Hadoop 0.23 is still considered alpha quality. I believe that is the reason
why it is still in the snapshots repository.
--Bobby Evans
On 1/31/12 11:31 PM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote:
I know, but I don't want to release a project with SNAPSHOT
dependencies. Is there no release
week) and I'll
fix it with hadoop-0.23.1.
thanks,
Arun
On Feb 1, 2012, at 8:02 AM, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
Thanks for the replies, all!
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Robert Evans ev...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Hadoop 0.23 is still considered alpha quality. I believe that is the reason
why
for the replies, all!
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Robert Evans ev...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Hadoop 0.23 is still considered alpha quality. I believe that is the
reason why it is still in the snapshots repository.
--Bobby Evans
On 1/31/12 11:31 PM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote:
I
Hi,
Hadoop 0.23 jars are seems still not in mvn repo. When will it be uploaded?
Thanks.
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon
you can find them in snapshot. Try URL repository.apache.org/snapshot
On Jan 31, 2012 7:22 PM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
Hadoop 0.23 jars are seems still not in mvn repo. When will it be uploaded?
Thanks.
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon
repository.apache.org/snapshot
On Jan 31, 2012 7:22 PM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
Hadoop 0.23 jars are seems still not in mvn repo. When will it be
uploaded?
Thanks.
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon
...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
Hadoop 0.23 jars are seems still not in mvn repo. When will it be uploaded?
Thanks.
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Bruno Mahé bm...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
I am glad to announce the availability of the first batch of packages of
Apache Hadoop 0.23 and Apache HBase 0.92 in Apache Bigtop (incubating).
Sweet!
St.Ack
On 19/10/11 00:40, Todd Lipcon wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Steve Loughranste...@apache.org wrote:
One more thing: are the ProtocolBuffers needed for all installations, or is
that a compile-time requirement? If the binaries are going to be required,
there's going to have to be one
Great news!
At 2011-09-27 05:07:06,Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Greetings,
I thought I'd drop a note to update folks on progress of hadoop-0.23.
Things are have been very busy in hadoop-0.23 land. We continue to crank
through the issues and get ready to ship.
We are mostly pass
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Steve Loughran ste...@apache.org wrote:
One more thing: are the ProtocolBuffers needed for all installations, or is
that a compile-time requirement? If the binaries are going to be required,
there's going to have to be one built for the various platforms, and
community continues to scramble to get things wrapped
up on hadoop-0.23.
We are down to ~30 blockers and I hope to see them resolved over the next
two weeks!
Also, I feel Alejandro and Tom can finish up the remaining mavenization
bits by then too - as I see it, it's very close... thanks
Folks,
Quick note - the dev community continues to scramble to get things wrapped up
on hadoop-0.23.
We are down to ~30 blockers and I hope to see them resolved over the next two
weeks!
Also, I feel Alejandro and Tom can finish up the remaining mavenization bits
by then too - as I see
)
From: Konstantin Shvachko shv.had...@gmail.com
To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 2:23 AM
Subject: Re: Update on hadoop-0.23
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler
eri...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Hi Doug, Jeff, Roman
I'd like to request that folks
in the East Bay is that my 500 users will.
I also hear that if 0.22 was available people would use it now.
Thanks,
Konstajntin
From: Konstantin Shvachko shv.had...@gmail.com
To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 2:23 AM
Subject: Re: Update on hadoop
I am very glad that the development and testing of 0.23 is going so well.
I see a lot of commits and hundreds of changes going in literally every day.
It is great to see the new technology building!
On the criticism of the 0.22 release.
Arun has a top-down view and I agree a lot of progress have
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler
eri...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Hi Doug, Jeff, Roman
I'd like to request that folks take bigtop project discussions onto
the bigtop lists and don't greet status reports on general@hadoop
I am personally very interested in the results of
On 29/09/2011 22:38, Doug Cutting wrote:
The ASF discourages the use of Java's @author tag in large part because
it tends to mark code as the territory of particular contributors. We
want ASF codebases to be the responsibility of an entire community.
