> -Original Message-
> From: John Austin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: November 20, 2003 12:37 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Development Environment suggestions ?
>
> So far I have been playing around like the Neanderthal*
> that I am. I use Sun Java 1.4.x with xterm, vi, emacs
> -Original Message-
> From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: September 2, 2003 2:49 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Place committers on inactive list?
>
>
> Le Mardi, 2 sep 2003, à 03:33 Europe/Zurich, Glen Mazza a écrit :
> > ...Perhaps Karen, Arved and Bert
> -Original Message-
> From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: June 16, 2003 5:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Nomination of Glen Mazza as committer
>
>
> Victor Mote wrote:
> > Being the greenest committer, I had hoped to defer this
> nomination to a more
> >
tters who are
interested in more - documentation, planning, the community, etc. The former
category, just as the non-committer developers, is not to be denigrated, but
you can defintely identify committers who take an interest in the big
picture as "leaders".
Arved Sandstrom
> ---
> -Original Message-
> From: Keiron Liddle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: February 25, 2003 9:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: markers in redesign
>
>
> > Looking at it again, I disagree. The "containing page" is the page
> > containing the first area generated or returned b
Comments below.
> -Original Message-
> From: Keiron Liddle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: February 24, 2003 10:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: markers in redesign
>
> > Exactly. All definitions regarding retrieve-position exclusively
> > refer to the "current page". There i
Comments inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: February 24, 2003 10:26 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: markers in redesign
>
>
> Arved Sandstrom wrote at 24 Feb 2003 08:01:40 -0400:
> > Comments be
Comments below.
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: February 24, 2003 6:53 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: markers in redesign
>
[ SNIP ]
> It seems to me that the "hierarchy" is not the same as the area tree or
> fo tree hierarchy. It i
Hi, Keiron
I interpret 6.11.4 as follows. Number one, the names have to match -
"marker-class-name" and "retrieve-class-name". This is straightforward. It
defines qualifying areas.
Number two, qualifying areas are excluded if they follow the page being
formatted, regardless of "retrieve-boundary"
> -Original Message-
> From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: February 21, 2003 1:35 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Long licence
>
> On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Arved Sandstrom wrote:
>
> > I'd like to find out what lawyer thou
22, 2003 8:23 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Markers in areas
>
>
> Arved Sandstrom wrote:
> > They are not connected concepts, Mark. I originally put in the code for
> > lineage pairs, and also started the implementation for markers. So I can
> > ass
what's bad about it. The licence stays in every file as
> necessary, the IDE should just as a service to the developer hide the
> licence because it's not relevant to normal development tasks.
>
> On 21.02.2003 14:01:34 Arved Sandstrom wrote:
> > I find it odd that it&#
Dirk, you may have seen my post on members, about this. The whole length of
license issue.
I find it odd that it's OK to suggest tools (IDEs/editors, etc) to hide a
license. When the argument presented to the board was presumably that the
long license is legally required.
I'd like to find out wha
uary 18, 2003 4:09 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Markers in areas
>
> Arved Sandstrom wrote:
> > Joerg, you can freely get rid of that stuff.
>
> Great!
> Anybody out there bothering to profile the new
Joerg, you can freely get rid of that stuff. I originally introduced it when
I had more faith in the spec, and thought that the authors knew what they
were talking about when it came to to their math. Specifically, the lineage
pairs is an abstract concept that I can see no implementation use for. I
;
> We had no -1 votes. The following active committers haven't voted so
> far: Karen Lease and Arved Sandstrom.
>
>
> Keiron Liddle proposed establishing some kind of rotation for the FOP
> representation in the XML PMC. We like the idea and we would like to ask
> the curr
> -Original Message-
> From: Joerg Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: January 3, 2003 5:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Footnote Problem
>
>
> Hi all,
> is the footnote are supposed to span the whole page width even
> if the body region has columns? If so, adding a fo
Title: JforIntegrationInFop - background and guidelines
I
looked at the page, Rhett. It looks good as a mission statement. This area
interests me a lot too, and I hope to start adding to it.
Arved
-Original Message-From: Rhett Aultman
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: December 26
I'd like to wish everyone here happy holidays, whatever is appropriate.
This is a good crowd.
Regards,
Arved Sandstrom
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But it was plausible. :-)
> -Original Message-
> From: Patrick Dean Rusk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: December 18, 2002 12:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Sun XSL Formatter
>
>
> Then I retract the suggestion.
