> > I couldn't agree more. JIRA has to help us smooth out the inflow.
>
>
>
> Can you elaborate on this? I'm rewriting JIRA's email templates at the
> moment, so am interested in that general area..
I don't think I was meaning anything more perceptive than JIRA is a good
TODOs list, but I have f
pretty OT, no? :-D. Some yacka-di-yack below.
Jeff Turner wrote:
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 08:59:17AM -0600, Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
I can do it, esp if people can be disciplined about using jira
(toomuchemail).
I couldn't agree more. JIRA has to help us smooth out the inflow.
Can you ela
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 08:59:17AM -0600, Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
> > I can do it, esp if people can be disciplined about using jira
> > (toomuchemail).
>
> I couldn't agree more. JIRA has to help us smooth out the inflow.
Can you elaborate on this? I'm rewriting JIRA's email templa
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
I can do it, esp if people can be disciplined about using jira
(toomuchemail).
I couldn't agree more. JIRA has to help us smooth out the inflow.
I think it'll pretty much reduce the time I
have available for actual gump development to 0, but that's hardly
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
Want me to put things into Gump JIRA?
yes.
Anybody know if we can have an
'Admins' sub-group of Gump in JIRA?
no idea.
- LSD
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
> I can do it, esp if people can be disciplined about using jira
> (toomuchemail).
I couldn't agree more. JIRA has to help us smooth out the inflow.
> I think it'll pretty much reduce the time I
> have available for actual gump development to 0, but that's hardly a
> change! :/
You k
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
Anybody here got sufficient Apache mojo to be trustworthy of root on Brutus?
Sam isn't able to be our sole admin, and I don't think infrastructure want
to take on our issues (if we -- i.e. Stefano/Leo/Stefan?) will take it on.
debian box right?
I can do it, esp if people can
> 3) Figuring out if brutus is busy & performing, or on a go slow. Runs are
> taking 4 or more hours, and I'd love to know why (to try to figure out
what
> to do to try to cut them down.)
Start Date/Time (UTC) Tue, 08 Jun 2004 04:00:41 (UTC)
End Date/Time (UTC) Tue, 08 Jun 2004 11:29:0
Scott wrote:
> I am a member of the foundation, I helped set up the box in SF, and I
> know apt-get about Debian :)
Cool
> I can do some part-time help. Keeping brutus out of the todo list of
> the infrastructure team is a "good thing".
It seems that Thom May has some plans, but for me I'd app
I am a member of the foundation, I helped set up the box in SF, and I
know apt-get about Debian :)
I can do some part-time help. Keeping brutus out of the todo list of
the infrastructure team is a "good thing".
Scott
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
Anybody here got sufficient Apache mojo to be trustwor
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Adam R. B. Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anybody here got sufficient Apache mojo to be trustworthy of root on
Brutus?
Apache mojo, yes. Linux sysadmin experience, yes. Debian experience,
none. Time, very limited.
Sam isn't able to be our sole admin,
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Adam R. B. Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anybody here got sufficient Apache mojo to be trustworthy of root on
> Brutus?
Apache mojo, yes. Linux sysadmin experience, yes. Debian experience,
none. Time, very limited.
> Sam isn't able to be our sole admin,
And he shouldn
Anybody here got sufficient Apache mojo to be trustworthy of root on Brutus?
Sam isn't able to be our sole admin, and I don't think infrastructure want
to take on our issues (if we -- i.e. Stefano/Leo/Stefan?) will take it on.
regards
Adam
- Original Message -
From: "Adam R. B. Jack" <[E
13 matches
Mail list logo
