Hi all,
Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
release for Chukwa.
The source tarball artifact is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/
Documents are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
The SVN tag to be vote
Thank you for the multiple examples. I think I finally understand
what you are saying, and
the information on LEGAL-59, and LEGAL-62. I will re-spin rc3 with a
new svn tag with required changes in NOTICE file. Thanks
regards,
Eric
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:33 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 January 20
On Jan 9, 2012 10:03 PM, "Roy T. Fielding" wrote:
>...
> And, no, the discussion has not been with the Trac community -- it was
> in private with a few individuals; as far as Apache is concerned,
> it never happened.
And Oracle's private conversations, and their decisions regarding OOo
contrary t
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> I don't follow that. Is Edgewall still a formal organization capable
> of owning copyright? If not, who owns the copyright? Have Christian
> and Remy stopped all work on Trac, or are they just busy with their $jobs?
>
Yes, Edgewall is
On Jan 9, 2012, at 9:42 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>> On Jan 7, 2012, at 1:49 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 7, 2012 4:24 PM, "Roy T. Fielding" wrote:
...
The original developers are not ambivalent to this fork.
>>>
>>> Unt
On 10 January 2012 02:29, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [to: general@, cc: callback-dev@]
>
> As discussed during the Callback proposal phase [1], the podling
> community wasn't too certain about the "Callback" name and thus after
> some discussion they recently voted [2] on adopting the new name
Hi,
[to: general@, cc: callback-dev@]
As discussed during the Callback proposal phase [1], the podling
community wasn't too certain about the "Callback" name and thus after
some discussion they recently voted [2] on adopting the new name
"Apache Cordova". The vote and its result was mentioned in
On 9 January 2012 19:40, Eric Yang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
> release for Chukwa.
>
> The source tarball artifact is available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc2/
>
> Documents are available at:
>
> http://peopl
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Franklin, Matthew B.
wrote:
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Alan D.Cabrera [mailto:l...@toolazydogs.com]
>>Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 3:47 PM
>>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>>Subject: Maven coordinate for incubating podlings
>>
>>It's my understanding t
+1, I couldn't have said it any better myself, Joe.
Cheers,
Chris
On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:00 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> I would like to see the Incubator someday reach the point where
> we could DISTRIBUTE our oversight across the podling lists, where
> graduation votes are largely ceremonial other
On Jan 9, 2012, at 10:27 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Lame. I would actually like to see mentors WRITING the reports
> at least for the first 6 months to a year, then going to sign-off
> on the wiki.
+1 on the mentors WRITING the reports part. I always try to do that
until my podlings beat me to it
Hi Jukka!
Thanks for this very constructive post!
I'm not a native english speaker, but even I understand the point with not
using JSR-330 but a more 'descriptive' wording :)
What about the following?
> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> interests of the Foundation a
>-Original Message-
>From: Alan D.Cabrera [mailto:l...@toolazydogs.com]
>Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 3:47 PM
>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Maven coordinate for incubating podlings
>
>It's my understanding that the group and artifact id do not include the token
>"incubating"
It's my understanding that the group and artifact id do not include the token
"incubating" or "incubator" but that "-incubating" is suffixed to the version
number.
Do I understand the requirements correctly?
Regards,
Alan
-
I would like to see the Incubator someday reach the point where
we could DISTRIBUTE our oversight across the podling lists, where
graduation votes are largely ceremonial other than vetting the
language, where release votes happen solely on dev lists, etc.
But we will NEVER get there and still do a
I was even thinking something like 'miss two reports, you're no longer a
mentor', but that might be a bit draconian :-)
I know I would fail according to the above criteria. But I suspect a
clear minimum would help keep me at least minimally connected.
Upayavira
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012, at 10:27 AM,
Hi all,
Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
release for Chukwa.
The source tarball artifact is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc2/
Documents are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
The SVN tag to be vote
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 3:04 PM, sebb wrote:
> There are quite a few files without any licenses at all, e.g.
>
> conf/aggregator.sql
> conf/database_create_tables.sql
> src/main/web/hicc/css/default.css
>
> The NOTICE file should only contain *required* notices.
>
> In particular, the following par
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Hyrum K Wright
wrote:
> I think the Trac community sees this as a zero-sum game: if people are
> contributing to Bloodhound, they *aren't* contributing to Trac.
> "Instead, we should try to convince the Bloodhound people that our
> philosophy is best, and they shoul
On 1/9/2012 12:27 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Lame. I would actually like to see mentors WRITING the reports
> at least for the first 6 months to a year, then going to sign-off
> on the wiki.
My point was, all mentors need to reply to the draft. -One- of them,
or a leader in the community would st
Frankly, I don't see that much use.
Of course reports are very important, but they most of the times are just
copied over from the previous month + a few adoptions.
And most of the times it's fine.
What I really expect from a mentor is to look at the code a bit, check if the
code style is c
Lame. I would actually like to see mentors WRITING the reports
at least for the first 6 months to a year, then going to sign-off
on the wiki.
- Original Message -
> From: William A. Rowe Jr.
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Upayavira
> Sent: Monday, January 9, 2012 1:23 PM
> S
On 1/9/2012 11:40 AM, Upayavira wrote:
> Regarding attrition of mentors, it was discussed having mentors 'sign'
> the board report for their podling. Could that be encouraged, and used
> as a sign of minimum 'activity' for a mentor?
