Hello, all!
I just made the jump this week up to FreeBSD 5-CURRENT on my laptop
(fresh install), and aside from a few core dumps here and there
(particularly ijsgimpprint - any ideas?), it seems to work pretty good.
Except for ACPI. I tried running with ACPI enabled early on, and had
some
a
LED was flashing, indicating data was received, but it never printed anything.
I stopped loading ACPI at boot and everything become normal. I did have some good
experience with
this motherboard and ACPI several months ago so I searched back and found that the
following
commit caused the pr
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, FUJITA Kazutoshi wrote
:
>Hi,
>
>My -CURRENT(2003/03/12) laptop(ThinkPad X23) can't be suspended.
>
>When I try
>
># acpiconf -s 1
>
>I have console message
>
>'acpi0: AcpiGetSleepTypeData failed - AE_NOT_FOUND'
>
>How can I solve this?
>
>
>dmesg output is attached.
PU)
Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6b1 Stepping = 1
Features=0x383f9ff
real memory = 670498816 (639 MB)
avail memory = 642658304 (612 MB)
Allocating major#253 to "net"
Allocating major#252 to "pci"
Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled
npx0: on motherboard
npx0: INT 16 in
>It seems like the fix right now is to disable it.
>Put this line:
>hint.acpi.0.disabled="1"
>in /boot/device.hints
Thankyou, this has given me a nice clean bootup now and I can reboot without
it panicing.
I'm still curious to learn what all that stuff ment though!
---
Matt ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
h
ot of ACPI errors on bootup and also a panic when I try to
reboot it, though luckily after it's synced the disks.
I have saved the dmesg output to http://tao.xtaz.co.uk/dmesg.txt
I was wondering if somebody could tell me what all those errors (and the
random gibberish at the top) is about. I a
Hi,
I have just recently installed -CURRENT on my desktop as I've been using it
succesfully on a server for months now. However this desktop has much more
advanced hardware. Whilst it does work perfectly and I have device support for
everything I get a lot of ACPI errors on bootup and a
I've been trying to figure out why my Intel SR2100 servers would not
boot with ACPI enabled, hanging uninterruptibly after probing the ACPI
timer. I experimented with disabling various subsystems, and came up
with the following results:
- With `pci_link' disabled, the boot gets
According to User Takawata:
> I also wrote it before. But I didn't commit because I don't tested it.
> If you tested your patch, I'll willing to commit.
It is nice to see that ACPI is working for some VAIO users :(
My Z600TEK is still freezing while trying to suspend under A
At 05:11 PM 6/03/03 +0900, User Takawata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I also wrote it before. But I didn't commit because I don't tested it.
>If you tested your patch, I'll willing to commit.
Aye, I did this on my VAIO (PCG-GRX5P) and it seems to work fine...
--- acpi.c.old Thu Mar 6 18:48:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul Wankadia wrote:
>After seeing the "yet another Sony Vaio PS/2 mouse ID" commits to
>src/sys/isa/psm.c from six weeks ago, I've hacked my
>src/sys/dev/acpica/acpi.c so now acpi_isa_pnp_probe() will try the
>compatibility ID like isa_pnp_probe() does in src/sys/is
After seeing the "yet another Sony Vaio PS/2 mouse ID" commits to
src/sys/isa/psm.c from six weeks ago, I've hacked my
src/sys/dev/acpica/acpi.c so now acpi_isa_pnp_probe() will try the
compatibility ID like isa_pnp_probe() does in src/sys/isa/isa_common.c.
It's quite trivial, so is there some reas
>From dmesg.boot:
acpi_cpu: throttling enabled, 16 steps (100% to 6.2%), currently 100.0%
ACPI-0432: *** Error: Handler for [EmbeddedControl] returned AE_ERROR
ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution failed, AE_ERROR
Preloaded elf module "/boot/kernel/acpi.ko" at 0xc04ff0a8
`make reinstallkernel'' which is safe
> > for MODULES_WITH_WORLD environment.
>
> I see it now. Thanks.
> I'v fixed it just going into /sys/modules/acpi and making install.
You should be able to do all of them, unless you make.conf has
problems, by:
cd /sys/i3
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 03:54:30PM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> > > That's saying the acpi.ko module was not built and installed.
> > >
> > > When you install your new kernel, use the Makefile target, instead
> > > of using "cp", or it won't install the modules it build
fe
> for MODULES_WITH_WORLD environment.