There's another reason which is if you
On 30/09/2011 06:27, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote:
Hi Doug, Jeff, Roman
Let me rephrase my point. I'd like to request that folks take bigtop project
discussions onto the bigtop lists and don't greet status reports on
general@hadoop with insinuations that folks who are working really hard on
3. There's 0.22 which is going to combine the API of 0.21 with the fixes
of 0.20.20x *and* will be the last release of the MR1.0 engine. For that
last reason, I think there's value in pushing it out, though it's going
to take time, and there's a risk of it adding another branch to be
maintained
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via
Tom White)
From: Konstantin Shvachko shv.had...@gmail.com
To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 2:23 AM
Subject: Re: Update on hadoop-0.23
On Thu, Sep 29
On 09/30/2011 03:17 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
4. There are the third party compatible projects, CDH, MapR, EMC HD,
Amazon Elastic MR, which are all declaring compatibility with 0.20.x; no
stated plans when/how to move to 0.23+
CDH4 will include 0.23 (hopefully without any patches). I expect
On Sep 30, 2011, at 3:17 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
3. There's 0.22 which is going to combine the API of 0.21 with the fixes of
0.20.20x *and* will be the last release of the MR1.0 engine. For that last
reason, I think there's value in pushing it out, though it's going to take
time, and
On Sep 30, 2011, at 3:17 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
3. There's 0.22 which is going to combine the API of 0.21 with the fixes of
0.20.20x *and* will be the last release of the MR1.0 engine. For that last
reason, I think there's value in pushing it out, though it's going to take
time, and
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
I apologize if my level of institutional knowledge of these things is
lacking, but do you have any
benchmarking results between 0.22 and 0.20.2xx? The reason I'm asking
is twofold -- I really
would like to see an
On Sep 30, 2011, at 1:13 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
I apologize if my level of institutional knowledge of these things is
lacking, but do you have any
benchmarking results between 0.22 and 0.20.2xx? The reason I'm asking
BTW, Roman I have a recollection of Hadoop performance suite for iTest (aka
BigTop now) which I have put together during the initial development phase of
the framework.
I don't see in BigTop's source tree - has this work ever been committed to
open source along with the iTest? This way if any
: Thursday, September 29, 2011 7:27 am
Subject: HBase trunk on 0.23 Was: Update on hadoop-0.23
To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Cc: bigtop-...@incubator.apache.org
Minor correction to Todd's report, currently HBase TRUNK doesn't
compileagainst 0.23 (
https://builds.apache.org/view/G-L/view/HBase/job
Hi Jeff,
This sees like a great opportunity for you to add some value. I'd welcome
that. It seems rude to me to beat up the folks who have been driving the
majority of the work on a project to do more. In general I don't think its
good open source etiquete to ask others to contribute their
On 09/29/2011 12:35 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote:
If you're wondering why I am asserting that arun and company have
done the majority of the work on 23, check out the last graph on this
post, or look at the commit logs.
The ASF discourages the use of Java's @author tag in large part because
Hi Doug, Jeff, Roman
Let me rephrase my point. I'd like to request that folks take bigtop project
discussions onto the bigtop lists and don't greet status reports on
general@hadoop with insinuations that folks who are working really hard on this
project should be contributing different things
Roman,
On Sep 27, 2011, at 12:24 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
I'm sorry if I had too many questions in my original email, but I can't find
an answer to my integration tests question. Could you, please, share
a URL with us where I can find out more about them?
