On 7 November 2013 22:22, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
Concretely, there are several possible implementations.
There's this pTLP variant:
1. Start with a Board resolution establishing a pTLP PMC seeded with IPMC
members.
2. Vote podling contributors onto the PMC as
As one of the mentors singled out I fully appreciate your very reasonable
explanation of your motives. On top of that those mentors do have thick
skins.
No harm done, I'm sure.
Ross
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Senior Technology Evangelist
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft
Hi all,
after more than 72hrs the vote about graduating the Marmotta podling as
a TLP passes with 9 +1s, 8 of those from IPMC members:
Bertrand Delacretaz (IPMC)
Andy Seaborne (IPMC, Marmotta Champion)
Fabian Christ (IPMC, Marmotta Mentor)
Alexei Fedotov
Nandana Mihindukulasooriya (IPMC,
IMO the IPMC cannot delegate legal oversight to a sub-committee (for
example) unless that sub-committee consisted of members of the IPMC. The
reason for this is hat only members of the IPMC are recognized by the board
and thus only IPMC members have binding votes.
That doesn't prevent social
Ha ha ha ha. Does the same also apply to maintaining the records, for
clutch, the vote monitoring and other tools, signing reports, writing
reports for that matter, and all the other aspects of the incubator -
all of that might get done eventually one day if people can ever find
the time, don't
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 7, 2013, at 4:36 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 7 November 2013 11:20, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
The Incubator has a fundamental structural
+1
Tom
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Andreas Neumann a...@apache.org wrote:
The discussion about the Weave proposal has calmed. As the outcome of the
discussion, we have chosen a new name for the project, Twill. I would like
to call a vote for Twill to become an incubated project.
The
Thanks for that!
Here's another that someone posted:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7EfnGMEjgK4feature=youtu.be
Upayavira
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013, at 06:49 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
The short guide to
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013, at 08:10 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
IMO the IPMC cannot delegate legal oversight to a sub-committee (for
example) unless that sub-committee consisted of members of the IPMC. The
reason for this is hat only members of the IPMC are recognized by the
board
and thus only IPMC
Whoops. Wrong email. Oh well. Creating that video was fun anyway.
Upayavira
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013, at 10:42 AM, Upayavira wrote:
Thanks for that!
Here's another that someone posted:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7EfnGMEjgK4feature=youtu.be
Upayavira
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013, at 06:49 AM,
On 11/04/2013 07:09 PM, Cory Johns wrote:
Hello,
This is a call for a vote on Apache Allura 1.0.1 incubating. This is our
second attempt at an initial release, which specifically addresses the
concerns raised in the previous, cancelled vote.
A vote was held on developer mailing list and
On Nov 8, 2013, at 1:47 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
Still, because my point was awkwardly crafted, I wound up singling out the
Allura team in a negative context. I apologize for my clumsiness.
And my apologies for ramping up the drama... This email came
at a time
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
As soon as you step off your soapbox, be sure to provide some
suggestions...
When an individual makes major contributions to the incubation of a
No offense Ross but give me a break. While I’m
glad to see my initial ideas gain so much traction
in the incubator now that people no longer remember
where they come from, and even are willing to falsely
claim credit for them, but this whole idea of populating
the IPMC with ordinary podling
+1 (binding)
Arun
On Nov 7, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Andreas Neumann a...@apache.org wrote:
The discussion about the Weave proposal has calmed. As the outcome of the
discussion, we have chosen a new name for the project, Twill. I would like
to call a vote for Twill to become an incubated project.
+1 (binding)
On Nov 7, 2013 1:04 PM, Andreas Neumann a...@apache.org wrote:
The discussion about the Weave proposal has calmed. As the outcome of the
discussion, we have chosen a new name for the project, Twill. I would like
to call a vote for Twill to become an incubated project.
The
On 07/11/2013 Andreas Neumann wrote:
The discussion about the Weave proposal has calmed. As the outcome of the
discussion, we have chosen a new name for the project, Twill. I would like
to call a vote for Twill to become an incubated project.
I used a different software named Twill in the
Welcome to the community. Go read the wiki. Follow the mailing list.
Figure out everything else by yourself! Good luck. Let us know when you
think you're ready to be a TLP.
Really?
One of my co-workers hit me with the line one:
Is that your best work?
Eric.
