Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

Hi, Yes, if there are no releases from the project since entering incubation, it's fine to disable the download section. Or if you want to expend the extra effort, you could clearly identify the download artifacts as non-ASF releases. Warm regards, Craig > On May 30, 2024, at 21:51, Apratim

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Fury(incubating) v0.5.1-rc2

Hi Chaokun Yang, During the community vote, none of your mentors cast a vote. The first source for binding release votes is your mentors. Can you please ask your mentors to vote before asking the entire Incubator PMC? Thanks, Craig > On May 27, 2024, at 04:21, Shawn Yang wrote: > > Dear

Re: [VOTE] Drop the incubator- prefix for podling's GitHub repo name

+1 binding clr > On May 7, 2024, at 17:31, tison wrote: > > Hi, > > Following the discussion thread [1], I'd start a vote on the following > proposals: > > 1. Establish a consensus to allow and finally converge podling's GitHub repo > to > have a name without the incubator- prefix. > 2.

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Pekko Connectors AWS SPI

On Mar 29, 2024, at 10:47, John D. Ament wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 11:13 AM Craig Russell wrote: > >> I read the IP-Clearance and this seems to be pretty straightforward: >> >> The code has already been partly adjusted to use Pekko - >> https://github

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Pekko Connectors AWS SPI

I read the IP-Clearance and this seems to be pretty straightforward: The code has already been partly adjusted to use Pekko - https://github.com/pjfanning/aws-spi-pekko-http It is our intention to bring the code in https://github.com/pjfanning/aws-spi-pekko-http into Apache Pekko. The code in

Re: New project invitations

Hi Suyan, Now I wonder how people get to that document... Thanks, Craig > On Mar 21, 2024, at 07:53, Suyan wrote: > > I did a google search and it seems to come from here: > https://shenyu.apache.org/community/icla/ > > > Sincerely, > Suyan > > Craig

Re: New project invitations

how to complete the forms. I'm ready to tackle this task. > Where can I find the repository to get started? > > Then, I believe the mentors should be responsible for guiding new initial > committers > on how to correctly fill out the ICLA forms. > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2024,

New project invitations

I have seen several instances where initial committers send ICLAs to secretary with this text: Hello Apache, I am willing to contribute to the ASF. The attachment is my ICLA information. My Github account is : This is bad. Most of the ICLAs do not have sufficient information to allow

[VOTE][RESULT] Podling web sites: make (incubator.) optional in podling urls

The Incubator PMC has approved this VOTE. binding +1 votes: clr fanningpj garyw humbedooh wave jmclean xinwang yay dockerzhang hulk zhangyonglun tison kirs ningjiang acosentino ayushsaxena non-binding +1 votes porcelli nielifeng chengpan After this discussion

Re: [VOTE] Podling web sites: make (incubator.) optional in podling urls

binding), thanks. >> >> On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 11:37 AM Craig Russell wrote: >> >>> After this discussion >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/frwsy1g1pkx3ppbvzt538xxh9qo9y319 >>> I'd like to propose that we make the incubator. part of the URL

[VOTE] Podling web sites: make (incubator.) optional in podling urls

After this discussion https://lists.apache.org/thread/frwsy1g1pkx3ppbvzt538xxh9qo9y319 I'd like to propose that we make the incubator. part of the URL optional for podlings. This is a way to minimize the work needed to graduate. No redirect or reimplementation of the web site is required.

Re: [VOTE] Have Amoro join the Incubator

+1 binding Good luck, Craig > On Mar 2, 2024, at 17:44, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > Following on from the discussion of the Amoro proposal [1][2], let's vote on > having it join the Incubator. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1, have it join the Incubator as an incubating project >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Pekko (incubating) as a TLP

ty. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko-sbt-paradox/issues/110 >>>> >>>> On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 at 18:40, sebb wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The website accesses 3rd party resources (api.github.com).

Podling web sites: .incubator. required?

It was policy at one point for podlings to have .incubator. in their home page url. But many podlings now have transitioned away from this and simply use their podling.apache.org name. The policy document is a bit iffy on the subject: https://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html > After a

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Pekko (incubating) as a TLP

/github.com/apache/incubator-pekko-site/pull/87 > > > On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 18:14, Craig Russell wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I noticed a few items that may be problematic if not resolved before the >> board votes on the resolution: >> >> 1.

