Minor problem in poddling.xml/FreeMarker

2018-04-21 Thread Daniel Dekany
found this. -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Resolution to graduate Apache FreeMarker to TLP

2018-02-15 Thread Daniel Dekany
received so far! Tuesday, February 6, 2018, 6:38:34 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > The FreeMarker community has discussed and voted positively on > graduating to a TLP. We'd like to initiate this discussion to > establish a consensus within the Incubator, and if appropriate, wil

Re: [DISCUSS] Resolution to graduate Apache FreeMarker to TLP

2018-02-07 Thread Daniel Dekany
. > Regards, > > Woonsan > > [2] https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FreemarkerProposal > >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >> [1] https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/freemarker >> >>> On Feb 6, 2018, at 9:38 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: >&

[DISCUSS] Resolution to graduate Apache FreeMarker to TLP

2018-02-06 Thread Daniel Dekany
he Apache Incubator FreeMarker podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator Project are hereafter discharged. -- -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For addition

[NOTICE] Community Vote for Apache FreeMarker to TLP

2018-01-13 Thread Daniel Dekany
/9a6e53784b930c2a90dbfb2bc725f3dee6a8611f9606f09185e65fe6@%3Cdev.freemarker.apache.org%3E Please note this is NOT a call to vote on the general@ mailing list. -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For

Re: Podling user@ lists (was: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation)

2017-12-01 Thread Daniel Dekany
an outdatged medium for that purpose. Of course, for longer discussions like feature requests, we encourage subscribing to the dev list or use Jira. > However if a podling is convinced that they need a user list I think > that's perfectly fine. -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.27 (incubating)

2017-10-30 Thread Daniel Dekany
s package because... > > Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding. > > > Woonsan Ko > on behalf of Apache FreeMarker Podling Project Management Committee > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mai

Re: [VOTE]: Apache Weex-incubating Release 0.12.0-RC2

2017-04-22 Thread Daniel Dekany
ator- >> weex.git;a=commit;h=9ac0c82443e65b1c9d8a2714fea6b9a5b8af9907> >> > >> > The source tarball can be found at: >> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/weex/0.12. >> 0-incubating/RC1/ >> > >> > The fi

Re: Podling Press Kit

2017-04-14 Thread Daniel Dekany
.apache.org/guides/press-kit.html from > the main website page to help build logos specific for podlings, in > addition to our standard banner logo. Podlings would have the option of > choosing which they prefer. > > Please review - I plan to distribute to all podlings tomorr

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.26 (incubating)

2017-03-25 Thread Daniel Dekany
The vote for releasing Apache FreeMarker 2.3.26 (incubating) passed with 3 binding "+1" votes, and no "0" or "-1" votes. Binding votes: Jacopo Cappellato +1 Niclas Hedhman +1 Sergio Fernández +1 Non-binding votes: Daniel Dekany +1 (on podling list only)

[VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.26 (incubating)

2017-03-20 Thread Daniel Dekany
e because... Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding. -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Donating freemarker-online as part of the FreeMarker project, how?

2017-03-16 Thread Daniel Dekany
need > done. OK, I have already asked the donator to make a PR. > Did you get a git repo created? Yes (https://github.com/apache/incubator-freemarker-online-tester). > John > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 1:27 PM Daniel Dekany wrote: > >> To be clear, the ASF has confirmed rec

Re: Donating freemarker-online as part of the FreeMarker project, how?

2017-03-10 Thread Daniel Dekany
from the IPMC. Wednesday, March 8, 2017, 7:18:10 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > Yesterday the ASF has received the CCLA. Does the IPMC accept it, can > we go ahead with the pull request? > > Thursday, February 23, 2017, 7:15:29 AM, Craig Russell wrote: > >> Hi Daniel, >>

Re: Donating freemarker-online as part of the FreeMarker project, how?

2017-03-07 Thread Daniel Dekany
Yesterday the ASF have received the CCLA. Does the IPMC accept it, can we go ahead with the pull request? Thursday, February 23, 2017, 7:15:29 AM, Craig Russell wrote: > Hi Daniel, > >> On Feb 22, 2017, at 9:24 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: >> >> Wednesday, February 22,

Re: Donating freemarker-online as part of the FreeMarker project, how?

2017-02-22 Thread Daniel Dekany
ange package names > Change license headers > > Craig > >> On Feb 22, 2017, at 10:39 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> This is related to the incubating FreeMarker project. >> >> A company called Kenshoo has developed a simple but han

Donating freemarker-online as part of the FreeMarker project, how?

2017-02-22 Thread Daniel Dekany
nshoo are also FreeMarker contributors, so we can get any papers needed from them (as there was no CLA signed at Kenshoo). -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional co

Re: [VOTE] Drop incubating requirement of Maven artifacts

2017-01-03 Thread Daniel Dekany
cosystem with a groupId change. -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany-incubating - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Drop incubating requirement of Maven artifacts

2017-01-02 Thread Daniel Dekany
/incubator.apache.org/projects/beam.html >> > >> > - >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>

Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

2016-12-31 Thread Daniel Dekany
a widely used project before trying to join Apache. > On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 9:40 AM Daniel Dekany wrote: > >> The original question in this thread is much less generic than in the >> linked one though, so it's certainly easier to answer. Just as a >> reminder, the sp

Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

2016-12-31 Thread Daniel Dekany
Apache FreeMarker (incubating). -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany Saturday, December 31, 2016, 1:50:02 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > For reference, please read this thread from 2008: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0b6c065a908c5f9ec39fa78c31b39c83a6fea29eb34fada0ee070413@1222432864

Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

2016-12-30 Thread Daniel Dekany
ly report and hook up with > other Apache projects for collaboration. >> > Freemarker has been in incubation for 17 months. What do you need to > learn and do before you will start your graduation vote? -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany -

Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

2016-12-28 Thread Daniel Dekany
Wednesday, December 28, 2016, 2:09:11 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 5:35 AM Daniel Dekany wrote: > Wednesday, December 28, 2016, 4:12:06 AM, Christopher wrote: > > [snip] >> The one complication here is that the release artifact (source tarball) is >

Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

2016-12-28 Thread Daniel Dekany
pend on your project) with an additional groupId change or with a non-standard version suffix. There are much more users than people who do releases after all. -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubsc

Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

2016-12-28 Thread Daniel Dekany
adme, pom metadata, or other files explain > it's status more clearly. It also creates excessively long file names and > the naming convention conflicts with other post-version identifiers, such > as Maven classifiers and RPM release/arch info. > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016, 20:18 Da

Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

2016-12-27 Thread Daniel Dekany
lmost 5x more usages than the last two "-incubating" releases together, which is suspicious. Spring has also stuck at that version for some reason. -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.25 (incubating)

2016-06-26 Thread Daniel Dekany
1 (on poddling list only) Non-binding votes: Daniel Dekany +1 (on podling list only) David E Jones +1 (on podling list only) Evangelia Dendramis +1 (on podling list only) Jacques Le Roux +1 Thank you for the participatio

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.25 (incubating)

2016-06-22 Thread Daniel Dekany
ect during incubation (but not after graduation). It was accepted after some debate. > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. ./src/main/java/freemarker/core/CommandLine.java > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incub

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.25 (incubating)

2016-06-22 Thread Daniel Dekany
gt;> >> Apache FreeMarker 2.3.25-incubating >> For the latest version or to report bugs visit: >> http://freemarker.org/ >> >> Thanks, >> Justin >> >> 1. ./src/main/java/freemarker/core/CommandLine.java >> - >> To u

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)

2016-03-27 Thread Daniel Dekany
rker.incubator.apache.org only) Non-binding votes (on d...@freemarker.incubator.apache.org only): Daniel Dekany +1 David E Jones +1 Evangelia Dendramis +1 Thanks to those who were able to take the time to vote. Friday, March 25, 2016, 1:07:44 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > Hi all, > &

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)

2016-03-26 Thread Daniel Dekany
- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)

2016-03-24 Thread Daniel Dekany
e because... Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding. -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[ANNOUNCE] Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 Release Candidate 1 (incubating) released

2016-01-29 Thread Daniel Dekany
fully endorsed by the ASF. -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

2016-01-27 Thread Daniel Dekany
.@mail.gmail.com%3E http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201601.mbox/%3CCAOfJQJ09E5buY2h91h8c6BMPdhhJJccYK6dnme9o-0ypxhk7Hg%40mail.gmail.com%3E -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany - To unsubscribe, e-mail: gener

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

2016-01-22 Thread Daniel Dekany
s. That doesn't mater. Ant has to find that jar somehow. > All the rest (MD5, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, NOTICE, README) is OK with me. I > enjoyed RELEASE-NOTES :) > > So +0 (not binding anyway) > > Jacques > > > Le 20/01/2016 08:26, Daniel Dekany a écrit : >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

2016-01-22 Thread Daniel Dekany
ml-s, etc. > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FREEMARKER-15 > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

2016-01-21 Thread Daniel Dekany
have META-INF/NOTICES. (Also the content of these jar-s isn't useful in itself... it's just test data.) > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-exceptions > 2. http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-binaries -- Thanks, Daniel

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

2016-01-20 Thread Daniel Dekany
- These only occur in the NOTICE of the source release, not in freemarker.jar!/META-INF/NOTICE for example. -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany Wednesday, January 20, 2016, 11:46:44 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > I notice the release contains several jars: > ./src/test/resources/freemark

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

2016-01-20 Thread Daniel Dekany
c01-incubating > > I am +0, however, to releasing it as Apache FreeMarker > 2.3.24-rc01-incubating > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal >> to releas

[VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

2016-01-19 Thread Daniel Dekany
but I'm okay with the release [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding. -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Websites at podling.apache.org

2016-01-16 Thread Daniel Dekany
n't know that this will trigger a such a long discussion, though I suppose as you let in projects established elsewhere, this will come up sometimes anyway.) -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany Thursday, January 14, 2016, 9:02:16 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jan 13, 20

Re: Non-voted Release Candidate binary downloadable from project homepage possible?