On 11/7/13, 3:34 PM, Martijn
On 11/08/2013 07:52 PM, Dave Brondsema wrote:
On 11/8/13 6:17 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 11/04/2013 07:09 PM, Cory Johns wrote:
Hello,
This is a call for a vote on Apache Allura 1.0.1 incubating. This is our
second attempt at an initial release, which specifically addresses the
concerns
On 11/8/13 6:17 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 11/04/2013 07:09 PM, Cory Johns wrote:
Hello,
This is a call for a vote on Apache Allura 1.0.1 incubating. This is our
second attempt at an initial release, which specifically addresses the
concerns raised in the previous, cancelled vote.
A vote
Andrea,
thanks for the link, we did see that project but thought that it is not
relevant because it has not had any activity for 6 years, so it is probably
dead.
Should we be more concerned about this?
-Andreas.
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On
I also have a software lib named twill that is not dead:
https://npmjs.org/package/twill
https://github.com/gtanner/twill
(Not that I am suggesting a name change ;))
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Andreas Neumann a...@apache.org wrote:
Andrea,
thanks for the link, we did see that project
Hi all,
The Apache Stratos (incubating) team is pleased to announce the first
release of Apache Stratos, 3.0.0-incubating.
Apache Stratos is a PaaS foundation that supports polyglot environments
including PHP, MySQL, and can be extended to support many more. Apache
Stratos is also the
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Andreas Neumann a...@apache.org wrote:
The discussion about the Weave proposal has calmed. As the outcome of the
discussion, we have chosen a new name for the project, Twill. I would like
to call a vote for Twill to become an incubated
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Andreas Neumann a...@apache.org wrote:
The discussion about the Weave proposal has calmed. As the outcome of the
discussion, we have chosen a new name for the project, Twill. I would like
to call a vote for Twill to
Yeah, sorry Joe. There have been many of us who tried to do this over the
years. You are correct that you also championed a number of people as did
some others possibly before and certainly after the ones I championed.
My apologies, I didn't intend to take credit, only indicate that the IPMC
as a
+1 (binding)
Good luck guys!
- Henry
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Andreas Neumann a...@apache.org wrote:
The discussion about the Weave proposal has calmed. As the outcome of the
discussion, we have chosen a new name for the project, Twill. I would like
to call a vote for Twill to become
Cleaning up Apache Incubator voting status,
HCatalog to Graduate and become part of Apache Hive was turned into a
discussion and never resolved. Thread available here:
Cleaning up Apache Incubator voting status,
Accept Curator into the Incubator, Apache Curator is a TPL already. Vote
thread to enter incubator was
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201303.mbox/%3C5D9C3DDD-5989-40C1-A1AA-2ECD7446C21E%40jordanzimmerman.com%3E
Cleaning up Apache Incubator voting status,
Apache Onami to become an ASF TLD, Onami has already graduated from the
incubator, vote thread available at
Cleaning up Apache Incubator voting status,
recommend Apache DeltaSpike for graduating out of the incubator, thread
was prefixed with a response therefore not picked up by the voting status
page. Thread available here
I've started to clean up the voter status page and have been finishing the
incubator closing steps for projects that have already graduated. Updates
for the projects listed below should start appearing shortly as the nightly
scripts run. Hopefully these steps will make it easier for the tools to
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 11:59 PM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 7 November 2013 22:22, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
1. Start with a Board resolution establishing a pTLP PMC seeded with IPMC
members.
2. Vote podling contributors onto the PMC as they
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Andreas Neumann a...@apache.org wrote:
[ ] +1 Accept Twill into the Incubator
[ ] +0 Don't care.
[ ] -1 Don't accept Twill because...
+1 (binding)
Marvin Humphrey
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013, at 08:10 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
IMO the IPMC cannot delegate legal oversight to a sub-committee (for
example) unless that sub-committee consisted of members of the IPMC. The
reason for this is hat only
Hi,
Someday I will get back to improving the Voting and Glossary pages, but
meanwhile, the Apache Flex PMC is still trying to construct a set of
bylaws and we are currently discussing whether there is a difference
between Majority Approval which is in the Glossary and Lazy Majority
which isn't,
We have a process in place which graduates a given incubating project to
TLP, why add a middle layer with a pTLP? There are enough steps in the
process, pTLP is not needed in my opinion.
If mentors are not performing their duties to vote on a given releases for
a podling, then it is up to the
37 matches
Mail list logo
