There had been some trouble with fixing a pipeline bug in /bin/sh. The
last version appears to work, although it was developed on
observation, not understanding, if you know what I mean ;-)
If you have complicated shell scripts, would you please test
-current's /bin/sh (with eval.c v. 1.25) on
subscribe freebsd-current [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Luoqi Chen wrote:
Since sometime last month, rc5des failed to start from my rc.local. I did
a little investigation and it turned out that rc5des was started but later
terminated by a SIGHUP. During its brief lifetime, /dev/console was its
control terminal. Does anyone know what was going on?
On Thu, 18 Nov 1999, Peter Wemm wrote:
Luoqi Chen wrote:
Since sometime last month, rc5des failed to start from my rc.local. I did
a little investigation and it turned out that rc5des was started but later
terminated by a SIGHUP. During its brief lifetime, /dev/console was its
control
Hello everyone!
I'm trying to update from 3.3-R to 4.0-current but without success.
cc every time died on the same place.
I upgraded via sources to 3.3-stable without any problem.
When I try again cc died with message "Bad system call"
I wrote in /etc/makefile.conf
CC=/usr/local/bin/gcc295
Gdb has stopped working recently in -current. In a snapshot from
October 24th, it's fine. In a snapshot from November 15th (before
the great gcc switchover), it's hosed. I've been told it's hosed in
today's -current as well. Here are the symptoms:
tuba# uname -sr
FreeBSD 4.0-19991115-CURRENT
Now that a working version of the Direct Rendering Manager (along with an open
source version of glide 3) has been released for Linux on a decent consumer
level card, is anyone interested in porting it over to FreeBSD? It could well
displace my TNT2U.
Stephen
To Unsubscribe: send
Vadim Chekan wrote:
Hello everyone!
I'm trying to update from 3.3-R to 4.0-current but without success.
cc every time died on the same place.
I upgraded via sources to 3.3-stable without any problem.
When I try again cc died with message "Bad system call"
I wrote in /etc/makefile.conf
On Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 05:16:55PM +, Stephen Hocking wrote:
Now that a working version of the Direct Rendering Manager (along with an open
source version of glide 3) has been released for Linux on a decent consumer
level card, is anyone interested in porting it over to FreeBSD? It could
sorry i'm don't put error message
i'm build and install -CURRENT kernel , and trying make world
cc -O -pipe -DFREEBSD_NATIVE -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-DDEFAULT_TARGET_VERSION=\"2.95.2\" -DDEFAULT_TARGET_MACHINE=\"i386-unknown-freebsd\"
-I/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1plus/../cc_tools
Hi Daryll,
is anyone interested in porting it over to FreeBSD?
I'm interested in porting Glide to FreeBSD. I've got a Voodoo 3 2000.
Roger
--
Roger Hardiman| Telepresence Research Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | DMEM, University of Strathclyde
tel: 0141 548 2897| Glasgow, Scotland, G1
I have no programming skills, but I will test it when testers are needed.
- Original Message -
From: Roger Hardiman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 1999 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: FreeBSD version of DRM?
Hi
In message Pine.BSF.4.10.9911172341110.397-10@localhost Alex Zepeda writes:
: Or perhaps restricting -U to root only? Since -e w/out -U isn't harmful,
: no?
-e w/o -U is still harmful.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of
On Thu, 18 Nov 1999 23:01:10 +0800, Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
root cron 2180 - -none-
root cron 2181 - -none-
root cron 2182 - -none-
root adjkerntz 400 -
Hi!
I'm in almost the same situation as mr Chekan. I have a 3.3-STABLE (SMP)
system and I want to move to CURRENT. I have modified my cvs-scripts and
updated the sources a few times the last couple of weeks. The problem is
when I try to do buildworld. It crashes with things like:
cc -static -O
Thus spake Jag ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I'm in almost the same situation as mr Chekan. I have a 3.3-STABLE (SMP)
system and I want to move to CURRENT. I have modified my cvs-scripts and
updated the sources a few times the last couple of weeks. The problem is
when I try to do buildworld. It
Jag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander Langer wrote:
Yes. Probably you've not built/booted a -current kernel before you build wo
rld.
Do you mean that I should build a new kernel *before* I do buildworld?
Is that possible?
Yes and yes.
Some clarification would be great. I've
/etc/rc's shell is a controlling process with control terminal /etc/console,
so /dev/console is supposed to be revoked when /etc/rc's shell exits.
