I'm trying to load 5.3 Release on a P3 1GHz machine with the FastTrak S150
installed. Attached is the output from a failed boot. It appears the card
is being detected and probed, but when the drives are probed there is a
panic. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
-Travis
Copyright (c)
Hi all,
Here is my output when I try to install jdk14 on my computer.
==
=== Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
=== Extracting for linux-sun-jdk-1.4.2.06_1
= Checksum OK for j2sdk-1_4_2_06-linux-i586.bin.
===
Andrew Hall wrote:
snip
Any idea about the missing browser plugin?
Which browser? For Firefox one way to get a functional Java plugin is
simply to install the JDK before you build Firefox.
I think on Konqueror you just need to set in the configurations the path to
javac, well at least that
In the last episode (Jan 24), faisal gillani said:
i want my freebsd 5.3 to boot faster
there are almost 15 sec my box is taking longer , 5
sec in the boot manager screen 10 sec more in the
welcome boot options screen ..
To lower the timeout to 1 second in the bootblock menu, run:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 03:13:32PM +0100, Josip wrote:
Let me first just say that I'm new to FreeBSD. I'm tring to compile a
custom kernel and when I do make buildkernel KERNCONF=NEWKERN I get
this:
perl5 /usr/src/sys/kern/vnode_if.pl -h /usr/src/sys/kern/vnode_if.src
perl5:No such file
Hello,
while reading some mail archives about SSH somebody argued
that sshd shouldn't be started on a port bigger than 1024,
since ports below that are priveleged ports.
How does that make sshd less secure if its on a port above
1024 ?
Thanks
Has it ever happened to anyone here where your computer (in this case,
my gateway running ipfw+natd) just restarts out of nowhere. It isnt
even a crash, it just restarted. Then when the computer came back up
nothing was running, dhcpd, natd, cupsd everything was just not
running. Weird.
--
This thought just came to me... Do I need
Linux Binary Compatibility packages to get
the acceleration? Right now I don't have it
setup since I didn't think I'd need it.
Thanks,
Mike
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
sounds like either powersurgery or you hit the wrong button to me...
also, are you the only one with root or power access to it?
maybe some coworker stepped over the cable, or some other one thought he
could work with a bsd, and just did the shutdown -r now...
in case you might wanna check all
KK Hello,
KK while reading some mail archives about SSH somebody argued
KK that sshd shouldn't be started on a port bigger than 1024,
KK since ports below that are priveleged ports.
KK How does that make sshd less secure if its on a port above
KK 1024 ?
KK
Yeah I'm the only root there, the only user with wheel access isnt
even used often for that same reason. I checked the logs and oddly
enough, it was all just like reboot, nothing interesting or
anything, I checked all the ssh logs and everything looks okay. The
weird thing is the deamons not
Hexren wrote:
How does that make sshd less secure if its on a port above
1024 ?
If ssh ever goes down, a user could start his own compromised
version of ssh and do some nasty stuff. The same user could not do
that if the connecting side would expect sshd to be on
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:10:23 +0100, Hexren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If ssh ever goes down, a user could start his own compromised
version of ssh and do some nasty stuff. The same user could not do
that if the connecting side would expect sshd to be on a privileged
port because the system
ok, now open some tail -f 's and stay logged in monitoring them continuously,
also let a packet capture program like tcpdum run, from that box, and from
some other box on your network as well, to see if anything unusual comes
through...
also check if that reboot happens again, and if so, if it
Hey, folks - my one remaining dependency on the Microsoft world
seems to be Streets and Trips. Even though the product has gone
down hill dramatically in the last three years, I still love it
and use it daily. One of the big differentiators for me is that
it doesn't require an Internet
I'll give that a shot. Thanks
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:19:21 +0100, Oliver Leitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, now open some tail -f 's and stay logged in monitoring them continuously,
also let a packet capture program like tcpdum run, from that box, and from
some other box on your network as
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 13:02:32 -0800, gabriel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has it ever happened to anyone here where your computer (in this case,
my gateway running ipfw+natd) just restarts out of nowhere. It isnt
even a crash, it just restarted. Then when the computer came back up
nothing was
Oh don't scare me, the machine I'm talking about is my gateway, the
last gateway I had died (mobo fried) but I dont remember it doing this
though.
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:34:50 -0500, Danny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 13:02:32 -0800, gabriel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has it
just to add reasons...
run a memtest on that machine, could be a dead ram as well...
On Monday 24 January 2005 22:36, gabriel wrote:
Oh don't scare me, the machine I'm talking about is my gateway, the
last gateway I had died (mobo fried) but I dont remember it doing this
though.
