[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-dhc-v6only-06

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Document: draft-ietf-dhc-v6only-06 Reviewer: Wassim Haddad

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-14

Wassim, thanks for the review. I entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Jan 3, 2020, at 9:53 PM, Wassim Haddad > wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-14

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-08

Wassim, thanks for your review. I entered an Abstain ballot. Alissa > On Sep 19, 2019, at 11:25 AM, Wassim Haddad > wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-08

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-conditional-ras-05

Wassim, thanks for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Jul 5, 2018, at 4:34 PM, Wassim Haddad wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the >

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-conditional-ras-05

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-conditional-ras-04

Thanks! > -Original Message- > From: Wassim Haddad <wassim.had...@ericsson.com> > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 4:41 PM > To: gen-art <gen-art@ietf.org> > Cc: Wassim Haddad <wassim.had...@ericsson.com>; draft-ietf-v6ops- > conditional-ras....@ietf.org

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-conditional-ras-04

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-13

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mboned-interdomain-peering-bcp-10

Christer, thank you for your review. Authors, thanks for taking on board his comment about Section 4. I have entered a DISCUSS and COMMENT ballot position based on my own review of the document. Alissa > On Sep 29, 2017, at 9:25 AM, Christer Holmberg > wrote:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-11

Thank you, Wassim! — Carlos Pignataro, car...@cisco.com “Sometimes I use big words that I do not fully understand, to make myself sound more photosynthesis." On Oct 9, 2017, at 2:10 PM, Wassim Haddad >

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-11

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mboned-interdomain-peering-bcp-10

Hi, >We discussed your first comment and we agree with Toerless's response. We >believe that the intro does express the intent and purpose of this BCP >adequately. Based on your second comment, we have changed the title of >Section 4 to "Functional Guidelines". The new version has been uploaded.

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mboned-interdomain-peering-bcp-10

Hi Christer, We discussed your first comment and we agree with Toerless's response. We believe that the intro does express the intent and purpose of this BCP adequately. Based on your second comment, we have changed the title of Section 4 to "Functional Guidelines". The new version has been

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mboned-interdomain-peering-bcp-10

On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 12:16:18PM +, Christer Holmberg wrote: > > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at >

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-payload-rtp-ancillary-10

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at Document: draft-ietf-payload-rtp-ancillary-10.txt Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review comments to draft-ietf-teas-lsp-diversity-08.txt

Reviewer: Linda Dunbar Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints-04

Thanks for the review! > Am 28.07.2017 um 23:08 schrieb Wassim Haddad : > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Please treat these

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints-04

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints-04 Reviewer: Wassim

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-precis-7564bis-08

Christer, thanks for your review. Peter, thanks for addressing Christer’s comment. I have entered a No Objection ballot position. Alissa > On Jul 3, 2017, at 5:06 AM, Christer Holmberg > wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints-03

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints-03 Reviewer: Wassim

[Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-precis-7564bis-08

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at Document: draft-ietf-precis-7564bis-08.txt Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review Date:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-precis-7564bis-07

Hi, >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >> >> >> >> >> Document: draft-ietf-precis-7564bis-07.txt >> >> Reviewer:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-precis-7564bis-07

Hi Christer, Thanks for your review. Comments below. On 6/22/17 1:09 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > > > > Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-precis-7564bis-07

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at Document: draft-ietf-precis-7564bis-07.txt Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review Date:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-05.txt

shared-ring-protection@tools.ietf.org > <mailto:draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection@tools.ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of > draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-05.txt > > Hej Christer, > > As I mentioned in my previous ema

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-05.txt

ection@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-05.txt Hej Christer, As I mentioned in my previous email I have discussed your questions and comments with the co-authors of this draft. Please find our response in line [Huub]. We hope t

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-05.txt

Hej Christer, As I mentioned in my previous email I have discussed your questions and comments with the co-authors of this draft. Please find our response in line [Huub]. We hope that we have provided the required clarification.

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-05.txt

On Behalf Of Huub van Helvoort Sent: den 22 maj 2017 00:32 To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmb...@ericsson.com>; gen-art@ietf.org; draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protect

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-05.txt

[mailto:gen-art-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Huub van >Helvoort >Sent: den 22 maj 2017 00:32 >To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmb...@ericsson.com>; >gen-art@ietf.org; >draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection@tools.ietf.org >Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-05.txt

tf.org Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-05.txt Hej Christer, Thank you very much for reviewing this draft. The minor issues and editorial issues you identified will be addressed by the authors. Best regards, Huub (on behalf of the co-a