Control terminal is for job control, and we don't need job control during
/etc/rc's execution, so why don't we change init not to acquire a
Yes, there was a change in the signal handling that requires the kernel
for 4.0 to be built and booted prior to building userland for 4.0. (This
is not from experience, this is from watching the current mailing list for
the past year). I believe the -current mailing list had lots of traffic
on
:
: /etc/rc's shell is a controlling process with control terminal /etc/console,
: so /dev/console is supposed to be revoked when /etc/rc's shell exits.
:
:Control terminal is for job control, and we don't need job control during
:/etc/rc's execution, so why don't we change init not to acquire
With the latest current, whenever I start amd, I would see a lot of log
messages repeating:
arplookup 127.0.0.1 failed: could not allocate llinfo
arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 127.0.0.1rt
If I ifconfig my ether interface down, as expected, the messages would stop.
It's
:
:In message Pine.BSF.4.10.9911172341110.397-10@localhost Alex Zepeda writes:
:: Or perhaps restricting -U to root only? Since -e w/out -U isn't harmful,
:: no?
:
:-e w/o -U is still harmful.
:
:Warner
I am all for removing -e, but I don't really like the idea of making
it optional
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Matthew Dillon writes:
: I am all for removing -e, but I don't really like the idea of making
: it optional nor do I like the idea of trying to maintain the capability
: for the user's own processes - that simply makes the code even more
: complex then
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you
write:
I am all for removing -e, but I don't really like the idea of making
it optional nor do I like the idea of trying to maintain the capability
for the user's own processes - that simply makes the code even more
complex then it already is.
supped made world a min ago:
check out the CPU: name
I am using AMD K6-2 333Mhz
Byung
---
Copyright (c) 1992-1999 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993
The Regents of the University of California. All
:
: no control terminal == no signals == no ^C'ing hung programs during
: startup (for example, when you need to boot a machine without a working
: network and sendmail and other programs stop the boot sequence in its
: tracks trying to do DNS lookups).
:
:
Sean Eric Fagan wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
m you write:
I am all for removing -e, but I don't really like the idea of making
it optional nor do I like the idea of trying to maintain the capability
for the user's own processes - that simply makes the code even more
On Thu, 18 Nov 1999 22:59:28 -0500 (EST), Luoqi Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hmm, good point. So I still need to find a way to start up rc5des, it seems
that rc5des installs a SIGHUP handler and therefore nohup is
useless.
Bug the authors to fix it? daemon(3) is provided for a reason!
People,
1) Search -current archives if you are new to the list.
2) See that /usr/src/UPDATING file? READ IT!
HandbookFreeBSD diary are *NOT* the kind of resource you resort to
if you want to run -current. Things in -current have not been
documented because they are happening here and now.
And
On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 01:47:46PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/usr/bin/apropos contains:
---snip---
# If possible check global system configuration file for additional
# man locales installed
if [ -r /etc/defaults/rc.conf ] ; then
. /etc/defaults/rc.conf
elif [ -r
On Thu, 18 Nov 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
In message Pine.BSF.4.10.9911172341110.397-10@localhost Alex Zepeda writes:
: Or perhaps restricting -U to root only? Since -e w/out -U isn't harmful,
: no?
-e w/o -U is still harmful.
ps -e w/out -U only shows variables for processes owned by
On Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 05:04:20PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
I am all for removing -e, but I don't really like the idea of making
it optional nor do I like the idea of trying to maintain the capability
for the user's own processes - that simply makes the code even more
-On [19991119 04:02], Byung Yang ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
supped made world a min ago:
check out the CPU: name
I am using AMD K6-2 333Mhz
---
CPU: \^E (334.40-MHz 586-class CPU)
Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x580 Stepping = 0
In message Pine.BSF.4.10.9911182311590.338-10@localhost Alex Zepeda writes:
: ps -e w/out -U only shows variables for processes owned by that user, no?
ps -ea.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Andreas Klemm writes:
: By simply removing it (without thinking about alternatives) I
: think FreeBSD looses some points ... I thought we were the team
: that doesn't do radical changes without a good reason ;-)
That's why I'm not in favor of removing it. That's far
Current seems to hangs, when amanda tries to run dump.
This appeared approximately 2 weeks ago, and is present in
yesterdays current also.
