Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Parquet from the Incubator

+1 (binding) congrats! On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Dave Lester wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015, at 10:46 AM, Julien Le Dem wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Julien > > > > > On Apr 13, 2015, at 08:46, Jake Farrell wrote: > > > > > > This thread is to start a vote on the gr

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Parquet from the Incubator

+1 (binding) On Mon, Apr 13, 2015, at 10:46 AM, Julien Le Dem wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Julien > > > On Apr 13, 2015, at 08:46, Jake Farrell wrote: > > > > This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Parquet > > has approved on the dev list with 14 positive votes (11

Re: [DISCUSS] Geode Incubation proposal

+1 for Geode accepted into Incubator. It shouldn't be a big issue whether the codebase is available or not at the moment. It is part of incubation to shape it up to an open source project, that doesn't have to happen a priori (can't recall that Google Wave was available as OSS before coming to ASF

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.2.0-incubating

Hi, +1 binding I checked: - artefact contains "incubating" - signatures and hashes good - LICENSE and NOTICE correct - has DISCLAIMER - All source files have correct headers - No binaries (expect one used in testing which is gzipped text) - Can compile from source but as noted a test fail Thanks

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams Project version 0.2-incubating (rc2)

On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: >> I'll prepare a new release with all test resources with unclear >> licensing removed and the tests that require them deactivated for now. > > That could be an easy short term solution, but I wouldn't remove the tests > just yet as it may be

Re: [DISCUSS] Geode Incubation proposal

On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:42 AM, jan i wrote: > On 13 April 2015 at 19:19, Greg Chase wrote: > >> jan i apache.org> writes: >> >> > >> > On Sunday, April 12, 2015, dsh gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > Just as a quick remark. Geode might be a trademark owned by AMD: >> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/

Re: [DISCUSS] Geode Incubation proposal

On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote: > If I understand the response below correctly you misspoke when you said there > were "export" issues. That in fact there is no related export restriction, > it's actually about the licensing issue. If that's the case then the

RE: [DISCUSS] Geode Incubation proposal

It's nothing to do with my browser. If I click the download link I get asked to join the "Pivotal Network" before I can download it. If I understand the response below correctly you misspoke when you said there were "export" issues. That in fact there is no related export restriction, it's actu

RE: [DISCUSS] Geode Incubation proposal

I believe we evaluate the community, not the code. However, in this case I would like to look at the code to get a feel for whether I would be interested in contributing to the project. Ross -Original Message- From: William A Rowe Jr [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net] Sent: Monday, April 13

Re: [DISCUSS] Geode Incubation proposal

On 13 April 2015 at 19:19, Greg Chase wrote: > jan i apache.org> writes: > > > > > On Sunday, April 12, 2015, dsh gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Just as a quick remark. Geode might be a trademark owned by AMD: > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geode_%28processor%29 > > > > Good catch, we need to

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Parquet from the Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Julien > On Apr 13, 2015, at 08:46, Jake Farrell wrote: > > This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Parquet > has approved on the dev list with 14 positive votes (11 PPMC (4 from IPMC > members), 3 community) > > Status page: http://incubator.apache.

Re: [DISCUSS] Geode Incubation proposal

jan i apache.org> writes: > > On Sunday, April 12, 2015, dsh gmail.com> wrote: > > > Just as a quick remark. Geode might be a trademark owned by AMD: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geode_%28processor%29 > > Good catch, we need to hear the opinion of trademark because it depend > on > it

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Parquet from the Incubator

+1 On Monday, April 13, 2015, Jake Farrell wrote: > This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Parquet > has approved on the dev list with 14 positive votes (11 PPMC (4 from IPMC > members), 3 community) > > Status page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/parquet.html >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Parquet from the Incubator

+1 On Apr 13, 2015 11:46 AM, "Jake Farrell" wrote: > This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Parquet > has approved on the dev list with 14 positive votes (11 PPMC (4 from IPMC > members), 3 community) > > Status page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/parquet.html >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Parquet from the Incubator