I see it now. Thanks.
I'v fixed it just going into /sys/modules/acpi and making install.
Sem.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 03:54:30PM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> > That's saying the acpi.ko module was not built and installed.
> >
> > When you install your new kernel, use the Makefile target, instead
> > of using "cp", or it won't install the modules it builds.
> >
> > If you did this, then
> That's saying the acpi.ko module was not built and installed.
>
> When you install your new kernel, use the Makefile target, instead
> of using "cp", or it won't install the modules it builds.
>
> If you did this, then check your make.conf to see if you are
> specifically telling it to not build
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> I'v cvsup'ed from 5.0-RELEASE to RELENG_5_0_0 last night and ACPI doesn't
> work now.
> When booting I'v got a message: "ACPI autoload failed - no such file or
> directory".
>
> How to fix?
That's saying the
I'v cvsup'ed from 5.0-RELEASE to RELENG_5_0_0 last night and ACPI doesn't
work now.
When booting I'v got a message: "ACPI autoload failed - no such file or
directory".
How to fix?
Sem.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
> > It is however possible to change this back to normal with
> > the "Fn" key (you probably have something similiar on your Toshiba) so
> > that the brightness back to "normal." Dell laptops remember this, so
> > the next time I run the computer on batteries it will restore the
> > brightness to
The Anarcat (Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 08:09:05PM -0500) wrote:
> On Tue Feb 18, 2003 at 12:19:35AM +, Bruce Cran wrote:
> >
> > ACPI power management on Asus motherboards with the VIA chipset seems to
> > be quite broken. On my A7V333 I can use mode 1 (CPU off), 2 and 3
&g
As Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > Can you suspend from within graphics mode?
> Have you tried using APMD to put the display into text mode when
> suspending?
Tried it, but didn't get that to work. I. e., it seems apmd never
calls /etc/rc.suspend (i can't see any syslog entry from that logger
call eit
store the
> brightness to the level I had last time I used it on batteries.
The Fn-keys for turning the brightness up/down doesn't work with 5.0 on
my laptop.
> I do not think this has anything to do with ACPI implimentation in
> FreeBSD.
Since the brightness was turned down because the
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 02:45:27PM +0100, Peter Gade Jensen wrote:
> I installed the DP2 release of current on my Toshiba laptop when it was
> released and acpi worked very well. When the powercable was disconected
> the profile changed to economic _and_ the screen was dimmed a little
I installed the DP2 release of current on my Toshiba laptop when it was
released and acpi worked very well. When the powercable was disconected
the profile changed to economic _and_ the screen was dimmed a little
bit to save power. But with every other iso release or cvsup from head since, acpi
s holding /dev/dsp or /dev/audio open.
>
> Can you suspend from within graphics mode? I can't seem to do that,
> neither with APM nor with ACPI. In some case, i've seen four
> horizontal lines upon wakeup, in other cases, the graphics display
> gets restored correctly, b
ell (though adding
> the code is somewhat tricky: YMMV, knowledge of both FreeBSD and
> Linux required; sorry, I do not have a patch against -current).
Yah, I think the correct/updated version is at:
http://www.poupinou.org/acpi/ibm_ecdt.html
However, I think I'll pray and
Darryl Okahata wrote:
> Tom Rhodes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > ACPI gives me hell on my IBM Thinkpad A31, also. Yet since it
> > does not crash anything I just leave it be waiting for the day
> > when the ACPI hackers have time to fix it :)
>
>
Tom Rhodes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ACPI gives me hell on my IBM Thinkpad A31, also. Yet since it
> does not crash anything I just leave it be waiting for the day
> when the ACPI hackers have time to fix it :)
It may not necessarily be a FreeBSD problem (or, not only).
: Since APCI is now used instead of APM, I'm wondering if we have to wait/program
: softwares to control the battery status ?
I use the apm command :-). The acpi code provides enough of the apm
API to allow apm and apmd to work.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Mark Santcroos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If your IrDA device can emulate a UART you can use ports/comms/birda.
> What kind of IrDA device do you have in your laptop?
I have no idea.
Where can I check this ?
Thx
--
Pierrick Brossin
IT Swiss - QUARK Media House
6a Puits Godet, 2000 Neuchate
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 09:15:43AM +0100, Pierrick Brossin wrote:
> Is IRDA now supported by 5.0 ? Can't find any docs.