As you know, me my team at HW
Minor correction to Todd's report, currently HBase TRUNK doesn't compile
against 0.23 (
https://builds.apache.org/view/G-L/view/HBase/job/HBase-TRUNK-on-Hadoop-23/42/console
):
[ERROR]
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
Minor correction to Todd's report, currently HBase TRUNK doesn't compile
against 0.23 (
https://builds.apache.org/view/G-L/view/HBase/job/HBase-TRUNK-on-Hadoop-23/42/console
):
[ERROR]
I don't see hadoop-hdfs artifact being downloaded during the build. I see
hadoop-hdfs-test, but not hdfs itself. This is likely to be a problem because
location of the interface in question is the same as it was back in 0.22
Cos
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 07:16PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Wed,
Roman,
In general, we'll need to make changes upstream:
# I believe someone got HBase working.
# We made changes to Pig - rather we got help from the Pig team, particularly
Daniel.
So, we plan to work through the rest of the stack - Hive, Oozie etc. very soon
and we'll depend on updated
On Sep 26, 2011, at 11:20 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
Roman,
In general, we'll need to make changes upstream:
# I believe someone got HBase working.
# We made changes to Pig - rather we got help from the Pig team, particularly
Daniel.
So, we plan to work through the rest of the stack
On 09/26/2011 02:07 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
We are about to finish performance certification for both HDFS
MapReduce in the next couple of weeks too, after which we start
integration tests with HBase, Hive, Oozie etc.
Who's 'we' here? I haven't seen this happening on the list, so I assume
Hi Arun!
Thanks for the quick reply!
I'm sorry if I had too many questions in my original email, but I can't find
an answer to my integration tests question. Could you, please, share
a URL with us where I can find out more about them?
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Arun C Murthy
Greetings,
I thought I'd drop a note to update folks on progress of hadoop-0.23.
Things are have been very busy in hadoop-0.23 land. We continue to crank
through the issues and get ready to ship.
We are mostly pass the initial teething pains of moving our entire build
infrastructure to Maven
Hi Arun!
Great news! Hopefuly you wouldn't mind answering some of the questions below...
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
NextGen MapReduce (aka MRv2, aka YARN) is coming along great:
# We are happy to report we've done extensive scale testing to
:
On Aug 18, 2011, at 9:36 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
HDFS-1073 and MAPREDUCE-279 are presently in trunk and I think it's
time
to cut the 0.23 branch so that we can focus on testing and stabilizing a
hadoop-0.23 release off that branch.
I propose to do it noon of the coming Monday (Aug 22
and MAPREDUCE-279 are presently in trunk and I think it's time
to cut the 0.23 branch so that we can focus on testing and stabilizing a
hadoop-0.23 release off that branch.
I propose to do it noon of the coming Monday (Aug 22).
Reminder - I'll create the branch at noon today.
thanks,
Arun
so that we can focus on testing and stabilizing a
hadoop-0.23 release off that branch.
I propose to do it noon of the coming Monday (Aug 22).
Reminder - I'll create the branch at noon today.
thanks,
Arun
Murthy a...@hortonworks.com
wrote:
On Aug 18, 2011, at 9:36 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
HDFS-1073 and MAPREDUCE-279 are presently in trunk and I think it's
time
to cut the 0.23 branch so that we can focus on testing and stabilizing a
hadoop-0.23 release off that branch.
I propose to do it noon
On Aug 18, 2011, at 9:36 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
HDFS-1073 and MAPREDUCE-279 are presently in trunk and I think it's time to
cut the 0.23 branch so that we can focus on testing and stabilizing a
hadoop-0.23 release off that branch.
I propose to do it noon of the coming Monday (Aug 22
C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
On Aug 18, 2011, at 9:36 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
HDFS-1073 and MAPREDUCE-279 are presently in trunk and I think it's time to
cut the 0.23 branch so that we can focus on testing and stabilizing a
hadoop-0.23 release off that branch.
I propose to do
it's time to
cut the 0.23 branch so that we can focus on testing and stabilizing a
hadoop-0.23 release off that branch.
I propose to do it noon of the coming Monday (Aug 22).
Reminder - I'll create the branch at noon today.
thanks,
Arun
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Eli Collins e...@cloudera.com wrote:
+1 Thanks for all the hard work.
To confirm, all changes will still still flow through trunk first?
We'll be able to merge HDFS-1623 in some update?
Ping. Arun, can you confirm?
Thanks,
Eli
Sorry, missed the original.
As I had indicated previously, I'm fine with that.
thanks,
Arun
On Aug 19, 2011, at 11:47 AM, Eli Collins e...@cloudera.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Eli Collins e...@cloudera.com wrote:
+1 Thanks for all the hard work.
To confirm, all changes
) and
the HDFS-1073 branch into trunk we should be good to create the hadoop-0.23
branch.
Since the last time we spoke (actually, since last night, in fact!) the world
(trunk) has changed to accommodate our wishes... *smile*
HDFS-1073 and MAPREDUCE-279 are presently in trunk and I think it's time to cut
, my current thinking is that after we merge NextGen MR (MR-279)
and the HDFS-1073 branch into trunk we should be good to create the
hadoop-0.23 branch.
Since the last time we spoke (actually, since last night, in fact!) the world
(trunk) has changed to accommodate our wishes... *smile
On Aug 18, 2011, at 1:21 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
I propose to do it noon of the coming Monday (Aug 22).
Thoughts?
I assume we will make sure the HDFS mavenization is in before then?
Tom said he intends to commit it tomorrow, but if something comes up
and it's not committed, let's make
+1 for creating the branch. As I said earlier, I am willing to help with any
HDFS issues.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
On Aug 18, 2011, at 1:21 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
I propose to do it noon of the coming Monday (Aug 22).
Thoughts?
I
+1. Lets get rolling on 0.23.0!
mahadev
On Aug 18, 2011, at 1:34 PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote:
+1 for creating the branch. As I said earlier, I am willing to help with any
HDFS issues.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
On Aug 18, 2011, at 1:21 PM,
rapidly - it's about time to start
thinking of the next release to unlock all of the goodies there.
As the RM, my current thinking is that after we merge NextGen MR (MR-279)
and the HDFS-1073 branch into trunk we should be good to create the
hadoop-0.23 branch.
Thoughts?
thanks,
Arun
into trunk we should be good to create the
hadoop-0.23 branch.
Since the last time we spoke (actually, since last night, in fact!) the world
(trunk) has changed to accommodate our wishes... *smile*
HDFS-1073 and MAPREDUCE-279 are presently in trunk and I think it's time to
cut the 0.23 branch
the
hadoop-0.23 branch.
Since the last time we spoke (actually, since last night, in fact!) the
world (trunk) has changed to accommodate our wishes... *smile*
HDFS-1073 and MAPREDUCE-279 are presently in trunk and I think it's time to
cut the 0.23 branch so that we can focus on testing
merge NextGen MR (MR-279)
and the HDFS-1073 branch into trunk we should be good to create the
hadoop-0.23 branch.
Since the last time we spoke (actually, since last night, in fact!) the
world (trunk) has changed to accommodate our wishes... *smile*
HDFS-1073 and MAPREDUCE-279 are presently
the hadoop-0.23
branch.
Thoughts?
thanks,
Arun
thinking of the next release to unlock all of the goodies there.
As the RM, my current thinking is that after we merge NextGen MR (MR-279)
and the HDFS-1073 branch into trunk we should be good to create the
hadoop-0.23 branch.
Thoughts?
Sounds great.
In order to support HA in a dot release
current thinking is that after we merge NextGen MR (MR-279)
and the HDFS-1073 branch into trunk we should be good to create the
hadoop-0.23 branch.
Thoughts?
Sounds great.
In order to support HA in a dot release we'll need to merge in the
branch for HDFS-1623, but that shouldn't
On Jul 13, 2011, at 6:01 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
In order to support HA in a dot release we'll need to merge in the
branch for HDFS-1623, but that shouldn't hold up branching for 23.
Sanjay mentioned this as the summit but I wanted to double check with
you, you support a dot release of 23
63 matches
Mail list logo
