Бен Томпсон wrote:
I am still testing ippool-dhcp and after updating to the latest git HEAD
I have come across a new issue. For some reason I am seeing the error
Unknown attribute regarding the variable %{pool-key}.
That's because the Pool-Key attribute doesn't exist.
The example
Many thanks.
2013/6/9 Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com
Бен Томпсон wrote:
I am still testing ippool-dhcp and after updating to the latest git HEAD
I have come across a new issue. For some reason I am seeing the error
Unknown attribute regarding the variable %{pool-key}.
That's
Hello everyone
After fixing my mistake with the $ versus % symbols I tried ippool-dhcp
again. My select statement worked and allocated an IP from the pool, but it
seems that all the other sql statements (update and commit) generated the
error (0) ERROR: dhcp_sqlippool : database query error in:
Many thanks. I will give it a try.
I am still working on this but, I have some further issues which I
need to resolve.
Firstly the ippool table for the oracle ippool schema contains various
columns which are defined as NOT NULL:
CREATE TABLE radippool (
id INT PRIMARY KEY,
Бен Томпсон wrote:
Firstly the ippool table for the oracle ippool schema contains various
columns which are defined as NOT NULL:
That is probably too strong a requirement.
CREATE TABLE radippool (
id INT PRIMARY KEY,
pool_name VARCHAR(30) NOT NULL,
framedipaddress
I am not sure what is happening here so I will have to do some reading.
Fixed. Git pull.
-Arran
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
On 25 Mar 2013, at 02:57, Arran Cudbard-Bell a.cudba...@freeradius.org wrote:
I am not sure what is happening here so I will have to do some reading.
Fixed. Git pull.
Or would have been if git push hadn't hung... Sorry GitHub has been really
flakey lately.
-Arran
-
List
2013/3/25 Arran Cudbard-Bell a.cudba...@freeradius.org:
On 25 Mar 2013, at 02:57, Arran Cudbard-Bell a.cudba...@freeradius.org
wrote:
I am not sure what is happening here so I will have to do some reading.
Fixed. Git pull.
Or would have been if git push hadn't hung... Sorry GitHub has
2013/3/23 Бен Томпсон b.thomp...@latera.ru:
2013/3/23 Arran Cudbard-Bell a.cudba...@freeradius.org:
On 23 Mar 2013, at 12:22, Бен Томпсон b.thomp...@latera.ru wrote:
Hello Everyone
Could anyone advise me what would be required to us dhcp-ippool with
Oracle? I had a quick look through the
Бен Томпсон wrote:
I began work on testing with Oracle but I have come across a couple of
issues. Firstly one of my SQL statements is throwing up an error, and
secondly the server is sending a unicast reply when I need a
broadcast. I should be able to fix the dodgy SQL but I wondered if
2013/3/24 Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com:
Бен Томпсон wrote:
I began work on testing with Oracle but I have come across a couple of
issues. Firstly one of my SQL statements is throwing up an error, and
secondly the server is sending a unicast reply when I need a
broadcast. I should be
Бен Томпсон wrote:
The SQL statement START TRANSACTION looks to be hard coded into
rlm_sqlippool.c but I don't know enough about Oracle etiher to say why
it is flagged as an error.
It's a configuration item. You can change it by editing the queries,
and adding:
allocate-begin = ...
2013/3/25 Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com:
Бен Томпсон wrote:
The SQL statement START TRANSACTION looks to be hard coded into
rlm_sqlippool.c but I don't know enough about Oracle etiher to say why
it is flagged as an error.
It's a configuration item. You can change it by editing the
On 23 Mar 2013, at 12:22, Бен Томпсон b.thomp...@latera.ru wrote:
Hello Everyone
Could anyone advise me what would be required to us dhcp-ippool with
Oracle? I had a quick look through the files in git and it seems to me
that the only thing missing is queries.conf?
If that is all that
2013/3/23 Arran Cudbard-Bell a.cudba...@freeradius.org:
On 23 Mar 2013, at 12:22, Бен Томпсон b.thomp...@latera.ru wrote:
Hello Everyone
Could anyone advise me what would be required to us dhcp-ippool with
Oracle? I had a quick look through the files in git and it seems to me
that the only
2011/10/17 Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Alejandro Gandara
agand...@optaresolutions.com wrote:
Hi List,
I have two doubts which I couldn't resolv properly. I'll be so pleased if
someone could give me a hand.