If your IrDA device can emulate a UART you can use ports/comms/birda.
What kind of IrDA device do you have in your laptop?
Mark
--
Mark SantcroosRIPE Netwo
Pierrick Brossin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is IRDA now supported by 5.0?
No.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Hi!
Since APCI is now used instead of APM, I'm wondering if we have to wait/program
softwares to control the battery status ?
Is IRDA now supported by 5.0 ? Can't find any docs.
Thanx again!
--
Pierrick Brossin
IT Swiss - QUARK Media House
6a Puits Godet, 2000 Neuchatel, Switzerland
Mail Prof:
On Tue Feb 18, 2003 at 12:19:35AM +, Bruce Cran wrote:
>
> ACPI power management on Asus motherboards with the VIA chipset seems to
> be quite broken. On my A7V333 I can use mode 1 (CPU off), 2 and 3
> report AE_NOT_FOUND and 4 dumps the cpu registers, while power-off on
> shut
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 06:03:08PM -0500, The Anarcat wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've been experimenting quite a bit with the new ACPI stuff from
> 5.0-release. I can reliably hang my box using acpiconf -s 3, both from
> X and the console. In X, upon wakeup, the screen is trashed wit
Hello!
I've been experimenting quite a bit with the new ACPI stuff from
5.0-release. I can reliably hang my box using acpiconf -s 3, both from
X and the console. In X, upon wakeup, the screen is trashed with color
strips. In the console, I can actually get some interaction back, but
the
"Matthew N. Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My only outstanding issue is that I can't suspend if an application
> is holding /dev/dsp or /dev/audio open.
Can you suspend from within graphics mode? I can't seem to do that,
neither with APM nor with ACP
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes:
>The clock on my ASUS P5A still runs at double speed unless I have
>debug.acpi.disable="timer" in loader.conf (as it has for as long as
>we've had ACPI support). Do any ACPI wizards have any suggestions as
The clock on my ASUS P5A still runs at double speed unless I have
debug.acpi.disable="timer" in loader.conf (as it has for as long as
we've had ACPI support). Do any ACPI wizards have any suggestions as
to how I could track down the cause of this bug, and hopefully fix it?
DES
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 10:24:57AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 07:55:49PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wro
nagement i.e. how we
> > manage the project and not for discussing code issues. It's badly named,
> > we should have called it something like "members" or "admin".
> >
> I must disagree. This message equally applies -current as well
> as -develo
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 10:24:57AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 07:55:49PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > Don't cross post current and developers.
> > >
> > > The developers charter says it's for internal management i.e. how we
> > > manage the project and not for disc
from my dmesg:
[snip]
acpi0: on motherboard
ACPI-0625: *** Info: GPE Block0 defined as GPE0 to GPE15
ACPI-0625: *** Info: GPE Block1 defined as GPE16 to GPE31
Using $PIR table, 6 entries at 0xc00f1a70
acpi0: power button is handled as a fixed feature programming model.
Timecounter "
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 07:55:49PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Don't cross post current and developers.
> >
> > The developers charter says it's for internal management i.e. how we
> > manage the project and not for discussing code issues. It's badly named,
> > we should have called it someth
have called it something like "members" or "admin".
>
I must disagree. This message equally applies -current as well
as -developers; I was interested in hearing from both -current
users and ACPI developers, and developers are not guaranteed to
be subscribed to the -current m
t; resuming from zzz(8). "ata1: resetting devices..." forever.
> >
> Did you happen to have:
> options AUTO_EOI_1
> in your kernel configuration?
>
No. It says something about the temperature exceeding the
system limit and barfs. I thought I'd better live w
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 08:27:45PM -0600, Mike Silbersack wrote the words in effect of:
>
> On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Martin Blapp wrote:
>
> > Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01 kernel: ACPI-0625: *** Info: GPE Block0 defined as GPE0
> > to GPE31
> > Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01 kerne
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 11:16:12PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Me being dumb. Forgot to comment out the apm "disabled" hint
> in /boot/device.hints. Still, scary things happen after
> resuming from zzz(8). "ata1: resetting devices..." forever.
>
Did you happen to have:
options AUTO_EOI_1
in
2-15 at 02:49, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> ACPI thermal panics my ThinkPad 600X, is anyone
> interested in a crash dump analysis?