On Mon, 24
D On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:10:23 +0100, Hexren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If ssh ever goes down, a user could start his own compromised
version of ssh and do some nasty stuff. The same user could not do
that if the connecting side would expect sshd to be on a privileged
port because the system
At 1:02 PM -0800 1/24/05, gabriel wrote:
Has it ever happened to anyone here where your computer (in this
case, my gateway running ipfw+natd) just restarts out of nowhere.
It isn't even a crash, it just restarted.
Yes. Turned out to be an overheating problem. (one of the CPU
fans was starting to
I am running 5.3 ... when I telnet into the box I see if I have
new email.
When I ssh into the box, it does not show if I have any new email or not.
I am running tcsh and since telnet shows me I have mail, I have to presume
my env and home files are setupwhat am I missing with sshd to have it
I secure my wireless network with IPsec. The rules are generated with a
perl script (included below) with a rule for each ip in the range
192.168.1.3-192.168.1.254 (.2 is my AP). The key exchange is handled by
racoon and works without issue. I have allow ip from any to any as my
first ipfw
All,
I would like to start addressing some of the feedback that I have
been given. I started this discussion because I felt that it was
important to share the information I discovered in my testing. I also
want to reiterate my earlier statement that this is not an X vs. X
discussion, but an
Amsn states it needs port 1863 for chats and port 6891 for
filetransfers.
Using ipf and being quit new to it), does that mean I do this both ways
(in/out) like:
## outgoing
# Allow out msn messenger chatting and filetransfers
pass out quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 1863 flags S
I'm looking for an application to run on our FreeBSD 4.9 server that
will allow some mining of data from our mail logs (Postfix). For
example, what ip's are rejected because they are incorrectly formatted
or what domains are not providing reverse dns entries (which we reject).
Being able to
Are you sure you aren't comparing filesystems with different mount
options? Async comes to mind first.
Pete
Nick Pavlica wrote:
All,
I would like to start addressing some of the feedback that I have
been given. I started this discussion because I felt that it was
important to share the
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 11:16:00PM +0200, Colin Alston wrote:
Hexren wrote:
How does that make sshd less secure if its on a port above
1024 ?
If ssh ever goes down, a user could start his own compromised
version of ssh and do some nasty stuff. The same
PH Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:08:52 +0200
PH From: Petri Helenius
PH To: Nick Pavlica
PH Are you sure you aren't comparing filesystems with different mount
PH options? Async comes to mind first.
speculation
He _did_ say as many default options as possible... does Linux still
mount async by
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 09:05, Bill Schmitt (SW) wrote:
I'm looking for an application to run on our FreeBSD 4.9 server that
will allow some mining of data from our mail logs (Postfix). For
example, what ip's are rejected because they are incorrectly formatted
or what domains are not
I dont know how to do that, but I dont see why running the config
proggy wouldnt get you the same result.
Cheers!
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:42:21 -0500, Alan Gerber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oops. Forgot to send this to the list. :-)
Alan Gerber wrote:
In my particular place, I have nothing
Hello,
I am running FreeBSD 5.3 Release on a AMD Athlon 2800+ with Linux
compatibility installed. I have just installed Linux-EnemyTerritory
from ports and I tried to run it: ./et in
/usr/compat/linux/usr/games/et .
I then get this error message:
...loading libGL.so.1: QGL_Init: dlopen
I didn't change any of the default mount options on either OS.
FreeBSD:
# cat /etc/fstab
# DeviceMountpoint FStype Options DumpPass#
well, you might wanna try to install the following port:
graphics/linux_mesa3
i dunno if FreeBSD has such a thing, for now im using
the debian.org package search interface for finding which library is part of
which archive...
Greetings
Oliver Leitner
Technical Staff
http://www.shells.at
On
Hi,
Not sure if anyone can help or provide some logic to my
problems I'm seeing, but I figured I would give it a
shot.
I recently purchased a dual AMD Opteron 64bit machine
with FreeBSD 5.2.1 pre installed. I had two streaming
servers which I wanted to run off of it and since
neithr had 64bit
We would like to use first initial last name for usernames on FreeBSD.
I am use to Solaris which is normally eight and if you have a long
password on Solaris it doesn't care what you type after 6 characters.
By default what is the max username and password limit in characters?
Sean Murphy writes:
SM We would like to use first initial last name for usernames on FreeBSD.
SM I am use to Solaris which is normally eight and if you have a long
SM password on Solaris it doesn't care what you type after 6 characters.
Solaris uses only six-character passwords? I guess it
I've been digging around the 'Net trying to fix my problem. I've
took note that a few people have stated the cause of this from wrong
verison of the BIOS to needing a patch for the i810 in Xorg.
