On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 03:32:11AM +0200, Ivo wrote:
On Friday 01 July 2005 14:05, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
http://members.aon.at/mfranz/citest [1.2kb]
I'm working on a similar tool (meaning: checking sanity of files) for
another project and this part does not work correctly with all
David Luff wrote:
[...] I'll send it again and remind him about the
runways! Hopefully I'll get rid of the rest of the data onto him by
the time he updates again.
Thanks for your effort !
Robin is using TaxiDraw himself now, as are a number of the regular
X-Plane contributors, so there
Le mardi 02 août 2005 à 00:42 -0500, Jon Berndt a écrit :
When the JSB a/c model has several engine+propeller we get
that JSB message error:
Failed to tie property propulsion/c-thrust[0] to a pointer
What must be defined in Aircraft.xml to solve it.
--
Gerard
Which version of
Jon Berndt wrote:
I've tried these both. This seems to be fatal no matter what I do:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/JSBSim$ ./configure
configure: error: cannot run /bin/sh ./config.sub
There are two things: Is is a symbolic link (and does the target exist)
and is it marked executable?
Erik
Jon Berndt wrote:
I've tried these both. This seems to be fatal no matter what I do:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/JSBSim$ ./configure
configure: error: cannot run /bin/sh ./config.sub
There are two things: Is is a symbolic link (and does the target exist)
and is it marked executable?
Erik
I
Hi --
I used to be able to get to Wolfram's hangar for FlightGear Flight
Simulator models through the link but now all I get is a T-mobile web
page. Is his site still out there in the ether somewhere? It was a
really great site!
Thanks,
Stacie
___
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 16:03, Corrubia, Stacie K wrote:
I used to be able to get to Wolfram's hangar for FlightGear Flight
Simulator models through the link but now all I get is a T-mobile web
page. Is his site still out there in the ether somewhere?
I don't know of a current host, but you
In case anyone is interested in looking at airplane pictures, I just
returned from a trip to Mojave, CA (KMHV) where I got to see a bunch of
neat aviation stuff. I took some pictures and posted them here:
http://www.flightgear.org/~curt/Photos/KMHV/
Mojave is home to a lot of wind mills on
Gerard Robin wrote:
Being Nvidia and X installed , i continu to search a good answer :
After many experimentations, I did not notice any change between
24bpp and 32 bpp.
There is no difference between 24 and 32 bpp on NVidia hardware. Both
of them give you a 32 bit 8:8:8:8 RGBA front and
On Sunday 31 July 2005 11:12, Paul Surgeon wrote:
SimGear WILL NOT compile with nVidia 6629 headers (like it used to).
I updated to 7667 OpenGL headers and it compiles now.
I should perhaps mention here for those not keen on updating to the newer
nvidia drivers yet that SimGear CVS (on 1st
Andy Ross wrote:
Gerard Robin wrote:
Being Nvidia and X installed , i continu to search a good answer :
After many experimentations, I did not notice any change between
24bpp and 32 bpp.
There is no difference between 24 and 32 bpp on NVidia hardware. Both
of them give you a 32 bit
Le mardi 02 août 2005 à 09:53 -0700, Andy Ross a écrit :
Gerard Robin wrote:
Being Nvidia and X installed , i continu to search a good answer :
After many experimentations, I did not notice any change between
24bpp and 32 bpp.
There is no difference between 24 and 32 bpp on NVidia
A J MacLeod wrote:
I should perhaps mention here for those not keen on updating to the
newer nvidia drivers yet that SimGear CVS (on 1st August 2005)
_does_ compile here on nVidia 6629 and runs fine, so it's worth
trying...
You might not have the NVIDIA headers installed. Check
Le mardi 02 août 2005 à 19:17 +0200, Harald JOHNSEN a écrit :
Andy Ross wrote:
FlightGear asks for a default color depth of 16bpp, but it also asks
for stencil; this is essentially a bug. These are not compatible
requests on any modern GPUs, which only support 8 bit stencil in true
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 18:30, Andy Ross wrote:
You might not have the NVIDIA headers installed. Check
/usr/include/GL/gl.h to see if it has an NVIDIA copyright at the top
or an x.org one. I think some of the non-NVIDIA binary distributions
of the driver include only the libraries and X
On Tuesday, 2 August 2005 21:25, AJ MacLeod wrote:
I'm using nvidia's headers all right...
From /usr/include/GL/gl.h
A while back I found that when the nVidia installer did its nut I had two
versions of GL files.
One set in /usr/include/GL and one in /usr/X11R6/include.
One was nVidia and
Gerard Robin wrote:
startup
splash-textureAircraft/harrier/harrier-splash.rgb/splash-texture
/startup
You have a splash screen image for an aircraft with no 3D model? :)
Andy
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
Oops,
you are quite right. I should have thought about it before I had sent this
mail.
Matthias
On Monday 01 August 2005 23:21, Gerard Robin wrote:
Le lundi 01 août 2005 à 23:08 +0200, Matthias Boerner a écrit :
Hi,
also NVIDIA is not working with 32bpp: You will get following error
Le mardi 02 août 2005 à 13:28 -0700, Andy Ross a écrit :
Gerard Robin wrote:
startup
splash-textureAircraft/harrier/harrier-splash.rgb/splash-texture
/startup
You have a splash screen image for an aircraft with no 3D model? :)
Andy
I have 3D models, sorry, i have a lot of aircrafts
Craig, two quick issues with your mail:
First, I notice that you are habitually starting new threads by
replying to existing, unrelated messages. Don't. This causes
problems for those of us who are using threaded mail client (I use
Mozilla Thunderbird, for example). It's confusing to be
OK, so I ordered some flight manuals on CD from eflightmanuals.com, but
what they didn't tell me is that they send them in a proprietary
encryption scheme for PDF files that requires Windows ME of later which
I don't have. According to the encryption software manufacturers it is
AES 256 bit
I was just thinking, if you could determine the amount of cloud cover
between the sun and the viewpoint, you could adjust the light levels for
some neat effects. It would seem wrong when looking into the distance,
but I don't think it would be too noticeable. Perhaps there is a way to
only affect
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josh Babcock schrieb:
OK, so I ordered some flight manuals on CD from eflightmanuals.com, but
what they didn't tell me is that they send them in a proprietary
encryption scheme for PDF files that requires Windows ME of later which
I don't have.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andy Ross schrieb:
* Which, at least for the US airplanes, are government documents and
therefore uncopyrightable. The only legal restriction on their
distribution would be their security classification, AFAIK. IANAL,
blah blah blah.
Christian Mayer wrote:
Shouldn't you then be able to get these documents easily by the
freedom of information act?
I dunno, I've never made a FOIA request. But from what I've been led
to believe it's a very slow, bureaucratic process. And in this case
it will be complicated because of the
Christian Mayer wrote:
Josh Babcock schrieb:
OK, so I ordered some flight manuals on CD from eflightmanuals.com, but
what they didn't tell me is that they send them in a proprietary
encryption scheme for PDF files that requires Windows ME of later which
I don't have. According to the encryption
Andy Ross wrote:
Christian Mayer wrote:
Shouldn't you then be able to get these documents easily by the
freedom of information act?
I dunno, I've never made a FOIA request. But from what I've been led
to believe it's a very slow, bureaucratic process. And in this case
it will be
Josh Babcock wrote:
These require a proprietary reader from Locklizard which does not
have printing enabled.
Hrm... then apparently he has changed mechanisms. The F-51D handbook
I ordered a year or so ago is a plain encrypted PDF (with an extra
step to get it off the CD that involves an
OK, I will attend to this. Thanks for the info.Andy Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig, two quick issues with your mail:First, I notice that you are habitually starting new threads byreplying to existing, unrelated messages. Don't. This causesproblems for those of us who are using threaded mail
Josh,
I have bought 4-5 manuals from them, and I have seen 2 types of copy protection, both a pain in the rear. I have also found them to be a little slow in the response category, so I agree on that point also.
On the return front, no returns for media is up to the seller, especially in the
Wow, have you guys seen the price on the locklizard stuff? Eflightmanuals must be making some money.of course, this has now become a huge challenge;)Andy Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josh Babcock wrote: These require a proprietary reader from Locklizard which does not have printing
Craig Martin wrote:
Josh,
I have bought 4-5 manuals from them, and I have seen 2 types of copy
protection, both a pain in the rear. I have also found them to be a
little slow in the response category, so I agree on that point also.
On the return front, no returns for media is up to the
32 matches
Mail list logo