2015-12-31 Thread Daniel Dekany
Thursday, December 31, 2015, 3:26:19 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 3:25 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: >> OK thanks, makes sense, then RC-s at FreeMarker will go through the >> same process as final releases (except that they don't go to stable >>

Re: Non-voted Release Candidate binary downloadable from project homepage possible?

2015-12-31 Thread Daniel Dekany
ave a look through Apache's offical _Release Policy_ and _Release > Distribution Policy_ documents. > > http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy > http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution > > Those policy documents (not the accompanying FAQs, just the Policies

Non-voted Release Candidate binary downloadable from project homepage possible?

2015-12-30 Thread Daniel Dekany
the RC period (plus the Maven staging repo downloads), so hopefully it's not a technical issue that it's a download directly from "repos". Is this procedure OK in ASF? I mean, we *kind of* publish something that wasn't voted on, at least not on incubator general. -- Thank

Give me wiki write access

2015-08-03 Thread Daniel Dekany
Please give me write access on https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/! Name: DanielDekany (I'm an initial comitter at FreeMarker: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/freemarker.html) -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany - To unsubscri

Re: [DISCUSS] Freemarker Incubation proposal

2015-06-15 Thread Daniel Dekany
ncubation-proposal-tp43872p44062.html > Sent from the Apache Incubator - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands

Re: [DISCUSS] Freemarker Incubation proposal

2015-06-08 Thread Daniel Dekany
hey usually just mean the last artifact (the engine). So I thought the SGA is ambiguous if we just say "Freemarker". -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany Wednesday, June 3, 2015, 2:11:29 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:07 PM Ralph Goers > wrote: > IMO, once

Re: [DISCUSS] Freemarker Incubation proposal

2015-06-05 Thread Daniel Dekany
ed, Jun 3, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: >> Wednesday, June 3, 2015, 5:29:40 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: >> >>> As soon as it can be done. The question is, why would you want to >>> wait? >> >> I thought, maybe, after being voted in, but before actual

Re: [DISCUSS] Freemarker Incubation proposal

2015-06-04 Thread Daniel Dekany
d like to thank the co-authors Dániel Dékány, David Jones and >> Jean-Frederic Clere. >> >> Thanks in advance for your time! >> >> Jacopo Cappellato >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe

Re: [DISCUSS] Freemarker Incubation proposal

2015-06-03 Thread Daniel Dekany
, 2015, at 12:01 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: >> >> So then I suppose my question can be reduced to: After the voting has >> concluded with positive result (for entering incubation), when must we >> migrate the source code to ASF? >> >> -- >> Thanks, >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Freemarker Incubation proposal

2015-06-03 Thread Daniel Dekany
So then I suppose my question can be reduced to: After the voting has concluded with positive result (for entering incubation), when must we migrate the source code to ASF? -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany Wednesday, June 3, 2015, 2:05:57 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > IMO, once the source code

Re: [DISCUSS] Freemarker Incubation proposal

2015-06-02 Thread Daniel Dekany
ommitted). Is it possible to only enter incubation when there are no known blockers that would make releases impossible? Or how does it work? -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany Thursday, May 28, 2015, 4:11:49 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Jacopo

Re: [DISCUSS] Freemarker Incubation proposal

2015-06-02 Thread Daniel Dekany
#x27;s hope no such thing will happen, but still, I should know this. -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany Thursday, May 28, 2015, 11:39:17 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Thursday, May 28, 2015, Jacopo Cappellato > wrote: > >> ...Should we move to the next step (that I t

Re: [DISCUSS] Freemarker Incubation proposal

2015-06-01 Thread Daniel Dekany
problems in the commits is highly welcome. (Regarding what concretely you (or other Hippo developers) wish to contribute, let's continue on freemarker-devel, as these are OT there.) -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany Monday, June 1, 2015, 5:15:35 PM, Woonsan Ko wrote: > On 5/21/15 10:29

Re: [DISCUSS] Freemarker Incubation proposal

2015-05-22 Thread Daniel Dekany
tecture, codebase, philosophy >> and history; as you have suggested we are going to include a sentence that >> explains the relationship with Velocity in our proposal >> >> Regards, >> >> Jacopo >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubsc

Re: [DISCUSS] Freemarker Incubation proposal

2015-05-22 Thread Daniel Dekany
t; > Regards, > > Jacopo > --------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Freemarker Incubation proposal

2015-05-22 Thread Daniel Dekany
e not for Apache? I don't know that, you tell me! Surely I don't want FM to go into incubation if failure is the most probable outcome. Can the requirements for getting out from incubation successfully be quantified? For the kind of project like this? -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany Friday, Ma

Re: [DISCUSS] Freemarker Incubation proposal

2015-05-21 Thread Daniel Dekany
it next to JSP and Velocity.) -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany Thursday, May 21, 2015, 8:03:03 PM, Chris Nauroth wrote: > As a very satisfied Freemarker user, I'm excited to see this proposal! > > I agree with the feedback that it would be helpful to have more > committers. Marmott