>
>
> Cheers,
--
Paul Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
FreeBSD Services Ltd
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Martin Blapp wrote:
> Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01 kernel: ACPI-0625: *** Info: GPE Block0 defined as GPE0
> to GPE31
> Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01 kernel: ACPI-0625: *** Info: GPE Block1 defined as GPE32
> to GPE63
I see similar errors on my Presario 2100US...
> Wild
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 06:41:29PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 09:48:32AM -0500, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> > On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > > Unfortunately I can't afford a new laptop, so I'm stuck with my 600E.
> >
> > APM works fine on the 600E. Th
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 09:48:32AM -0500, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > Unfortunately I can't afford a new laptop, so I'm stuck with my 600E.
>
> APM works fine on the 600E. The latest BIOS updates and new model main
> batteries seem to solve most of
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Unfortunately I can't afford a new laptop, so I'm stuck with my 600E.
APM works fine on the 600E. The latest BIOS updates and new model main
batteries seem to solve most of the battery complaints.
My only outstanding issue is that I can't suspend
Tom Rhodes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ACPI thermal panics my ThinkPad 600X, [...]
> ACPI gives me hell on my IBM Thinkpad A31, also. [...]
This is just the last in a long series of Thinkpad f***ups. I
concluded long ago th
: ACPI-0625: *** Info: GPE Block0 defined as GPE0
to GPE31
Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01 kernel: ACPI-0625: *** Info: GPE Block1 defined as GPE32
to GPE63
ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution failed, AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT
ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution failed, AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT
ACPI-1287: *** Error
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003 04:49:39 +0200
Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ACPI thermal panics my ThinkPad 600X, is anyone
> interested in a crash dump analysis?
>
>
ACPI gives me hell on my IBM Thinkpad A31, also. Yet since it
does not crash anything I just leave it
ACPI thermal panics my ThinkPad 600X, is anyone
interested in a crash dump analysis?
Cheers,
--
Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sunbay Software AG,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD committer,
+380.652.512.251Simferopol, Ukraine
http
Martin Blapp wrote:
This IBM X-Series 305 show these ACPI problems. And rebooting the box with
ACPI enabled hangs it (deadlock).
Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01 kernel: acpi0: on motherboard
Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01 kernel: ACPI-0625: *** Info: GPE Block0 defined
as GPE0
to GPE31
Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01
This IBM X-Series 305 show these ACPI problems. And rebooting the box with
ACPI enabled hangs it (deadlock).
Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01 kernel: acpi0: on motherboard
Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01 kernel: ACPI-0625: *** Info: GPE Block0 defined as GPE0
to GPE31
Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01 kernel: ACPI-0625
Hi everyone,
the situation is the same as described in my previous posting, except:
* new kernel from yesterday's sources
* played around a bit with my device.hint, only minor changes.
Dmesg output from two boots is appended. First is an acpi-boot, second
without acpi (unset acpi_load in l
"Cliff L. Biffle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I sort of expected ACPI to fail after watching everyone else, but the killer
> here is that APM doesn't seem to work either once ACPI is disabled. Its
> error messages are less interesting. When compiled into the
I've stumbled across a Satellite 1605CDS that I'm trying to beat into shape.
ACPI fails as follows:
acpi0: on motherboard
ACPI-0483: *** Error: GPE0 block (GPE 0 to 15) overlaps the GPE1 block
(GPE 0 to 15)
acpi0: could not enable ACPI: AE_BAD_VALUE
device_probe_and_attach: ac
0 on pcib0 at pcibus 0 on motherboard.
Problem 2) occurred when the acpi module was loaded: the kernel found no
disks! The words 'isa' and 'ata' do not appear on the screen, but now my
pci topology is
pci0 on pcib0 on acpi0 on motherboard.
acpi0 is (spaces exactly as on scre
Seele Varcuzzo wrote:
> has anyone had ACPI recovering issues? anytime i go into a S3 suspend
> and try to recover, if im in x the screen tries to recover and sortof
> "melts" before it goes white with color vertical lines, and if im in
> the console i get no video, and it s
has anyone had ACPI recovering issues? anytime i go into a S3 suspend and try to
recover, if im in x the screen tries to recover and sortof "melts" before it goes
white with color vertical lines, and if im in the console i get no video, and it seems
to go into a halt. is th
Hi,
I've got ACPI problems. First I've got a little note:
"acpi0: AcpiGetSleepTypeData failed - AE_NOT_FOUND"
Wouldn't it be a lot more userfriendly to display:
"acpi0: Sleep mode type 1 not supported, available modes are: 0 3 4 5"
or a similar error. Is
viapm and its requirements still in
> > the config file. The system boots fine now with acpi.