#0 0xc013daa4 in boot ()
(kgdb) bt
#0 0xc013daa4 in boot ()
#1 0xc013de41 in panic ()
#2 0xc011d739 in db_panic ()
#3 0xc011d6d9 in db_command ()
#4
On Fri, 19 Nov 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
In message Pine.BSF.4.10.9911182311590.338-10@localhost Alex Zepeda writes:
: ps -e w/out -U only shows variables for processes owned by that user, no?
ps -ea.
Then perhaps -a and -U should be disabled? *grin*
- alex
To Unsubscribe: send
In message Pine.BSF.4.10.9911182331120.338-10@localhost Alex Zepeda writes:
: Then perhaps -a and -U should be disabled? *grin*
No. -e, -a, -U are all use for the sysadmin. They can provide
sensitive information, so should have sensible access policies placed
upon their use. While the
On Fri, 19 Nov 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
In message Pine.BSF.4.10.9911182331120.338-10@localhost Alex Zepeda writes:
: Then perhaps -a and -U should be disabled? *grin*
No. -e, -a, -U are all use for the sysadmin. They can provide
sensitive information, so should have sensible access
On 18 Nov, William R. Somsky wrote:
Hmm... aside from whether or not apropos should be reading in rc.conf,
isn't this code fragment doing the wrong thing in regards to the way
we have /etc/defaults/rc.conf and /etc/rc.conf setup nowadays?
No, look at the last lines of /etc/defaults/rc.conf
In message Pine.BSF.4.10.9911182338520.338-10@localhost Alex Zepeda writes:
: Erk. That came out wrong. I meant removal for non root or
: perhaps non gid wheel? or somesuch.
Actually, you wanna do access control like procfs does (will do?) for
its cmdline file.
Warner
To Unsubscribe:
If you're using the ata driver, please remove the ad_sleep() call
at the bottom of the adopen() in ata-disk.c and see if that
helps you.
Poul-Henning
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Taavi Talvi
k writes:
Current seems to hangs, when amanda tries to run dump.
This appeared approximately 2 weeks
On Fri, Nov 19, 1999 at 08:41:30AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
On 18 Nov, William R. Somsky wrote:
Hmm... aside from whether or not apropos should be reading in rc.conf,
isn't this code fragment doing the wrong thing in regards to the way
we have /etc/defaults/rc.conf and
Vadim Chekan wrote:
Hello everyone!
I'm trying to update from 3.3-R to 4.0-current but without success.
Thanks to all!
Now I know what to do. 4.0 kernel is installed and is bootable. I need
to chouse few hours to build world.
Vadim Chekan.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
In our project, we're trying to connect two PCs to both ends of a SCSI
chain. I've got it somewhat working, but have a couple of questions
re. mounting the filesystems.
If I mount the filesystem from one machine (A) as read-write, then the
other one (B) can't mount it read-write because
However, if I try to mount it from B read-only while A is mounting it
read-write, it succeeds. This looks dangerous, as A writing data onto
the disk could cause B's cache to go stale without B knowing it. Is
it a good idea to allow read-only mounts of a dirty filesystem anyway?
(The filesystem
Igor Roshchin wrote:
I've encountered this problems while installing 3.0-RELEASE
on a PII-350 with ASUS P2B-LS motherboard (i.e. there
is Adaptec U2W adapter and Intel EtherExpress 100/10 on board)
All HDDs are UW SCSI.
2. I didn't find any documentation in the man pages which describes
* However, if I try to mount it from B read-only while A is mounting it
* read-write, it succeeds. This looks dangerous, as A writing data onto
* the disk could cause B's cache to go stale without B knowing it. Is
* it a good idea to allow read-only mounts of a dirty filesystem anyway?
*
On Fri, Jan 15, 1999 at 11:45:02PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
Just wondering if there is an updated timeline for 3.0.1 release ?
15.01. + 'five' more days (Jordan said on -committers)
--
Andreas Klemmhttp://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas
What gives you 90% more
On Fri, Jan 15, 1999 at 08:46:23PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
Are you using any
other tool besides ctm to touch your cvs archive? Are you doing commits
locally?
No.
In terms of convenience, cvsup is supreme, but in terms of stability,
Poul's baby here is the champ, so you have to really
On Fri, Jan 15, 1999 at 11:45:02PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
Just wondering if there is an updated timeline for 3.0.1 release ?
15.01. + 'five' more days (Jordan said on -committers)
+ 0.1.0 - 0.0.1 release numbers
luigi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with
In message 199901161046.caa47...@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu, Satoshi Asami write
s:
* However, if I try to mount it from B read-only while A is mounting it
* read-write, it succeeds. This looks dangerous, as A writing data onto
* the disk could cause B's cache to go stale without B knowing it.
