Re: [Freedos-devel] Instituting a vetting process for FreeDOS software

2015-01-26 Thread Michael Brutman
This is a slippery slope. While I don't use Turbo C anymore for mTCP, I did use it and still use it for smaller projects. It is commercial but readily available for little money and it does not have any royalty encumbrances. On Jan 26, 2015 3:44 AM, Jim Hall jh...@freedos.org wrote: On Jan

Re: [Freedos-devel] Instituting a vetting process for FreeDOS software

2015-01-26 Thread Ralf Quint
On 1/26/2015 3:44 AM, Jim Hall wrote: On Jan 26, 2015 4:41 AM, JAYDEN CHARBONNEAU jcharbonnea...@cpsge.org mailto:jcharbonnea...@cpsge.org wrote: Hello!I was reading you discussion,and I agree with your idea.There should be a mofe formal way to include programs into freeDOS.Although I am

Re: [Freedos-devel] Multi user system

2015-01-26 Thread imre . leber
https://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~horie/intx.bas - Oorspronkelijk bericht - Van: JAYDEN CHARBONNEAU jcharbonnea...@cpsge.org Aan: Technical discussion and questions for FreeDOS developers. Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Verzonden: Vrijdag 23 januari 2015 12:01:02 Onderwerp:

Re: [Freedos-devel] Multi user system

2015-01-26 Thread Guti
Have you considered hosting in on Sourceforge or Github? =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Remitente:imre.le...@telenet.be imre.le...@telenet.be Destinatario: Technical discussion and questions for FreeDOS developers.

Re: [Freedos-devel] secure drive mount tool algorithm suggestions

2015-01-26 Thread Tom Ehlert
Hi security fans, Hi Eric here are some results from wikipedia-ing around a bit: I think that designing security should be a bit more in depth then 'wikipedia-ing around a bit' ~ 2 K text Whew. So many algorithms. I hope this helps anybody when picking existing code modules as the ones

Re: [Freedos-devel] Instituting a vetting process for FreeDOS software

2015-01-26 Thread Jim Hall
On Jan 26, 2015 4:41 AM, JAYDEN CHARBONNEAU jcharbonnea...@cpsge.org wrote: Hello!I was reading you discussion,and I agree with your idea.There should be a mofe formal way to include programs into freeDOS.Although I am new to this community,I am slowly becoming a skilled programmer.As for the

Re: [Freedos-devel] Instituting a vetting process for FreeDOS software

2015-01-26 Thread JAYDEN CHARBONNEAU
Hello!I was reading you discussion,and I agree with your idea.There should be a mofe formal way to include programs into freeDOS.Although I am new to this community,I am slowly becoming a skilled programmer.As for the language,I think it matters not.If a really good program is written in

Re: [Freedos-devel] Instituting a vetting process for FreeDOS software

2015-01-26 Thread JAYDEN CHARBONNEAU
I have noticed that this is an explosive topic.Some people think it doesn't matter the source,and others disagree.From what I'm reading (I may be wrong),but it seems from what I'm reading in this discussion that a program can only be submitted to freeDOS if it is made with a specific compiler.I

Re: [Freedos-devel] Instituting a vetting process for FreeDOS software

2015-01-26 Thread Ralf Quint
On 1/26/2015 1:27 PM, JAYDEN CHARBONNEAU wrote: I have noticed that this is an explosive topic.Some people think it doesn't matter the source,and others disagree.From what I'm reading (I may be wrong),but it seems from what I'm reading in this discussion that a program can only be submitted