> >
> > By the way, the system didn't hang as I claimed in my earlier mail. I
> > was able to telnet in... Having acpi and viapm had the side effect of
> > making the c
I have viapm, smb, and acpi enabled on my system, and console is
not gone. It works just fine. I can [ctrl-alt]-F[1-8] as normal
and xdm works just fine. I can get a dmesg and kernel config if
people want it.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 12:36:18PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
: On Sat, 25 Jan 2003
system boots fine now with acpi.
>
> By the way, the system didn't hang as I claimed in my earlier mail. I
> was able to telnet in... Having acpi and viapm had the side effect of
> making the console go away.
viapm is VIA power management, not an apm system. It's intere
; > > > went smoothly, and I was up and running quickly, but with an acpi related
> > > > problem.
> > > >
> > > > When booting, the kernel loads, detects the devices, then hangs right
> > > > here:
> > > >
> > > >
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Bryan Liesner wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Bryan Liesner wrote:
> > > I just upgraded my 4.7 system to 5.0-current via sources. Everything
> > > went smoothly, and I was up and running qui
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Bryan Liesner wrote:
> > I just upgraded my 4.7 system to 5.0-current via sources. Everything
> > went smoothly, and I was up and running quickly, but with an acpi related
> > problem.
> >
> > When b
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Bryan Liesner wrote:
> I just upgraded my 4.7 system to 5.0-current via sources. Everything
> went smoothly, and I was up and running quickly, but with an acpi related
> problem.
>
> When booting, the kernel loads, detects the devices, then hangs right
> h
I just upgraded my 4.7 system to 5.0-current via sources. Everything
went smoothly, and I was up and running quickly, but with an acpi related
problem.
When booting, the kernel loads, detects the devices, then hangs right
here:
Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
pid 84 (fsck_ufs), uid 0
Hi -current,
just FYI regarding my suspend/resume problem on the T20 (seems like other
people have the same problem):
> On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote:
>
> > I think I've found the culprit: it's the sound device. If I remove "device
> > pcm" from the kernel, I can suspend/resume after swit
.
And something like:
Correcting VIA ACPI Bug was displayed.
I am nearly 100% sure, that nobody touched this Computer during the whole
night.
Of course the Laptop was equiped with a battery and connected to AC/DC.
Now my question:
Did i make something worng when turning down my Laptop?
Did anyone else
This is not surprising, ACPI also fails on my FIC motherboard,
I lost floppy drive when I enable ACPI, fdc0 can not allocate resources,
sigh.
David Xu
--
Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The
Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Peter Schultz wrote:
>
> >ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution failed, E_AML_UNINITIALIZED_LOCAL
> >can't fetch resources for \\_SB_.PCI0.FDC0 - AE_AML_UNINITIALIZED_LOCAL
> >
> >I have a Tyan S1834 and see the above
Sorry for a lack of details here, but -- sometime in the last few ACPI
imports (perhaps in the last three months), one of my test boxes began to
spew the attached message:
ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution failed, AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT
ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution failed
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Peter Schultz wrote:
> ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution failed, E_AML_UNINITIALIZED_LOCAL
> can't fetch resources for \\_SB_.PCI0.FDC0 - AE_AML_UNINITIALIZED_LOCAL
>
> I have a Tyan S1834 and see the above error during boot. I'm not sure
&
ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution failed, E_AML_UNINITIALIZED_LOCAL
can't fetch resources for \\_SB_.PCI0.FDC0 - AE_AML_UNINITIALIZED_LOCAL
I have a Tyan S1834 and see the above error during boot. I'm not sure
if this is such a big problem but it would be nice to eliminate
Hi folks,
I was so delighted to see that the shipping (iso) version RC3 didn't
crash immediately in ACPI thermal on my i845 based laptop! (I reported
this after installing RC1 in December and it reoccured with RC2.)