A number of things seem to be changing rapidly.
1) cvsup and Do a make buildworld/installworld. worked for me
yesterday.
2) See if you can build the GENERIC kernel. Worked for me.
3) check the stuff in your custom kernel vs. the GENERIC.
There has been some sizable changes. You'l have to do
Did a make world and then
rm -rf ../../compile/TITAN
config TITAN
cd ../../compile/TITAN
make depend all
See errors below ...
Am I missing something ?
loading kernel
syscons.o: In function `scvidprobe':
syscons.o(.text+0x231): undefined reference to `vid_configure'
syscons.o(.text+0x24e):
I just pulled the latest SANE-1.0 package today for CAM/3.0-current
(I'm on 3.0R). On my Microtek E6, it positions the head and gets ready to
scan (sounding like normal) but as soon as it begins the movement to scan
down the page, I get a dialog:
Error during read: Error during
On Sat, 16 Jan 1999, Randall Hopper wrote:
I just pulled the latest SANE-1.0 package today for CAM/3.0-current
(I'm on 3.0R). On my Microtek E6, it positions the head and gets ready to
scan (sounding like normal) but as soon as it begins the movement to scan
down the page, I get a
Did a make world and then
rm -rf ../../compile/TITAN
config TITAN
cd ../../compile/TITAN
make depend all
See errors below ...
Am I missing something ?
See
http://www.freebsd.org/~yokota/sc_update.txt
and update your kernel config file.
Kazu
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
On Fri, 15 Jan 1999, Boris Staeblow wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible that there are slight differences between the
CTM's and the real world ?
Yes, there are differences. You can't get the optional security stuff
via CTM while you can with CVSUP. Last time I tried it, this means you
can't do a
Jaye Mathisen writes:
It would be kind of cool if when managing a remote system if /kernel
failed to boot, then on the next boot, the loader will fire up
/kernel.old, or a /kernel.somethingorother.
Sort of a kernel-clean flag. Then 300 miles away, I can try stuff, and
have at least
I haven't been able to make world since the texinfo problem. I don't
see anyone else on the list with problems. Did I miss another change?
Am I doing something wrong?
Thanks,
ed
P.S. This is where I stopped this time. cvsup finished about 9:25 CST.
DynaLoader.c:282: `NULL' undeclared
At 10:23 AM 1/16/99 -0600, Edwin Culp wrote:
I haven't been able to make world since the texinfo problem. I don't
see anyone else on the list with problems. Did I miss another change?
Am I doing something wrong?
Thanks,
ed
P.S. This is where I stopped this time. cvsup finished about 9:25
Also, it might be nice if the disklabel(8) man pages explicitely
say that the bootstrap code can be installed on each slice.
(am I wrong ?)
You're right, the bootblocks can be installed on each slice, and
this also needs documenting.
This doesn't need documenting. disklabel(8) knows nothing
Carroll Kong wrote:
I have been getting that error all day yesterday. Remade world 2-3
times... after cvsupping... none of the changes fixed it, and I still
'perished' at the same spot you did. I figured... I might as well wait a
few more days before the next cvsup so they can fix whatever
I know that, but that's not the point here. If the filesystem is
marked dirty, it could very well be corrupted. Why am I allowed to
mount it (even read-only)?
Because you are root, and root never makes mistakes :-).
how else would you fsck / if it was dirty ?
Boot from an alternative device
Is it just me, or is there anyone else experiencing system freezes
on current after a zzz?
--
Daniel C. Sobral(8-DCS)
d...@newsguy.com
If you sell your soul to the Devil and all you get is an MCSE from
it, you haven't gotten market rate.
To Unsubscribe: send mail
On Wed, Jan 13, 1999 at 10:00:48PM +0100, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
Where ${rootdev} points to? Shouldn't you set it accordingly to disk3s1a:?
rootdev isn't set at all (as show says).
I can't imagine that this will make a change, as I am booting from
disk3, the problem stems from FreeBSD not
On Fri, Jan 15, 1999 at 11:13:09AM +, Doug Rabson wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 1999, Nicolas Souchu wrote:
Hi there,
Currently, the ZIP+ probe is intrusive and sends char to the printer if
no ZIP+ is connected.