I hope I can get a definitive direction to start working towards. Let
me know if you need more
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Sean Murphy writes:
SM We would like to use first initial last name for usernames on FreeBSD.
SM I am use to Solaris which is normally eight and if you have a long
SM password on Solaris it doesn't care what you type after 6 characters.
Solaris uses only six-character
Ok, this is a longshot... i kinda dont know this problem...
but maybe, if you set your clockrate to something lower, its gonna work, look
below for a list of your supported hz vs. supported resolutions...
i have that info from your logfile pastings...
Greetings
Oliver Leitner
Technical Staff
Well, theyre prolly in the sourcecode for the login routine, were talking
bout opensource, you know...
sorry, i dont know them, and i havent looked em up on my own, but im sure
they are there.
Greetings
Oliver Leitner
Technical Staff
http://www.shells.at
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 01:00, Sean
Sean Murphy wrote:
We would like to use first initial last name for usernames on FreeBSD.
I am use to Solaris which is normally eight and if you have a long
password on Solaris it doesn't care what you type after 6 characters.
Solaris pays attention to 8 characters.
By default what is the max
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 04:00:55PM -0800, Sean Murphy wrote:
Sorry eight for password as well.
Does any know the limits for FreeBSD?
man 1 passwd says
The new password should be at least six characters long (which may be
overridden using the login.conf(5) ``minpasswordlen'' setting for
Do we still need perl to make use of ports
Just asking because it bugs me. I never use it and it just takes up
space and it is a security risc :P I want it gone :)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
I asked the question the other day, whether to do a standard install or
a custom install. This was brought about because I read several
sources, including G. Lehey's The Complete FreeBSD
I will be doing a Custom install. My question however, is looking at
page 70, in The Complete FreeBSD and
make and make install clean should do a good thing too, if the sourcecode
itself isnt perl, nor any part of it, you should get the results wanted with
these commands.
please correct me, if im not right, but the Makefile is not pl, right?
Greetings
Oliver Leitner
Technical Staff
i dont see the /usr in your calculations...
asside of that...
it really depends on what youre going to do with the system, or which data
its going to be holding...
this is absolutely subjective, cant tell you as long as i dont get any
further data on the probably size of your data, and where
Chuck Swiger writes:
CS If you are using traditional DES encryption, 8 and 8. If you use the
CS fancy new MD5 hash, _PASSWORD_LEN (currently 128 characters).
So which is the default?
--
Anthony
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 01:42:24AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
Do we still need perl to make use of ports
Just asking because it bugs me. I never use it and it just takes up
space and it is a security risc :P I want it gone :)
Only if you want to do certain things like 'make index', but not
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:54:50 -0800, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 01:42:24AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
Do we still need perl to make use of ports
Just asking because it bugs me. I never use it and it just takes up
space and it is a security risc :P I want
On 2005-01-25 01:53, Anthony Atkielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chuck Swiger writes:
CS If you are using traditional DES encryption, 8 and 8. If you use the
CS fancy new MD5 hash, _PASSWORD_LEN (currently 128 characters).
So which is the default?
The one set in /etc/login.conf:
%
Hello,
I would like some advice on which Bittorrent client to use. I really
like Azureus, but I always get OutOfMemoryException's and it takes up
like 300 MB of memory sometimes. Is there a more lightweight client
that has the main features of Azureus (priorities, auto-resuming)? What
does
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 02:02:13AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:54:50 -0800, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 01:42:24AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
Do we still need perl to make use of ports
Just asking because it bugs me. I never use
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:22:57 -0800, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 02:02:13AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:54:50 -0800, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 01:42:24AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
Do we still
can somebody explain what the difference is between forks and threads
? I know what a spoon is, something that ly's in the kitchen :)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
Hi,
I'm trying to make my TV-card work on my box, using FBSD-5.3-STABLE.
For this I put the following lines in my Kernel config. file:
device bktr
device iicbus
device iicbb
device smbus
compiled the new kernel, installed it and rebooted. But dmesg
Thanks all of you,with your instruction,i found that it's
/var/spool/clientmqueue use almost all of my disk space!!And i delete
this directory,every thing is ok!
But which program produce those rubish?and how can i stop that program?
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:12:50 -0600, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
he ccj writes:
Thanks all of you,with your instruction,i found that it's
/var/spool/clientmqueue use almost all of my disk space!!And i
delete this directory,every thing is ok!
But which program produce those rubish?and how can i stop that
program?
That would be sendmail.
hi
I wanted to know whether it is unusal or is a
problem if when my system starts it indicates that
there is some fragmentation of the files but the file
system is clean and thus it is skipping the fsck. Is
this a bad thing? Is this unusual?
__
Do
I am going by what G. Lehey is suggesting in his book The Complete
FreeBSD on pg. 70 he does not recommend a /usr, or a /var file system.
i dont see the /usr in your calculations...
asside of that...
it really depends on what youre going to do with the system, or which
data its going to be
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 03:03, Peterhin wrote:
I am going by what G. Lehey is suggesting in his book The Complete
FreeBSD on pg. 70 he does not recommend a /usr, or a /var file system.
i dont see the /usr in your calculations...
asside of that...
it really depends on what youre
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 21:03:17 -0500, Peterhin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am going by what G. Lehey is suggesting in his book The Complete
FreeBSD on pg. 70 he does not recommend a /usr, or a /var file system.
[...]
What does he recommend then?
...D
Mervin McDougall wrote:
I wanted to know whether it is unusal or is a
problem if when my system starts it indicates that
there is some fragmentation of the files but the file
system is clean and thus it is skipping the fsck. Is
this a bad thing? Is this unusual?
No. It's normal.
[ Well,
That would leave me with a /home of approx. 72GB. I would appreciate
any thoughts as to how I should do this. The computer will be used as
a stand alone workstation, with internet and email access for now. I do
have a large number of JPEG files in my existing /home directory.
(Linux)
I have an old Compaq ProLiant 1500 that I would like to install FreeBSD
on, but the installation process freezes while attempting to load the
installation. The following is the line(s) on which FreeBSD hangs:
device_attach: ida0 attach returned 12
eisab0: PCI-EISA bridge at device 15.0 on pci0
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 06:03:04PM -0800, Mervin McDougall wrote:
hi
I wanted to know whether it is unusal or is a
problem if when my system starts it indicates that
there is some fragmentation of the files but the file
system is clean and thus it is skipping the fsck. Is
this a bad thing?
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 02:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to make my TV-card work on my box, using FBSD-5.3-STABLE.
For this I put the following lines in my Kernel config. file:
devicebktr
deviceiicbus
deviceiicbb
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:59:22 -0800
Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 20 January 2005 03:38 pm, Joachim Dagerot wrote:
I have got it before and took appropriate steps using the ideas
and tips from you guys. Now I have it again:
Current situation on my head-less
On Monday 24 January 2005 06:54 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 01:42:24AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
Do we still need perl to make use of ports
Just asking because it bugs me. I never use it and it just takes up
space and it is a security risc :P I want it gone :)
Only
# Gert Cuykens:
can somebody explain what the difference is between forks and
threads
Nutshell version: fork(2) produces a new process, which may consist
of multiple threads.
fork(2)ing used to be slightly more expensive, as it creates a new
process with an accompanying process control block
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 09:20:16PM -0600, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
On Monday 24 January 2005 06:54 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 01:42:24AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
Do we still need perl to make use of ports
Just asking because it bugs me. I never use it and it
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 19:25:10 -0800, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 09:20:16PM -0600, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
On Monday 24 January 2005 06:54 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 01:42:24AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
Do we still need perl to
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 04:47:41AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 19:25:10 -0800, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 09:20:16PM -0600, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
On Monday 24 January 2005 06:54 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 08:44:13PM -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
he ccj writes:
Thanks all of you,with your instruction,i found that it's
/var/spool/clientmqueue use almost all of my disk space!!And i
delete this directory,every thing is ok!
But which program produce those
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 04:20:56 +0100, Mario Hoerich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# Gert Cuykens:
can somebody explain what the difference is between forks and
threads
Nutshell version: fork(2) produces a new process, which may consist
of multiple threads.
fork(2)ing used to be slightly more
Thanks all of you,with your instruction,i found that it's
/var/spool/clientmqueue use almost all of my disk space!!And i
delete this directory,every thing is ok!
But which program produce those rubish?and how can i stop that
program?
That would be sendmail.
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 19:53:20 -0800, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 04:47:41AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 19:25:10 -0800, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 09:20:16PM -0600, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
On Monday
Hello,
I have been trying for the last few days to figure out how to update
the ports collection via the cvsup process. I have two different books on
FreeBSD version 5.x and both say to use this cvsupit program but I cannot
find it any where. I have FreeBSD release 5.3 install and created
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 01:43:35AM +0100, Oliver Leitner wrote:
i dont see the /usr in your calculations...