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Pekko (incubating) as a TLP

Hi, I noticed a few items that may be problematic if not resolved before the board votes on the resolution: 1. The home page https://pekko.apache.org has Apache Pekko in the first prominent usage but does not use a TM symbol as in Apache Pekko™. 2. The downloads page

Re: ASF at Jetbrains

Hi Lukasz, > On Feb 20, 2024, at 09:10, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > > wt., 20 lut 2024 o 16:49 Craig Russell napisał(a): >> The donation has been recorded via SGA. So the paperwork on that is still to >> call for a vote for IP Clearance. > > Ok, I will prepare the

Re: ASF at Jetbrains

The donation has been recorded via SGA. So the paperwork on that is still to call for a vote for IP Clearance. But does the SGA cover the web site as well? That's the only paperwork still needed from Jetbrains in order for us to copy the web content. Regards, Craig > On Feb 19, 2024, at

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache OpenDAL (incubating) as a TLP - Incubator

+1 binding Good Luck, Craig > On Dec 28, 2023, at 16:21, Xuanwo wrote: > > Hello all, > > We've got positive feedback on the DISCUSS thread[1], I'd like to start an > official VOTE thread now. > > Below are some facts and project highlights from the incubation phase > as well as the draft

Re: [DISCUSS] Procedure for graduating an existing sub project to new top level project

n=sig-email_content=webmail> > Virus-free.www.avast.com > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=webmail> > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > > On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 11:42 AM Craig Russell wrote: > >> H

Re: [DISCUSS] Procedure for graduating an existing sub project to new top level project

Hi Andrew, I'd suggest that you have a DISCUSS thread on dev@arrow with the proposal, including the list of folks who would form the new PMC, the proposed chair, the repositories that would be moved, and the name of the new project. If that results in consensus, have a VOTE thread and if that

Re: podling security issues

Hi PJ, I agree that there should be a section in podlings' reports that highlights security issues. Regards, Craig > On Dec 13, 2023, at 05:22, PJ Fanning wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I'm wondering if podlings should include some details about their > security issues [1] in their 3 podling

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.19.0-rc2

Hi Zikuan, Just for the record, adding the license *near* the beginning, as was done with yarn-3.4.1.cjs, is perfectly fine. It just needs to be easily found. That is, there is no need for the license to be the first text, as long as it is not after the real content. Warm regards, Craig > On

New podling members: PPMC member or Committer?

According to https://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html > Initially, [the PPMC] is composed of the Podling’s mentors and the initial > committers But now it seems that some podlings have decided (how???) to restrict their PPMC members. I understand that after the initial PPMC is created,

Re: [VOTE] Accept ResilientDB Into The Apache Incubator

Hi Atri, > On Oct 21, 2023, at 06:31, Atri Sharma wrote: > > This vote is now closed with 10 +1s and no opposing votes. > > The vote has passed. Please be sure to close the vote with a VOTE RESULT message to the incubator. Warm regards, Craig > > I will start the further procedures now. >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Answer into the Apache Incubator

+1 binding. Good luck! Craig > On Oct 2, 2023, at 17:17, Willem Jiang wrote: > > Following up the [DISCUSS] thread on Answer [1] I would like to call a > VOTE to accept into the Apache Incubator. > > Answer is a question-and-answer (Q) platform software for teams at > any scale to build a

Podling status page clarification for copyright and svn/git

Two things occurred to me while taking a more detailed look at a podling status page. 1. There is an assumption that podlings use svn for their repositories. I think it would be good to review the entire incubator web site to change "svn" to "svn or git" where needed, and probably add a new

Re: New Mentor Question: IP Clearance

Hi Brian, > On Aug 3, 2023, at 05:30, Brian Proffitt wrote: > > Yes, so I looked through the thread PJ sent, and it points to the same page > I mentioned as being unclear. > > Dave, you also specified there is a separate process: "Mentors should > ensure that any SGA or IP diligence needed is

Re: is it ok to modify copyright headers that have no end year?

Hi PJ, I don't know the answer to your question but I do think that this is a non-standard copyright notice that should be changed. I'd suggest opening a LEGAL JIRA for an official response (and perhaps once it's resolved, it would be a good FAQ). Warm regards, Craig > On Jun 26, 2023, at

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Teaclave (incubating) v0.5.1-rc.2

t; mail list. > > Best, > He > > On 2023/05/31 13:10:58 Craig Russell wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm a bit concerned that there are 19 PPMC members and six additional >> committers and none of them voted on the release. >> >> Voting on releases shoul

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Teaclave (incubating) v0.5.1-rc.2

Hi, I'm a bit concerned that there are 19 PPMC members and six additional committers and none of them voted on the release. Voting on releases should be a regular exercise for all developers. Is there some reason that only mentors voted? Regards, Craig > On May 30, 2023, at 20:20, He Sun

Re: [RESULT] Graduate Apache SeaTunnel (incubating) as a TLP

Hi, Can you please double check that all of the votes shown as Binding are from IPMC members? Thanks, Craig > On May 5, 2023, at 02:32, JUN GAO wrote: > > Hi, all. > According to the vote thread[1], the result as the follows: > We got 15 binding +1 votes and 8 non-binding +1 votes, no +0

Re: A little incubator game

I could not figure out how to make a release... Craig > On Apr 3, 2023, at 19:25, Justin Mclean wrote: > > A hint: Working on the code may not attract contribitors as quickly as some > other activities. > > On Tue, 4 Apr 2023, 11:51 am Josh Fischer, wrote: > >> I haven’t gone through the

Re: [VOTE] Retire Marvin-AI from Incubator

+1 (binding) Craig > On Feb 22, 2023, at 06:10, Calvin Kirs wrote: > > Hi, > > Marvin-AI has been incubating since 2018-08-27. > > Since 2021, activity has been low, and the chances of attracting new > committers and building a vibrant community seem very slim at this > point. > > At the

Re: [QUESTION] Code grant or IP clearance?

Hi Jason, What Justin said. Most projects ask all contributors for ICLAs, but only require them for "significant" contributors. If a contributor is not particularly active and has a few merged PRs then it's ok to use the Apache License 2.0 clause 5. I expect that most of the significant

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove 72 hour waiting time to add PPMC members.

+1 from me. The IPMC has greater ability to correct any PPMC "mistakes" at graduation than the board does in case of an issue with a PMC appointment. Craig > On Oct 15, 2022, at 21:46, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> While this is a legitimate concern, as far as I know the Board and the

Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Livy podling

Hi Larry, > On Oct 8, 2022, at 10:30, larry mccay wrote: > > Good to hear, Jean-Baptiste! > We will send the proposal both here and to the Livy private list, I guess. > Once we come to an agreement and direction we can share with the dev@ and > user@ lists. I support the effort to revive the

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Hi Tison, It's good to have the github ids and email addresses listed in the proposal, but the initial committers' public names should be listed in the proposal. For example: Huajie Wang (https://github.com/wolfboys ) [benj...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc (Incubating) 1.2.0

Hi, May I suggest that you try to get your Mentors to vote on this release? They all have IPMC (binding) votes on releases. Warm regards, Craig > On Jul 25, 2022, at 08:58, Shuai Liu wrote: > > Hi Incubating Community, > > HELP WANTED！ > brpc(Incubating) community plans to release version

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache ShenYu(Incubating) as a TLP [ROUND 2]

> On Jun 22, 2022, at 12:59, John D. Ament wrote: > > +1 to graduate. > > Just a note for internal, maybe we need to update some process documents, > but the resolution can change between when the IPMC votes and the final > version that board reviews during the board meeting. We should not

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache ShenYu(Incubating) as a TLP

Hi, > On Jun 21, 2022, at 18:19, XiaoYu wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks to everyone for the vote. > > I made a mistake when describing the project in the resolution template. > I only described the functionality of the project and not the scope of > the project. > It doesn't fit the standard

Re: Multiple entities of software grant agreement

Hi, The grant covers the code that is owned by the grantor. No date is needed. Craig > On Apr 24, 2022, at 7:18 PM, hulk wrote: > >> I think the key is how they make this conclusion. Was the project >> moving to a 3rd party repository, and changing the owner from a >> license perspective? >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Teaclave (incubating) v0.4.0-rc.1

Hi, You have six Mentors. Have you asked them to review and vote? Warm regards, Craig > On Apr 12, 2022, at 11:23 AM, Mingshen Sun wrote: > > Dear Community, > > Sorry for the multiple follow ups. Please help to review this release > (we need more IPMC votes). Thanks! > > Mingshen > > On

Re: [VOTE] Apache StreamPipes 0.69.0 (incubating) RC1 release

Hi Christofer, You have five mentors. Are they all unavailable? Warm regards, Craig > On Mar 15, 2022, at 4:32 AM, Christofer Dutz > wrote: > > Hi all ... > > it would be great if we could get at least one more IPMC to vote on this > > The StreamPipes team put specially a lot of effort

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 2.0.0.beta1.rc1

Hi Barry, When you have a vote in the incubator, only IPMC members are considered binding. It's good to ask your mentors for their votes. If they all vote, you have all the binding votes you need. Warm regards, Craig > On Mar 14, 2022, at 6:15 PM, Barry Jin wrote: > > Because I do not get

Re: [VOTE] Retire BlueMarlin

+1 to retire Craig (mentor) > On Feb 15, 2022, at 3:20 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Please vote to retire BlueMarlin. This is a group that has made no progress > as an Apache podling. There is no interest in developing a community. They’ve > had multiple chances. > > [ ] +1 Retire BlueMarlin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache YuniKorn (incubating) 0.12.2 RC4

Hi Craig, Just a note on protocol for incubating project votes. The term "binding" in release votes refers to votes cast by IPMC members (including the podling's Mentors). So by the time this release vote came to the incubator general list, there could have been six binding votes. Votes cast

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project

ubscribed to the private list are not in their profile at id.apache.org. This is trivial for them to fix. Warm regards, Craig > > Everyone else: please subscribe to the private mailing list. Otherwise I > will create an email discussion to have you removed from the project. >

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project

Hi, It looks like the project whimsy page shows some concerns highlighted below. https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/age > On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:28 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Four more concerns: > > (1) Three of the PPMC members are not subscribed to the private mailing list. > Jasper

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Linkis (Incubating) 1.0.3-RC1

Hi, For the next release vote (both dev@ and general@ lists) please include a check list for folks to use to validate the release. A simple +1 doesn't really mean anything. "Binding" is a specific term of art at Apache. For a podling release vote, it means the voter is a member of the IPMC.

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project

Hi Trista, I appreciate the time and energy you personally put into your role here. Warm regards, Craig > On Dec 29, 2021, at 6:31 AM, Juan Pan wrote: > > Hello, > > > After going through all the updates of this thread, here are some inputs from > me, > > > 1. PPMC voting, a NOTICE to

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project

Hi Andrew, > On Dec 27, 2021, at 9:09 PM, Andrew Ko wrote: > > Hello, > > > Please guide if the ICLA form needs to be resubmitted to the secretary to > update the existing (@agedb.io) email address. New ICLAs are not often needed, even when their email addresses change. Users with Apache

Re: Corporate CLA for Apache Arrow contributions

JuliaData/Arrow.jl <https://github.com/JuliaData/Arrow.jl> > and/or https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia > <https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia>." > > Thanks! > > Best, > Jarrett > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 11:15 AM Craig Russell <mailto:apache

Re: Corporate CLA for Apache Arrow contributions

ributed (via commit, filed issue, or filed pull request) to the > Arrow.jl package repository currently located at > https://github.com/JuliaData/Arrow.jl; > > If so I can add it and get back the signed form today. > > Best, > Jarrett > > > On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 6

Re: Corporate CLA for Apache Arrow contributions

What is the decision on this? Option 1 or Option 2. Until this is resolved, I do not believe the IP Clearance is satisfied. Craig > On Dec 23, 2021, at 2:37 PM, Craig Russell wrote: > > Hi Jarrett, > > We received this CCLA but it does not include a grant for the Arrow J

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Doris 0.15.0-incubating-rc04

Hi Mingyu, > On Nov 27, 2021, at 12:09 AM, 陈明雨 wrote: > > Hi Shaofeng: > Thanks for your vote. > > > And dear Incubator PMC, we are still looking for one more vote! Thank you! > Have you asked your mentors for their votes? Warm regards, Craig > > 此致！Best Regards > 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen > >

Re: [MENTORS] Download page issues

Sorry for the top post, but the issue of download pages has been raised at the community and board level. The incubator is a great place to steer projects in the direction of making it easier to verify that download pages are conformant with policy. To that end, I'd propose adding a SHOULD to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ShenYu (incubating) 2.4.1

Hi ShenYu folks, I notice that there was a [VOTE] to release 2.4.0 in August, and that release was mentioned on this month's (October 2021) podling report. But I could not find any [RESULT][VOTE] email, and I could not find any [ANNOUNCE] email on the release. The 2.4.0 is also not mentioned

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Hop (Incubating) as a TLP

Hi, I'd strongly suggest that you improve the wording of the resolution "related to short for the Hop Orchestration Platform". It's barely parseable. Perhaps make it simpler by removing the entire text after "related to short for the Hop Orchestration Platform...easily used by other software"

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache InLong(Incubating) 0.10.0-incubating RC1

Hi Charles, It appears to me you might misunderstand JB and Justin's comments about the binary files in the source distribution. They are saying it is a *good thing* that there are no binary (compiled artifacts e.g. .jar, .exe) in the source. Test files like image.png are ok of course. Warm

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Maven - Mvndaemon

For context, https://github.com/mvndaemon/mvnd/graphs/contributors It looks to me like the not-top-2-contributors accounted for well under one percent of the code, and all of their contributions were under the Apache License 2.0. While not trivial, the other contributions seem to be simple

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft - Java Client (incubating) 0.7.5

he IPMC general list. The IPMC > composition changes over time and not listing them may make it difficult when > looking at historical votes. > >Thanks, >Justin > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-ma

Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.1.0 [RC1]

nan Ashton 于2021年5月19日周三 下午12:37写道： > >> On Tue, May 18, 2021, 6:07 PM Craig Russell wrote: >> >>> Hi Nathan, >>> >>> A few comments on the process: >>> >>> It looks like the RC1 was changed in the middle of the PPMC vote so >

Re: How to understand cut a release

b.com/apache/www-site/ It is not quite live yet but that's where the content will be shortly. Best, Craig > > -- > > Zhang Yonglun > Apache ShenYu (Incubating) > Apache ShardingSphere > > > Craig Russell 于2021年5月19日周三 上午8:17写道： > >> Hi, >>

Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.1.0 [RC1]

Hi Nathan, A few comments on the process: It looks like the RC1 was changed in the middle of the PPMC vote so the mentors might have thought that you were planning on preparing an RC2 to vote. As far as I can tell, none of your mentors have voted on this release. I would recommend keeping

Re: How to understand cut a release

Hi, I'd say that there are two distinct parts to making releases, and would recommend that we update the docs to reflect: 1. "Preparing a release" is something that is done by a release manager. Some documentation refers to this as "cutting" a release. Preparing a release means following the

Please ask contributors NOT TO COPY private list when sending ICLAs

Hi, Many of the contributors to ShenYu have copied the private list when sending their ICLAs to secretary. I have not seen the original email to the contributors but please please send another email asking them NOT TO COPY the private list when sending their ICLA to secretary. Many thanks,

Re: Looking for guidance on IP clearance process for donation to Apache Arrow

es of the folks who have not responded to your request and the size of their contributions, and the risk in case they don't file an ICLA and later show up demanding that you remove their contributions. Regards, Craig > > Thanks, > > Andy. > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 6:32 PM Craig

Re: Looking for guidance on IP clearance process for donation to Apache Arrow

This is just my opinion; others may have different ideas. I'm considering that the project is licensed under the terms of the Apache License, v2.0 and I'm assuming that the contributors knew that when they made their contributions. I'd continue to try to obtain ICLAs from the other

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.7.0 RC1

Hi Juan, I think you need -a512 or shasum thinks that you are using sha1. (It could be smarter about the name suffix but...) HTH, Craig > On Mar 24, 2021, at 12:35 AM, Juan Pan wrote: > > Hi, > > > I firstly did shasum checking but got the following exception. > Then I found the .sha512

Re: [VOTE] Retire BlueMarlin project from Incubator

Hi, Just one observation which might be useful. The usual case for a large project being brought in is to leave the existing copyright headers in place and then change them once the code is in the Apache repository. Then it is a bit easier to see which files were being donated with a grant

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc3

Hi Sheng, The first place I would suggest you to ask is your mentors. Next, your PPMC members who are IPMC members. Hope this helps, Craig > On Feb 25, 2021, at 1:21 PM, Sheng Zha wrote: > > Bumping this thread up. Thanks to those who helped with the vote. > > So far, our 1.8 vote has

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TubeMQ (Incubating) 0.8.0-incubating RC2

The reference [2] refers to the three different licenses for the three different products. There are three links to three different license pages. https://www.oracle.com/downloads/licenses/berkeleydb-oslicense.html https://www.oracle.com/downloads/licenses/berkeleydb-jeoslicense.html

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TubeMQ (Incubating) 0.8.0-incubating RC2

Which Oracle product is TubeMQ dependent on? From what I see, there are two distinct Oracle products, with different licenses: Berkeley DB uses a Category X non-commercial license, which Justin points out is not an open source license. Berkeley DB Java Edition uses a standard Apache License,

Re: Link missing from an Incubator page

I think this is what you are looking for: https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/Incubator.html Regards, Craig > On Dec 26, 2020, at 7:27 AM, Andrew Wetmore wrote: > > At the end of this page [1] there is this text: "The published Incubator > Board reports can be found here." It looks like

Re: [VOTE] Accept Sedona into the Apache Incubator

+1 Craig > On Jul 18, 2020, at 6:18 AM, Willem Jiang wrote: > > +1 （binding) > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 11:49 AM Felix Cheung wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> As we discussed the Sedona proposal [1], I would like to call for a vote to >>

Re: [MENTORS] https://www.apache.org/dist/ has been deprecated

Just a note: Please use https: for all links on download pages. The below might have been a typo... Craig > On Mar 11, 2020, at 8:23 PM, lgcareer2...@outlook.com wrote: > > I have changed DolphinScheduler to point at downloads.apache.org > . Thank you for the

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache ShardingSphere (incubating) as a TLP

Perhaps this could be resolved by having the github logo on the front page refer to https://shardingsphere.apache.org/community/en/contribute/contributor/ where contributions to the project (developer audience) are discussed. The first item on that page under "Develop Flow" is "Fork

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache ShardingSphere (incubating) as a TLP

scription below to the board? > > Apache ShardingSphere is related to database middleware providing data > sharding, distributed transactions and distributed governance. > > -- > > Liang Zhang (John) > Apache ShardingSphere & Dubbo > >

Re: [MENTORS] Podlings download pages with issues

Hi Lee, Many projects have sub-projects with downloads. For example, https://shardingsphere.apache.org/document/current/en/downloads/ is the English version of shardingsphere's download page. It is a manual process to set up a download page and then as more releases are made, a simple process

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache ShardingSphere (incubating) as a TLP

Hi, In my opinion, this is way too wordy for a description of the project. How about ... related to database middleware providing data sharding, heterogeneous database support, and distributed transactions for Java application development. Other functionality descriptions can be added but

Re: Podling announcement messages

e > clear. A dedicated download page might be a bit over kill IMHO but some > suggestions and examples could be helpful. > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 9:20 PM Craig Russell wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I guess I'm looking for a way for podlings to get help creating a download >&g

Re: Podling announcement messages

If the release candidate didn't > pass it's just a little more work to be done for the next RC vote.I'm > still learning the ropes here, so I'm most likely just out of the loop. > > - Josh > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 10:37 PM Craig Russell wrote: > >> Announcements of

Podling announcement messages

Announcements of Apache releases need to follow a specific protocol, and I wonder if there is some way for folks here to review announcements and download pages of podlings before they get sent out and rejected. https://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#download-links Would it make sense

Looking for community development stories

Hi, I'm working on a presentation to the Huawei Developer Conference in Shenzhen February 11 on the subject of "Growing Communities The Apache Way". I'd like to share with the audience some stories of Apache Projects that have grown their communities, either in the incubator or after becoming

Re: [VOTE] Accept YuniKorn into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Good luck. Craig > On Jan 10, 2020, at 9:46 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli > wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like to call a vote on accepting YuniKorn into the Apache Incubator. > > Please see the discussion thread [1]. > > Please see the full proposal: >

Re: [DISCUSS] YuniKorn Proposal

Hi Casey, > On Dec 20, 2019, at 10:31 AM, Casey wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > Cloudera does not have a trademark on YuniKorn; we do use the name in a few > places with a quick look. So there's no trademark assignment needed, but > if there is something else you'd like us to do related to any

Re: [DISCUSS] YuniKorn Proposal

Hi Wangda, There is a distinction between licensing the code to Apache, which is done via SGA, and giving Apache rights to the name, which is done by a trademark assignment. Apache in general will not use the name if Cloudera who owns the name intends to keep using it. Apache would need to

Re: [VOTE] Accept NuttX into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Best wishes! Craig > On Dec 3, 2019, at 9:31 PM, 俊平堵 wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > The [DISCUSS] thread on NuttX has died down. > > > Accordingly, I would like to call a VOTE to accept NuttX into the > > Apache Incubator. > > > Please cast your vote: > > > [ ] +1, bring

Re: [DISCUSS] NuttX Proposal

IPMC hat on... > On Dec 2, 2019, at 2:05 AM, 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote: > > Bertrand Delacretaz 于2019年12月2日周一 下午4:24写道： > >> On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 3:20 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) >> wrote: >>> >>> ...IMO, the name 'NuttX' is a kudos to Gregory Nutt, who has been >>> developing and maintaining the project

Incubator cookbook: Podling Releases update

I believe that the current cookbook recommendations need an update. [1] 1. "Binding" should always refer to IPMC members' votes. This is a source of confusion for many podling communities. 2. Votes on the dev list should automatically carry over to the general list. Assuming that there is no

Re: Incubator podling reports due today

Hi Justin, I've signed off on the ShardingSphere report for this month. I hope that the other mentors can also review and provide their input. Craig > On Sep 6, 2019, at 1:35 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks for Myriad for updating it’s report, that leaves: >> Iceberg >> Omid >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) 0.34.0 [RC1]

Hi Justin, > On Aug 21, 2019, at 10:42 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > ... >> Oh, mentors, quick question about the [RESULT] post, do I account for both >> threads (dev@+general@) in it, or just the general@ one? > > Just the IPMC votes. My understanding of best practice is to combine

Re: New disclaimer text

I agree that the DISCLAIMER-WIP should refer to the status page, but the current disclaimer https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/New+Incubator+Disclaimer also has a free-form section for a list of known issues. "What follows is a list of known issues the project is currently

Re: New disclaimer text

It looks like we are closing on agreement to have (at least) two disclaimers. Now we need to discuss naming. [1] Two big choices here: DISCLAIMER.txt for both versions of disclaimer; or DISCLAIMER.txt for the current standard disclaimer and some other name for the new disclaimer. If we

Re: New disclaimer text

Hi, I understand I'm a bit late to this particular discussion, but perhaps we can consider two different disclaimers that podlings can choose: The standard disclaimer that does not disclaim licensing issues; or, The proposed new disclaimer to be used by podlings' first releases until they

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 0.8.0

Hi Greg, > On Jun 27, 2019, at 1:42 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > > Maybe I should say you're being an ass about the whole process. :-) No. Smiley face doesn't count. Stop. Craig > > -g Craig L Russell c...@apache.org

Re: LGPL dependency

The Webkit license page https://webkit.org/licensing-webkit/ says portions licensed under LGPL and BSD licenses. Usually this means it's the user's choice which license to use. We would choose the BSD License for the components that we use. Can you find anywhere a statement that the Webkit.so

Re: overzealous bureaucracy (was: [VOTE] Zipkin leave incubator, return back to OpenZipkin)

Hi Greg, > On Jun 19, 2019, at 12:17 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 1:48 AM Justin Mclean > > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>> The VOTE was ridiculous. It can only come out "Yes", so why? >> >> Which is the outcome of most votes, they confirm

Re: [IMPORTANT] Board proposal on podling releases

Hi Justin, As a board member, I'm not comfortable with granting a blanket exception to policy that might put us at legal risk. As an IPMC member, I think that we do not want to allow podlings to release material that might put us at legal risk. I do think that the IPMC under today's policy

  1   2   3   4   >