How about simply sign off on podling-dev@? Even if it is "Thanks
On 1/9/2012 7:04 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>
> I don't think Wookie should graduate, but it certainly shouldn't be
> kicked out (and I don't think it will be). However, as I not above
> incubation may be holding it back. The question for me is, can we do
> more for projects that are in this position
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> Regarding attrition of mentors, it was discussed having mentors 'sign'
> the board report for their podling. Could that be encouraged, and used
> as a sign of minimum 'activity' for a mentor?
I feel that what I am learning here is that my topic
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> On Jan 7, 2012, at 1:49 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
>> On Jan 7, 2012 4:24 PM, "Roy T. Fielding" wrote:
>>> ...
>>> The original developers are not ambivalent to this fork.
>>
>> Untrue. Christian and Remy are, and always have been, supportive.
Regarding attrition of mentors, it was discussed having mentors 'sign'
the board report for their podling. Could that be encouraged, and used
as a sign of minimum 'activity' for a mentor?
Upayavira
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012, at 08:10 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Benson Margulie
Since this thread has come back to life, I read through it and have
one comment to add:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 20:27, Benson Margulies wrote:
>...
> I can see two problems with this view to begin with. One is IP
> management. The more people participate in a project and the longer
> they do so,
Hey Board@,
Ferdy Galema accepted our invite for the Gora PPMC + committership so I just
updated
the Gora resolution in r32841 to include his name.
Cheers,
Chris
On Jan 3, 2012, at 7:40 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> Okey dok, I added it in r32707 now that Doug created the agenda.
>
>
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 to graduate, with the following note:
>
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
>> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
>> Foundation's pu
I'm actively mentoring Isis.
With having bval out of incubation I will also find a bit more time to review
the bits and pieces a bit better.
Isis really has a pretty active community and we have quite some users coming
along.
It would maybe make sense to shift direction a bit from a pure Na
>-Original Message-
>From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 8:21 AM
>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating
>
>On 9 January 2012 13:09, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>> Does my answer below suffice? It would be
On 9 January 2012 13:09, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
> Does my answer below suffice? It would be nice to close this vote out one
> way or another
>
The answer describes what happened.
However, it does not fix the problem, which is that the end-user sees
a file with conflicting information.
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
> Sam,
>
> I started this separate thread because I view this situation as
> distinctive from the problem you are referring to here. I take that
> situation just as seriously as you do, I think. If you'd prefer that I
> drop this (less urge
Does my answer below suffice? It would be nice to close this vote out one way
or another
>-Original Message-
>From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:mfrank...@mitre.org]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 12:19 PM
>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave
On 9 January 2012 12:46, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:28 AM, ant elder wrote:
...
>> I don't know about the more autonomy proposal but I had a quick look
>> at Isis. If they've never added any new committers thats a worry but
>> other than that they seem to meet all the ot
On 9 January 2012 04:41, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> This has been the subject of prior conversations, but I'm opening a
>> thread in some hope of reaching a definitive resolution.
>> Some of our non-graduating podlings have a common prob
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:28 AM, ant elder wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Benson Margulies
>>> wrote:
Sam,
Rather than argue about the existence and interpr
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> Etch is a cross-platform, language- and transport-independent
> framework for building and consuming network services. The Etch
> toolset includes a network service description language, a compiler,
> and binding libraries for a variety of
Just an FYI: I have posted a status update on Etch on general@, hoping
it doesn't fall on deaf ears with all the discussions going on:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201201.mbox/%3ccab63y-dsjkbkeljkhuvkbdlmsjwvfvixo0fnxexofhq1v4m...@mail.gmail.com%3e
Martijn
On Sun, J
Hi,
+1 to graduate, with the following note:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> Committee charged with
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:11 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 8 January 2012 21:04, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>
>>
>> Dear IPMC, dear Community!
>>
>> The Apache Bean-Validation project provides an ALv2 licensed implementation
>> of the JSR-303 Bean Validation Specification and would like to start a VOTE
>> on
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Benson Margulies
>> wrote:
>>> Sam,
>>>
>>> Rather than argue about the existence and interpretation of messages
>>> about squashing stale podlings, how a
Benson,
I dint have time for a full response. However, I have a couple podlings
that are in a similar position to Isis. That is, reasonably healthy, but
small community.
The ASF is about communities, if there is no community there is no TLP.
Without having a concrete proposal from you regardunf y
Just as an aside: I intend on staying with the PMC to provide
oversight as a Member (and being a familiar Mentor), provided the Etch
community wants me to tag along.
Martijn
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> Etch is a cross-platform, language- and transport-independent
>
Etch is a cross-platform, language- and transport-independent
framework for building and consuming network services. The Etch
toolset includes a network service description language, a compiler,
and binding libraries for a variety of programming languages. It
currently supports C, C# and Java. Supp
+1
Regards
JB
On 01/09/2012 09:04 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
+1
2012/1/8 Mark Struberg:
Dear IPMC, dear Community!
The Apache Bean-Validation project provides an ALv2 licensed implementation of
the JSR-303 Bean Validation Specification and would like to start a VOTE on
graduating as a TLP.
+1
2012/1/8 Mark Struberg :
>
>
> Dear IPMC, dear Community!
>
> The Apache Bean-Validation project provides an ALv2 licensed implementation
> of the JSR-303 Bean Validation Specification and would like to start a VOTE
> on graduating as a TLP.
> The podling is in the incubator since 2010 and su
48 matches
Mail list logo
