Re: [gem5-dev] update ARM Full-System Files (aarch-system-2014-10.tar.xz)

Thanks a lot for bringing this up. I wanted to start such conversation for a long time as all the full system files in the webpage are deprecated. Thank you, Mohammad On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Pau Cabre wrote: > Hi all, > > > > I would like to start a discussion

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3763: dist, dev: fix etherswitch upgrade script

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3763/#review9218 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Mohammad Alian On Dec. 15, 2016, 4:50 p.m

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3746: dev: Fix race conditions at terminating dist-gem5 simulations

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3746/#review9173 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Mohammad Alian On Nov. 25, 2016, 5:21 p.m

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3595: dev: Add m5 op to toggle synchronization for dist-gem5.

> On Aug. 30, 2016, 3:39 p.m., Michael LeBeane wrote: > > Any comments on this patch? I just have some high level question before goring through the code: Can you explain the use-case for this patch? Probably it means to speed up the simulation but why do we need to switch on/off

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3586: dev: Exit correctly in dist-gem5

> On Aug. 16, 2016, 9:26 p.m., Mohammad Alian wrote: > > Thanks for this fix. Just one issue that I think still is not resolved for > > the termination of dist-gem5 simulations. Maybe Gabor also has an opinoin > > on this. > > When one of the gem5 processes (node

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3586: dev: Exit correctly in dist-gem5

uf, length, MSG_WAITALL ); if (ret <= 0 || ret != length) panic("recv() failed"); return (ret == length); } - Mohammad Alian On Aug. 4, 2016, 4:48 p.m., Michael LeBeane wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically g

[gem5-dev] changeset in gem5: dev, dist: Fixed a scheduling bug in the ethe...

changeset a16337161285 in /z/repo/gem5 details: http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=a16337161285 description: dev, dist: Fixed a scheduling bug in the etherswitch This patch fixes a bug in etherswitch. When a packet gets inserted in the output fifo, the txEvent

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3543: dev, dist: Fixed a scheduling bug in the etherswitch

hip it! > > Thanks! > > > - Gabor Dozsa > > On July 5th, 2016, 11:44 p.m. UTC, Mohammad Alian wrote: > Review request for Default. > By Mohammad Alian. > > *Updated July 5, 2016, 11:44 p.m.* > *Repository: * gem5 > Description > > Changeset 11558:dfca4ee0968b &g

[gem5-dev] Review Request 3543: dev, dist: Fixed a scheduling bug in the etherswitch

in the reschedule function. Diffs - src/dev/net/etherswitch.cc cdb94f2332a6 Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3543/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Mohammad Alian ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5

[gem5-dev] Possible bug in mem_ctrl.cc?

Hi, In mem_ctrl.cc, when a write request arrives at the memory controller, in "addToWriteQueue" function we check if an existing request to the same address is in the writeQueue to whether we can merge them together: bool merged = isInWriteQueue.find(burstAlign(addr)) !=

[gem5-dev] changeset in gem5: dist, dev: Fixed the packet ordering in ether...

changeset 2aa4d7bd47ec in /z/repo/gem5 details: http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=2aa4d7bd47ec description: dist, dev: Fixed the packet ordering in etherswitch This patch fixes the order that packets gets pushed into the output fifo of etherswitch. If two

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3465: dist, dev: Fixed the packet ordering in etherswitch

Hi All, I would really appreciate if somebody commit this patch for me. If you think I'm qualified and/or don't want me to bother you anymore with my patches, please give me commit access :). Thank you, Mohammad On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Mohammad Alian <m.alian1...@gmail.com>

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3465: dist, dev: Fixed the packet ordering in etherswitch

s.gem5.org/r/3465/ > > Ship it! > > Ship It! > > > - Andreas Hansson > > On May 30th, 2016, 1:32 p.m. UTC, Mohammad Alian wrote: > Review request for Default. > By Mohammad Alian. > > *Updated May 30, 2016, 1:32 p.m.* > *Repository:

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3465: dist, dev: Fixed the packet ordering in etherswitch

macro for that if I remember correctly), or alternatively the > > cpt_upgrader.py in util needs to be updated and add the field. > > Mohammad Alian wrote: > I've added a cpt_upgrader to fix this issue. > > Andreas Hansson wrote: > Fantastic. Thanks for that! A

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3465: dist, dev: Fixed the packet ordering in etherswitch

> On May 24, 2016, 10 p.m., Andreas Hansson wrote: > > src/dev/net/etherswitch.cc, line 93 > > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3465/diff/7/?file=55548#file55548line93> > > > > should this perhaps even be a warn (or do we ever expect this to happen > >

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3465: dist, dev: Fixed the packet ordering in etherswitch

util/cpt_upgraders/etherswitch.py PRE-CREATION Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3465/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Mohammad Alian ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3465: dist, dev: Fixed the packet ordering in etherswitch

l. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3465/#review8338 --- On May 30, 2016, 2:46 a.m., Mohammad Alian wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-m

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3465: dist, dev: Fixed the packet ordering in etherswitch

util/cpt_upgraders/etherswitch.py PRE-CREATION Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3465/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Mohammad Alian ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3465: dist, dev: Fixed the packet ordering in etherswitch

oEntry::unserialize" - Mohammad --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3465/#review8336 --- On May

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3465: dist, dev: Fixed the packet ordering in etherswitch

Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3465/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Mohammad Alian ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3465: dist, dev: Fixed the packet ordering in etherswitch

e at the same tick, it can lead to non-deterministic simulations > > > Diffs > - > > src/dev/net/etherswitch.hh 954d3014f7f0 > src/dev/net/etherswitch.cc 954d3014f7f0 > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3465/diff/ > > > Testing > --- > > > Thanks, > > Mohammad Alian > > ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3465: dist, dev: Fixed the packet ordering in etherswitch

-- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3465/#review8329 --- On May 23, 2016, 8:08 p.m., Mohammad Alian wrote: > > --

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3465: dist, dev: Fixed the packet ordering in etherswitch

Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3465/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Mohammad Alian ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3465: dist, dev: Fixed the packet ordering in etherswitch

t: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3465/#review8320 --- On May 20, 2016, 6:39 p.m., Mohammad Alian wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-m

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3465: dist, dev: Fixed the packet ordering in etherswitch

Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3465/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Mohammad Alian ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3465: dist, dev: Fixed the packet ordering in etherswitch

Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3465/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Mohammad Alian ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3465: dist, dev: Fixed the packet ordering in etherswitch

-- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3465/#review8311 --- On May 18, 2016, 8:06 p.m., Mohammad Alian wrote: >

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3465: dist, dev: Fixed the packet ordering in etherswitch

: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3465/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Mohammad Alian ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3465: dist, dev: Fixed the packet ordering in etherswitch

Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3465/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Mohammad Alian ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3465: dist, dev: Fixed the packet ordering in etherswitch

hammad --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3465/#review8298 --- On May 17, 2016, 3:22 a.m., Mohammad A

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3465: dist, dev: Fixed the packet ordering in etherswitch

Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3465/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Mohammad Alian ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

[gem5-dev] Review Request 3465: dist, dev: Fixed the packet ordering in etherswitch

--- Thanks, Mohammad Alian ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

[gem5-dev] changeset in gem5: dist: config file for distributed switch

IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE +# OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. +# +# Authors: Mohammad Alian + +# This is an example of an n port network switch to work in dist-gem5. +# Users can extend this to have different different topologies + +import optparse +import sys +

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3231: dist: config file for distributed switch

een here waiting for 2 month. Thanks - Mohammad --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3231/#review7990 -------

[gem5-dev] changeset in gem5: dist, dev: add an ethernet switch model

ESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY + * THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT + * (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE + * OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. + * + * Authors: Anthony Gutierrez + *

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3230: dist, dev: add an ethernet switch model

Dear Tony, Could you please commit these two patches? I will appreciate it as these patches are essential for dist-gem5 functionality. http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3231/ http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3230/ Thank you, Mohammad Alian On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Tony Gutierrez <anthony.gut

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3230: dist, dev: add an ethernet switch model

/etherswitch.hh PRE-CREATION Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3230/diff/ Testing --- several testing done with different benchmarks and different switch sizes Thanks, Mohammad Alian ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3230: dist, dev: add an ethernet switch model

generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3230/#review7955 --- On Jan. 24, 2016, 8:35 p.m., Mohammad Alian wrote: > > --- > This

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3230: dist, dev: add an ethernet switch model

- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3230/#review7940 --- On Jan. 24, 2016, 8:35 p.m., Mohammad Alian wrote: > >

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3230: dist, dev: add an ethernet switch model

/etherswitch.cc PRE-CREATION Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3230/diff/ Testing --- several testing done with different benchmarks and different switch sizes Thanks, Mohammad Alian ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3230: dist, dev: add an ethernet switch model

d on an old patch which never gets commited to gem5 tree, so I didn't change the basic design descisions. Apparently you are not happy with the current implementation, so I reflect what you proposed here into the new revision. It's up to the respected reviewers to decide which implementation is better to get commited. If you decided to go for the previous implem

Re: [gem5-dev] On ReviewBoard: dist-gem5, the integration of multi-gem5 and pd-gem5

, Mohammad On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Mohammad Alian <al...@wisc.edu> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > To provide the full distributed simulation feature available to the > public, we would like to commit the rest of dist-gem5 patches asap (by the > end of next week, Jan-15, if there

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3230: dist, dev: add an ethernet switch model

en if > > there is nothing to do. > > > > Even if we don't make the model event based, could we at least make > > sure that it only ticks if there is something to do? > > Mohammad Alian wrote: > Please refer to my prevoius comment. We do not tick when there is no >

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3230: dist, dev: add an ethernet switch model

n. 11, 2016, 5:58 a.m., Mohammad Alian wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3230/ > --- > > (Update

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3230: dist, dev: add an ethernet switch model

there is no packet in the rx or tx queues. - Mohammad --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3230/#review7868 ------

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3230: dist, dev: add an ethernet switch model

be much better if this module was event based. Is there a > > reason why it is not? > > Mohammad Alian wrote: > I couldn't think of any better implementation. We should retry sending > packets when some of them cannot make it through the fabric (due to >

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3230: [mq]: rb3230.patch

PRE-CREATION src/dev/net/etherswitch.cc PRE-CREATION Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3230/diff/ Testing --- several testing done with different benchmarks and different switch sizes Thanks, Mohammad Alian ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3230: dist, dev: add an ethernet switch model

9d2364203316 src/dev/net/SConscript 9d2364203316 src/dev/net/etherswitch.hh PRE-CREATION Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3230/diff/ Testing --- several testing done with different benchmarks and different switch sizes Thanks, Mohammad Alian

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3230: dist, dev: add an ethernet switch model

ount associated with the vector port, why not use that? Done. - Mohammad --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3230/#review7843 -

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3230: dist, dev: add an ethernet switch model

switch model > > > Diffs > - > > src/dev/net/etherswitch.cc PRE-CREATION > src/dev/net/Ethernet.py 9d2364203316 > src/dev/net/SConscript 9d2364203316 > src/dev/net/etherswitch.hh PRE-CREATION > > Diff: htt

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3231: dist: config file for distributed switch

, synchronisation and checkpointing but combines those with the elaborated network switch model from pd-gem5. Diffs (updated) - configs/example/sw.py PRE-CREATION Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3231/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Mohammad Alian

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3231: dist: config file for distributed switch

, synchronisation and checkpointing but combines those with the elaborated network switch model from pd-gem5. Diffs (updated) - configs/example/sw.py PRE-CREATION Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3231/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Mohammad Alian

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3231: dist: config file for distributed switch

> On Jan. 8, 2016, 7:10 p.m., Andreas Hansson wrote: > > The description should be <80 char lines. I am also not sure about the > > license header. Is it intentionally the "extended" BSD rather than just the > > plain BSD? > > Mohammad Alian wrote:

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3231: dist: config file for distributed switch

il. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3231/#review7846 --- On Nov. 19, 2015, 8:16 p.m., Mohammad Alian wrote: > > --- > This is an automatic

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3231: dist: config file for distributed switch

eviews.gem5.org/r/3231/#review7845 --- On Nov. 19, 2015, 8:16 p.m., Mohammad Alian wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3231/ > --

Re: [gem5-dev] On ReviewBoard: dist-gem5, the integration of multi-gem5 and pd-gem5

inal Message- > From: gem5-dev [mailto:gem5-dev-boun...@gem5.org] On Behalf Of Mohammad > Alian > Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 2:24 PM > To: gem5 Developer List > Subject: Re: [gem5-dev] On ReviewBoard: dist-gem5, the integration of > multi-gem5 and pd-gem5 > > Th

[gem5-dev] Review Request 3231: dist: config file for distributed switch

-CREATION Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3231/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Mohammad Alian ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3230: dist, dev: add an ethernet switch model

2375b33bddc6 src/dev/SConscript 2375b33bddc6 src/dev/etherswitch.hh PRE-CREATION src/dev/etherswitch.cc PRE-CREATION Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3230/diff/ Testing (updated) --- several testing done with different benchmarks and different switch sizes Thanks, Mohammad Alian

[gem5-dev] Review Request 3025: dev: enable support for pd-gem5 runs 0

f35e317d2e1e Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3025/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Mohammad Alian ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

[gem5-dev] Review Request 3021: dev: add an ethernet switch model

/etherlink.cc f35e317d2e1e src/dev/etherswitch.hh PRE-CREATION src/dev/etherswitch.cc PRE-CREATION Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3021/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Mohammad Alian ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org

[gem5-dev] Review Request 3024: dev: enable support for pd-gem5 runs 1

f35e317d2e1e src/dev/etherdump.hh f35e317d2e1e src/dev/etherlink.hh f35e317d2e1e src/dev/etherlink.cc f35e317d2e1e Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3024/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Mohammad Alian ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5

[gem5-dev] Review Request 3023: config: enable support for pd-gem5 runs 2

configs/example/sw.py PRE-CREATION util/pd-gem5/pd-gem5.conf PRE-CREATION util/pd-gem5/pd-gem5.py PRE-CREATION Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3023/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Mohammad Alian ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http

Re: [gem5-dev] pd-gem5: simulating a parallel/distributed system on multiple physical hosts

with multi-threaded gem5. Thanks, Mohammad On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Mohammad Alian al...@wisc.edu wrote: Hi Steve, Sorry for the misinterpretation, my comment on communication is not correct and there are certainly values in using other programming models. My argument is that if we could

Re: [gem5-dev] pd-gem5: simulating a parallel/distributed system on multiple physical hosts

synchronization. I'm going to consult with our local MPI expert and see what he thinks about using MPI here. Steve On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:07 PM Mohammad Alian al...@wisc.edu wrote: Hi, Regarding combining MultiIface and pdgem5 network model, my understanding is that MultiIface

Re: [gem5-dev] pd-gem5: simulating a parallel/distributed system on multiple physical hosts

Hi, Regarding combining MultiIface and pdgem5 network model, my understanding is that MultiIface design is tightly dependent on a centralized module that do both packet forwarding and synchronization at the same place (tcpserver in multi-gem5). The first thing that comes into mind is to integrate

Re: [gem5-dev] pd-gem5: simulating a parallel/distributed system on multiple physical hosts

Here I’m trying to summarize this long discussion ( I just summarize the points that are discussed in this email thread). 1- Synchronization: using one socket for both communication and synchronization is superior design (multi-gem5). Both pd-gem5 and multi-gem5 use barrier synchronization. 2-

Re: [gem5-dev] pd-gem5: simulating a parallel/distributed system on multiple physical hosts

. - Gabor On 7/7/15, 6:10 PM, Mohammad Alian al...@wisc.edu wrote: I think you did't understand my point. I'll explain it with an example. A receive tick of a packet cannot fall into the current quantum so every packet can get scheduled for eceive properly even

Re: [gem5-dev] pd-gem5: simulating a parallel/distributed system on multiple physical hosts

. Does that make sense? - Gabor On 7/7/15, 4:11 PM, Mohammad Alian al...@wisc.edu wrote: Then you are assuming taking checkpoint with quantum size smaller than link latency which contradicts your initial motivation for unsync checkpoint!: (I copied this sentence from earlier messages

Re: [gem5-dev] pd-gem5: simulating a parallel/distributed system on multiple physical hosts

implementation for MultiIface ;-) - Gabor On 7/7/15, 6:29 AM, Mohammad Alian al...@wisc.edu wrote: Gabor- My concern about unsync checkpoint is that when you restore from an unsync checkpoint, you'll have gem5 processes that each is running in different tick. Then how do you handle accurate delivery

Re: [gem5-dev] pd-gem5: simulating a parallel/distributed system on multiple physical hosts

On 01/07/2015 21:41, gem5-dev on behalf of Mohammad Alian gem5-dev-boun...@gem5.org on behalf of al...@wisc.edu wrote: Thanks Gabor for the reply. I feel this conversation is useful as we can find out pros/cons of each design. Please find my response in-lined below. Thank you

Re: [gem5-dev] pd-gem5: simulating a parallel/distributed system on multiple physical hosts

must not rely on synchronicity. It is vital for several workloads that we can checkpoint the various gem5 instances at different Ticks (due to the way the workloads are constructed). Andreas On 01/07/2015 21:41, gem5-dev on behalf of Mohammad Alian gem5-dev-boun...@gem5.org on behalf

Re: [gem5-dev] pd-gem5: simulating a parallel/distributed system on multiple physical hosts

patch so let me add some more clarifications and answer to your concerns. My comments are inline below. Thanks, - Gabor On 6/27/15, 10:20 AM, Mohammad Alian al...@wisc.edu wrote: Hi All, Curtis-Thank you for listing some of the differences. I was waiting for the completed multi-gem5

Re: [gem5-dev] pd-gem5: simulating a parallel/distributed system on multiple physical hosts

is at least as fast and more scalable. Thanks, Curtis From: gem5-dev [gem5-dev-boun...@gem5.org] On Behalf Of Mohammad Alian [ al...@wisc.edu] Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 7:37 PM To: gem5 Developer List Subject: Re: [gem5-dev] pd-gem5: simulating

Re: [gem5-dev] pd-gem5: simulating a parallel/distributed system on multiple physical hosts

of Mohammad Alian [ al...@wisc.edu] Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 12:43 PM To: gem5 Developer List Subject: Re: [gem5-dev] pd-gem5: simulating a parallel/distributed system on multiple physical hosts Hi Andreas, Thanks for the comment. I think the checkpointing support in both works is the same

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2910: base, dev: enable client/server socket for ethertap

/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Mohammad Alian ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Re: [gem5-dev] pd-gem5: simulating a parallel/distributed system on multiple physical hosts

. Does this sound reasonable? Thanks, Andreas On 24/06/2015 05:05, gem5-dev on behalf of Mohammad Alian gem5-dev-boun...@gem5.org on behalf of al...@wisc.edu wrote: Hello All, I have submitted a chain of patches which enables gem5 to simulate a cluster on multiple physical

[gem5-dev] pd-gem5: simulating a parallel/distributed system on multiple physical hosts

features from both works. Thank you, Mohammad Alian ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

[gem5-dev] Review Request 2915: tests: scripts for taking checkpoint and a simple test for pd-gem5

-CREATION scriptdir/TEST/tux0.sh PRE-CREATION scriptdir/TEST/tux1.sh PRE-CREATION scriptdir/TEST/tux2.sh PRE-CREATION scriptdir/TEST/tux3.sh PRE-CREATION Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2915/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Mohammad Alian

[gem5-dev] Review Request 2914: config: pd-gem5 extention, parallel/distirbuted simulation of a cluster

/example/sw.py PRE-CREATION util/pd_gem5/pd-gem5.conf PRE-CREATION util/pd_gem5/pd-gem5.py PRE-CREATION Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2914/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Mohammad Alian ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http

[gem5-dev] Review Request 2912: dev: Add a network switch model for pd-gem5

/ Testing --- Thanks, Mohammad Alian ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

[gem5-dev] Review Request 2909: dev: replace pollevent in ethertap

--- Thanks, Mohammad Alian ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

[gem5-dev] Review Request 2910: base, dev: enable client/server socket for ethertap

acceptTap function. Diffs - src/base/socket.hh e4f63f1d502d src/base/socket.cc e4f63f1d502d src/dev/Ethernet.py e4f63f1d502d src/dev/ethertap.hh e4f63f1d502d src/dev/ethertap.cc e4f63f1d502d Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2910/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Mohammad Alian

Re: [gem5-dev] Patches needing review - checkpointing broken

This is an interesting feature if we could have in gem5. Actually, we have done the same work in enabling parallel/distributed simulation of a cluster using gem5. Please refer to a recently published paper on this for more information:

[gem5-dev] TCP segmentation offload feature for Intel NIC model

Hi All, Does anybody knows if TCP segmentation offload feature for Intel NIC model works? If it works, how should I enable it? Based on this commit, TSO has been added to NIC model: http://repo.gem5.org/gem5/rev/b98a6a9739fe Thank you, Mohammad ___

Re: [gem5-dev] PCIe device in DVFS enabled kernel

Well, I found the solution, just to share with others: You should set the following flags in the kernel .config file and recompile the kernel: *CONFIG_NET_VENDOR_INTEL=yCONFIG_E100=yCONFIG_E1000=yCONFIG_E1000E=y* --Mohammad On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Mohammad Alian al...@wisc.edu

[gem5-dev] PCIe device in DVFS enabled kernel

Hi all, How should I enable PCIe devices (Ethernet) in the DVFS enabled kernel? This is what I get when I try to bring up eth0 after I boot linux with DVFS enabled kernel: *#ifconfig eth0 upSIOCSIFADDR: No such deviceeth0: ERROR while getting interface flags: No such device* This is also

[gem5-dev] Uncachable memory requests in Ruby

? If it takes about 10 minutes, I suggest that you come over to the CS building so that I can take a look at your setup. -- Nilay On Sat, 24 Jan 2015, Mohammad Alian wrote: After digging into the issue, I found out that ruby actually doesn't cache memory requests within memory mapped devices

Re: [gem5-dev] Uncachable memory requests in Ruby

: 5253512 KBytes Program aborted at cycle 2379481334283000 Aborted (core dumped)   Any idea about what is going on here and possible fixes? Thank you,Mohammad On Thursday, January 22, 2015 10:28 AM, Mohammad Alian via gem5-dev gem5-dev@gem5.org wrote: Hello, How can I force a request

[gem5-dev] Uncachable memory requests in Ruby

Hello, How can I force a request to be uncacheable when using Ruby memory system?req-setFlags(Request::UNCACHEABLE) works for classic memory system but it doesn't have any effect on the request while using Ruby. Thank you,Mohammad ___ gem5-dev mailing

Re: [gem5-dev] Ethernet device doesn't work with O3 cpu model in X86 ISA

From: gem5-dev [gem5-dev-boun...@gem5.org] on behalf of Nilay Vaish via gem5-dev [gem5-dev@gem5.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 9:41 AM To: Mohammad Alian via gem5-dev Subject: Re: [gem5-dev] Ethernet device doesn't work with O3 cpu model in X86 ISA How did you do this?  My current

Re: [gem5-dev] Ethernet device doesn't work with O3 cpu model in X86 ISA

? Thanks, Steve On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Mohammad Alian via gem5-dev gem5-dev@gem5.org wrote: Hi, For some reasons gem5 doesn't recognize that PCI device address ranges are uncacheable. I set UNCACHEABLE flag for all accesses in the PCI physical address range and it fixed the problem

Re: [gem5-dev] Ethernet device doesn't work with O3 cpu model in X86 ISA

, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Mohammad Alian via gem5-dev gem5-dev@gem5.org wrote: Hi all, Ethernet device work perfectly with atomic cpu in X86 ISA but I get an error when I switch cpu to detailed O3 cpu. The error is: gem5.opt: build/X86/dev/i8254xGBe.cc:182: virtual Tick IGbE::read(PacketPtr

[gem5-dev] Ethernet device doesn't work with O3 cpu model in X86 ISA

Aborted I noticed that the size of packet that Ethenet device receive with O3 cpu is same as cache line size(64Bytes) however the Ethernet device just support 32bit accesses. Any Idea how to fix this problem? Thank you, Mohammad Alian ___ gem5-dev mailing

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2301: config, x86: add ethernet support for x86 fullsystem

On July 18, 2014, 1:39 p.m., Andreas Sandberg wrote: LGTM. Thanks for fixing this! Hi, Have you ever tried to boot system or use Ethernet device with O3 cpu model? With O3 cpu I get this error: gem5.opt: build/X86/dev/i8254xGBe.cc:182: virtual Tick IGbE::read(PacketPtr): Assertion