> and fixing them repaired the constellations. Orion before:
>
> http://www.rhodesmill.org/tmp/orion-before.png
>
> Orion after:
>
> http://www.rhodesmill.org/tmp/orion-after.png
P
Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Brandon Craig Rhodes wrote:
>> Many FlightGear constellations have the wrong shapes ... whoever
>> built your star database (the data/Astro/stars file in CVS) made
>> the error of applying a negative sign only to the units, and not
>> the fractions, of th
On 14:48 Thu 27 Nov , Jon Stockill wrote:
> I remember seeing the army display team at RAF Waddington a couple of
> years ago - 4 gazelle & 1 lynx all lined up in the hover, then the lynx
> pilot backflipped the aircraft out of the lineup. The first time you see
> it you really can't believe wh
Hi,
the Westland Lynx has nearly the same rotor than the bo (they both were
developed in the same project at boelkow).
Maik
Matthew Law wrote:
On 07:50 Thu 27 Nov , Martin Spott wrote:
The first is correct, the latter is not (see above). Pilots love this
helicopter because of his outsta
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Matthew Law wrote:
> Check out the Westland Lynx. I've seen these at a couple of airshows
> this year and the pilots did manage quite a bit of inverted flight
> during their routines. These too have a rigid rotor head with
> elastomeric bearings and the blades are intentiona
Curtis L. Olson writes:
> Bernie Bright writes:
> > SGSocket::readline() and SGSocket::read() do act differently. For a
> > server, readline() correctly handles the accept and reads from the new
> > socket. read() also handles the accept but reads from the master socket.
> > I'm not sure if this
Bernie Bright writes:
> SGSocket::readline() and SGSocket::read() do act differently. For a
> server, readline() correctly handles the accept and reads from the new
> socket. read() also handles the accept but reads from the master socket.
> I'm not sure if this is intentional or if its a bug.
S
Erik Hofman wrote:
Here's an idea ... now that FlightGear is deathly quiet, I can't tell
if FlightGear is doing anything when it is starting up or if my
machine has hung. Maybe we could make a progress bar out of the flags
of all the countries of people that have contributed to
FlightGear. (?) I
On 10:47 Thu 27 Nov , Erik Hofman wrote:
> Yeah, but then you'd get a fight over which flag is put in first and
> which flag is shows just for 0.1 usec (e.g. the last flag) ...
>
> Erik
Maybe randomise the order ?
All the best,
Matt
___
Flightge
> > Here's an idea ... now that FlightGear is deathly quiet, I
> can't tell
> > if FlightGear is doing anything when it is starting up or if my
> > machine has hung. Maybe we could make a progress bar out
> of the flags
> > of all the countries of people that have contributed to
> > FlightGear.
Brandon Craig Rhodes wrote:
Many FlightGear constellations have the wrong shapes; in particular
Orion's belt has the shape of a "V" rather than a straight line! It
seems that whoever built your star database (the data/Astro/stars file
in CVS) made the error of applying a negative sign only to the
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Andy Ross writes:
I, for one, think it would be immensely cool if the flag bar grew over
time. If any revisions are going to be done to the list, though, it
should be pointed out that there's no maple leaf on the existing
banner. Don't tell David.
I told Jon when he made
Andy Ross wrote:
But here's a question on a related subject. How do we handle
declaration of Nasal code? The ability to write inline handlers is
great, but limited to small functions. The ability to drop module
files into the Nasal directory is great too, for globally useful
code.
But sometimes
On 07:50 Thu 27 Nov , Martin Spott wrote:
> The first is correct, the latter is not (see above). Pilots love this
> helicopter because of his outstanding manouverability. It's even
> capable of doing serious aerobatic - up to inverted flying (AFAIR with
> a modified gear box lubrication),
Chec
Andy Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Spott wrote:
>> No, because the BO105 - contrary to the 'usual' Bell's for example -
>> has a rigid rotor. Please have a look here:
>>
>> http://www.b-domke.de/AviationImages/Rotorhead.html#Eurocopter
> Well, that explains my confusion... I guess this
38 matches
Mail list logo