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-05.txt

Hej Christer, Thank you very much for reviewing this draft. The minor issues and editorial issues you identified will be addressed by the authors. Best regards, Huub (on behalf of the co-authors). --- I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-05.txt

Hi Christer, Thank you very much for reviewing the draft in detail and for your valid comments. We, the authors of the draft, will incorporate your comments. B.R. Weiqiang Cheng -邮件原件- 发件人: Christer Holmberg [mailto:christer.holmb...@ericsson.com] 发送时间: 2017年5月17日 20:49 收件人:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-05.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at Document: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-05.txt Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review Date:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost-08

Wassim, thank you for your review! Alissa > On Apr 6, 2017, at 4:37 PM, Wassim Haddad wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at > > >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost-08

ietf-alto-multi- >>cost....@ietf.org >>Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost-08 >> >>I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen- >>ART, please see the FAQ at >><http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/t

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost-08

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at Document: draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost-08 Reviewer: Wassim Haddad Review Date: 06 April 2017 IETF LC End Date: 27 March 2017 IETF Telechat

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-09

Thanks for the review, Christer! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option: Minor and editorial

works for me, thanks Jouni! Al > -Original Message- > From: jouni korhonen [mailto:jouni.nos...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 7:24 PM > To: nalini.elk...@insidethestack.com > Cc: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); General Area Review Team; draft-ietf-ippm- > 6man-pdm-option@ietf.org;

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option: Minor and editorial

Hi, The text with Al’s revisions are looking good. I did some further editing & proposals to it - see below. The text is not exactly to a precision I was hoping for but I guess that when PDM gets used the actual test setup/profile would define & mandate a certain observing location. 3.5.2

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option: Minor and editorial

Agreed. I think this is as precise and concise as we can be. This is excellent! R; >-Original Message- >From: Ackermann, Michael [mailto:mackerm...@bcbsm.com] >Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 10:32 AM >To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); nalini.elk...@insidethestack.com; >jouni.nospam >Cc:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option: Minor and editorial

Well said Al! Especially the last sentence that essentially means that some of this will be implementation dependent. So I think these guidelines and intentions are probably about as far as we can go in this doc. Thanks Mike -Original Message- From: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option: Minor and editorial

Al, Love it!!! Jouni? Anyone else? Thanks so much, Al. What would I do without you? Nalini Elkins Inside Products, Inc. www.insidethestack.com (831) 659-8360 On Fri, 3/10/17, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) wrote: Subject: RE:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option: Minor and editorial

Hi Nalini, Let me suggest a few quick clarifications in a top-post: I liked your original first sentence, with the SHOULD, that's really all we can ask. The last sentence was quite practical, too. Also, wiretime is a concept/notion, the ideal we try to get close to achieving in practice. And

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option: Minor and editorial

Al, I should have remembered that from RFC2330! Thanks for pointing that out. My revised wording inline. Nalini On Fri, 3/10/17, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) wrote: Subject: RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option: Minor and editorial

> -Original Message- > From: nalini.elk...@insidethestack.com > [mailto:nalini.elk...@insidethestack.com] > Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 8:55 AM > To: nalini.elk...@insidethestack.com; jouni.nospam > Cc: General Area Review Team; draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm- > option@ietf.org; Michael

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option: Minor and editorial

Jouni, Our team has been discussing this. So, please let us know what you think about the wording below: Wording to be added to section 3.5 Implementation Considerations (will make the current considerations 3.5.1)

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option: Minor and editorial

Hi Nalini, Thank you. Accurate timestamping is a non-trivial goal to achieve. You should have the “ideal” reference plane described (this usually is located close or within the network interface PHY) and the exact packet location described what constitutes the point that timestamp refers to

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option: Minor and editorial

Jouni, OK.   I will look.   We are also working with a very well respected FreeBSD developer to create a version of FreeBSD which has PDM in it.   We need to know exactly what choices one has in the OS stack itself. Thanks, Nalini ElkinsInside Products, Inc.www.insidethestack.com(831) 659-8360

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option: Minor and editorial

Hi, Thank you for the updates. I am fine with them. I still have one fundamental complaint. There is no discussion or definition of the message timestamp points. All this nanosecond or better accuracy, and the concern of truncation inaccuracy do not really matter if the message timestamp

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-09

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at Document: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-09.txt Reviewer: Christer Holmberg

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option: Minor and editorial

Jouni, We have posted a new version which addresses the minor and editorial comments. It is below. I am waiting for your response to the major comments & then I will integrate. As far as I know now, I have addressed all outstanding issues. My comments to your editorial / minor is below.