+1 Tom On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Jake Farrell wrote: > This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Parquet > has approved on the dev list with 14 positive votes (11 PPMC (4 from IPMC > members), 3 community) > > Status page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/parq

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Parquet from the Incubator

+1 as well Tim On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Henry Saputra wrote: > +1 > > Awesome job guys > > On Monday, April 13, 2015, Jake Farrell wrote: > >> This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Parquet >> has approved on the dev list with 14 positive votes (11 PPMC (4 fr

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Parquet from the Incubator

+1 Awesome job guys On Monday, April 13, 2015, Jake Farrell wrote: > This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Parquet > has approved on the dev list with 14 positive votes (11 PPMC (4 from IPMC > members), 3 community) > > Status page: http://incubator.apache.org/proje

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Parquet from the Incubator

+1 (non-binding) rb On 04/13/2015 09:02 AM, jan i wrote: +1 (binding) jan i. On 13 April 2015 at 17:46, Jake Farrell wrote: This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Parquet has approved on the dev list with 14 positive votes (11 PPMC (4 from IPMC members), 3 commu

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Parquet from the Incubator

+1 (binding) jan i. On 13 April 2015 at 17:46, Jake Farrell wrote: > This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Parquet > has approved on the dev list with 14 positive votes (11 PPMC (4 from IPMC > members), 3 community) > > Status page: http://incubator.apache.org/proje

[VOTE] Graduate Apache Parquet from the Incubator

This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Parquet has approved on the dev list with 14 positive votes (11 PPMC (4 from IPMC members), 3 community) Status page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/parquet.html Graduation discussion: http://s.apache.org/8qU Graduation resol

[Pre - IP Clearance] ec2stack and gstack donation to CloudStack

Hi, This is a heads up and request for help to prepare for a IP clearance request for two code base to be donated to Apache CloudStack: ec2stack: https://github.com/BroganD1993/ec2stack and, gstack: https://github.com/NOPping/gstack Its two software there were developed on github by myself an

Re: Report for April mostly done

On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > At this point, you should move to reporting in May. > > Thanks, will do when it opens up. > > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Ian C wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Ted Dunning > > wrote: > > > > > General section looks gran

Re: [DISCUSS] Geode Incubation proposal

On Monday, April 13, 2015, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > >> On 13 Apr 2015, at 06:39, Ted Dunning > wrote: > >> > >> I think it is common to take a quick look at code coming in. In > > To be clear, there were conversations with Jim (as VP Legal) prior to > this submission. The ASF wouldn't accept

Re: [DISCUSS] Geode Incubation proposal

>> On 13 Apr 2015, at 06:39, Ted Dunning wrote: >> >> I think it is common to take a quick look at code coming in. In To be clear, there were conversations with Jim (as VP Legal) prior to this submission. The ASF wouldn't accept the software grant until the Incubator approved the proposal. Piv

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.2.0-incubating

+1. Checked out the LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER files, checked to make sure there were no jars or class files in the source distribution, ran the tests (and quickly found the east of GMT issues :) ). Alan. Julian Hyde April 13, 2015 at 6:05 Hi all, The Calcite

Re: Report for April mostly done

At this point, you should move to reporting in May. On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Ian C wrote: > On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Ted Dunning > wrote: > > > General section looks grand. > > > > We have a few projects unreported, DataFu, ODF Toolkit, OpenAz. > > > > > Hi, > > I was just ab

Re: [DISCUSS] Geode Incubation proposal

> On 13 Apr 2015, at 06:39, Ted Dunning wrote: > > I think it is common to take a quick look at code coming in. In > particular, a glance to see whether there is any hygiene around licensing > is an important question. Many projects in the world at large have no good > record of who write the

Re: Report for April mostly done

On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > General section looks grand. > > We have a few projects unreported, DataFu, ODF Toolkit, OpenAz. > Hi, I was just about to update the report for the ODF Toolkit , although not a great deal to say. We are quiet but not dead just yet... :-)