1º There is any way to configure
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Alejandro Gandara
agand...@optaresolutions.com wrote:
2º How I could check the bind addresses in db.* files?
try http://wiki.freeradius.org/Rlm_ippool_tool
I'd recommend you use rlm_sqlippool instead though.
When I use this tool I got users identified by
2011/10/17 Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Alejandro Gandara
agand...@optaresolutions.com wrote:
2º How I could check the bind addresses in db.* files?
try http://wiki.freeradius.org/Rlm_ippool_tool
I'd recommend you use rlm_sqlippool instead though.
We use the same sort of setup, have a look through your radius.log at
the same time that the unclosed accounting session went bad, you'll
probably find that you have a lot of duplicate discarded records.
We're looking into some solutions ourselves, as mikrotik will often take
requests from
Konstantin Chekushin wrote:
My pool size is 32k. And I'm using this pool only for fallback issue.
So, I'll need it rarely in the future.
For 32K IP's, I'd suggest using a database.
If cache-size = 32768, then radiusd process takes all memory.
Mon Sep 13 12:33:46 2010 : Error: Couldn't
Thanks for advice, but I am using database for main solution (I've
writen my module for this issue, which uses rlm_sql functions for sql
logic). And I wont to use file-based for redundancy only. So, the
main question - what will happens, if query-cache will be less, then
ip-range? I have
Konstantin Chekushin wrote:
Thanks for advice, but I am using database for main solution (I've
writen my module for this issue, which uses rlm_sql functions for sql
logic). And I wont to use file-based for redundancy only. So, the main
question - what will happens, if query-cache will be less,
WiMAX can also works in DHCP proxy mode: acquire IP address from ip pool in
RADIUS and convert to DHCP message format for the R6 interface.
IP address assignment has nothing to do with the EAP method (EAP-TLS) you
are using. I make the ip pool assignment working using sqlippool. What is
your
Victor Tangendjaja wrote:
I read from a post back in 2007 that freeRADIUS ippool or sqlippool does
not support assigning IP via EAP/TLS. I was wondering if this is still
the case?
Yes. Because when 802.1X is used, IP address assignment is done via DHCP.
Alan mentioned that there would be
It doesn't make sense. And ist doesn't work. Hi Alan, do you have an idea
? Thanks for our support.
TF
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Date:
28.11.08 00:11
Subject:
Re: ippool per NAS
Sent by:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
file: users
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't make sense. And ist doesn't work. Hi Alan, do you have an
idea ? Thanks for our support.
All I can say is that it works for me.
What *else* is going on? You haven't posted the contents of the
Access-Request packet... maybe they don't match!
Alan
Cellular:+49 (0) 151 1631-4611
Fax:+49 (0) 30 68905-2940
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:
Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Date:
28.11.08 09:43
Subject:
Re: ippool per NAS
Sent by:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks for your quick response. As described, all works fine in 2.0.5.
Here the Access-Request:
So far as I can tell, nothing changed from 2.0.5 to 2.1.x that should
affect this.
Are you sure it's reading the users file you're editing? Try also
moving that entry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The files readable for the user (and for testing purposes for all). I
tried two ways.
1st) I took the working configuration from 2.0.5.
2nd) I build a new configuration with the files comming with 2.1.1
The configuration from 2.0.5 *should* pretty much work with
Fax:+49 (0) 30 68905-2940
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:
Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Date:
28.11.08 10:30
Subject:
Re: ippool per NAS
Sent by:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks for your quick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't it what you suggested - to put all into the users file ?
No. Simplify the problem.
Take that ONE entry, and out it at the TOP of the users file. Yes,
it might break other things. At this point, who cares... you need to
debug the problem before you make it
) are not used . For me it seems, the
sql module do anything other than in 2.0.x ?