That is actually consistent with his source. Greg Lehey's recommendation
is to not separate root and /usr.
aside of that...
it really depends on what youre going to do with the
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 05:12:12AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
So if i want to completly wipe out perl where in my freebsd 5.3 ports
tree do i do make deinstall ?
Use pkg_info and pkg_delete to remove the installed packages. See the
manpages.
Kris
pgpzrqfa4Va8E.pgp
Description: PGP
Hey;
I have a fairly fresh installation of FreeBSD 5.3 running PostGreSQL. I
enabled TCP socket connection in the
/usr/local/pgsql/data/postgresql.conf file (tcpip_socket = true), and
allowed all hosts in pg_hba.conf (host all all 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
trust)... but I still get a connection refused
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:20:10 -0800, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 05:12:12AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
So if i want to completly wipe out perl where in my freebsd 5.3 ports
tree do i do make deinstall ?
Use pkg_info and pkg_delete to remove the installed
Who did the port? Perhaps you could e-mail him or her?
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of SigmaX
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 8:17 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: PostgreSQL TCP sockets access?
Hey;
I have a
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 23:14:47 -0500, Andrew Batson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have been trying for the last few days to figure out how to update
the ports collection via the cvsup process. I have two different books on
FreeBSD version 5.x and both say to use this cvsupit
On Monday 24 January 2005 08:14 pm, Andrew Batson wrote:
Hello,
I have been trying for the last few days to figure out how to update
the ports collection via the cvsup process. I have two different
books on FreeBSD version 5.x and both say to use this cvsupit
program but I cannot find
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 11:14:47PM -0500, Andrew Batson wrote:
Hello,
I have been trying for the last few days to figure out how to update
the ports collection via the cvsup process. I have two different books on
FreeBSD version 5.x and both say to use this cvsupit program but I cannot
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 06:03:04PM -0800, Mervin McDougall wrote:
hi
I wanted to know whether it is unusal or is a
problem if when my system starts it indicates that
there is some fragmentation of the files but the file
system is clean and thus it is skipping the fsck. Is
this a bad thing?
Oliver Leitner wrote:
sounds like either powersurgery or you hit the wrong button to me...
also, are you the only one with root or power access to it?
maybe some coworker stepped over the cable, or some other one thought he
could work with a bsd, and just did the shutdown -r now...
in case you
At 22:14 1/24/2005, Andrew Batson wrote:
Hello,
I have been trying for the last few days to figure out how to update
the ports collection via the cvsup process. I have two different books on
FreeBSD version 5.x and both say to use this cvsupit program but I cannot
find it any where. I have
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Riaan de Klerk wrote:
hi there i am stuck i have a older auwa laptop and cant find the s3 savage
86c270 video driver for it.
could you be as kind as to assist me in finding it.
Kind regards.
Using FreeBSD 5.3 (?) depending on what you want to use try:
Xorg -configure
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Oliver Fuchs wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Riaan de Klerk wrote:
hi there i am stuck i have a older auwa laptop and cant find the s3 savage
86c270 video driver for it.
could you be as kind as to assist me in finding it.
Kind regards.
Using FreeBSD 5.3 (?)
On Monday 24 January 2005 09:25 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 09:20:16PM -0600, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
On Monday 24 January 2005 06:54 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 01:42:24AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
Do we still need perl to make use of ports
is there a current jre that works with a amd 64
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 24 January 2005 10:23 pm, Gert Cuykens wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:20:10 -0800, Kris Kennaway
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 05:12:12AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
So if i want to completly wipe out perl where in my freebsd 5.3
ports tree do i do make
I have got it before and took appropriate steps using the ideas
and tips from you guys. Now I have it again:
Current situation on my head-less system is that I do have a
single SSH session up. Unfortunately it's not authenticated as
ROOT but as an ordinary user.
When I try a ls I
does cvsup need perl ?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 03:28 pm, Gert Cuykens wrote:
does cvsup need perl ?
Yes
--
Yours Sincerely
Shinjii
http://www.shinji.nq.nu
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe,
yes i do use the host allow function ..
no i dont use dhcp anywhere on my network ..
i like static ip assingment ,
thanks for the reply sir
--- Daniel S. Haischt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
those logs are containing traces from the smbd and
nmbd
process.
Do you ahve a line this in your
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
jeremy pedersen
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 6:22 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: FreeBSD 5.3 on Compaq ProLiant 1500
I have an old Compaq ProLiant 1500 that I would like to install
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 11:15:12PM -0600, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
And if you want to install packages using the ports tree.
Eh?
depend on installing packages only, ok. Of course, you have to wait
for them to be built.
I just ran pkg_info -R perl-5.8.5, too many to count by
101 - 200 of 212 matches
Mail list logo