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option: Server Time

Thanks! There is one before this for the other major question. Also, I am working on the minor changes & "wordiness" of the document. Spencer had a great idea to move some more things into an Appendix. So, have done that. Should have that cleaned up in a day or two. Nalini Elkins Inside

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option: Server Time

Hi, I’ll have a review of the changes shortly. Just wanted to acknowledge I’ve seen this mail ;) Thanks, Jouni > On Feb 21, 2017, at 10:12 AM, nalini.elk...@insidethestack.com wrote: > > I don't know why this email keeps getting cut off! > > I am attaching my response in a text

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-trill-rfc6439bis-04

Hi Christer, Version -05 of the draft, which was just posted, is intended to resolve your comments. Thanks, Donald === Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA d3e...@gmail.com On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 7:47 AM,

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option: Server Time

Jouni, Here is the thread for your second major comment: Major comment #2 from you: >2) The PDM option relation to actual "server" time is somewhat confusing and >the 5-tuple does not allow me to detect the real relationship between the >>server/application action that caused the generation

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option: Time Reference Plane

Jouni, We have finished with the comments from the Security Area (I believe!) and are now starting on the comments from you. There is a new draft which has the latest changes incorporated. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option/ I wanted to start a thread for each of

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-key-tag-04

Thanks! On 01 Feb 2017, at 23:18, Christer Holmberg wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at > > > Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

Hi, INTRODUCTION: >> Q2:In the Introduction, before the first sentence, shouldn't >> there be some background text, including some information about the >> problem that the document solves. I know there is something in the >> Abstract, but I think there should also be something in the

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

W dniu 01.02.2017 o 21:57, Christer Holmberg pisze: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by > the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like > any other last call comments. >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

Hi, You suggestions look good, and I am happy with your reply :) Regards, Christer -Original Message- From: kkinnear [mailto:kkinn...@cisco.com] Sent: 02 February 2017 01:07 To: Christer Holmberg Cc: Kim Kinnear ; gen-art@ietf.org;

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

Christer, I have deleted the issues not under discussion. More comments, indented, below... > On Feb 1, 2017, at 5:57 PM, Christer Holmberg > wrote: > > Hi, > >> >>> Q3:In the Introduction, I suggest adding a reference to the first >>> occurrences

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

Hi, >I will make all of the changes that you suggest, and have offered details >(indented) below. Note that while I'm willing to make the change you have >discussed in Q3, I don't >actually understand what you would like us to do. > >More below... INTRODUCTION: >> Q1:In the first

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

Thanks for the review Christer. And thanks for taking care of this quickly Kim. Regards Suresh > On Feb 1, 2017, at 11:43 PM, kkinnear wrote: > > >> On Feb 1, 2017, at 4:36 PM, Jari Arkko wrote: >> >> Thanks for your review, Christer! >> >>

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

> On Feb 1, 2017, at 4:36 PM, Jari Arkko wrote: > > Thanks for your review, Christer! > > Authors, can you make a note of the editorials? Yes, I have agreed to make all of the changes suggested by Christer. Thanks -- Kim > > Jari > > On 01 Feb

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

Christer, Thanks for your review. I will make all of the changes that you suggest, and have offered details (indented) below. Note that while I'm willing to make the change you have discussed in Q3, I don't actually understand what you would like us to do. More below... > On Feb 1, 2017, at

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

Thanks for your review, Christer! Authors, can you make a note of the editorials? Jari On 01 Feb 2017, at 21:57, Christer Holmberg wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-key-tag-04

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-key-tag-04.txt Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review Date:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review postings (Was: Re: Review of draft-ietf-geojson-text-sequence-03)

On 25/01/2017 04:27, Dale R. Worley wrote: ... > Also, is there a reason why people would want to see "Gen-ART last-call > review of ..." vs. "Gen-ART telechat review of ..."? It wouldn't make a > difference to me, but perhaps it is useful input to someone else's > workflow. IMHO, it makes a

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review postings (Was: Re: Review of draft-ietf-geojson-text-sequence-03)

Jari Arkko writes: > First, there’s been a change from “Gen-ART review: ….” to > “Review of …” in the e-mail subject lines. Which do people > prefer? It may depend on who you are. I only see reviews via the gen-art mailing list or followups thereto, so the subject line

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review postings (Was: Re: Review of draft-ietf-geojson-text-sequence-03)

On 1/24/17 6:30 AM, Jari Arkko wrote: Robert, Thanks for the review, again! And thank you so much (for the whole set of people) for the new review tool and integration to the tracker. It makes my life much easier. Just a couple of discussion points relating to how we post these today wrt.

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review postings (Was: Re: Review of draft-ietf-geojson-text-sequence-03)

Robert, Thanks for the review, again! And thank you so much (for the whole set of people) for the new review tool and integration to the tracker. It makes my life much easier. Just a couple of discussion points relating to how we post these today wrt. before when we didn’t have the new tool

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-trill-rfc6439bis-04

Hi Donald, Please see inline. >> Also, in general, the document does expand some acronyms on first >> occurrence, while it does not expand others. Can the authors verify >>that all >> the acronyms NOT expanded so called ³well known² acronyms? > >Can you point to one that isn't well known? I

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-trill-rfc6439bis-04

Hi Christer, On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Christer Holmberg wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for > the IETF Chair. Please treat these

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-trill-rfc6439bis-04

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-key-tag-03

> On Jan 4, 2017, at 10:24 AM, Christer Holmberg > wrote: > > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at > > > Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration-06

Thanks! On 05 Jan 2017, at 07:53, Wassim Haddad wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at > > > Document: draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration-06

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration-06

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > Document: draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration-06 Reviewer: Wassim Haddad Review Date:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-key-tag-03

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at Document:   draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-key-tag-03.txt Reviewer:                         Christer Holmberg Review Date:    

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-20

Russ, This note is primarily FYI for others cc'ed in this email. >From: Russ Housley [mailto:hous...@vigilsec.com] >Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2016 12:46 PM >Subject: Re: SecDir Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-20 > I reviewed this document as part of the Security Directorate's

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review Assignments - LC and Telechat

Hi all, The following LCs received deadline extensions: Ralph Droms 2017-01-11 draft-ietf-nvo3-use-case Francis Dupont2017-01-09 draft-ietf-trill-directory-assist-mechanisms Christer Holmberg 2017-01-10 draft-ietf-trill-rfc6439bis Orit Levin2017-01-04 draft-ietf-ospf-ttz Meral

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review Assignments - LC and Telechat

Hi all, Below are both new and outstanding review assignments. Note if a draft is on a Telechat but did not change since its LC review, I did not assign it: Documents on the 2017-01-05 Telechat Reviewer Type LC end Draft Vijay Gurbani Last Call 2016-12-14

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-14

Hi Matthew, Sorry for the late response. I had a look at version -15 (and also -16), and I am ok with the changes. Thanks! Regards, Christer -Original Message- From: Matthew Kerwin [mailto:matthew.ker...@qut.edu.au] Sent: 14 December 2016 01:28 To: Christer Holmberg

Re: [Gen-art] gen-art review of draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls-12

Thanks for the review & fixes! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-14

Christer, thank you for the review and I very much agree with your comments. Thanks Matthew and others for addressing the issue. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry-07

Russ, Gabriel, Thank you very much for the review and fixes. I have balloted “no-objection”. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-14

Hi, From: Christer Holmberg [mailto:christer.holmb...@ericsson.com] Sent: Wednesday, 7 December 2016 16:23 > > Hi, > >>Thanks for the review, it dovetails nicely with other feedback I've >>received. >> >>Elsewhere this text has been suggested for the abstract: >> >>> This document provides a

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry-07

Thanks for the quick turnaround, Russ! I've corrected this in my working copy. Will wait a couple more days in case there are other nits or comments coming in... Thanks, Gabriel > -Original Message- > From: Russ Housley [mailto:hous...@vigilsec.com] > Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2016

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry-07

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-20

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-14

Hi Christer, Thanks for the review, it dovetails nicely with other feedback I've received. Elsewhere this text has been suggested for the abstract: > This document provides a full specification of > the "file" Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) scheme, replacing the > very brief definition in

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-kitten-pkinit-freshness-07

.@microsoft.com>; IETF Gen-ART <gen-art@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-kitten-pkinit-freshness@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-kitten-pkinit-freshness-07 Many thanks for your review, Russ, and for thinking about this space and what issues there might be. I too am c

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07

Hi Ran, Thanks for addressing all my concerns and congratulations to you and your colleagues for the good work. Regards, Dan On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Ram Mohan R (rmohanr) wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Thanks for your review. Please see inline > > From: Dan Romascanu

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07

tf.org>, <draft-ietf-siprec-callflows@tools.ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07 Resent-From: <alias-boun...@ietf.org>, <jari.ar...@piuha.net> Resent-To: <rmoh...@cisco.com>, <par...@parthasarathi.co.in>, <pk

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07

Hi Dan, Thanks for your review. Please see inline From: Dan Romascanu Date: Friday, 25 November 2016 at 5:46 PM To: "gen-art@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-siprec-callflows@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Gen-ART

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07

Thank you very much for your review, Dan. Authors, have you taken a look at Dan’s comments? Jari On 25 Nov 2016, at 14:16, Dan Romascanu wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >