[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are the Athelon chips the same as the Intel chips in this discussion?
Aren't they less expensive and don't they run cooler?
They're definitely less expensive, but not, in general, less
power-hungry. The Intel chips are better at reducing power
I argue no. I do not see Apple making the profit they want and wouldn't
be very profitable. As it stands, Apple needs to sell hardware.
Remember during the clone wars? That may happen again unless Apple
builds MacOS X's marketshare. Now, I pose the question, who would buy a
license for
on 06/09/02 05:09, markemmanuel at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I argue no. I do not see Apple making the profit they want and wouldn't
be very profitable. As it stands, Apple needs to sell hardware.
Remember during the clone wars? That may happen again unless Apple
builds MacOS X's
On 9/6/02 5:49 AM, Laurent Daudelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But Apple could replace the PowerPC and keeps the rest of the architecture
of the machines they have today. Then, an x86 version would be handy, but
that doesn't mean that OS X would run on your neighbor's Dell (or Gateway or
Walter Basil writes:
As Apple Computer Inc. draws up its game plan for the CPUs that will power
its future generations of Mac hardware, the company is holding an ace in the
hole: a feature-complete version of Mac OS X running atop the x86
architecture.
Apple has been porting the Mac OS to Intel
It doesn't mean Apple will ever sell x86 computers, but it does mean that
Apple could sell OS X as an alternate OS for that hardware. Imagine how
many might abandon Windows and Linux for such an OS
my roommate, an die-hard wintel fan, has expressed interest in using
OS X on his PC so I
Are the Athelon chips the same as the Intel chips in this discussion?
Aren't they less expensive and don't they run cooler?
Paula
--
G-Books is sponsored by http://lowendmac.com/ and...
Small Dog Electronicshttp://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives |
-- Check our
In a message dated 9/6/02 8:59:52 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would mind if they used the standard PC architecture, because I truly
think Apple would die because of it. I don't think they make enough revenue
from their software. OK...so they sold 100,000 copies of Jag in their first
From an article on Ziff Davis...
As Apple Computer Inc. draws up its game plan for the CPUs that will power
its future generations of Mac hardware, the company is holding an ace in the
hole: a feature-complete version of Mac OS X running atop the x86
architecture.
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Walter Basil wrote:
As Apple Computer Inc. draws up its game plan for the CPUs that will power
its future generations of Mac hardware, the company is holding an ace in the
hole: a feature-complete version of Mac OS X running atop the x86
architecture.
Comments?
It
On 9/5/02 3:03 PM, Kevin Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't seem germane to G-books. Since you asked.
KeS
Well..that's not what I meant, but you know that don't you?
You are tolerated...this time ;)
Walt
--
G-Books is sponsored by http://lowendmac.com/ and...
Small Dog
On Thursday, September 5, 2002, at 05:56 PM, Walter Basil wrote:
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,496270,00.asp
Comments?
It's a rumor to be ignored as it has little to do with how we use our
Macs today.
Shawn King
On this week's YML:
Shalat, Breen America's Most Romantic Couple!
On 9/5/02 3:03 PM, Kevin Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't seem germane to G-books. Since you asked.
KeS
Well..that's not what I meant, but you know that don't you?
You are tolerated...this time ;)
I think Apple will be digging its own hardware grave if they do that.
They
The x86 version is simply a academic exercise to ensure portability and
keep good programming practices. Heck, sometimes bugs don't show up on
one hardware platform but it does on another.
Of course, you can't rule out the possiblity of Apple releasing MacOS X
on the 'other' platform when
The x86 version is simply a academic exercise to ensure portability and
keep good programming practices. Heck, sometimes bugs don't show up on
one hardware platform but it does on another.
Of course, you can't rule out the possiblity of Apple releasing MacOS X
on the 'other' platform when the
15 matches
Mail list logo
