(Bernard ?? :-)
Cheers
Martin
--- Adeyemi Adesanya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have added Matt's code suggestions and I also made some other
tweaks so that you can now spoof a 'heartbeat' :
Example:
gmetric --conf=/var/ganglia/gmond.conf --
spoof=123.456.678.9
I have added Matt's code suggestions and I also made some other
tweaks so that you can now spoof a 'heartbeat' :
Example:
gmetric --conf=/var/ganglia/gmond.conf --
spoof=123.456.678.901:YemiAbstractDevice --heartbeat
The heartbeat message will simply update the 'last reported' time for
ot;final" patch just open an bugzilla entry and attach the patch to it
(diff -udpr). Post the bugzilla # and someone will take care of the
thing.
Martin
--- Adeyemi Adesanya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK,
To those of you who have been waiting for my Ganglia host spoofing
mod/hack - I&
Hi Matt.
Thanks for responding. I was hoping you would pitch in! Your changes
sound good to me. I'll cc the developers mailing list too.
---
Yemi
On May 4, 2006, at 2:37 PM, matt massie wrote:
yemi-
awesome job on the spoof code. very nice.
i have a few tiny changes that i'd like to
OK,
To those of you who have been waiting for my Ganglia host spoofing
mod/hack - I'm sorry! Time to put the powers of open source
development to work. This modification of mine will allow you to send
gmetric messages on behalf of another host. This host may be real or
imaginary. No steps
riginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Adeyemi Adesanya
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 10:24
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Host spoofing for SNMP
Hi Martin.
I will put in
Hi Martin.
I will put in some testing time before submitting code along with
documentation. This is of great importance to me because I need to
monitor Network Appliance (NetApp) boxes.
It is also worth considering security implications. Once the
recipient gmond has processed the spoof me
Hi.
I've recently been testing Ganglia 3.0.1 on our OS X cluster (panther
10.3). For some reason,
gmond is unable to resolve it's own hostname and sets the 'HOST NAME'
to the ip address.
I looked at Ganglia_host_get() in gmond.c and sure enough,
apr_getnameinfo fails and the hostname is s
Hmm.I think the configuration file change is significant but the
overall architecture has not changed that much.
The changes could have been introduced incrementally over a series of
minor releases but I think we would still be at a 2.x stage.
2.6.0 narrowly gets my vote.
---
Yemi
On
I have just noticed that the Solaris network metrics including bytes_in
and bytes_out appear to be missing from the 2.6.0 snapshot.
They do not appear in the solaris default configuration when I run
"gmond -t" but they are in the Linux version.
I tried to add the following collection group myse
gcc? you can get it in pkg format from
http://www.sunfreeware.com/. easy to install.
i've been contacted by someone at sun who wants to package up ganglia
for solaris as well. in the future, you will be able to install using
official sun packages.
-matt
Adeyemi Adesanya wrote:
Mat
Hey,
Can't I build ganglia using the native solaris compiler instead?
--
Yemi
On Jan 20, 2005, at 5:38 PM, Adeyemi Adesanya wrote:
Matt I'm running gcc 2.95.3 . I guess that's pretty old but should
it still be compatible. Was the confuse library a recent addition?
I
matt-massie.com/ganglia/ganglia-2.6.0.200501201537.tar.gz
Adeyemi Adesanya wrote:
I'm having trouble building this snapshot on Solaris 5.9. gmond.c
fails to compile:
gmond.c: In function `process_configuration_file':
gmond.c:155: parse error before `*'
gmond.c:186: `tmp' und
Hi Matt.
I'm having trouble building this snapshot on Solaris 5.9. gmond.c fails
to compile:
gmond.c: In function `process_configuration_file':
gmond.c:155: parse error before `*'
gmond.c:186: `tmp' undeclared (first use in this function)
gmond.c:186: (Each undeclared identifier is reported on
Matt,
How soon can we expect a full functioned 2.6.0 beta? Have you locked
down the feature set?
--
Yemi
On Jan 10, 2005, at 5:12 AM, Matt Massie wrote:
Martin Knoblauch wrote:
--- Matt Massie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i just uploaded a nearly functional snapshot of 2.6.0 to
http:/
Matt,
Can you please create a 2.5.x branch so we can quickly pave the way for
a 2.5.8 release?
---
Yemi
Well,
2005 is here and I hope that we will see a new release soon. Any chance
of rolling out a final 2.5.x release (2.5.8?) this month?
---
Yemi
Martin,
I was under the impression that we were close to finalizing the new
features/fixes for 2.5.8.
Several of them have been floating around for a while and I really feel
like the rug has been pulled from underneath
me. Anyone who runs Ganglia on Solaris will know how I feel. When I
realiz
Hi There.
It appears that 2.6.0 is quite a significant step from 2.5.x especially
since there isn't 100% backwards compatibility with 2.5.x. I don't want
to sound too pessimistic but I sense that it may be sometime before we
see an official 2.6.0 release. Why don't we see more frequent minor
Hi Matt.
I welcome some of the new features you are planning to introduce for
2.6.0. I have downloaded this snapshot and I'll try and I'm looking
forward to a working version I can test out too. From your description
I understand that a metric collection_group is used to specify a bunch
of re
Matt,
Just tried building the 2.6.0 snapshot. On Linux and Solaris I get the
same compilation error with confuse.c:
confuse.c: In function `cfg_init':
confuse.c:1082: `LC_MESSAGES' undeclared (first use in this function)
confuse.c:1082: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
confuse
Hi.
I have just been testing
ganglia-monitor-core-2.5.8.200411241228.tar.gz that I downloaded from
Matt's web site. Happy to see that the Solaris code uses kstat instead
of kvm and the network-related metrics are present :-)
However, the unicast interface does not allow me to specify multip
Hi.
Sounds like CVS is in order now. Can you let me know when the 2.5.x
Solaris related improvements (kstat, network metrics, etc.) are in a
2.5.8 beta? I'm eager to test the unicast stuff on my Solaris boxes.
Thanks for all your hard work.
Yemi
On Nov 21, 2004, at 2:37 AM, Martin
Hi Matt.
Haven't tried 2.5.8 yet but I plan to as soon as I get the chance.
Can you also add unicast support to gmetric?
---
Yemi
On Nov 5, 2004, at 3:09 AM, Matt Massie wrote:
did anyone have a chance to try out ganglia 2.5.8?
http://matt-massie.com/ganglia/ganglia-monitor-core-2.5.8.ta
Steve,
Our systems guys can't wait for the Ganglia unicasts either. Every time
I add more nodes I cringe.
Can we please see a Ganglia 2.6.x? If I recall, the target date was
sometime in September.
Yemi
On Nov 2, 2004, at 1:22 PM, Steve Gilbert wrote:
I've never seen this error bef
Hi.
Is the list of new features for 2.6.0 frozen? I'd really like to see a
stable release ASAP. Matt, I haven't heard much from you recently so
I'm guessing that you're knee-deep in work. Can you please post a
stable 2.6.0 snapshot on your web site? It seems that others are also
keen to use u
Hi.
If you haven't noticed already, I'm really eager to use 2.6.0 in my
production environment. Are there any new tests/snapshots for me to try out
on Solaris?
Yemi
Wow.
No responses to my initial posting. Anyone else interested in using Ganglia
to monitor SNMP devices? One of our systems experts has already produced a
first version of an SNMP ganglia metric generator!
--
Yemi
On 7/23/04 11:34 AM, "Adesanya, Adeyemi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
On 5/27/04 8:03 AM, "Martin Knoblauch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi.
If cpu_wio is a percentage does anyone know why some of my Solaris hosts
report a value far exceeding 100? (Ganglia 2.5.5).
Yemi
> Hi,
>
> after receiving overwhelming feedback on my request for discussing the
> additio
Matt,
I may create a test environment to try out 2.6.0. Solaris is still my #1
platform for running gmond while gmetad and the web frontend run on Linux. I
understand that the rrds won't be compatible across the releases. Is an rrd
migration script still in the works?
Yemi
On 5/18/04 3:44 P
Federico,
Thank you for responding.
Yemi
On 5/11/04 7:43 AM, "Federico Sacerdoti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Exactly. Since heartbeats are simply UDP multicast messages, they can
> be lost in the network. Therefore we do not proclaim death after 20
> sec, but wait 4 times that before get
Just realized I sent this to ganglia-general. I think it belongs here
instead:
-- Forwarded Message
From: "Adesanya, Adeyemi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:19:13 -0800
To:
"'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
net>
Subject: [Ganglia-general] Iostat metrics
I'd really like
>
> Regardless, I don't have this code.
>
> And for the record, I never said I was happy about having to run gmond
> as root instead of nobody. :)
>
> Adeyemi Adesanya wrote:
>> Hi Christopher.
>>
>> I have not received a response from Steven Wagne
Hi Christopher.
I have not received a response from Steven Wagner so I will sent this
message to the ganglia-developers list (where it belongs). I am keen to get
these changes added to the ganglia because running gmond in root mode is a
risk that many net security teams are unwilling to take.
Can
34 matches
Mail list logo