The problem comes back though if I compile a kernel myself after
CVSU
--- /stand/help/INSTALL.TXT Fri Jan 10 18:21:12 2003
+++ INSTALL.TXT Tue Jan 14 16:51:44 2003
@@ -891,13 +891,14 @@
the i386 platform to aid in system configuration if it's detected during
boot. Unfortunately, some bugs still exist in both the ACPI driver and
within s
aid in system configuration if it's detected during
> > boot. Unfortunately, some bugs still exist in both the ACPI driver and
> > within system motherboards and BIOS. The use of ACPI can be disabled by
> > - setting the ``hw.acpi.0.disable'' hint in th
ome bugs still exist in both the ACPI driver and
> within system motherboards and BIOS. The use of ACPI can be disabled by
> - setting the ``hw.acpi.0.disable'' hint in the third stage boot loader:
> + setting the ``hint.acpi.0.disable'' hint in the third stage
Attached (and below my sig) is a diff of ACPI changes to INSTALL.TXT.
Francis Barnhart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://francisbarnhart.com/
--- /stand/help/INSTALL.TXT Fri Jan 10 18:21:12 2003
+++ INSTALL.TXT Tue Jan 14 15:34:00 2003
@@ -891,13 +891,14 @@
the i386 platform to aid in system
s to type consistent with
what they add to device.hints.
Scott, since you put the original message in INSTALL.TXT, could you
correct the acpi disabling advice as shown above? The set command has
invalid syntax (extra ".") and there's a typo, "inforation".
Thanks,
-Nate
T
[[ Courtesy wrap of long lines. ]
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 11:42:58AM -0800, Francis Barnhart wrote:
> That is where this issue is documented. However, it is incorrect.
> The proper hint is in fact:
>
> hint.acpi.0.disabled
Yes, you are correct. INSTALL.TXT should be updated.
>
> While other
="1"
to
/boot/device.hints
The way I understand it, setting the above hint to 1 disables acpi. If acpi_load is
set and the above hint is not equal to 1, acpi will be loaded. So acpi_load is an
abstraction of the hint (less typing).
I also prefer that Those With Laptops have to deal w
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 11:10:03AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
>
> But before the conversation gets off topic, I want to know where acpi
> disabling is documented so I can point people to the doc instead of
> answering the same question over and over.
>
It's documented in loa
install CDs and floppies! It
> was VERY frustrating to boot the CD on my laptop and have it crash
> after a few minutes. Kinda hard to get a crash dump, either.
The issue is, ACPI is needed to route interrupts for certain computers
(namely, laptops). Without it being on, many laptops coul
eone in here can help me.
>
>
> - Forwarded message from Simon Coggins
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 21:56:29 +1100 From:
> Simon Coggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Problems
> installing 5.0 RC2 on a Compaq Amarda
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 02:13:39PM +1100, Simon Coggins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having a problem installing 5.0 RC2 from cd onto my Compaq amarda M700
> laptop. I get errors from acpi on boot that look like:
>
> ACPI-1287: *** Method execution failed. AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT
>
on a Compaq Amarda M700 (acpi problems)
Organisation: University of Wollongong (http://www.uow.edu.au/)
Hi,
I'm having a problem installing 5.0 RC2 from cd onto my Compaq amarda M700
laptop. I get errors from acpi on boot that look like:
ACPI-1287: *** Method execution failed. AE_AML_BU
hi
I'm getting kernel panic on Compaq evo n1020v notebook when trying to boot
with ACPI enabled. Last message from kernel is
psm0: unable to allocate IRQ
without acpi it gets assigned IRQ without problems. Panic is however probably
unrelated to psm problem - it paniced the same way w
"David O'Brien" wrote:
> Ever since the last ACPI import, I get all this output (non-verbose)
> boot. What's the change on them going away soon?
>
> acpi0: on motherboard
> ACPI-0625: *** Info: GPE Block0 defined as GPE0 to GPE15
> ACPI-0438: ***
Ever since the last ACPI import, I get all this output (non-verbose)
boot. What's the change on them going away soon?
acpi0: on motherboard
ACPI-0625: *** Info: GPE Block0 defined as GPE0 to GPE15
ACPI-0438: *** Error: Looking up [Z00Q] in namespace, AE_NOT_FOUND
ACPI
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Adrian Neumaier wrote:
> on of the problems this here:
>
> ACPI-0432: *** Error: Handler for [EmbeddedControl] returned AE_ERROR
> ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution failed, AE_ERROR
> ACPI-0432: *** Error: Handler for [EmbeddedControl] returned AE_ER
901 - 1000 of 1762 matches
Mail list logo
