Re: [fossil-users] strange `fossil diff ' behaviour

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 2:29 PM, j. van den hoff wrote: > On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:19:46 +0200, Stephan Beal > wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Mark Janssen > >wrote: >> >> The fossil rebuild logic uses a two pass algorithm. I am not quite sure >>> why this is necessary, it could have

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil authentication doesn't seem to be required

Check the permissions of the users "nobody" and "anonymous". Those control how much/little of the repo is accessible via cgi when not logged in or logged in as anonymous respectively. On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 9:49 PM, wrote: > ** > I've setup a local fossil repository by exactly following these

Re: [fossil-users] survey: your top 5 most-used fossil CLI commands?

On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Martin S. Weber wrote: > On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 07:30:01PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: > > @All: > > Your answers surprise me a bit, guys. addremove, really? i've never used > > that one, either. > > I find it easy to bring my checkout to the state I want the DB t

Re: [fossil-users] survey: your top 5 most-used fossil CLI commands?

On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Sergei Gavrikov wrote: > history | gawk \ > '{if($2=="f"||$2=="fossil")s[$3]++}END{for(i in s)print s[i],i}'|sort -Vr > Nice use of awk! That one is going in my notes. -V doesn't work on the sort available for me but -nr works nice. I keep most of my command lin

Re: [fossil-users] survey: your top 5 most-used fossil CLI commands?

On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Ross Berteig wrote: > >> I wonder how hard it would be for fossil to (optionally) keep the >> statistics you are interested in? >> > > That's an interesting question. Keeping them locally would be very little

Re: [fossil-users] Memorable names for ticket IDs

Can tickets be tagged? A quick browse of the tickets page and I conclude the answer is probably no. If tickets could be tagged similar to the timeline then tags could be used to give tickets a sync friendly short name which could be used in the ticket listings and when discussing the tickets. The

[fossil-users] json timeline segfault on fossils fossil.

The json timeline seems to have trouble with fossils fossil. ./configure --json && make ./fossil json timeline checkin --limit 100 Segmentation fault I ran into this in trying to write a script to tag all nodes with -rNODENUM. An example where it works can be seen at: http://chiselapp.com/user/k

Re: [fossil-users] json timeline segfault on fossils fossil.

Sorry, I should have specified, this is again with the fossil fossil. On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Matt Welland wrote: >> >>> > ./fossil json t

Re: [fossil-users] json timeline segfault on fossils fossil.

Thanks for the quick response! Unfortunately there seems to be another problem: > ./fossil json timeline checkin --limit 10 [snip] { "type":"checkin", "uuid":"f460839cff85d4e4f1360b366bb2858cef1411ea", "is

Re: [fossil-users] strange `fossil diff ' behaviour

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Matt Welland wrote: > Regarding stable numbered tags. How about a script or added feature that > scans the timeline and tags every node in a systematic way similar to what > people might expect from Subversion or similar tools? > > v1.1

Re: [fossil-users] SSH transport changes for Fossil 1.27?

I did a little testing of branch ssh-transport-changes on Ubuntu and they seem to work well. What is the recommended ssh command line for Linux? 'ssh -q' seems to work fine for me. The -q silences the "pseudo-terminal will not be allocated ... " message. It might be nice to suppress the echo of t

Re: [fossil-users] SSH transport changes for Fossil 1.27?

On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Andy Bradford < amb-sendok-1381204277.bfphninpnickkchnj...@bradfords.org> wrote: > Thus said Matt Welland on Sat, 07 Sep 2013 20:22:42 -0700: > > > What is the recommended ssh command line for Linux? 'ssh -q' seems to > > work

Re: [fossil-users] New command proposal?

On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Andy Bradford < amb-sendok-1377061791.goefgfndahogdhegp...@bradfords.org> wrote: > Notice that I'm able to access multiple fossil files with my SSH key and > Fossil account. And, I can install as many SSH keys into the ``guest'' > account as I like. > > > > This

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been > uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html > > I do this infrequently enough that I keep forgetting exactly how things > were compiled the previous time. So pl

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Matt Welland wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > >> Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been >> uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html >> >> I

[fossil-users] Another case of silent sync failure ...

I have run into another case where a sync between two fossils reports nothing needed to be synced: Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 0 Pull finished with 1249 bytes sent, 1276 bytes received But when I check the timeline there are tags that didn't get synced. I can't share this repo b

Re: [fossil-users] Another case of silent sync failure ...

Please ignore this failure report. It was a tag that had in fact synced but because the "edit" records apparently do not show on the remote site I jumped to conclusions. As far as I can tell everything was actually fine. On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Matt Welland wrote: > I

Re: [fossil-users] two files showing up where one is expected

wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Matt Welland wrote: >> >>> Heh, yeah, I'll update fossil on that server tonight as I don't have >>> access right now. >>> >>> Could this be a hash collision? >>> >> >>

Re: [fossil-users] two files showing up where one is expected

Heh, yeah, I'll update fossil on that server tonight as I don't have access right now. Could this be a hash collision? On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > >> >> http://www.kiatoa.com/cgi-bin/fossils/libfossil/artifact/da

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket system -- blockers

Applying constraints as receiver end filtering could be very useful and I think it could fit the sync model if not needed blobs were not necessarily dropped but a record was kept so that they wouldn't be sync'd and they are kept out of the list of blobs. Essentially something similar to what the sh

Re: [fossil-users] Incompatible and undocumented output change between 1.24 and 1.27

Losing the username in annotate command line is a big hit for me. I don't understand why that would be removed. Is this driven by Windows users who are stuck with limited terminal width? You could shave off some characters by only printing the first 4 letters of the node id. Also the : at the end o

Re: [fossil-users] Anecdote regarding permissions tracking in Fossil

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Joseph R. Justice wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Alaric Snell-Pym > wrote: > > >> I've written a backup/archival tool based on content-addressible >> storage, and a common question people ask is "So why don't I just put my >> home directory/entire filesy

Re: [fossil-users] missing branch tag (?)

I've had something similar happen before and was able to fix it by using the ui to "make a branch" trunk in several nodes along the trunk timeline until one of them worked. Try it disconnected do as not to mess up the original db. On Oct 9, 2013 3:26 PM, "B Harder" wrote: > I know what you're ta

Re: [fossil-users] 2-way sync between Git & Fossil

I have done what Ron suggests before and it works well but it is initially complicated to set up. A generic script or tool to do this would be very nice to have available. I created "vendor branches", one for each system, the git branch in fossil would track the git master and the fossil branch in

Re: [fossil-users] commit message empty

Simply make the ignore prefix something extremely unlikely to collide such as: ##-fossil-## Enter comments on this check-in. ##-fossil-## Lines beginning with "##-fossil-##" are ignored. ##-fossil-## ##-fossil-## user: matt ##-fossil-## tags: v1.55 ##-fossil-## ##-fossil-## EDITED db.scm ##-fo

Re: [fossil-users] commit message empty

ern editor has rectangular selection I'm sure. Us antiquated vi and (x)emacs users are covered of course :) When I have a multi-line comment to enter I just put my -m at the end of line and use quotes however I generally prefer succinct one line comments. On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 a

Re: [fossil-users] 2-way sync between Git & Fossil

On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Remigiusz Modrzejewski wrote: > > On Oct 15, 2013, at 17:34 , Matt Welland wrote: > > > I have done what Ron suggests before and it works well but it is > initially > > complicated to set up. A generic script or tool to do this would

[fossil-users] fossil stash diff aborts

I have two stashed bundles and tried to do a diff on one of them: fossil stash diff 3 . fossil: ./src/blob.c:187: blob_reset: Assertion `(pBlob)->xRealloc==blobReallocMalloc || (pBlob)->xRealloc==blobReallocStatic' failed. Aborted Doing: fossil stash apply 3 worked fine. The diff on the ot

Re: [fossil-users] Hide items from timeline [Was: clone --once and URL user as admin.]

Hiding clutter is hugely important in my opinion. If something is marked as irrelevant then hide it regardless of how the final timeline looks. However an obvious button to toggle show-all on the timeline would be equally important. I see the intent as enabling a view of the important and relevant

Re: [fossil-users] Hide items from timeline [Was: clone --once and URL user as admin.]

hide stuff. On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Ron Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Andy Bradford > wrote: > >> Thus said Matt Welland on Tue, 26 Nov 2013 12:01:30 -0700: >> >> >> > Do you now have: >> > >> > -> a ->

Re: [fossil-users] Commit File Subset Shorthand

I'm going to hazard a guess that you are on windows? I speculate that one of the shells listed here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_alternative_shells_for_Windows might expand the wildcard before handing the list to fossil. Windows cmd.exe leaves wildcard expansion to the application, a choic

Re: [fossil-users] Commit File Subset Shorthand

On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Ory Drilon wrote: > > I'm going to hazard a guess that you are on windows? I speculate that > one of > > the shells listed here > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_alternative_shells_for_Windowsmight > > expand the wildcard before handing the list to fossil.

Re: [fossil-users] Hide items from timeline [Was: clone --once and URL user as admin.]

I'm not following all the details here but it sounds like your intended usage is mostly to hide branches that are considered mistakes. My intended use is different. I like to commit often and thus end up with many commits that are useful to me in debugging, cherrypicking etc. but not interesting i

Re: [fossil-users] Remove whole directory from Fossil?

If your repo is kept clutter free by rigorous use of ignore-glob you can just "rm -rf somedir" and then do "fossil addremove" and then commit. On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Gilles wrote: > Hello > > I rearranged the directory tree where I keep source files, and need to > remove a bunch of d

Re: [fossil-users] Parent of the very first checkin?

How is what you are looking for different from checking out the very first node in your tree, the "initial empty check-in"? I used to do what you are describing quite extensively when I used monotone. But with monotone it was easy to sync a subset of branches or revision trees from one repo to ano

[fossil-users] Multiple independent timelines in a fossil - how to create and what are the unintended consequences?

I find myself wanting to maintain multiple fossils per project since some parts need to decoupled from the source. This is a pain since now I have to remember to sync multiple fossils, deal with N times the maintenance (e.g. add users to three fossils) and wiki pages and tickets are not shared. I

Re: [fossil-users] Multiple independent timelines in a fossil - how to create and what are the unintended consequences?

On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Matt Welland wrote: > >> I find myself wanting to maintain multiple fossils per project since some >> parts need to decoupled from the source. This is a pain since now I

[fossil-users] Possible to read rss page without starting server?

I'd like to read the rss page for a fossil from the command line without starting the server. Is this possible? Thanks. -- Matt -=- 90% of the nations wealth is held by 2% of the people. Bummer to be in the majority... ___ fossil-users mailing list foss

Re: [fossil-users] Possible to read rss page without starting server?

;help" for more information On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 1:35 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:44 PM, Matt Welland wrote: > >> I'd like to read the rss page for a fossil from the command line without >> starting the server. Is this possible? >&g

Re: [fossil-users] Possible to read rss page without starting server?

is not valid in preprocessor expressions make: *** [bld/main.o] Error 1 On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Matt Welland wrote: > Regarding the link, I suggest an optional parameter to set it: -link " > http://fossil-scm.org/"; . For my needs it is good enough if the link is > so

Re: [fossil-users] Possible to read rss page without starting server?

cake but is fine also. On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Matt Welland wrote: > >> I swear it had compiled cleanly but I guess not. I did a "make clean" is >> there something more I should do? I'll try in a

Re: [fossil-users] Possible to read rss page without starting server?

On Jan 21, 2014 10:45 AM, "Stephan Beal" wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Matt Welland wrote: >> >> A clean checkout and configure and make worked. Very cool! I hope this makes it to trunk, it will simplify and speed up the rss2email gateway I've s

Re: [fossil-users] Command line option for HTTP Auth?

On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Kevin Martin wrote: > > On 1 Feb 2014, at 05:03, Andy Bradford wrote: > > > If everyone else agrees that this is a good idea (automatically sending > > HTTP Authorization in response to 401) > > How does fossil authenticate with a server, does it send the passw

[fossil-users] Windows installer?

The last time I installed fossil on Windows it was a minor hassle as there was no installer. I'm considering putting together an installable version of fossil using Inno Setup (http://www.jrsoftware.org/isinfo.php). Has anyone already done this? Does anyone care and if you care do you have sugges

Re: [fossil-users] Windows installer?

. > I'm not opposed to this but it is way out of my realm of experience. If I pursue the installer/mini-gui I'll ping you for input. > Jonathan Otsuka > > On Feb 1, 2014, at 10:14 AM, Matt Welland wrote: > > The last time I installed fossil on Windows it was a minor has

Re: [fossil-users] Windows installer?

On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Mark Janssen wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Matt Welland wrote: > >> The last time I installed fossil on Windows it was a minor hassle as >> there was no installer. >> >> I'm considering putting togeth

Re: [fossil-users] Painful team interaction with fossil, how to improve?

On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Baptiste Daroussin < baptiste.darous...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using fossil for a while now, and I'm quite happy with it, for the scm > part and the web part. > > The problem is when going with the ticket part of fossil. > > I do not need something sophist

Re: [fossil-users] looking for interesting new fossil skins

Hmmm I thought I could just do a "fossil config pull skin" to get these but that seems not to be sufficient. What are the steps to clone a skin? On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Baptiste Daroussin < baptiste.darous...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have also stolen long ago the "google code" like th

Re: [fossil-users] Painful team interaction with fossil, how to improve?

I set up our email notification to use a wiki page as the source for email addresses (creatively named "emailnotification"). Anyone who has read/write to the wiki can add or remove email addresses. This works fine for us so far but might not work for a open web facing project. On Thu, Feb 13, 201

Re: [fossil-users] automated email notification of changes to the repo (notably ticket creation/changes)

The approach that I used is complicated in part because I am sending email for over 350 fossils spread out over 12 different areas with as many as 500 users registered in some of those fossils (although only a very few of whom actually access them). So efficiency is crucial for my situation. I'll

Re: [fossil-users] automated email notification of changes to the repo (notably ticket creation/changes)

e rss2email for each user and then shut down the server. I think most people will not have that problem. On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Matt Welland wrote: > >> 3. Write a script that gets the email addresses and runs rss2em

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil in a multi-user environment

I'm not sure I understand what exactly is your issue but are you cloning via a server or directly from shared disk? If the later then you may have run into a problem that may still exist - the default user is not properly handled when cloning using file:// . Exactly why I don't know. The "fix" is

Re: [fossil-users] fossil humor: poor man's bug tracking...

On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:52 AM, j. van den hoff wrote: > On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 17:21:04 +0100, Stephan Beal > wrote: > > For those who don't need the full features of the ticketing system, i >> think >> i've discovered a new way to keep track of bugs: use a "fixme" tag. >> >> [stephan@host:~/cvs/

Re: [fossil-users] Please improve documentation for the "checkout" command

This is good feedback and I think mentioning checkout/co in the top level help is important. What I teach when doing fossil training is the following: 1. Use "fossil checkout" to move from branch to branch (I try to use "checkout" consistently in the training. "co" is nice but confusing) 2. If y

Re: [fossil-users] Please improve documentation for the "checkout" command

On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Matt Welland wrote: > >> This is good feedback and I think mentioning checkout/co in the top level >> help is important. >> > > +1 > > >> >> What

[fossil-users] fossil mv dir1 dir2 - different results depending on order of physical move/fossil move

mv dir1 dir2 fossil mv dir1 dir2 gives different results from: fossil mv dir1 dir2 mv dir1 dir2 The correct result is only achieved by the second case. Also, mv is not like rm and IMHO fossil should either do the physical move or give the user a way to do the physical move as part of the comman

[fossil-users] fossil cat should work outside a checkout

A fossil cat command only works if run inside an opened area but there is no intrinsic reason why. > fossil cat foo/bar.txt -r trunk -R /some/fossil/file.fossil fossil: current directory is not within an open checkout -- Matt -=- 90% of the nations wealth is held by 2% of the people. Bummer to b

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil CGI trick: extensionless CGIs under Apache

I think a sym-link will give you both worlds. ln -s blah blah.cgi However I'm not sure I understand the actual limitation being addressed as my cgi "scripts" are all compiled programs and I don't recall ever needing an extension. I assumed that behaviour was default but I may simply have been luc

[fossil-users] Partial checkouts, a possible methodology ...

Partial checkouts is something I find myself desiring to do surprising often. Given the fossil data model partial checkouts are, rightfully, considered a bad idea. However I think there is a possible implementation that could be really useful. Simply allow masking directories. I'll use the term "p

Re: [fossil-users] Partial checkouts, a possible methodology ...

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Matt Welland wrote: > >> 1. It should be possible to "fossil open" only a subset (or none), e.g. >> "fossil open -pop src,lib" >> 2. All operations would nee

[fossil-users] can fossil try harder on sync failure?

We are seeing quite a few of these sync failures on busy repositories: fossil commit cfgdat tests -m "Added another drc test" Autosync: ssh://host/path/project.fossil Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 0 Error: Database error: database is locked: {UPDATE event SET mtime=(SELECT m1 FROM

Re: [fossil-users] can fossil try harder on sync failure?

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Matt Welland wrote: > >> Error: Database error: database is locked: {UPDATE event SET >> mtime=(SELECT m1 FROM time_fudge WHERE mid=objid) WHERE objid IN (SELECT >> mid FROM time

Re: [fossil-users] can fossil try harder on sync failure?

I'm not sure if this is relevant but I found with sqlite3 that in situations with high contention for a database (multiple coincident reads/writes) that backing off and trying again in a half second rather than relying on the sqlite3 timeout seemed to increase overall throughput and reliability. I

Re: [fossil-users] can fossil try harder on sync failure?

Just FYI, I'm seeing this kind of message quite often. This is due to overlapping clone operations on large fossils on relatively slow disk. Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 0 Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 109 Round-trips: 2 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 109 Round-trips: 2 Art

Re: [fossil-users] can fossil try harder on sync failure?

Sorry for the multiple mails but I have a little more info. I can reliably reproduce this. Just do two simultaneous clones via ssh from a large fossil. This is on NFS. It happens very quickly so fossil is giving up pretty fast. On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Matt Welland wrote: > Just

Re: [fossil-users] can fossil try harder on sync failure?

On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > NFS w/ db file == fundamentally bad idea. > > db.c sets the default budy timeout to 5 seconds. > So you are recommending we abandon fossil because of this? Storing the files on local disk is not an option for us. Also, other than being a lit

Re: [fossil-users] can fossil try harder on sync failure?

to be cloning from and to the same host. On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Matt Welland wrote: > >> >> I did some more testing and this is unique to using ssh and it occurs on >> local disk just as f

Re: [fossil-users] can fossil try harder on sync failure?

How big is the repo? The one I'm cloning is 420 MB. Perhaps that is a factor? On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Matt Welland wrote: > >> NFS is not needed to reproduce this. Simultaneous parallel cloning v

Re: [fossil-users] can fossil try harder on sync failure?

On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > NFS is historically problematic when it comes to file locking. This is true. However technology doesn't stop evolving. The locking on NFS on the systems I use seems pretty rock solid. I push sqlite3 to extremes on NFS and there have been ch

Re: [fossil-users] can fossil try harder on sync failure?

On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 12:38 AM, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said Matt Welland on Wed, 16 Apr 2014 09:01:28 -0700: > > > Autosync: ssh://host/path/project.fossil > > Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 0 > > Error: Database error: database is locked: {UPDATE e

Re: [fossil-users] can fossil try harder on sync failure?

On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said Matt Welland on Mon, 21 Apr 2014 09:26:25 -0700: > > > Yes! This is fixed on latest! Any idea which commit fixes the problem? > > Will you tell me exactly which version of fossil it is? e.g. run > ``

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil update goes not get lastest checkin

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Samuel Debionne < > samuel.debio...@ujf-grenoble.fr> wrote: > >> fossil commit -m "Blabla" from my PC >> fossil update from my Mac >> >> But this time the update did not get the latest c

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil update goes not get lastest checkin

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Matt Welland wrote: > >> I have seen this issue a few times and this was with using file:// for >> the transport to the "server". I've fixed it by doing a checkout to anothe

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil update goes not get lastest checkin

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said Stephan Beal on Tue, 22 Apr 2014 18:07:08 +0200: > > > Just to confirm that: this has come up several times before in the > > past year and, so far, has remained unexplained. We're not sure what > > causes it or how to reprod

Re: [fossil-users] wiki edits outside HTML UI

Here is a bash script that I use to edit wiki pages: Just use it like this: editwiki wikipagename === #!/bin/bash wikiname=$1 FOSSILBIN=/usr/local/bin/fossil if [ x"$wikiname" == "x" ];then echo "Usage: viwiki wikipagename" exit fi $FOSSILBIN sync wikitmpfile=`mktemp /tmp/${USER}

Re: [fossil-users] wiki edits outside HTML UI

On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Matt Welland wrote: > >> EDITOR=gvim -f >> > > Missing quotes? > > [stephan@host:~/cvs/fossil/fossil/src]$ EDITOR=gvim -f > ec-f: command not found > > But thi

Re: [fossil-users] FossilFS. Was: libfossil + fuse

+1 (and I'm bumming I only get a "1" for my +) This would be a really sweet addition to fossil. Consider caching under /var/tmp or something so that performance is decent. I'm not sure you'd be able to deliver a precompiled binary with dependencies on fuse but being able to compile in this feat

Re: [fossil-users] Tracking System Configuration Files - Best Practices

FYI, beware that there may be a bug with symlinks support in the more recent versions of fossil. I haven't reported it as I haven't had time to reproduce it but a couple of users have complained that when they clone/open a fossil that has allow-symlinks = true that the symlinks are replaced by the

Re: [fossil-users] Excluding [brackets] from ... links

I have the same annoyance with scrape 'n paste. Would adding a space between the "[" or "]" and the hex string alleviate the annoyance but still provide the visual delineation? On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Joel Bruick wrote: > Stephan Beal wrote: > > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:22 PM, B Har

Re: [fossil-users] Suggestions for autosync changes?

t; > I think you're right, they are separate issues. I would like to hear > from Matt Welland who originally asked for Fossil's autosync to try > harder to see if this is still an issue before merging in the > autosync-tries branch. The original ``can fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Suggestions for autosync changes?

On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 10:51 PM, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said Matt Welland on Sun, 18 May 2014 22:39:57 -0700: > > > We are still seeing this scenario. User education seems to have > > lessened the frequency a little. > > Are you still running a version of F

Re: [fossil-users] Suggestions for autosync changes?

On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Jan Nijtmans wrote: > 2014-05-19 7:59 GMT+02:00 Matt Welland : > > On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 10:51 PM, Andy Bradford < > amb-fos...@bradfords.org> > > wrote: > >> Are you still running a version of Fossil that does not have t

Re: [fossil-users] Autosync retry?

Retry on autosync would be a big help in my environment. Autosync failures due to overlapping access are a regular and annoying occurrence. I like Stephan's approach of 0, 1, N for off, on, multi-try On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said Marc Simpson on Thu, 29 May 20

[fossil-users] 3-way merge likely to happen anytime soon?

I saw a prior thread on this topic but I am not clear on if any action was planned. Not sure yet why but I'm getting a lot more merge conflicts than I did with Monotone. If nothing is being worked on I'll make a perl script helper as fixing merges by editing the files with markers is really tedious

Re: [fossil-users] 3-way merge likely to happen anytime soon?

Hipp wrote: > Just to clearify, by "3-way merge", you mean a graphical merging tool? I > ask because Fossil always has done a 3-way merge behind the scenes - it just > doesn't show you what it is doing or give you the opportunity to intervene. > > On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 a

Re: [fossil-users] 3-way merge likely to happen anytime soon?

I tested [691fccbaf7] and it seems to work great! I still get conflicts where I suspect I would not have in the past (i) but they are no big deal with a little help from xxdiff. Thanks!! (i) I have no defensible evidence for this claim. If anyone

[fossil-users] symlinks to directories are traversed by fossil extras?

What is the plan for handling symlinks for fossil? My preference would be for fossil to treat links as a file. Storing the pointer would be great. Just ignoring links would also be fine by me. But actually traversing the links is not a good idea IMHO and is a real fossil killer. It is also not easy

Re: [fossil-users] Work flow with fossil (understanding conflict resolution)

For a very nice (IMHO) model on how to handle forks take a look at monotone. Forking is natural, you just want to take precautions to keep your data safe. A fork is just a branch you haven't given a name to and didn't necessarily intentionally create. In the case of monotone it just lets you know y

[fossil-users] A crazy idea, but perhaps it has merit ...

I don't have a lot of public stuff out there yet (my fossils are at www.kiatoa.com/fossils/opensrc) but there have been several times where I made a typo or minor mistake and it would have saved some embarrassment *and* been really cool to be able to browse to the file and make a change and check i

[fossil-users] ignore-glob behavior - fossil extras taking inordinate amount of time

Does fossil descend into directories filtered out by ignore-glob? I have a repo which contains a directory with links to a large (hundreds of megs) amount of data and "fossil extras" takes over fifteen minutes to complete. I added a pattern to prevent those files from showing up in the listing in t

Re: [fossil-users] ignore-glob behavior - fossil extras taking inordinate amount of time

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Joshua Paine wrote: > On 4/13/2011 11:41 PM, Matt Welland wrote: >> "fossil extras" takes over fifteen minutes >> to complete. > > Any chance you're running an older fossil? I had similar problems with > an old fossil almost

Re: [fossil-users] SharpFossil/WinFossil

Rather than changing the terminal user interface (it will be slightly less nice IMHO due to the extra newline on a prompt) I suggest considering the approach used on the monotone project. A separate interface for automation. Make the human friendly interface friendly to humans and make the automati

Re: [fossil-users] WHY IS FOSSIL REMOVING ALL MY CODE!

You have no trunk. I can reproduce what you saw by cloning mongrel, opening it, then doing the update. If you have no trunk you probably want to add the branch you want to your open "fossil open ../mongrel.fossil ws-hybi-7" The fix in fossil would be to have a real branch selected on open if one i

Re: [fossil-users] WHY IS FOSSIL REMOVING ALL MY CODE!

One correction, you do have a "trunk" but fossil is not recognizing it: fossil branch /tmp/mongrel proxymustdie * ws-hybi-7 That looks like a fossil bug to me since "trunk" is not marked as closed as far as I can tell. On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 9:29 AM,

Re: [fossil-users] WHY IS FOSSIL REMOVING ALL MY CODE!

Hi Zed, Please confirm if you really lost local changes. That would be a big concern for me. I haven't lost any non-checked in work and would like to keep it that way. No tool is perfect and if there is a bug in fossil that causes local changes to be inadvertently discarded we'd all like to know

Re: [fossil-users] WHY IS FOSSIL REMOVING ALL MY CODE!

On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Zed A. Shaw wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:57:45AM -0700, Matt Welland wrote: >> Hi Zed, >> >> Please confirm if you really lost local changes. That would be a big >> concern for me. I haven't lost any non-checked in work a

Re: [fossil-users] Partial commit after merge

===Remigiusz Modrzejewski wrote:=== "What is exactly the design idea that prohibits merging only a few files? It would certainly be useful in this kind of untangling mess that I have to do now. Which I have to do by having two open local copies and manual copying :/" ==

Re: [fossil-users] Needed: volunteer to autoconf Fossil

All of these alternative build systems are a PITA on one system or another. If it requires jam, cmake or anything that requires installing prerequisites 9 times out of 10 I won't even try that software unless there is a binary install available somewhere or a pre-assembled Makefile. I thought that

Re: [fossil-users] Can't make gdiff work

Are you using fossil compiled for cygwin or fossil compiled for windows? If the later then internally it will not know about cygwin paths and may not be able to launch cygwin binaries (not sure on that one, haven't tested it). On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Brian Cottingham wrote: > I'm using F

Re: [fossil-users] Needed: volunteer to autoconf Fossil

As an end user this appears to the best alternative I've seen so far. The fact that autosetup presents a familiar ./configure && make interface is fantastic - if it really works as advertised. Does the cross compilation really work? I'd really like to put fossil on my n900 but I don't want to set

<    1   2   3   4   >