Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus

2008-07-15 Thread Nicholas Thompson
al Message - From: Robert Holmes To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: friam Sent: 7/15/2008 4:33:55 PM Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus Nick - all you are doing is shouting "Absurd!" in an ever louder voice. Link me to a methodology for assessing the existence/non-existence of a

Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus

2008-07-15 Thread Robert Holmes
ged the definition of a point. > > That is how progress is made, you rigid boob!" But then I want to > continue > > to wonder (for perhaps a few more days) what implications this might have > > for the concept of mind. My New Realist mentors taught me to think of > &

Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus

2008-07-15 Thread Ken Lloyd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nicholas Thompson Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 9:58 AM To: Robert Holmes; friam Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus My reference is to that eminent logician, nthompson, who wrote. that in logic, Once you have said in your definitions, "A point

Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus

2008-07-15 Thread Nicholas Thompson
ck Nicholas S. Thompson Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology, Clark University ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Original Message - From: Robert Holmes To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];FRIAM Sent: 7/15/2008 9:40:34 AM Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus Hey Nick, I'm not talking ab

Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus

2008-07-15 Thread Robert Holmes
icholas S. Thompson > Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology, > Clark University ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > > > > > - Original Message - > From: Robert Holmes > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];FRIAM > Sent: 7/12/2008 6:47:34 PM > Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calcul

Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus (The View From Nowhere)

2008-07-15 Thread Tom Carter
Nick - Have you read Thomas Nagel's "The View From Nowhere" ?You might find it amusing . . . tom On Jul 14, 2008, at 8:35 PM, Nicholas Thompson wrote: But then I want to continue to wonder (for perhaps a few more days) what implications this might have for the concept of mind.

Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus (step two)

2008-07-15 Thread Tom Carter
Nick - OK . . . now that we recognize that terms like "point" are (should more properly be?) left intentionally undefined in the axiomatic systems, we can move to the next step . . . A term like "point" (in an axiomatic theory) is a place where we can make a (temporary?) connection be

Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus

2008-07-15 Thread Ken Lloyd
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nicholas Thompson Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 9:28 PM To: Robert Holmes Cc: FRIAM@redfish.com Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus Robert, Some how this message got caught in my outbox and you went unchastised for a whole 48 hours. No! You have gone

Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus

2008-07-14 Thread Tom Carter
Nick - So, ummm . . . in a carefully done axiomatization of Euclidean geometry, the terms "point", "line", "plane" (among others . . .) are left explicitly *undefined* . . . See, for example, Hilbert's axiomatization as described here: http://www.math.umbc.edu/~campbell/Math306Spr

Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus

2008-07-14 Thread Nicholas Thompson
ing Applied Complexity Coffee Group Sent: 7/14/2008 10:01:58 PM Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus Nick, I think I am beginning to get a glimmer of what you are complaining about. The wording of your definition is ambiguous. How about this one from Google: a geometric element that ha

Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus

2008-07-14 Thread Roger Frye
Nick, I think I am beginning to get a glimmer of what you are complaining about. The wording of your definition is ambiguous. How about this one from Google: a geometric element that has position but no extension; "a point is defined by its coordinates" I think you are arguing that since

Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus

2008-07-14 Thread Nicholas Thompson
from which the world is viewed, or at b Nicholas S. Thompson Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology, Clark University ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Original Message - From: Robert Holmes To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];FRIAM Sent: 7/12/2008 6:47:34 PM Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and C

Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus

2008-07-14 Thread Nicholas Thompson
sychology and Ethology, Clark University ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Original Message - From: Robert Holmes To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];FRIAM Sent: 7/12/2008 6:47:34 PM Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus Nick - the snippet below illustrates the key problem with invoking catego

Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus

2008-07-12 Thread Robert Holmes
Nick - the snippet below illustrates the key problem with invoking category errors. I think giving the infinitesimal point speed and direction makes sense and you do not. You see a category error and I do not. So how do we adjudicate? We can't: there's no objective methodology for saying if a categ

Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus

2008-07-10 Thread Günther Greindl
Nick, I think the questions you are asking won't be answered in a math book but rather in a book like this: Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being by George Lakoff, Rafael Nuñez http://www.amazon.com/Where-Mathematics-Comes-Embodied-Brings/dp/04650377

Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus

2008-07-10 Thread Marcus G. Daniels
Nicholas Thompson wrote: > What about the flow in the opposite direction? Can the calculus tell > us anything about how we think about goal direction in human behavior? Well, goal direction means having some way to measure achieving a goal or getting closer. One artificial neural net training

Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus

2008-07-09 Thread Frank Wimberly
ginal Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Steiner Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 1:40 PM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus It may not be a category error, but a domain error... app

Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus

2008-07-09 Thread Nicholas Thompson
Ethology, Clark University ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Original Message - From: Robert Holmes To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Sent: 7/9/2008 9:49:11 AM Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus This is based on nothing more than reading the

Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus

2008-07-09 Thread Nicholas Thompson
son Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology, Clark University ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Original Message - From: Robert Holmes To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Sent: 7/9/2008 9:49:11 AM Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus This is base

Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus

2008-07-09 Thread James Steiner
It may not be a category error, but a domain error... applying definitions of objects from one domain to similarly named objects in another. This error is the basis of the classic paradox regarding immovable object's interactions with irresistible forces. The question of what happens when the form

Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus

2008-07-09 Thread Joshua Thorp
point. This is not a category error; it’s a definition. Frank From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Holmes Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 9:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and

Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus

2008-07-09 Thread Frank Wimberly
; The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus This is based on nothing more than reading the entry on categories at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/categories/ so please take with a pinch of salt... It seems that the tools necessary to cons

Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus

2008-07-09 Thread Ken Lloyd
Of Nicholas Thompson Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 10:46 PM To: friam@redfish.com Cc: echarles Subject: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus All who have patience, Once of the classic critiques of mentalism the belief that behavior is caused by events in some "inner" space calle

Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus

2008-07-09 Thread Robert Holmes
This is based on nothing more than reading the entry on categories at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/categories/ so please take with a pinch of salt... It seems that the tools necessary to construct category systems are severely broken. Specifically, there is no generally accepted method for di

Re: [FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus

2008-07-08 Thread Marcus G. Daniels
Nicholas Thompson wrote: > > For instance, a motive, or an intention, is not some inner thing that > directs behavior, but rather the limit of its behavioral direction. > Or it could be that the so-called `motive' or `intention' was merely a rationalization of a subconscious impulse that had alre

[FRIAM] Mentalism and Calculus

2008-07-08 Thread Nicholas Thompson
All who have patience, Once of the classic critiques of mentalism the belief that behavior is caused by events in some "inner" space called the mind ... is that it involves a category error. The term "category error" arises from ordinary language philosophy (I think). You made a category e