Here is a patch that corrects the problem for my printer, but I haven't
any
On Sat, 16 Jan 1999, Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 1999 at 10:00:48PM +0100, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
Where ${rootdev} points to? Shouldn't you set it accordingly to disk3s1a:?
rootdev isn't set at all (as show says).
I can't imagine that this will make a change, as I am
On Sat, 16 Jan 1999, Nicolas Souchu wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 1999 at 11:13:09AM +, Doug Rabson wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 1999, Nicolas Souchu wrote:
Hi there,
Currently, the ZIP+ probe is intrusive and sends char to the printer if
no ZIP+ is connected.
Here is a patch that
Just noticed that both rc and rc.local print starting local daemons and
the terminating .. Would it not be more aesthetically pleasing if only
rc.local did so?
Mike
--
Mike Zanker, Academic Computing Service, The Open University, UK
Tel: +44 1908 652726, Fax: +44 1908 652193
Views expressed are
Mike Smith writes:
It would be kind of cool if when managing a remote system if
/kernel failed to boot, then on the next boot, the loader will
fire up /kernel.old, or a /kernel.somethingorother.
We're trying to work out a clean way of managing that sort of
persistent state
Does softupdates give any gain over async?
I have /usr/src and /usr/obj both mounted async, noatime, and it does
seem to be rather nicely fast over default mountops.
Async isn't fully async in FreeBSD (some directory operations are still
sync), so softupdates is much faster in some cases. Fully
On Sun, 17 Jan 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
Is it just me, or is there anyone else experiencing system freezes
on current after a zzz?
I tried it on an Intel chipset a while back, and got the same
result. Of course, I disabled APM from then on :)
--
Daniel C. Sobral
Bruce Evans wrote:
Also, it might be nice if the disklabel(8) man pages explicitely
say that the bootstrap code can be installed on each slice.
(am I wrong ?)
You're right, the bootblocks can be installed on each slice, and
this also needs documenting.
This doesn't need documenting.
Hello
I was reading the man page for find(1), looking for the precise option
to follow symbolic links.
This option is -follow, of course, but it is not described in the man
page (I do not find in the cgi query :
On Sat, 16 Jan 1999, Mike Zanker wrote:
Just noticed that both rc and rc.local print starting local daemons and
the terminating .. Would it not be more aesthetically pleasing if only
rc.local did so?
rc.local was removed from the tree on Dec. 12th. If you're still
using it you're on your
Edwin Culp wrote:
I haven't been able to make world since the texinfo problem. I don't
see anyone else on the list with problems. Did I miss another change?
Am I doing something wrong?
Thanks,
ed
P.S. This is where I stopped this time. cvsup finished about 9:25 CST.
After recvsupping -current from the uk Mirror this morning, 'make buildworld'
completed without any problem, but a subsequent 'make installworld' failed
when trying to install shared libraries (in this case, libdescrypt.so.2).
Further investigation showed that building the aout part of world
Huh? Isn't a 'make world' or 'make buildworld' supposed to just do the
right thing? I mean, I *have* converted to elf...
On Sat, 16 Jan 1999, David A. Gobeille wrote:
Edwin Culp wrote:
I haven't been able to make world since the texinfo problem. I don't
see anyone else on the list
We're all seeing this error, not to worry. Happily, it's clearly
Mark's baby since he both imported the new texinfo *and* does the
perl5 stuff. :-)
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Sat, 16 Jan 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
We're all seeing this error, not to worry. Happily, it's clearly
Mark's baby since he both imported the new texinfo *and* does the
perl5 stuff. :-)
Backing out /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/libperl/config.SH* to 14jan
allowed make world to complete
On Sat, Jan 16, 1999 at 06:49:25PM +, Doug Rabson wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jan 1999, Nicolas Souchu wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 1999 at 11:13:09AM +, Doug Rabson wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 1999, Nicolas Souchu wrote:
Hi there,
Currently, the ZIP+ probe is intrusive and sends char to the
Ok, first the conclusion...
I am not able to boot anymore from a 3.0-current system while I can boot
quite nicely from the 3.0-RELEASE generic kernel.
The system hangs on checking the scsi chain and remains stopped here. The
last thing I can see on the screen is the :
Waiting 3 seconds for
At 12:49 AM 1/17/99 +0100, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote:
Ok, first the conclusion...
I am not able to boot anymore from a 3.0-current system while I can boot
quite nicely from the 3.0-RELEASE generic kernel.