From:
Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Date:
28.11.08 11:42
Subject:
Re: ippool per NAS
Sent by:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The files
file: users
# default ippools per NAS
$INCLUDE users.ippools
It looks like include doesn't work in users (? any more).
file: users.ippools
# Addresspool for ll-us
DEFAULT NAS-IP-Address == 172.16.30.2, Pool-Name := ll-us_pool
Fall-Through = Yes
Just copy the content of users.ippools
Alexandre Chapellon wrote:
The servers will have to communicate with each other before handing
out IP addresses.
Is it a featured in freeradius?
No. That code would need to be written.
I thought about it but not managing a huge number of ippool (for
different type of users,
Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
Think about using DRBD.
It's very often more efficient to implement application-aware
replication. i.e. replication that knows about the data it's contents.
Using DRDB may be much higher overhead than simply proxying RADIUS
packets.
Alan DeKok.
-
List
Alan DeKok a écrit :
Alexandre Chapellon wrote:
The servers will have to communicate with each other before handing
out IP addresses.
Is it a featured in freeradius?
No. That code would need to be written.
I thought about it but not managing a huge number
Why enabling replication? Isn't it possible to have one centralized
database for all radius server?
Ahem, even a single radius server is so much faster than the database.
That arrangement is doomed.
Ivan Kalik
Kalik Informatika ISP
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Why enabling replication? Isn't it possible to have one centralized
database for all radius server?
Ahem, even a single radius server is so much faster than the database.
That arrangement is doomed.
Well, actually here is how i wanted to set things up:
Alexandre Chapellon wrote:
I'm not sure *any* RADIUS server has this functionality. It's usually
done as part of the database replication, etc.
Why enabling replication? Isn't it possible to have one centralized
database for all radius server?
You really don't want that. RADIUS
Alexandre Chapellon wrote:
Each radius have a local mysql database to locally store accounting data.
If nothing will be querying those databases, I suggest *not* using
SQL. It's just not needed.
Each local database is replicated to a central database which couls be
used too as a redundancy
Alan DeKok a écrit :
Alexandre Chapellon wrote:
Each radius have a local mysql database to locally store accounting data.
If nothing will be querying those databases, I suggest *not* using
SQL. It's just not needed.
Right, nothing will query the database directly on radius
Alexandre Chapellon wrote:
Right, nothing will query the database directly on radius servers.
Then don't put a database there.
But i
really need to have one central database that will be queried by webapps
to let users know about thier quota left, time of connection etc...
Then put a
Again, using *one* database for *many* RADIUS servers is very likely
wrong. i.e. it will be slow, fragile, and is likely to not meet your
needs of high availability.
Alan is saying a single MySQL instance is fragile because it's a single
point of failure.
Clustered SQL is bad because
Alexandre Chapellon wrote:
Is it possible to use the same sqlippool database for different
freeradius servers that belong to a cluster?
Yes. Just create an SQL cluster, and point the servers at the cluster.
Is there drawback, doing this?
It will be slower, and database replication may
Alan DeKok a écrit :
Alexandre Chapellon wrote:
Is it possible to use the same sqlippool database for different
freeradius servers that belong to a cluster?
Yes. Just create an SQL cluster, and point the servers at the cluster.
Is there drawback, doing this?
It
Alexandre Chapellon wrote:
Looking at freeradius online doc, i saw that sqlippool requires
transmission of interim-updates packets to the accounting server to
function correctly
It uses the interim-updates to mark the IP address as still in use.
Anders Holm wrote:
Adding additional IP ranges, which are non-contiguous, and at the same time
not adding a new ippool, seems to me to be really impossible. Either you
have static ranges in-between, or, worse still, you do not own/operate the
IPs in-between but someone else does. . .
Each
Adding additional IP ranges, which are non-contiguous, and at the same time
not adding a new ippool, seems to me to be really impossible. Either you
have static ranges in-between, or, worse still, you do not own/operate the
IPs in-between but someone else does. . .
Either you should have a larger
Hey John,
I've recently added support in current SVN of daloRADIUS for IP Pool
management, it's currently very basic and allows the basic
list/add/edit/delete
functionality of pool names and their IP addresses.
I'm not using it myself currently so it needs testing and some pointers
as to how the
John Joe wrote:
Hy,
What happens if the ip addresses from the ippool are finished? I have
some moments when the clients are receiving ip addresses from 10.67
subnet allthow i have nothing configured for this.
As always, run the server in debugging mode to see what's going on.
In this
On Mon 26 Feb 2007 16:52, Graeme Crawford wrote:
Hi,
i read a post from 2004 where freeradius' ippool does not support
assigning ip's to eap/tls supplicants and was wondering if that is
still the case?
http://wiki.freeradius.org/IP_Pool
--
Peter Nixon
http://www.peternixon.net/
PGP Key:
Ehh O, ok..
that makes sense. i thought the ippool was some sort of DHCP..(hamding
out IP nrs)
but it isn't... there for the dns, gateway and proxy question is obsolete.
Thx
Collen
Alan DeKok wrote:
Collen Blijenberg wrote:
if i'm right, the ippool option, is for handing out IP's to
Collen Blijenberg wrote:
if i'm right, the ippool option, is for handing out IP's to clients ?!
(right ??)
you could call it DHCP (right??)
No.
how can i setup the dns gateway and proxy options in a ippool...
There is no standard RADIUS attribute to set DNS servers. And I have
no idea
Sascha Djuric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I already posted on this list about my probs with ippool. now with the help
of some members on this list i got it running on a 32-Bit solaris system. now
doing the same on a 64 Bit solaris system (intel 64 by dell) i only get the
message
ippool:
Sorry for being so sloppy, this is 1.1.3
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 14:07:58 -0400
Von: Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Betreff: Re: ippool on solatis10 32/64 bit difference
Sascha Djuric
Sascha Djuric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
still everything works fine.
now i added a Pool-Name to the check attributes of my test user.
Then I get:
... not found.
Can you please post the entry from SQL? Odds are you used a
comparison operator like '==', rather than ':='
Alan DeKok.
On Mon 04 Sep 2006 16:20, Sascha Djuric wrote:
Hello
this is my second try:
im using freeradius 1.1.3 under solaris10. i got it installed and
configured with mysql. everything works fine, I added a user with Password
and all and radtest works fine. next i configured an ippool and added it
and radgroupcheck
with ':=' op.
Thx for Your help
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 12:33:59 -0400
Von: Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Betreff: Re: ippool causes Auth-Type error
Sascha Djuric [EMAIL
I have a doubt, it's possibile use ippool with LDAP (CHAP authentication)?Have someone ideas about this error? I'm not able to find documentation or other about this.Thanks in advance. Giusy
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Objet: Re: ippool error
I have a doubt, it's possibile use ippool with LDAP (CHAP
authentication)?
Have someone ideas about this error? I'm not able to find documentation or
other about this.
Thanks in advance.
Giusy
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list
On 7/31/06, Sebastien Cantos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes it's possible.
However you will have to store passwords in clear text format onto the ldap. Ldap works fine. The authentication works, the only thing that doesn't works is ip pool assignment.
-
List
.
Regards,
Sebastien.
De:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Giuseppina Venezia
Envoyé: lundi 31 juillet
2006 14:31
À: FreeRadius users mailing
list
Objet: Re: ippool error
On 7/31/06, Sebastien
Cantos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes
On 7/31/06, Sebastien Cantos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've something like
this in the user file:
That's Ok
Then make sure you have a
reference to your pool in the postauth section of radiusd.conf :Yes.
And also a reference of
it in the accounting section (just to make sure
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Giuseppina Venezia
Envoyé: lundi 31 juillet
2006 16:26
À: FreeRadius users mailing
list
Objet: Re: ippool error
On 7/31/06, Sebastien
Cantos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've something like this in the user file:
That's Ok
Giuseppina Venezia wrote:
On 7/28/06, *Phil Mayers* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the ippool module is saying Pool-Name is not found, then these
entries must not be matching. Run FreeRadius under debugging with the
-X argument, and watch for the bit where it
On 7/31/06, Phil Mayers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The logs you have given are NOT debugging output.[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/etc/raddb# radiusd -X -A [1] 16321Starting - reading configuration files ..Ready to process requests.
rad_recv: Access-Request packet from host 127.0.0.1:1039,
Giuseppina Venezia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rlm_ippool: Could not find Pool-Name attribute.
As has been said many times, you are not setting the Pool-Name
attribute.
users
...
DEFAULT Huntgroup-Name == studenti, Ldap-Group == student,
Pool-Name:=studenti
Which is OK, except
On 7/31/06, Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You deleted files from authorize, and are still trying to usethe users file.Please don't break the server configuration.The defaultconfiguration is there for a purpose: it works.It's frustrating to
see the number of people who go out of their way to
Giuseppina Venezia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you, Alan. Now, I have decommented files, it reads users but give
the same error. I'll paste the log and the authorize configuration of
radius.conf:
...
Ready to process requests.
rad_recv: Access-Request packet from host 192.168.1.96:2061,
On 7/31/06, Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then, add a users file entry setting the pool name, and a passwordfor a test user.See the FAQ.Then test it.Get THAT to work, andthen start working on LDAP, and everything else.
Ok. Again, please stop trying so hard to break the
Giuseppina Venezia wrote:
users
DEFAULT Service-Type == Framed-User, Huntgroup-Name == professori,
User-Profile:=employeeType=professor, Pool-Name := professori
Fall-Through = Yes
If the ippool module is saying Pool-Name is not found, then these
entries must not be matching. Run
On 7/28/06, Phil Mayers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the ippool module is saying Pool-Name is not found, then theseentries must not be matching. Run FreeRadius under debugging with the -Xargument, and watch for the bit where it processes the authorize
section - see what entries are matched in the
Pierre LEONARD wrote:
i would like to assign fixed ip for each vpn users but when i use
The pool module does not do this. It assigns IPs based on a configurable
hash of NAS attributes. By default, this is NAS IP and port number. Your
users will therefore get a random IP from the pool each
Phil Mayers a écrit :
Pierre LEONARD wrote:
i would like to assign fixed ip for each vpn users but when i use
The pool module does not do this. It assigns IPs based on a
configurable hash of NAS attributes. By default, this is NAS IP and
port number. Your users will therefore get a
Phil Mayers a écrit :
Pierre LEONARD wrote:
i would like to assign fixed ip for each vpn users but when i use
The pool module does not do this. It assigns IPs based on a
configurable hash of NAS attributes. By default, this is NAS IP and
port number. Your users will therefore get a
On Monday 17 April 2006 17:48, Alan DeKok wrote:
Nikos Vassiliadis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using ippool and it seems that it is using the same IP addresses
all the time(given that they are available). So when I am testing with
just one client, I get two alternating addresses. Am I
Nikos Vassiliadis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using ippool and it seems that it is using the same IP addresses all
the time(given that they are available). So when I am testing with just one
client, I get two alternating addresses. Am I missing something or this is
the wanted behaviour?
try to go out of /etc/raddb , and check who owns raddb folder then.
just chown it with radiusd including subfolders
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.org] On Behalf Of S. K Rahman
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 4:35 PM
To: FreeRadius users mailing
rlm_ippool: Failed to open file /etc/raddb/db.ippool: Permission denied
Eeeks
I made a stupid mistake again and it was indeed a permission related issue.
Regards
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Palmer J.D.F. wrote:
Hello,
Just a quick question, is it possible to allocate client IP details using
ippools within FreeRADIUS when using EAP(PEAP)?
Yes you can do that at the server side, but it won't DO anything if
you're using EAP to protect wired or wireless networks. IPs are
Rafael Roldán wrote:
But when I tried to test the ippool module I obtained a segmentation
fault when I run radiusd.
Please no HTML to the list.
If you found a bug in FreeRADIUS, follow the instructions here:
http://freeradius.org/radiusd/doc/bugs
In my rlm_ippool directory I have:
# pwd
list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: IPPOOL PROBLE
Rafael Roldán wrote:
But when I tried to test the ippool module I obtained a segmentation
fault when I run radiusd.
Please no HTML to the list.
If you found a bug in FreeRADIUS
Hello,
where you radius server and users config file ?
