Maybe take a look at lftp, at the mirror option. For basic demands its a
compact solution.
Cheers
herb langhans
--
sprachtraining langhans
herbert langhans, warschau
herbert.raimund[at]gmx.net
herbert[at]langhans.com.pl
http://www.langhans.com.pl
+0048 603 341 441
| jabber:herbs
| icq:41450086
Hi,
On Saturday 23 June 2012 13:24:02 RetspaN Code wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Intruder already block, but my problem is the intruder before they get
> block they load their exploit file to my machine that cause of my machine
> /usr/src directory is set to read only i can't upload or put any file on
> th
Hi,
On Saturday 23 June 2012 12:59:26 RetspaN Code wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Yes I'm still have a root access... that is why i right you a letter for a
> help regarding to this problem on my server which is running freebsd 8.1
> p1 release... i did paste the error that i encounter on the server on my
>
Hi, since a few of days ago, I noticed my home server turns very slow more than once a
day, so every time I run "top" to see what's processes are running, I can see
fsck_ufs at the very top, and the hard drive working like mad.
background_fsck=NO in /etc/rc.conf
I've checked my crontab and
My criteria for procedures are:
1. They should minimize the need for additional software beyond the base
system as much as reasonably possible. This means not only that I do not
good idea.
3. They should provide for incremental backups.
do backed up laptops use FreeBSD or have another fil
a) Normally any Domain name registered has to have 2 Nameservers. Some
don't have to. but should.
registry like the one responsible for .ORG requires 2 at least to propagate
the domain. In teh case of .COM that is not a requirement, one nameserver
could work. If for some reason I have 2 of th
>> b) I am looking for good list like this one for people developing,
>> learning about Android Development. Any suggestion ?
>> I am trying to setup a Freebsd machine for developing for Android, if
>> possible.
>
> Hmm. http://developer.android.com/sdk/index.html suggests that maybe the
> Linux d
On Jun 22, 2012, at 8:28 PM, Jorge Biquez wrote:
> Hello.
Hola!
> I am sorry if the following 2 questions could sound too stupid.
>
> a) Normally any Domain name registered has to have 2 Nameservers. Some
> registry like the one responsible for .ORG requires 2 at least to propagate
> the domai
Hi,
On Saturday 23 June 2012 09:47:35 RetspaN Code wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since you all the responsible of freebsd source and updates... Is there
you are the only one responsible for the break in. So, what was the problem?
> anyway to fix my server without re install the system?
>
Oh yes, you can
Hello.
I am sorry if the following 2 questions could sound too stupid.
a) Normally any Domain name registered has to have 2 Nameservers.
Some registry like the one responsible for .ORG requires 2 at least
to propagate the domain. In teh case of .COM that is not a
requirement, one nameserver c
Bacula is the tool
Enviado desde mi iPod
El 22/06/2012, a las 8:31 p.m., "Chad Perrin"
escribió:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 08:14:34PM -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Chad Perrin
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm setting up a "new" backup server using FreeBSD. It will be
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:56:39 -0700 (PDT), Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
> Hi, since a few of days ago, I noticed my home server turns very
> slow more than once a day, so every time I run "top" to see
> what's processes are running, I can see fsck_ufs at the very
> top, and the hard drive working like ma
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 20:56:59 +0200, lokada...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> How can i disable cups, docbook and other ports from compiling after
> port update?
> I have no printer and no use of cups or docbook.
If you don't mind the _time_ required for building those ports
(and taking into mind th
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 08:14:34PM -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Chad Perrin wrote:
>
> > I'm setting up a "new" backup server using FreeBSD. It will be used for
> > backing up laptops, which will not be connected to the network by any
> > kind of schedule, so
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> I'm setting up a "new" backup server using FreeBSD. It will be used for
> backing up laptops, which will not be connected to the network by any
> kind of schedule, so backups will be initiated manually rather than by
> cron or other schedule
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 08:47:40PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 10:09:03AM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > I'm setting up a "new" backup server using FreeBSD. It will be used for
> > backing up laptops, which will not be connected to the network by any
> > kind of schedule, s
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Jun 22 13:47:20 2012
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:41:46 -0500
> From: Mark Felder
> Subject: Re: Sendmail and Postfix
>
> When you installed Postfix did you allow it to update the entries in
> /etc/mail/mailer.con
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:24:57AM -0500, Reid Linnemann wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > I disagree with the assessment by others that FreeBSD is in some way
> > effectively a subsidiary of its corporate users, but it does have
> > corporate users, as well as non-
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2007-December/164174.html
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@fre
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 01:16:09PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Chad Perrin wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 01:06:12PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > > i already proposed (but not publically) to turn FreeBSD into
> > > commercial system.
> > >
> > > REALLY i would not see a problem to pa
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 08:28:17AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >
> >biggest problem with what you propose, though, is that it would destroy
> >the social factors in development of the FreeBSD system that make it what
> >it is, and thus destroy FreeBSD itself, as far as I am concerned.
>
> I am
> From woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl Fri Jun 22 09:26:33 2012
> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:25:55 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Wojciech Puchar
> To: Robert Bonomi
> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Why Clang
>
> > Because it doesn't address an of the *OTHER* valid reasons why GCC is
> > b
John Levine writes:
> I have an 8.3 x86-64 system, fully patched, all ports but one up to date.
>
> When I try to build libreoffice, it fails in various sub-builds.
> Most of the sub-builds work when I retry them, except for
> tail_build which fails repeatedly.
There are known issu
I have found that 9-stable is on a couple of sites. Today I looked up the
addresses of the packages and used pkg_add -r ftp://ftpetc I have
xorg-7.5.2 with newer drivers for my recent AMD HD 7950. It looks very,
very nice. xorg-7.7 on 10 must be awesome but this is my principle
mach
4.5 years ago, I posted about cron's piling up. It seems if I install
libnss-mysql on a fresh 9.0-STABLE, this problem persists.
Here was the original post:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2007-December/164174.html
I've seen this on 6.2, 7.x, and now 9.0 FreeBSD.
How to r
On Friday 22 June 2012 16:43:06 John Levine wrote:
> I have an 8.3 x86-64 system, fully patched, all ports but one up to date.
>
> When I try to build libreoffice, it fails in various sub-builds. Most of
> the sub-builds work when I retry them, except for tail_build which fails
> repeatedly.
>
>
Would probably be good to take care of the storm threshold if you haven't,
set it to 0
and you disable the check, that's what we do internally. As for the queues
and number
of descriptors, that's kind of up to you, different work loads and
environments work best
with different setups.
Hopefully, w
"Thomas Mueller" wrote:
>
>
> There actually is/was a closed-source BSD (BSDI), and there is Mac OS X, with
> BSD under the covers.
BSDi sold source-code licenses. I was an early-adopter, and I _have_ one.
The vast majority of the code was taken directly from BSD 4.4 Lite, and
the source-code
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
> Hi, since a few of days ago, I noticed my home server turns very slow
> more than once a day, so every time I run "top" to see what's
> processes are running, I can see fsck_ufs at the very top, and the
> hard drive working like ma
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Increase your system mbuf pool size, you do not want that failure to happen.
Thanks, Jack. I saw a thread where you discussed this. You are
referring to kern.ipc.nmbclusters, correct?
Should I also adjust the following?
hw.ixgbe.rxd
hw.ixgb
Hi, since a few of days ago, I noticed my home server turns very slow more than
once a day, so every time I run "top" to see what's processes are running, I
can see fsck_ufs at the very top, and the hard drive working like mad.
I've checked my crontab and there's nothing related to fsck_ufs, whe
I have an 8.3 x86-64 system, fully patched, all ports but one up to date.
When I try to build libreoffice, it fails in various sub-builds. Most of
the sub-builds work when I retry them, except for tail_build which fails
repeatedly.
It's using clang for the build, but I don't see any option to us
Increase your system mbuf pool size, you do not want that failure to happen.
Jack
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Rick Miller wrote:
> dmesg and ifconfig output below...
>
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Rick Miller
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Andrew Boyer
> wrote:
> >>
dmesg and ifconfig output below...
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Rick Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Andrew Boyer wrote:
>> The ixgbe driver creates devices named ix0, etc.
>>
>> I believe you need to run 'ifconfig ix0 up' before it will attempt to get
>> link.
>
> Thanks f
On 22 Jun 2012, at 22:02, Rick Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Andrew Boyer wrote:
>> The ixgbe driver creates devices named ix0, etc.
>>
>> I believe you need to run 'ifconfig ix0 up' before it will attempt to get
>> link.
>
> Thanks for clarifying that tidbit. At least I
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 22 June 2012 11:44, Matthew Seaman
> wrote:
> > On 22/06/2012 18:40, Eitan Adler wrote:
> >>> q) Is there a place where all sysctl variables are documented? It
> >>> > occurred to me when I was trying to find the memory usage on my
> syste
On 22 June 2012 11:44, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 22/06/2012 18:40, Eitan Adler wrote:
>>> q) Is there a place where all sysctl variables are documented? It
>>> > occurred to me when I was trying to find the memory usage on my system
>>> > but `sysctl -a | grep mem' shows a whole bunch of stuff.
>
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Andrew Boyer wrote:
> The ixgbe driver creates devices named ix0, etc.
>
> I believe you need to run 'ifconfig ix0 up' before it will attempt to get
> link.
Thanks for clarifying that tidbit. At least I know the driver loading
is the correct driver :)
I did try
The ixgbe driver creates devices named ix0, etc.
I believe you need to run 'ifconfig ix0 up' before it will attempt to get link.
-Andrew
On Jun 22, 2012, at 3:45 PM, Rick Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Rick Miller wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Wondering if the Intel X520-DA2 10G F
On 06/20/12 23:25, Lynn Steven Killingsworth wrote:
I don't seem to have generated much comment.
I suspect you are thinking as I do that if your servers don't
immediately download then their is a bandit on my Internet line??
Xorg 7.7 for testing.
http://miwi.bsdcrew.de/2012/06/cft-xorg-7-7-rea
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Rick Miller wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Wondering if the Intel X520-DA2 10G Fibre NIC is supported in
> stable/8. Hardware notes don't specify it, but I have a system up and
> the interfaces appear to be loaded by the ix driver. However, status
> indicates "no carrier".
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:41:46 -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
> When you installed Postfix did you allow it to update the entries in
> /etc/mail/mailer.conf ? If so, I wouldn't worry about the mailq binary
> that came with the system; it's ignored.
Thanks! (Thanks too to the other responders.)
Looks li
Hi--
On Jun 22, 2012, at 11:19 AM, Walter Hurry wrote:
> A little digging around has revealed that there are two 'mailq'
> executables on my system: /usr/local/bin/mailq and /usr/bin/mailq.
>
> The first is part of the mail/postfix-current port which I have installed
> and use, and the second i
On Jun 22, 2012 10:42 AM, "Eitan Adler" wrote:
>
> On 21 June 2012 04:24, Fred Morcos wrote:
> >
> > Introduction and background
> > q) Is it possible to run a FreeBSD system without much building? In
> > other words, can I survive by depending on packages and only resorting
>
Hi All,
Wondering if the Intel X520-DA2 10G Fibre NIC is supported in
stable/8. Hardware notes don't specify it, but I have a system up and
the interfaces appear to be loaded by the ix driver. However, status
indicates "no carrier".
--
Take care
Rick Miller
Hi all,
How can i disable cups, docbook and other ports from compiling after
port update?
I have no printer and no use of cups or docbook.
*Sorry for my english*
Greetings
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma
During subsequent system upgrades, of you build from source, you should
watch out for thus during the mergemaster piece.
Brian
On Jun 22, 2012 11:44 AM, "Matthew Seaman" wrote:
> On 22/06/2012 19:19, Walter Hurry wrote:
> > It seems that Sendmail is embedded somehow in the base system. What is
>
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 10:09:03AM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> I'm setting up a "new" backup server using FreeBSD. It will be used for
> backing up laptops, which will not be connected to the network by any
> kind of schedule, so backups will be initiated manually rather than by
> cron or other sc
On 22/06/2012 18:40, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> q) Is there a place where all sysctl variables are documented? It
>> > occurred to me when I was trying to find the memory usage on my system
>> > but `sysctl -a | grep mem' shows a whole bunch of stuff.
> You can try sysctl -ad but most of the systls are
When you installed Postfix did you allow it to update the entries in
/etc/mail/mailer.conf ? If so, I wouldn't worry about the mailq binary
that came with the system; it's ignored.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.o
On 22/06/2012 19:19, Walter Hurry wrote:
> It seems that Sendmail is embedded somehow in the base system. What is
> the 'approved' way to get rid of /usr/bin/mailq? Or better, remove
> Sendmail?
You don't need to remove the base system sendmail. All you need to do
is set up /etc/mail/mailer.con
On Jun 22, 2012 10:45 AM, "Brandon Gooch"
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 1:01 AM, O. Hartmann
> wrote:
> > I have a USB drive/stick, Lexar USB Flash drive as reported by FreeBSD
> > shown below.
> > When first used, I was able to put approx. 30 GB of data on it - it was
> > visible to FreeBSD
A little digging around has revealed that there are two 'mailq'
executables on my system: /usr/local/bin/mailq and /usr/bin/mailq.
The first is part of the mail/postfix-current port which I have installed
and use, and the second is presumably part of Sendmail, which I have not
installed and do
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 1:01 AM, O. Hartmann
wrote:
> I have a USB drive/stick, Lexar USB Flash drive as reported by FreeBSD
> shown below.
> When first used, I was able to put approx. 30 GB of data on it - it was
> visible to FreeBSD 9 and 10 as expected.
> A Linux system at the lab was also capa
On 21 June 2012 04:24, Fred Morcos wrote:
>
> Introduction and background
> q) Is it possible to run a FreeBSD system without much building? In
> other words, can I survive by depending on packages and only resorting
> to ports when really needed?
To an extent. It is currently
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:25:55 -0500, Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
examples? All test shows that gcc code is not only bad, but very good.
Why are you just saying things you know isn't true?
Fast code is not guaranteed to be correct code.
___
freebsd-ques
I'm setting up a "new" backup server using FreeBSD. It will be used for
backing up laptops, which will not be connected to the network by any
kind of schedule, so backups will be initiated manually rather than by
cron or other scheduled procedures. I'm trying to decide on what tools
to use for ma
On Jun 22, 2012 1:45 AM, "Kaya Saman" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to authenticate Dovecot to Active Directory using the
> SAMBA/Winbind method and so far my setup seems that everything is
> working apart from the Dovecot authentication which I believe I have
> traced to PAM.
>
> I can login usin
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Because it doesn't address an of the *OTHER* valid reasons why GCC is
being replaced -- among them:
1) GCC's continuously increasing propensity to generate "bad code",
examples? All test shows that gcc code is not only bad, but very good.
Why are you just saying things yo
Because it doesn't address an of the *OTHER* valid reasons why GCC is
being replaced -- among them:
1) GCC's continuously increasing propensity to generate "bad code",
examples? All test shows that gcc code is not only bad, but very good. Why
are you just saying things you know isn't true?
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> I disagree with the assessment by others that FreeBSD is in some way
> effectively a subsidiary of its corporate users, but it does have
> corporate users, as well as non-corporate users. Just as it must
> reasonably see to the needs of the i
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 3:13 PM, UNIX developer @ Google.com <
developeru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, I understud!
> I remove from rc.conf this rows:
> static_routes="clnet"
> route_clnet="-net 192.168.2.0/24 192.168.1.10"
>
> new rc.conf:
> ifconfig_em0=" inet 192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0"
>
Thank you, Mark!
All work!
-
Вы писали 22 июня 2012 г., 16:31:39:
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 08:10:43 -0500, UNIX developer @ Google.com
> wrote:
>> now after reboot the problem still the same.
>> ping -S 192.168.2.1 192.168.1.1
>> PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) from 192.168.2.1: 56 d
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Ian Smith wrote:
I thought I saw something somewhere (maybe just wishful thinking) about
FreeBSD on the Arduino, which normally runs a sort of embedded Linux,
that could be very interesting; the hardware is cheap (kits at Jaycar
stores in Australia anyway), very modular desi
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Jun 21 12:46:15 2012
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:37:48 -0500
> From: Mark Felder
> Cc: Wojciech Puchar
> Subject: Re: Why Clang
>
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:36:03 -0500, Wojciech Puchar
> wrote:
>
> >
> > But why
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Jun 21 12:44:17 2012
> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:36:03 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Wojciech Puchar
> To: Mark Felder
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Why Clang
>
> >>
> >> sources please!
> >
> > Google "GPLv3 court case". There are no a
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Jun 21 12:39:02 2012
> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:30:23 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Wojciech Puchar
> To: "Robison, Dave"
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Why Clang
>
> > Because there's no reason to do that. It's an asinine suggestion.
>
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Jun 21 12:37:00 2012
> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:30:40 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Wojciech Puchar
> To: Mark Felder
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Why Clang
>
> z> wrote:
> >
> >> programs compiled by GPLv3 compiler are not encumbere
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >>
> >> "We put clang because sponsors wanted it."
> >>
> >
> >
> > Sponsors didn't want clang. Sponsors wanted not to be encumbered by a GPLv3
> they are not.
> programs compiled by GPLv3 compiler are not encumbered.
You don't know what you don't know, trollboi.
Anyt
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Jun 21 11:50:42 2012
> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:47:30 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Wojciech Puchar
> To: Matthias Gamsjager
> Cc: FreeBSD Questions
> Subject: Re: Is ZFS production ready?
>
> >
> > True but this applies as much to you. You think you know
Dear Sir/Madam,
Iam really appreciate if you take a look into below email and advise me any
update.
On 6/16/12 7:01 PM, "info smartelcom" wrote:
> HI there,
>
> hope my email find you well, i recently order a server with below
> configuration
>
> INTEL
> 1x Quad-Core i5-2500 3.3GHz, 6M Ca
Wojciech Puchar wrote:`
> Subject: Re: Is ZFS production ready?
>
> stick with UFS. It JUST WORKS(R), and is trusty.
> And it works fast.
Be sure to descrirbe how that is even _possible_, given that the OP needs/
wants "larger than 2tb" filesystems.
___
Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 01:06:12PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > i already proposed (but not publically) to turn FreeBSD into
> > commercial system.
> >
> > REALLY i would not see a problem to pay say 100$ per server licence.
>
> I would see a problem with that -- not bec
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Jun 21 06:18:56 2012
> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:03:12 +0430
> From: Hooman Fazaeli
> To: FreeBSD Questions
> Subject: Is ZFS production ready?
>
> Dear community
>
> In the past, I built a 8TB ZFS log server on freebsd 7.4.
> However, the system e
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Jun 21 06:07:49 2012
> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 13:06:12 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Wojciech Puchar
> To: Michel Talon
> Cc: FreeBSD Questions , kpn...@pobox.com
> Subject: Re: Why Clang
>
> > for commercial sponsors of FreeBSD, it has zero bearing on FreeB
On 22/06/2012 10:11, dude golden wrote:
> INTEL
> 1x Quad-Core i5-2500 3.3GHz, 6M Cache
> 16GB DDR3
> 2x 500GB SATAII
> then ask from my COLOCATION to install FreeBSD 8.2 or 8.3 with RAID
> 1, after many times of fail in installation from colocation they said
> that we have problem with RAID 1.we
On 6/22/12 11:11 AM, dude golden wrote:
> HI there,
>
> hope my email find you well, i recently order a server with below
> configuration
>
> INTEL
> 1x Quad-Core i5-2500 3.3GHz, 6M Cache
> 16GB DDR3
> 2x 500GB SATAII
>
> then ask from my COLOCATION to install FreeBSD 8.2 or 8.3 with RAID 1, a
HI there,
hope my email find you well, i recently order a server with below configuration
INTEL
1x Quad-Core i5-2500 3.3GHz, 6M Cache
16GB DDR3
2x 500GB SATAII
then ask from my COLOCATION to install FreeBSD 8.2 or 8.3 with RAID 1, after
many times of fail in installation from colocation they s
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:16:31 -0500, Wojciech Puchar
> wrote:
>
>> programs compiled by GPLv3 compiler are not encumbered.
>
> This has not been decided in court yet.
In which court not? Of which jurisdiction?
Even if one jurisdiction says so
Hi,
I'm trying to authenticate Dovecot to Active Directory using the
SAMBA/Winbind method and so far my setup seems that everything is
working apart from the Dovecot authentication which I believe I have
traced to PAM.
I can login using an AD account using:
wbinfo -K
# wbinfo -K
Enter 's pass
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 01:06:12PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >for commercial sponsors of FreeBSD, it has zero bearing on FreeBSD itself.
> >If FreeBSD appears
> >as a subsidiary of some commercial company (say Juniper) i am not sure this
> >will be good
>
> I think any project that size is
On Friday 22 June 2012 07:04:35 Bernt Hansson wrote:
>
>
> I want to whish all a very mery Midsummer's Eve and Midsummer's Day
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midsummer#Sweden
I appreciate the sentiment but it's midwinter here ;)
Jonathan
___
freebsd-q
underway to make sure the base system will compile cleanly with both
Clang and GCC 4.2+, so I think you're just making up complaints here.
Someone (other than Wojciech Puchar, who would just be talking out of his
once again personal attacks from unhappy childs.
ass) correct me if I'm mistaken
83 matches
Mail list logo