>
> Pat
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Graham
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: December 16, 2002 12:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Sun XSL Formatter
>
>
> Arved Sandstrom wrote at 14 Dec 2002 15:05:05 -0400:
> > No bitterness at all, actually, Pet
> -Original Message-
> From: Victor Mote [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: December 14, 2002 3:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Sun XSL Formatter
>
>
> Arved Sandstrom wrote:
>
> > But can I point out that C is about as portable as it gets?
&
> -Original Message-
> From: Victor Mote [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: December 14, 2002 3:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Sun XSL Formatter
>
>
> Peter S. Housel wrote:
>
> > Looks like they want to donate it to Gnome, not Apache.
>
> AFAIR, the BSD license is pretty inco
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter S. Housel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: December 14, 2002 2:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Sun XSL Formatter
>
>
> "Arved Sandstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Well, Java or C or
Message-
> From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: December 13, 2002 8:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Sun XSL Formatter
>
>
> Arved Sandstrom wrote:
> > Not to sound bitter, but it would have been nice to know about
> this sooner.
>
Not to sound bitter, but it would have been nice to know about this sooner.
This pretty much usurps what I and Eric Bischoff have been doing (when we
can); I sort of figure it didn't get written in the last month either. Any
reason for the blasted secretiveness?
Arved
> -Original Message-
Responses below.
> -Original Message-
> From: Keiron Liddle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: December 10, 2002 5:56 AM
> To: FOP
> Subject: RE: Redesign issues
>
>
> Hi Arved,
>
> On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 20:30, Arved Sandstrom wrote:
> > The feeling I
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: December 9, 2002 8:56 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Redesign issues
>
>
> Keiron Liddle wrote:
> >
> >
> > I still believe that it is useful to have the layout managers separate
> > from the fo tree. T
Response below.
> -Original Message-
> From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: December 7, 2002 7:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Redesign issues
>
[ SNIP ]
> Now the biggest issue: the layout managers itself. At the first
> glance it is
> not obvious why they s
Considering that our new chief executive is Greg Stein, I'd be surprised if
this isn't on the horizon. :-)
> -Original Message-
> From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: December 1, 2002 4:12 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Still on for freeze deadline?
>
>
> Jerem
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: November 26, 2002 3:25 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Alt-Design status: XML handling
>
> Rhett,
>
> To comment on only two aspects of your posting.
>
> Rhett Aultman wrote:
> >
> > -Original Messag
Realistically I should be considered inactive myself. Thanks for bringing
this up, Art.
I just happen to have a brutal workload at the moment and I don't see it
lessening in the next 4 months, minimum. It's fun stuff - I love it - but at
the end of a workday I can't stand to look at code much, and
+1.
> -Original Message-
> From: Keiron Liddle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: November 20, 2002 5:23 AM
> To: FOP
> Subject: [VOTE] Victor as committer
>
>
> Hi Developers,
>
> I propose we have a vote for Victor to become a committer.
>
> Plenty of eagerness shown already and I am
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin O'Neill [mailto:kevin@;rocketred.com.au]
> Sent: November 11, 2002 5:47 PM
> To: FOP Developers
> Subject: Re: A performance patch for PDFInfo class
>
[ SNIP ]
> String buffers are used by the compiler to implement the binary string
> concatenation operato
> -Original Message-
> From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: October 6, 2002 2:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re:
>
>
> Arved Sandstrom wrote:
> > And unless _I_ am missing something, "-" precisely matches that
> -Original Message-
> From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: October 6, 2002 1:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re:
>
>
> Arved Sandstrom wrote:
> > An Expr can be a Literal, the production for which is
> >
> > '
> -Original Message-
> From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: October 6, 2002 12:39 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re:
>
> Arved Sandstrom wrote:
> > Can you cite the specific productions that lead to this
> conclusion? I am not
>
> -Original Message-
> From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: October 6, 2002 12:00 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re:
>
>
> Arved Sandstrom wrote:
> > Why is character="-" a parsing error? The XML Recommendation
> has at
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: September 30, 2002 11:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re:
>
> Arved Sandstrom wrote:
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: Tony Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
ength 1.
>
> Except that you know that that's not specified among the allowed
> conversions.
>
> The interesting thing is that 'character' doesn't appear in the
> productions in Section 5.9, Expressions, of the XSL Recommendation.
> Now there's a question for [
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: September 26, 2002 11:41 AM
> To: fop-dev
> Subject:
>
> Fopdevs,
>
> Any comments on the representation and parsing of type
> attributes would be gratefully received.
This came up on www-xsl-fo, because Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: August 20, 2002 9:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Style issues.
[ SNIP ]
> > The only encoding rule I'd realy like to have:
> > Don't mix underscores with camelCase.
> > Beside looking *really*
> -Original Message-
> From: Karen Lease [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: August 19, 2002 6:58 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Tasks - layout
>
[ SNIP ]
> With regard to the line-height calculations, is anybody in the group
> interested in getting into the gory details of the b
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin O'Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: August 15, 2002 9:14 PM
> To: FOP Developers
> Subject: Re: Style issues.
>
[ SNIP ]
> Now you might say "but a developer might forget to do it so it's
> worthless over time", that's where code quality tools like
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: August 14, 2002 11:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: FOP memory usage
>
> Joerg, Keiron, et al,
>
> This is why I have harped on the theme of lookahead. The layout design
> simply must accommodate it,
> -Original Message-
> From: Joerg Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: August 13, 2002 4:53 AM
> To: FOP Dev
> Subject: Re: just a thought
>
> Oleg Tkachenko wrote
[ Snipped Oleg's proposal ]
>
> I thought I posted this two weeks ago. I made some
> measurements with the FOP exam
> -Original Message-
> From: Oleg Tkachenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: August 12, 2002 8:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: just a thought
>
> It's probably not too late to consider some trivial optimization of fo
> tree in redesign code. In a typical fo document probably abo
> -Original Message-
> From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: August 3, 2002 3:05 AM
> To: fop dev
> Subject: Commit of container change
>
> Hi all,
> something went wrong with the commit, probably with line
> endings, all source files appears to be completely changed.
> Th
Peter, Joerg, Keiron, Jeremias, others,
I don't currently do more than monitor the Fop lists, and if I see a
question that pertains to something I wrote, then I'll try to answer it.
Since I have not been directly involved with the project for a year, it's
not my place to offer opinions on how peo
some generalisation of flows of the
fo:flow type, and have more flexibility than just one single fo:region-body.
Regards,
Arved Sandstrom
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: RamanaJV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: July 17, 2002 11:12 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [UML]: Poseidon license key
>
> HI All,
> I have installed Poseidon 1.3.1 and it is asking me for the license
> key when I start it. But, I couldn't find
nt I am
in the same boat as lots of other people, i.e., I don't comprehend the
current HEAD codebase that well, and anything that helps is welcome.
Regards,
Arved Sandstrom
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Joerg Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: July 4, 2002 9:48 AM
> To: FOP Dev
> Subject: [vote] removing BufferManager and XTTreeBuilder
>
>
> Hello all,
> there is some dead wood to cut:
> - The BufferManager isn't used anymore, because it apparent
Well, if by "ASF" you mean the board, then that sentence parses better.
Because a mini-chunk of the ASF is already here and as uninformed as the
rest. :-)
Seriously, though, I'll track down board minutes and see where this is
explained, and report back.
Arved
> -Original Message-
> From
t have been expressed before and I think
they are still valid.
But that's common sense. When did licensing ever mesh with common sense? :-)
If we have to switch back to the long form, oh well. Not much choice there.
Regards,
Arved Sandstrom
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: June 20, 2002 11:00 PM
> To: fop-dev
> Subject: Using bugzilla
>
> Foplings,
>
> I'm only just beginning to realise how useful bugzilla is, in spite of
> having watched numerous mozilla bugs over a long period.
> -Original Message-
> From: Christian Geisert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: June 10, 2002 1:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: manifest classpath (was: Re: delay for release candidate)
>
> Arved Sandstrom schrieb:
> > Christian, if it's not alr
I'll see what I can locate. It's useful to have the earlier history in mind
if we decide to talk to them now.
Arved
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: June 5, 2002 8:11 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Redesign Goals and XSmiles
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: June 5, 2002 3:42 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Redesign Goals and XSmiles
>
> I've heard about XSmiles but never tried it. It's somewhat surprising
> that noone from that project ever contacted the
Christian, if it's not already changed, this release would be a good
opportunity to modify the manifest file Class-Path so that it does not
expect JARs inside a lib/ directory. As was discussed some time back this is
awkward for a number of J2EE servers. If nothing else it can lead to a
redundancy
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: May 24, 2002 9:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: build changes
>
> What approach is taken in the places you mention to the identification
> of binary components?
Version information is included in the
Hi, all
I am very pleased to announce that Keiron has been elected to membership in
the Apache Software Foundation, effective tomorrow (voting finished today).
I'd like to be the first to extend my hearty congratulations. :-)
Regards,
Arved
__
Arved Sandstr
> -Original Message-
> From: Keiron Liddle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: May 24, 2002 6:29 AM
> To: FOP
> Subject: Re: build changes
>
> On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 12:51, Peter B. West wrote:
> > The full range of what I want to do with versioning I am not sure of;
> > the minimum I am sur
> -Original Message-
> From: Adrian Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: May 22, 2002 10:18 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Why do links generate multiple rectangles in PDF?
>
> Thanks Arved,
>
> That sounds far more promising than I had hoped. I thought that
> it might ha
> -Original Message-
> From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: May 22, 2002 6:07 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Why do links generate multiple rectangles in PDF?
>
> Arved Sandstrom wrote:
> > So that's your answer. :-) The mult
Hi, Adrian
It's been quite a while but I recall that at the time that basic-link code
was written (long enough ago that they were still called simple-links) there
was an option to choose between link rectangles per word, which aws intended
more as a debugging setting, or combining link rectangles
gards,
AHS
______
Arved Sandstrom
Sr Software Developer
Platform Products Group
Halifax R&D Office
Hummingbird Ltd
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
image size.
I think I am missing something. Can you describe this scenario in more
detail? It sounds like a good use case.
Regards,
Arved Sandstrom
> -Original Message-
> From: Torsten Erler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: May 15, 2002 6:23 AM
> To: Fop-Dev (E-mail)
> S
A drop cap, in other words. :-)
> -Original Message-
> From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: May 14, 2002 4:47 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Line breaks and other typographical stuff (was: Re: Latest
> FOP schema)
>
>
> Arved Sands
> -Original Message-
> From: Joerg Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: May 14, 2002 7:52 AM
> To: FOP Dev
> Subject: Line breaks and other typographical stuff (was: Re: Latest FOP
> schema)
>
> Well, if we are at this, another typographical nastyness which
> comes to mind is an
> -Original Message-
> From: Joerg Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: May 14, 2002 7:52 AM
> To: FOP Dev
> Subject: Line breaks and other typographical stuff (was: Re: Latest FOP
> schema)
>
> I found them online, the relevant URLs appear to be
> http://www.unicode.org/Public/
Comments intermingled.
> -Original Message-
> From: J.U. Anderegg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: May 13, 2002 5:15 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: AW: AW: Latest FOP schema
>
> J. Pietschmann wrote:
>
> are
>
> > Rectangular areas, perhaps indented and with border, padding
> >
Comments down under...
> -Original Message-
> From: Keiron Liddle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: May 7, 2002 4:40 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [REDESIGN] Line layout manager discussion
>
>
> On Tue, 2002-05-07 at 03:56, Arved Sandstrom wrote:
Interleaved commentary...
> -Original Message-
> From: Keiron Liddle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: May 6, 2002 5:21 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [REDESIGN] Line layout manager discussion
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> What it boils down to seems to be if the inline fo returns the blo
Comments intermingled.Default reference orientation and lr-tb writing mode
assumed.
> -Original Message-
> From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: May 5, 2002 1:34 PM
> To: fop dev
> Subject: Border properties
>
> Hello,
> I tried to make something out of bug 684. Again, af
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: May 5, 2002 12:55 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [REDESIGN] Line layout manager discussion
>
>
> Arved,
>
> I agree that there is no need to tie the rendering to any particular
> model, as long as the
> -Original Message-
> From: Keiron Liddle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: May 3, 2002 9:31 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [REDESIGN] Line layout manager discussion
>
> Hi devs,
Be careful with the abbreviations. :-) One small slip of the keys and we'll
all be referred to as
Comments below.
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: May 3, 2002 10:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [REDESIGN] Line layout manager discussion
>
[ SNIP ]
> From what I see here you are changing the shape of the tree. The
> motivation
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: May 2, 2002 11:26 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [REDESIGN] Line layout manager discussion
>
> Karen Lease wrote:
>
[ SNIP ]
> >For the record, I disagree with Arved's reading of Line-Building. I read
Comments below.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chuck Paussa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: May 2, 2002 7:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: What the spec says about table-row, table-cell etc.
>
>
> I've been working on a schema for FO documents so that I can off-load
> the validat
riters had been clearer, we wouldn't have
> to spend hours chasing our tails like this!
I find the transitions from relatively formal set-oriented treatments to
casual prose disconcerting. As soon as I see formal then my Pedant-O-Meter
cranks way up, and I find it hard to switch off. :-)
> Regard
Hi, Keiron
I think what I should do is establish a section on the website with all the
other design notes that is a central location for these kinds of studies.
This could be the first one. I can undertake to start churning these out on
a fairly regular basis - I think we need them.
Once they ar
Comments inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: J.U. Anderegg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: May 1, 2002 5:19 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: AW: [REDESIGN] Line layout manager discussion
>
> Questions:
>
> o A basic-link in PDF means an annotation - an annotation defines a
> rect
Comments inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: May 1, 2002 2:19 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [REDESIGN] Line layout manager discussion
>
[ SNIP ]
> Look at
>
> a paragraph of text with a block and more
> text
>
> What about the
Discussion follows below.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Karen Lease
> Sent: April 29, 2002 5:39 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [REDESIGN] Line layout manager discussion
>
> Keiron Liddle wrote:
> > So why flatten the inline
You'll get a disgruntled reply from Brian if you actually asked him on his
personal email. :-) Stuff like this it's best to go to [EMAIL PROTECTED];
typically you'll end up talking to Manoj Kasichainula.
Arved
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent:
I have some thoughts and suggestions, some of which we might adopt with
varying degrees of success.
1. I can see a place for structured (that is, planned) communication:
conference calls, scheduled meetings on a system like Peter describes, use
of something like MSN Messenger, setting up an IRC c
Very cool. I will try to pry away from my other project and also doing my
income taxes and put in some quality time checking this out this weekend.
Sounds like we are basically at the point where a bunch of us can usefully
pitch in. :-)
As far as the Unicode bidi algorithm is concerned, yup, no k
h a relatively
stable spec that _definitely_ has a strong business case. :-)
If you read the report, incidentally, the GAO is not urging caution with
respect to XML, per se - it has to do with how the technology is being
adopted.
Regards,
AHS
______
Arved Sandstrom
Sr Soft
What it says. It builds, and I ran a few simple tests.
I'll be standing by to do any further fixup work or to add more related
features.
Regards,
AHS
__
Arved Sandstrom
Sr Software Developer
Platform Products Group
Halifax R&D Office
Hummin
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: April 23, 2002 8:18 AM
> To: fop-dev
> Subject: Aids to distributed design
>
[ SNIP ]
> While I am not suggesting that anything much is likely to change in the
> current situation, I think that one of the lessons
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Gratton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: April 22, 2002 11:11 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: inital background-image patch
>
> Arved Sandstrom wrote:
> >
> > I seem to recall from last year that we
s.
The only thing that may cause a problem with this interpretation, if outer
regions are being used, is in rendering conflict of marks. You cannot
specify z-index on regions so this only works if you can guarantee that
region-body gets rendered first, and I don't know if that is a spe
Not at all, to the first. I've been using DHCP on Windows and Linux for
quite a while and CVS over SSH has not involved any aggro with respect to
.rhosts. Once you've got your public/private key pair created, and you've
uploaded your public key (and placed it into 'authorized_keys' on the CVS
serv
I will definitely check it out.
Regards,
AHS
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Gratton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: April 19, 2002 1:02 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: inital background-image patch
>
>
>
> Guys,
>
> An initial maintenance-branch patch for background-im
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: April 13, 2002 11:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: AW: Multithreading FOP ?
>
[ SNIP ]
> It seems to me, of what I have heard so far, that there is no problem
> with statics _per se_. If they are use
Agreed, definitely. +1.
I think we want to be generous when proposing and voting on new committers.
The main thing is staying power - I can say this even though my efforts have
been sparse as of late - and all three nominated individuals have
demonstrated plenty of it, to my mind.
AHS
> -Or
This is still accurate as far as I am concerned, although I have not done
much yet. However I have to look at images anyway with respect to my other
project so it will definitely happen and happen soon.
I am also transitioning my FOP development setup from Linux over to Win2K so
I can get more pr
Absolutely and wholeheartedly +1.
-Original Message-
From: Keiron Liddle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: April 11, 2002 7:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Vote] New committers: Peter West, Joerg Pietschmann?
I propose that we offer Peter West and Joerg Pietschmann to become
commi
er than to ensure that
appropriate traits (instance variables) are set on the affected areas that
are eventually passed to the renderers. Almost all of the real work is in
the renderer stage.
Regards,
Arved Sandstrom
-Original Message-
From: Michael Gratton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sen
1 - 100 of 327 matches
Mail list logo