- Original Message -
From: Johansson, Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Subject: Ippool and NAS
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:18:59 +0100
Hi Freeradius users.
I have compiled and installed
Johansson, Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now I have 5 NAS boxes that is accessing the radius server the problem
is that I want each NAS to use a set if ipadresses.
So for NAS(1) the radius should return ippool(1) and so on.
That can be done.
I have looked at the FAQ and have been
Johansson, Daniel wrote:
Hi Freeradius users.
I have compiled and installed the 1.1.0 version of Freeradius and made
the basic configurations and everything works fine.
Now I have 5 NAS boxes that is accessing the radius server the problem
is that I want each NAS to use a set if ipadresses.
Mark Novitzkas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to setup freeradius 1.0.0.5 using mysql and ippools.
Basically i want to use mysql to auth the incoming request and and use
ippool to assign an adress to that request. Firstly is that possible?
Yes.
rlm_ippool: Failed to open file
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of milver nisay
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 10:44
AM
To: 'FreeRadius users mailing
list'
Subject: RE: ippool problem
What
does radiusd –X tells you?
Can you
post more info from your accounting and post-auth section?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED
What does radiusd X tells you?
Can you post more info from your
accounting and post-auth section?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 7:42
AM
To: freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Subject: ippool
radius -X doesn´t show any error
or warning until the end (Segmentation fault). You can see the result of
my last execution:
Starting - reading configuration files
...
reread_config: reading radiusd.conf
Config: including file: /usr/local/etc/raddb/proxy.conf
Config: including file:
Hi.
Is /usr/local/var/log/radius/radutmp existing and is rw for radius ?
Cheers,
Marcin.
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 12:04:55 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
radius -X doesn´t show any error or warning until the end (Segmentation
fault). You can see the result of my last execution:
Starting -
Check user access and access permissions from
radiusd.conf and from
the files and folders
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 11:05
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: RE: ippool problem
radius -X
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I start the server I get always the error Segmentation Fault after
loading radutmp, just when it tries to load the ippool in the accounting
See doc/bugs
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Marek Gradzki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
unfortunately all sessions that are terminated in the box working
with radius come to this device by the same port. So I had to
rewrite a little bit rlm_ippool module to verify used ip addresses
not only by nas device and nas port but also by user name.
Hi,
why do you actually need
two different instances of freeradius?
Regards,
Edvin Seferovic
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miguel Sennoun
Sent: Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2005
14:33
To: 'FreeRadius
users mailing list'
Subject: ippool
Hi,
mailing list'
Objet: RE: ippool
Hi,
why do you actually need
two different instances of freeradius?
Regards,
Edvin Seferovic
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Miguel Sennoun
Sent: Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2005
14:33
To: 'FreeRadius
users mailing list
Miguel Sennoun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone an idea on the best solution to run two freeradius on the same
machine. I tried with one installation that uses different conf and log
directories but I wonder if all works well with the second instance.
Yes. I do it all of the time.
For
Le vendredi 27 mai 2005 à 13:39 +0200, Christoph Hubmann a écrit :
debug output:
rad_recv: Access-Request packet from host 192.168.1.1:1648, id=231,
length=5
6
User-Name = test
User-Password = xxx
NAS-IP-Address = 192.168.1.1
NAS-Port-Type = Virtual
Let me just make sure I'm clear on this idea... Your AP will give out
private IP addresses from a DHCP pool (presumably with 802.11x so you
get the good WPA-Enterprise security) and then the machine must launch
a PPP tunnel (over PPTP/L2TP I presume?) which then authenticates to
the RADIUS
Craig Huckabee wrote:
Paul Hampson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 07:04:09PM +0800, Chan Min Wai wrote:
I hope that radius server can talk to the DHCP server and tell the DHCP
server what ip address to be allocate...
Write a script in that adds the authenticated client's MAC address and
Paul Hampson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 02:19:21PM +0800, Chan Min Wai wrote:
Dana Hudes wrote:
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004, Chan Min Wai wrote:
Go back to the defintion of RADIUS: Remote Authentication Dial-In User
System. Now think. How do dialup users connect? They use SLIP/PPP.
PPP has
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo