Hi,
I'm displaying a list of contacts on a page, when a contact is added I fetch
the new list using Ajax, my action is set in the init() of the controller as
an ajax action.
public function init()
{
$contextSwitch = $this-_helper-getHelper('AjaxContext');
Hi Till,
I totally get you that every app is doing something different. However
afaik, there is little info available online about how much memory
sites/apps actually use. I'd love to see a chart or something, going from
html holding page to video cruncher.
When I moved my site to MT and
Litka's RPMs are fine; I've relied on them for almost two years now.
Honestly, PHP 5.1.6 came out two and a half years ago. Red Hat may
backport the security fixes, but look at the bug fixes in this change log
from 5.1.6 to 5.2.8: http://www.php.net/ChangeLog-5.php
-Matt
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at
I use a custom validator for this functionality. Add it to the
validation chain in the form model:
$confirmPassword = new Zend_Form_Element_Password(password_confirm);
$confirmPassword-setLabel('Confirm Password')
-setDescription('Please re-enter your
After a lot of tweaking, I got
http://devzone.zend.com/article/3811-Using-Zend_Tool-to-start-up-your-ZF-Proje
c
Using Zend_Tool to start up your ZF-Project to work, but in
http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFDEV/Zend_Tool+-+Todo+2008-10-01?showC
hildren=true#children
Zend_Tool
Is it possible to pass the POST variable(s) once instead of twice when using
the identical validator?
What I have is a method in a model that checks a param which is passed when
the form is generated in the controller. Then the controller (if the request
is post) runs isValid($_POST).
This
Hi,
The following snippet of code is what I intuitively would have thought would
solve the requirement of subqueries:
$query = Engine::$DB-select();
$query-from(
array( 'L' = 'sales_opportunities' ),
array(
L.*,
assigned_to_name =
I never used the identical validator before but my first thought was that it
should be something like this:
$password = self::createElement('text', 'newpassword');
-setRequired(true)
-setLabel('Password');
$password1 = self::createElement('text',
Thanks!
This works great... Quick question, I couldn't find it in the manual...
a) is it required to set addPrefixPath()
b) if so how can I set it globally?
Edward Haber wrote:
I use a custom validator for this functionality. Add it to the
validation chain in the form model:
Bear in mind Wordpress has several aggressive caching plugins. Are these
activated and configured? They too could certainly reduce memory usage on
average. ;)
Paddy
Sent from my iPhone
On 5 Jan 2009, at 15:07, mothmenace ultranib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Till,
I totally get you that every
I think what you are looking for is to be able to use Zend_Db_Expr() inside
of the from method of the select object.
Effectively, it would be:
$query-from(
array('L' = 'sales_opportunity'),
array('L.*',
'assigned_to_name' = new Zend_Db_Expr($DB-select()-...)
)
...
That
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 12:08 PM, mothmenace ultranib...@gmail.com wrote:
I just got round to testing some other web apps memory use against my Zend
App that I mentioned before.
I'm using memory_get_usage(true) to test before and after php script,
although also have Xdebug installed.
My
Hi all,
I have a form that collects billing and shipping information. I want to be
able to control whether or not the shipping information is required based on
a same as shipping checkbox element. I have written a validator using the
$context array to check whether or not this checkbox is
I set it in my form class. I don't know if there's a global way to set
it, but i wouldn't doubt it. You could also use a base form class like
so:
class MF_Form
{
public function __construct($options = null)
{
parent::__construct($options);
I just got round to testing some other web apps memory use against my Zend
App that I mentioned before.
I'm using memory_get_usage(true) to test before and after php script,
although also have Xdebug installed.
My Zend app uses 5-6.5mb without APC, and 2mb with.
I just tested a default
Sorry should have been :
class MF_Form extends Zend_Form
{
Thx,
EH
This is a matter of taste more than anything else. To my knowledge, neither
example is more performant than another.
Think of it like this, you are either calling a method on the object in the
global scope ($select-...), or you are calling a method on the object
returned from the previous method
Matthew Weier O'Phinney-3 wrote:
-- ardx ovg...@rogers.com wrote
(on Sunday, 04 January 2009, 06:34 PM -0800):
Till Klampaeckel-2 wrote:
Zend_File seems to lead the list, but only with 5.2.1, not 5.2.4.
And if anyone cares, here are the version requirements per component
(tests
-- Robert Castley robert.cast...@macro4.com wrote
(on Monday, 05 January 2009, 09:47 AM -):
Out of the two following examples which is the most efficient code i.e. which
offers the best performance?
Example 1:
$sql = $this-select()
-from($this-_name)
-order('timestamp', 'DESC');
Yep Wordpress has some really nice caching plugins. The 10.75mb was without
them. But I was only using WP as a 'control' to compare against, as WP is so
popular and I'm assuming well written.
I'm pretty suspicious if my 2mb Zend app was ever to blame for the memory
problems now. Media Temple DV
-- ardx ovg...@rogers.com wrote
(on Sunday, 04 January 2009, 06:34 PM -0800):
Till Klampaeckel-2 wrote:
Zend_File seems to lead the list, but only with 5.2.1, not 5.2.4.
And if anyone cares, here are the version requirements per component
(tests not included):
...
Zend_Date:
I'm still learning more about the javascript integration through the jquery
xtra shipped with 1.7, but when I look at all the hoops you have to jump
through to do some basic things with javascript in the Zend way... I just
get the feeling its more trouble than its worth.
The jquery plugin
Hi,
Out of the two following examples which is the most efficient code i.e.
which offers the best performance?
Example 1:
$sql = $this-select()
-from($this-_name)
-order('timestamp', 'DESC');
Example 2:
$sql = $this-select();
$sql-from($this-_name);
$sql-order('timestamp', 'DESC');
What you could do is just test that one element and if succes (or not succes
depends on what you want) continue. Something like this:
$form = new MyForm();
if ($this-_request-isPost()) {
$test =
$form-getElement('Elementname')-isValid($this-_request-getPost('Elementname'));
if($test ==
-- sprynmr robert.sp...@hivelive.com wrote
(on Monday, 05 January 2009, 12:32 PM -0800):
I'm still learning more about the javascript integration through the
jquery xtra shipped with 1.7, but when I look at all the hoops you
have to jump through to do some basic things with javascript in the
I may be totally wrong when saying this.. but the ZF integration benefits
with *any js framework* are minimal at best, especially when factoring in
the overhead required (as you mentioned before) and the double training that
would require on robust apps. Don't get me wrong, I am a -huge- fan of
Thanks Matt,
I think I'm coming to pretty much the same conclusion you have, although I
think I might favor keeping my form validation in a separate jquery plugin
for great flexibility. Definitely going to leverage the JS integration as
far as the scaffolding goes and building the script tags
Hello Robert, Hello Josh,
thanks for the comments on jQuery. I do see the point in your criticism and
share it a bit. Personally I think when the jQuery integration plays best is
when you are using it for prototyping, admin areas and scaffolding generation.
If you want to use the jQuery or
I didn't bother with any JS integration and I never mix JavaScript with PHP.
I have a view helper to load required .js files and another to trigger
onload events.
All event handlers are attached in js using jQuery and no code is ever
generated.
I think it's just simpler, cleaner and doesn't limit
Hi all,
In most of the ZF tutorials I have read (ZF Quickstart, Rob's one, ZF Book),
they all recommend setting your Apache's webroot to your /zfapp/public/
directory for security reasons.
I can understand the logic, putting the application / library directory
outside of the webroot is a good
A quick note to everyone who may be confused: he's replying to an e-mail I
sent him off-list. (Didn't want to spam a link to my blog yet again.)
-Matt
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 2:09 PM, sprynmr robert.sp...@hivelive.com wrote:
Thanks Matt,
I think I'm coming to pretty much the same conclusion
The only 'framework' file in public in you index.php which loads your
bootstrap. You could move it up a level and adjust the include paths
accordingly.
I've done this as well, since I'm running some sites on Plesk systems where
we don't have write access to the level containing the webroot.
Hey Benjamin,
I haven't thought it through 100% yet, but essentially I'm thinking along
the lines of dynamically including javascript based on naming conventions
(pairing with the similarly named view script). I'm also thinking of doing
the same sort of thing when including various classes that
One possible solution is setting a .htaccess file for the other root
directories setting the deny from all directive to forbid access.
Pádraic Brady
http://blog.astrumfutura.com
http://www.survivethedeepend.com
OpenID Europe Foundation Irish Representative
On Sunday 04 January 2009 18:28:04 Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
Originally, the Y! group was invite only, to keep the discussions
targetted. Later, it was to ensure that Zend_Tool discussions could be
found easily -- we're not sure if we'll do an additional list for just
Zend_Tool in the
Hi,
I made following solution without thinking it much =(
1. I have module based filesystem for my application
2. I added the javascripts folder to my module folder
3. In my base controller, I check if the current action has js file
4. If there is a file, I add new js file to view component. eg
36 matches
Mail list logo