The system hangs on checking the scsi chain and remains stopped here. The
last thing I
Hello folks,
I just did a cvsup and tried rebuilding world and the kernel,
but I keep getting an error during the kernel linking stage.
loading kernel
syscons.o: In function `scvidprobe':
syscons.o(.text+0x231): undefined reference to `vid_configure'
syscons.o(.text+0x24e): undefined reference
+[ Christopher Knight ]-
| At 12:49 AM 1/17/99 +0100, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote:
|
| Ok, first the conclusion...
|
| I am not able to boot anymore from a 3.0-current system while I can boot
| quite nicely from the 3.0-RELEASE generic kernel.
|
On Sat, 16 Jan 1999, Rajesh Vaidheeswarran wrote:
Hello folks,
I just did a cvsup and tried rebuilding world and the kernel,
but I keep getting an error during the kernel linking stage.
loading kernel
syscons.o: In function `scvidprobe':
syscons.o(.text+0x231): undefined reference to
According to David Kelly:
via CTM while you can with CVSUP. Last time I tried it, this means you
can't do a make release as Jordan's release Makefiles can't handle a
total absense of that stuff (eBones? whatever its called).
It is available on internat.freebsd.org with CTM...
--
Ollivier
At 12:56 PM 1/17/99 +1000, you wrote:
I recently (last night) added USB support to my kernel (just to see :-)
and it hung at the same place. Removing the USB entries fixed it.
This was also at the same time as the syscons/atkbd changeover for me as well
so I wasn't expecting it really to be the
You probably need to add kbd0 and update sc0 in your kernel config file.
Have a look in the GENERIC kernel config to see how it is done now...
On Sat, 16 Jan 1999, Rajesh Vaidheeswarran wrote:
Hello folks,
I just did a cvsup and tried rebuilding world and the kernel,
but I keep getting an
Thanks Chris, and thank you all who have replied to
my message.
I did as per your suggestions, and my kernel compiles now. (I haven't
yet tried a reboot though).
Thanks, once again.
rv
-- using MH template repl.format --
In a previous message, Chris Timmons writes:
You probably need to
Ollivier Robert writes:
According to David Kelly:
via CTM while you can with CVSUP. Last time I tried it, this means you
can't do a make release as Jordan's release Makefiles can't handle a
total absense of that stuff (eBones? whatever its called).
It is available on internat.freebsd.org
Watch out for bugs awoken by this.
bde 1999/01/16 21:46:25 PST
Modified files:
sys/i386/isa wd.c wdreg.h
sys/pci ide_pci.c
Log:
Pass the unit number to the DMA cookie lookup routine and use it
to look up cookies properly, at least for standard
:Another problem is if A is mounting it read-only and then B tries to
:mount it read-write. This succeeds and is dangerous for the same
:reason as the last example. Since A can't write anything to the disk,
:I guess there is no way we can avoid this situation. (The only way I
:could think of
j...@zippy- dmesg|grep Freeing
Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected ISA irq 11.
Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected ISA irq 10.
Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected ISA irq 10.
Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected ISA irq 10.
Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected ISA irq 9.
Freeing (NOT
Robert Watson wrote:
This seems only to affect the krbIV stuff in -world.
cd /usr/src/kerberosIV/lib/libacl;/usr/obj/elf/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/make befor
einstall
make: don't know how to make /usr/src/kerberosIV/lib/libacl/../../../crypto/k
erberosIV/lib/acl/acl.h.
Stop
*** Error code 2
David Kelly wrote:
It is available on internat.freebsd.org with CTM...
And its legal for me to import it to the US?
No problem. It is illegal to export _from_ the US.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with
David Kelly wrote:
While you can download the missing security stuff, make release wants
to check it out of your local cvs archive. I haven't found a way to put
it there but I'm a cvs novice.
There is an international repository of crypto sources. Lemme know
if you want it.
M
--
Mark Murray
Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
We're all seeing this error, not to worry. Happily, it's clearly
Mark's baby since he both imported the new texinfo *and* does the
perl5 stuff. :-)
... and he is not getting the errors!
I have done N make worlds in the last 48 hours; clean as a whistle.
(I do blow
Every -current release I try and build falls over with this one.
Tried making a release lately? :)
- Jordan
Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
We're all seeing this error, not to worry. Happily, it's clearly
Mark's baby since he both imported the new texinfo *and* does the
perl5 stuff. :-)
...
100 matches
Mail list logo
